Henry Cort

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Henry Cort died on the 23rd of May 1800 with a government pension and a reputation as one of England's great industrial innovators, yet he died, by all accounts, a ruined man. He was buried in the churchyard of St John-at-Hampstead in London, far from the ironworks where his ideas had transformed how Britain made metal. The questions his story raises are not simple ones. How does a Navy pay agent become the man credited with reshaping iron production during the Industrial Revolution? And how does someone whose furnace designs were eventually running in roughly 8,200 installations by 1820 end up bankrupt, stripped of his patents, and dependent on state charity? The answer winds through borrowed money, a clerk's sudden death, and a royalty agreement that collapsed before it could reward him.

• 2. From Pay Office to Ironworks

  ›

  By 1765, Cort was operating out of an office in Crutched Friars near Aldgate in London, collecting half pay and widows' pensions on commission for the Royal Navy. It was steady work, but it placed him at the edge of the industrial world rather than inside it. The connection to iron came through marriage. In 1768, Cort married Elizabeth Heysham, whose uncle William Attwick had inherited a family ironmongery business in Gosport that supplied the navy with mooring chains, anchors, and a wide range of other iron goods. When Cort took over Attwick's business, he also took over the navy contract. By 1780, the Royal Navy's Victualling Commissioners had reached an agreement with him to convert scrap iron hoops from their barrels. He had recently acquired a rolling mill at an existing iron mill in Titchfield, and it was there that he began to think about the deeper problem of British iron production. At that time, despite Abraham Darby's advances in smelting iron with coke rather than charcoal, the iron that came out of British furnaces still required a slow and laborious process to be converted into usable bar iron. Baltic imports undercut domestic production on price, and Cort believed he could change that.

• 3. The Fontley Works

  ›

  Short of funds, Cort turned to Adam Jellicoe, the chief clerk in the Pay Office of the Royal Navy. Jellicoe agreed to loan Cort money to develop a new method of converting cast iron to bar iron, and over roughly ten years, this amounted to nearly £58,000. The security Jellicoe held was, by any standard, thin. It was accepted practice at the time for Pay Office clerks to make temporary use of surplus government funds for their own benefit, which was how Jellicoe assembled the capital. As part of the deal, Jellicoe's son Samuel became a partner in what Cort renamed the Fontley Works, the old Titchfield Hammer site. Working there, Cort filed a 1783 patent for a simple reverberatory furnace to refine pig iron. A reverberatory furnace applies heat from above rather than through forced air from below. His 1784 patent followed, covering a puddling furnace with grooved rollers that mechanised what had previously been heavy manual work. His approach built on the existing ideas of the Cranege brothers and, particularly, on Peter Onions' puddling process, in which iron is stirred to separate out impurities and extract higher quality wrought iron. In 1784, Cort obtained the patent for his improved version of Onions' process, although the commercial value of the design would not be fully realised until the 1790s.

• 4. The Puddling Process

  ›

  Inside a puddling furnace, the carbon content of a cast iron charge was reduced through oxidation. A worker called the puddler would stir the molten metal using an iron bar known as a rabbling bar, drawing out impurities and gradually separating the higher quality wrought iron from the dross. When enough pure iron had gathered, the puddler extracted a ball of metal from the furnace. That ball was then processed into a form called a shingle by a shingling hammer, and then rolled through the rolling mill. Cort's grooved rollers were a practical leap: they replaced much of the hand labour involved in hammering iron into shape. The original version of the process, however, had a significant flaw. Cort had been working with iron from charcoal furnaces rather than with coke-smelted pig iron, which was the standard in general production by that point. The process only became commercially viable in the 1790s, after Richard Crawshay and Homfray of the Cyfarthfa Ironworks in Merthyr Tydfil introduced the modifications needed to make it work at scale.

• 5. Collapse and Bankruptcy

  ›

  Adam Jellicoe died suddenly on the 30th of August 1789, and with him died any possibility of quietly settling the debt. The Crown moved quickly. Because the nearly £58,000 that Jellicoe had lent to Cort was traced to surplus government funds, the Crown seized all of Jellicoe's property as well as the assets of the partnership between Cort and Samuel Jellicoe. Cort was held responsible for the full debt and declared bankrupt. The Crown later returned possession of the works at Titchfield and Gosport to Samuel Jellicoe, but Cort received nothing. Though he eventually rectified his formal financial status, he never again engaged in industrial activities. The 1787 royalty agreement he had reached with South Wales ironmaster Richard Crawshay, under which all iron manufactured according to Cort's patents would yield a royalty of 10 shillings per ton, became unenforceable once his patents were caught up in the bankruptcy proceedings.

• 6. Recognition Without Reward

  ›

  As early as 1786, Lord Sheffield had ranked Cort's improvements to bar iron production alongside James Watt's work on the steam engine, calling them more important than the loss of America. That assessment placed Cort in extraordinary company. Yet the commercial reward that should have followed never reached him. The puddling furnaces eventually spread on a vast scale, with reportedly 8,200 in use by 1820, but they used a modified version of his process that had been refined by Crawshay and the Merthyr Tydfil ironmasters. Those modifications allowed operators to sidestep the exact terms of Cort's patents and avoid paying royalties. His marriage to Elizabeth Heysham had produced 13 children, and despite the industrial reach of his ideas, his business ventures brought no lasting wealth. A government pension was eventually awarded to him, but it came too late to restore what had been lost. His burial at St John-at-Hampstead closed a life that had touched the transformation of British industry without sharing in its profits.