Skip to content

German invasion of the Netherlands

Ch. 1 of 7
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Contents

German invasion of the Netherlands

7 sections
  • The German invasion of the Netherlands began in the pre-dawn hours of the 10th of May 1940. Within five days, the main Dutch forces had surrendered. The entire country was under German occupation seven days after that. What makes that speed so striking is not German invincibility. It is how thoroughly the Dutch had convinced themselves the attack would never come, and how severely underprepared they were when it did. This documentary asks how a wealthy, densely populated nation with a tradition of strategic defence collapsed so quickly. The answers lie in decades of political wishful thinking, a catastrophic arms gap, a daring German plan developed by Hitler himself, and a single bombing raid that broke the will of a General Staff that knew it could not protect its cities.

  • Hendrikus Colijn, who served as Prime Minister of the Netherlands from 1933 to 1939, was personally convinced that Germany would not violate Dutch neutrality. That conviction shaped government policy at exactly the moment when defence spending needed to grow. An economic recession lasting from 1920 until 1927 had already shrunk military budgets to a minimum, with just 1.5 million guilders per year spent on equipment in that decade. In 1931 and again in 1933, special commissions tasked with finding further savings both concluded the same thing: the acceptable floor had already been reached, and spending actually needed to increase. The government ignored them.

    Part of the reluctance to name Germany as a threat came from economic entanglement. The Netherlands depended on Germany as a vital trade partner, and senior officials did not want to antagonise it. Repressing public criticism of Nazi policies was considered an acceptable price. A deeper cultural factor was at work too: the Dutch had remained neutral in the First World War, and most civilians simply assumed that pattern would hold. In a radio speech on the 20th of January 1940, Winston Churchill urged the Netherlands and Belgium to join the Anglo-French alliance before Germany struck. Both governments refused.

    The wake-up calls kept coming and kept being minimised. Germany occupied the Rhineland in March 1936, annexed Austria in March 1938, absorbed Czechoslovakia's Bohemia and Moravia in March 1939, and invaded Poland in September 1939. Each crisis produced a slightly larger Dutch military response, but always a carefully limited one. Only in April 1939 did the Dutch carry out a partial mobilisation of 100,000 men. A full mobilisation followed on the 28th of August 1939, raising army strength to about 280,000. Even then, much of the available training time was spent building fortifications rather than drilling soldiers, and munition shortages prevented proper live-fire exercises. A Japanese naval attaché, Captain Tadashi Maeda, warned in early 1940 that a German attack was certain. A state of emergency was declared on the 19th of April. Yet most civilians, the source notes, still cherished the illusion their country might be spared.

  • On the 10th of May 1940, the Netherlands possessed 39 armoured cars and five tankettes. That was the sum total of Dutch armour. Germany arrived with tanks, Junkers Ju 87 Stuka dive bombers, and a modern professional infantry. The gap was not an accident of geography or resources. The Dutch had an armaments industry, a wealthy population, and a geography that should have favoured defenders. They simply had not invested in the equipment those advantages required.

    The shortage was so severe that a single Renault FT tank, a design from the First World War, had at one point represented the entire Dutch tank force. By 1940 it was no longer even in service, having been retained only to test antitank obstacles. The minimum requirement calculated in 1937 was 146 modern tanks: 110 light and 36 medium. On the day of the invasion the Netherlands had zero. Desperate procurement efforts in 1939 and 1940 had come to nothing: Germany deliberately delayed deliveries of ordered equipment; France was reluctant to arm a country that refused to join its side; the Soviet Union, which had plenty of arms to sell, was not recognised by the Dutch government. An attempt to buy Soviet armour captured by Finland in 1940 also failed.

    The artillery was at least present, if dated. Available guns included 310 Krupp 75 mm field guns, 52 105 mm Bofors howitzers (the only truly modern pieces), and a range of obsolete Krupp and Vickers pieces. Only eight of 120 modern 105 mm guns ordered from Germany had actually arrived. Antitank defences consisted of 386 Böhler 47 mm guns, effective weapons but at only a third of the planned number. The air force on the 10th of May operated 155 aircraft, of which 74 were biplanes. The Dutch infantry rifle, the Geweer M.95, had been adopted in 1895. Despite the Netherlands being home to Philips, one of Europe's largest radio manufacturers, the army mostly communicated by telephone; only the artillery had radio sets, just 225 of them.

  • Adolf Hitler personally developed the plan to capture the Netherlands, and it was, by the standards of 1940, audacious to the point of recklessness. The core idea, called Fall Festung, was to land paratroopers around The Hague on the first day, seize the Dutch government, the High Command, and Queen Wilhelmina simultaneously, and thereby produce an immediate collapse before serious resistance could organise. German officers were given lessons in how to address royalty in preparation for this arrest. If the Dutch did not capitulate at once, bridges at Rotterdam, Dordrecht, and Moerdijk were to be seized to let the 9th Panzer Division drive north and relieve the airborne troops from below.

    The airborne force committed to this operation consisted of two divisions: the 7. Flieger-Division of paratroopers and the 22nd Luftlande-Infanteriedivision of air-landing infantry. The 9th Panzer Division, the relief force, had a total of 141 tanks. Germany's 18th Army assigned to the Netherlands as a whole was, as the source puts it, by far the weakest of all German armies involved in the western offensive. It contained only four regular infantry divisions, most of them raised in August 1939 from territorial units with few professional officers. Eighty-eight percent of German soldiers in this force were, like their Dutch counterparts, insufficiently trained.

    The command structure added further complexity. The airborne assault was solely a Luftwaffe operation, not under Army command at all. The 18th Army considered the air landings subservient to the ground advance. A peculiar consequence was that an intelligence officer in Berlin, Colonel Hans Oster of the Abwehr, had been leaking the German attack plans to his friend Major Gijsbertus J. Sas, the Dutch military attaché, since March 1939. Sas passed the information to the Allies through other attachés. But repeated postponements for bad weather had produced so many false alarms that Dutch officials had grown sceptical. On the evening of the 9th of May 1940, Oster called Sas and said only: "Tomorrow, at dawn." Dutch troops were finally placed on full alert.

  • At 04:30 on the 10th of May, Dutch citizens woke to the sound of aircraft. Kampfgeschwader 4, led by Oberst Martin Fiebig, struck first. One wing flew west over Dutch airspace and disappeared, giving the impression the raid was aimed at England. Over the North Sea it reversed course and hit the naval airfield at De Kooy, destroying 35 aircraft, most of them trainers. Fiebig himself was shot down and spent five days as a Dutch prisoner of war. Other waves hit Amsterdam-Schiphol, where the Dutch lost a third of their medium bombers, and the airfields near The Hague. By the end of that first day, the Dutch air force had been reduced from 125 operational aircraft to just 70.

    The attack on The Hague, the heart of the Dutch government, failed. German paratroopers could not capture the main airfield at Ypenburg quickly enough for the air-landing infantry to follow safely. Five Landsverk armoured cars, working with machine gun positions, destroyed the eighteen Junkers transport planes of the first two German waves, killing many of the soldiers aboard. When the airstrip was clogged with wrecks, subsequent waves scattered into meadows and beaches. The small auxiliary airfield of Ockenburg fell, but Valkenburg's runway was still under construction and planes sank into the waterlogged soil on landing. By early afternoon Dutch artillery had driven the paratroopers back from the outskirts of The Hague. Around 1,600 German airborne troops ended up isolated in villages and mansions across the area.

    At Rotterdam the story was different. Twelve Heinkel He 59 floatplanes, each packed with soldiers, landed on the Nieuwe Maas in the heart of the city. The assault teams seized the Willemsbrug bridge and held it. To the south, the airfield at Waalhaven fell to paratroopers after a confused fight that overwhelmed the Dutch battalion defending it. The Royal Netherlands Navy attempted a response: torpedo boats Z5 and TM 51 attacked the Willemsbrug, and the destroyer HNLMS Van Galen steamed up the Nieuwe Waterweg to bombard Waalhaven. The Van Galen was bombed and sank. A plan to also send the gunboats HNLMS Flores and HNLMS Johan Maurits van Nassau was abandoned. The Moerdijk bridges over the wide Hollands Diep estuary, critical links between the island and North Brabant, were captured and fortified. German Brandenburger commandos wearing Dutch military police uniforms, some of them Dutch members of the Nationaal-Socialistische Beweging, had tried to prevent the destruction of river bridges throughout the country. Most attempts failed and the bridges were blown, in two cases with the Brandenburgers still on them. The one decisive exception was the Gennep railway bridge, where an armoured train and a troop train drove straight through the Peel-Raam defensive line and unloaded an infantry battalion behind the Dutch positions.

  • Dutch defensive strategy rested on the Grebbe Line, a fortified position running from Lake IJssel to the Lower Rhine along an Ice Age moraine called the Utrechtse Heuvelrug. General Henry Winkelman had decided this would be where the decisive battle was fought. The line was intended to hold long enough for reserves to arrive, buying time against an enemy who was expected to exhaust much of his offensive power before reaching it.

    On the morning of the 11th of May, at about half past three, German artillery began shelling the outpost line in front of the Grebbeberg. Two battalions of the SS regiment Der Fuehrer attacked at dawn. The telephone lines were already cut, so the Dutch companies holding the outposts could not call for artillery support. By noon the Germans had broken through at the northern end of the outpost line and were rolling up the positions from behind. By evening every outpost was in German hands.

    Major-General Jacob Harberts, commanding the 2nd Army Corps, misread what had happened. He believed the outposts had been abandoned through cowardice in the face of a small probing force. He did not know that motorised SS troops had led the assault. He ordered a night counterattack by a single reserve battalion; that battalion, moving up in the dark, was fired upon by its own side because no one had been told it was coming. An engineer bridge needed to cross the Grift rivulet never arrived. The counterattack collapsed in confusion.

    On the 12th of May, a battalion of Der Fuehrer attacked an 800-metre sector of the main Grebbe Line in the afternoon. Exploiting dead angles in Dutch fields of fire, it breached positions that had little depth. Eight hundred metres further west sat the Stop Line, a continuous trench system designed for active defence. Obersturmbannführer Hilmar Wäckerle spotted a weak point and attacked without coordinating with other units, driving one mile west with a force of roughly company strength before being halted near the Rhenen railroad. The break caused the defenders to abandon the Stop Line in panic across more than two miles to the north. Wäckerle's company was eventually isolated and surrounded, but the damage to Dutch cohesion was done. Reserves that should have reinforced the Grebbe Line had already been diverted south to fight the airborne troops.

  • By the morning of the 12th of May, General Winkelman still thought the situation salvageable. He did not yet understand the danger to the Grebbe Line and expected the French to help stabilise North Brabant. Both assumptions were about to collapse simultaneously.

    The French 7th Army had arrived expecting to find five Dutch divisions holding the Peel-Raam Position in North Brabant. Instead, the three best divisions had already been withdrawn to the north and the remaining forces were in full retreat. The Peel Division, a covering force assembled from units left behind during the withdrawal, had tried to hold a canal line near Heeswijk, but the order to destroy the bridge there never arrived. German troops crossed that bridge effortlessly at 13:00 on the 11th. A second crossing at Erp broke what remained of the line. By the end of the 11th, the Peel Division had largely disintegrated.

    On the morning of the 12th, reconnaissance elements of the 9th Panzer Division caught Colonel Leonard Johannes Schmidt, the commander of Dutch troops in North Brabant, near Loon op Zand and took him prisoner. Dutch forces in the province lost all unified command at once. Shortly after noon German armoured cars had driven thirty kilometres further west to reach the southern Moerdijk bridgehead. At 16:45 they reached the Moerdijk bridges themselves, cutting Fortress Holland off from all Allied forces. At 13:35, General Gamelin had already ordered a complete French withdrawal to Antwerp. The ring around Fortress Holland was closed. The 9th Panzer Division, which the Germans had always intended as the instrument to drive north from the captured Moerdijk bridges into Fortress Holland's southern perimeter, now had a clear path. The bombing of Rotterdam on the 14th of May, in which the Luftwaffe devastated the city centre, was the final pressure point. The German command threatened further raids on other Dutch cities. The General Staff, knowing it could not stop the bombers, ordered the Royal Netherlands Army to cease hostilities. Dutch troops under French command in Zeeland held out until the 17th of May. The last parts of the Netherlands were not liberated until 1945.

Updated

Common questions

When did the German invasion of the Netherlands take place?

The German invasion of the Netherlands began on the 10th of May 1940. The main Dutch forces surrendered on the 14th of May, and Dutch troops in Zeeland under French command continued to resist until the 17th of May, when Germany completed its occupation of the entire country.

Why did the Netherlands surrender so quickly in 1940?

A combination of severe military unpreparedness, a political culture that refused to treat Germany as a direct threat, and the devastating Luftwaffe bombing of Rotterdam on the 14th of May 1940 drove the Dutch to surrender. The General Staff knew it could not protect Dutch cities from further air attacks and ordered the army to cease hostilities. The Netherlands had almost no tanks, an air force largely composed of biplanes, and soldiers who had received minimal training before the invasion.

What was Fall Festung and what was its goal?

Fall Festung was the German plan, developed personally by Adolf Hitler, to capture the Dutch government, the High Command, and Queen Wilhelmina on the first day of the invasion using paratroopers landed around The Hague. The objective was to produce an immediate Dutch collapse. German officers were given lessons in how to address royalty in preparation. The operation failed: Dutch forces destroyed the incoming German transport planes at Ypenburg airfield and approximately 1,600 German airborne troops ended up isolated across the area without achieving their objective.

Who was Colonel Hans Oster and what role did he play in the invasion of the Netherlands?

Hans Oster was a colonel in the Abwehr, German military intelligence, and a leading figure of the German resistance to the Nazi regime from 1938 to 1943. Beginning in March 1939, he secretly passed the date of the planned German attack to his friend Major Gijsbertus J. Sas, the Dutch military attaché in Berlin. Repeated postponements caused the Dutch government to become sceptical of the warnings. On the evening of the 9th of May 1940, Oster called Sas and said only "Tomorrow, at dawn," prompting a Dutch alert. Oster was later hanged after the 20th of July 1944 bomb plot to assassinate Hitler.

What was the Grebbe Line and did it hold during the German invasion?

The Grebbe Line was the main Dutch defensive position, running along an Ice Age moraine called the Utrechtse Heuvelrug between Lake IJssel and the Lower Rhine. It was intended to hold long enough for reserves to arrive and mount counterattacks. It did not hold: SS troops from the regiment Der Fuehrer broke through the outpost line on the 11th of May and breached the main line on the 12th. Reserves that should have reinforced the position had been diverted to counter German airborne troops elsewhere, and mismanagement by Major-General Jacob Harberts further hampered the defence.

What happened at Rotterdam during the German invasion of the Netherlands?

On the 10th of May 1940, twelve Heinkel He 59 floatplanes landed on the Nieuwe Maas river in central Rotterdam and seized the Willemsbrug bridge. The destroyer HNLMS Van Galen attempted to bombard the German-held Waalhaven airfield but was bombed and sank. On the 14th of May the Luftwaffe bombed Rotterdam, devastating the city. Germany then threatened to bomb other Dutch cities, and the Dutch General Staff, knowing it could not stop the aircraft, ordered a ceasefire.

All sources

282 references cited across the entry

  1. 4Hooton 2007, p. 48
  2. 5De Jong, Het Koninkrijk, Staatsuitgeverij, 1971
  3. 7BookHitler's Blitzkrieg Campaigns: The Invasion And Defense Of Western Europe, 1939–1940J.E. Kaufmann et al. — Da Capo Press — 2007
  4. 8Shirer (1960), p. 633
  5. 9Frieser (2005), p. 74
  6. 10BookInside EuropeJohn Gunther — Harper & Brothers — 1940
  7. 11Amersfoort (2005), p. 77
  8. 12De Jong (1969), p. 438
  9. 13De Jong (1969), p. 506
  10. 14Amersfoort (2005), p. 67
  11. 15De Jong (1969), p. 541
  12. 16De Jong (1969), p. 542
  13. 17De Jong (1969), p. 570
  14. 18De Jong (1969), p. 642
  15. 19De Jong (1969b), p. 363
  16. 20Amersfoort (2005), p. 78
  17. 21De Jong (1969), p. 548
  18. 22Germany: Westwall; France: Maginot Line
  19. 23De Jong (1969b), p. 129
  20. 24De Jong (1969b), pp. 203–208
  21. 25Amersfoort (2005), p. 92
  22. 26De Jong (1969b), p. 143
  23. 27De Jong (1969b), p. 144
  24. 28De Jong (1969b), p. 254
  25. 29De Jong (1969b), p. 251
  26. 30De Jong (1969b), pp. 254–256
  27. 31De Jong (1969b), pp. 256–258
  28. 32De Jong (1969b), p. 258
  29. 33De Jong (1969b), p. 392
  30. 34De Jong (1969b), p. 393
  31. 35De Jong (1969b), p. 249
  32. 36De Jong (1969b), p. 324
  33. 37Amersfoort (2005), p. 64
  34. 38De Jong (1969b), p. 362
  35. 39Amersfoort (2005), p. 72
  36. 40Amersfoort (2005), pp. 73, 76
  37. 41Amersfoort (2005), p. 79
  38. 42De Jong (1969b), p. 351
  39. 43De Jong (1969), p. 562
  40. 44Schulten (1979), p. 37
  41. 45De Jong (1969b), p. 325
  42. 46Schulten (1979), p. 24
  43. 47Schulten (1979), pp. 33–37
  44. 48Schulten (1979), pp. 38–40
  45. 49Schulten (1979), pp. 40–41
  46. 50De Jong (1969b), p. 331
  47. 51De Jong (1969), p. 545
  48. 52De Jong (1969b), p. 332
  49. 53De Jong (1969b), p. 327
  50. 54Van arbeider naar artilleristSaminna van den Bulk — Defensie.nl — 28 July 2023
  51. 55Nederlandse Vuurwapens: Landmacht en Luchtvaartafdeling, drs G. de Vries & drs B.J. Martens, pp. 40–56
  52. 56De Jong (1969b), p. 330
  53. 57De Jong (1969b), p. 337
  54. 59De Jong (1969b), p. 338
  55. 60De Jong (1969b), p. 340
  56. 61De Jong (1969), p. 544
  57. 62Amersfoort (2005), p. 71
  58. 63De Jong (1969b), p. 344
  59. 64Amersfoort (2005), p. 82
  60. 65De Jong (1969b), p. 349
  61. 66De Jong (1969b), p. 329
  62. 67De Jong (1969b), p. 346
  63. 68De Jong (1969), p. 577
  64. 69Amersfoort (2005), p. 188
  65. 70Amersfoort (2005), p. 84
  66. 71De Jong (1969b), p. 366
  67. 72De Jong (1969b), p. 322
  68. 73De Jong (1969), p. 573
  69. 74De Jong (1969b), p. 141
  70. 75Amersfoort (2005), p. 87
  71. 76De Jong (1969b), p. 360
  72. 77De Jong (1969), p. 578
  73. 78De Jong (1969b), p. 197
  74. 79De Jong (1969b), p. 194
  75. 80De Jong (1969b), pp. 195–196
  76. 81De Jong (1969b), p. 216
  77. 82Amersfoort (2005), p. 94
  78. 83De Jong (1969b), p. 221
  79. 84De Jong (1969b), p. 148
  80. 85Amersfoort (2005), p. 90
  81. 86Amersfoort (2005), p. 97
  82. 87De Jong (1969b), p. 191
  83. 88De Jong (1969b), p. 229
  84. 89De Jong (1969b), p. 230
  85. 90De Jong (1969b), p. 231
  86. 91Amersfoort (2005), p. 96
  87. 92De Jong (1969b), p. 224
  88. 93Amersfoort (2005), p. 100
  89. 94De Jong (1969b), p. 225
  90. 95Amersfoort (2005), p. 101
  91. 96Amersfoort (2005), p. 240
  92. 97Amersfoort (2005), p. 128
  93. 98De Jong (1969b), pp. 62–63
  94. 99De Jong (1969b), p. 65
  95. 100Amersfoort (2005), p. 129
  96. 101Amersfoort (2005), p. 140
  97. 102De Jong (1969b), p. 283
  98. 103Amersfoort (2005), p. 138
  99. 104Amersfoort (2005), p. 139
  100. 105Amersfoort (2005), p. 142
  101. 106Amersfoort (2005), p. 143
  102. 107De Jong (1969b), pp. 296–297
  103. 108Jentz (1998), p. 116
  104. 109Jentz (1998), p. 121
  105. 110De Jong (1969b), p. 305
  106. 111Amersfoort (2005), p. 145
  107. 112De Jong (1969b), p. 105
  108. 113Shirer (1960), pp. 1024, 1073
  109. 114De Jong (1969b), p. 106
  110. 115De Jong (1969b), p. 107
  111. 116De Jong (1969b), p. 126
  112. 117De Jong (1969b), pp. 124–126
  113. 118De Jong (1969b), pp. 244–247
  114. 119De Jong (1969b), p. 323
  115. 120De Jong (1969b), p. 308
  116. 121Amersfoort (2005), p. 103
  117. 122Grimm, P. e.a. pp. 21–27
  118. 123Hooton 1994, p. 241.
  119. 124Grimm, P. e.a. pp. 22–27
  120. 125J.N. Fernhout, 1992, "Het verband tussen de Luftwaffe-verliezen in mei '40 en de Duitse invasieplannen voor Engeland", Militaire Spectator 161(8): 364–371
  121. 126Amersfoort (2005), p. 192
  122. 127Amersfoort (2005), p. 197
  123. 128Amersfoort (2005), p. 199
  124. 129Amersfoort (2005), p. 341
  125. 130Amersfoort (2005), p. 340
  126. 131Amersfoort (2005), p. 363
  127. 132Amersfoort (2005), p. 338
  128. 133Amersfoort (2005), p. 336
  129. 134De Jong (1969b), p. 201
  130. 135Amersfoort (2005), p. 214
  131. 136Amersfoort (2005), p. 215
  132. 137Amersfoort (2005), p. 220
  133. 138Amersfoort (2005), p. 218
  134. 139Amersfoort (2005), p. 213
  135. 140Amersfoort (2005), p. 153
  136. 141De Jong (1969b), p. 358
  137. 142Amersfoort (2005), p. 348
  138. 143Amersfoort (2005), p. 349
  139. 144Amersfoort (2005), p. 230
  140. 145Amersfoort (2005), p. 226
  141. 146Amersfoort (2005), p. 227
  142. 147Amersfoort (2005), pp. 316–320
  143. 148Amersfoort (2005), p. 162
  144. 149Amersfoort (2005), p. 165
  145. 150Amersfoort (2005), p. 350
  146. 151Amersfoort (2005), p. 351
  147. 152Amersfoort (2005), p. 345
  148. 153Amersfoort (2005), p. 346
  149. 154Amersfoort (2005), p. 347
  150. 155Amersfoort (2005), p. 344
  151. 156Amersfoort (2005), p. 235
  152. 157Amersfoort (2005), p. 229
  153. 158Amersfoort (2005), p. 231
  154. 159Amersfoort (2005), p. 164
  155. 160Amersfoort (2005), p. 266
  156. 161Amersfoort (2005), p. 267
  157. 162Amersfoort (2005), p. 269
  158. 163Amersfoort (2005), p. 272
  159. 164Amersfoort (2005), p. 275
  160. 165Amersfoort (2005), p. 276
  161. 166Amersfoort (2005), p. 278
  162. 167Amersfoort (2005), p. 279
  163. 168Amersfoort (2005), p. 320
  164. 169Amersfoort (2005), p. 168
  165. 170Amersfoort (2005), pp. 171–172
  166. 171Amersfoort (2005), p. 237
  167. 172Amersfoort (2005), p. 238
  168. 173Amersfoort (2005), p. 243
  169. 174Amersfoort (2005), p. 352
  170. 175Amersfoort (2005), p. 353
  171. 176Amersfoort (2005), p. 355
  172. 177Amersfoort (2005), p. 364
  173. 178Amersfoort (2005), p. 281
  174. 179Amersfoort (2005), p. 282
  175. 180Amersfoort (2005), p. 284
  176. 181Amersfoort (2005), p. 285
  177. 182Amersfoort (2005), p. 290
  178. 183Amersfoort (2005), p. 324
  179. 184Amersfoort (2005), p. 170
  180. 185Amersfoort (2005), p. 172
  181. 186De Jong (1970) p. 272
  182. 187Amersfoort (2005), p. 141
  183. 188Amersfoort (2005), p. 167
  184. 189Amersfoort (2005), p. 176
  185. 190De Jong (1970), p. 225
  186. 191Amersfoort (2005), p. 175
  187. 192De Jong (1970), p. 264
  188. 193De Jong (1970), p. 288
  189. 195De Jong (1970), p. 300
  190. 196De Jong (1970), p. 301
  191. 197Amersfoort (2005), p. 358
  192. 198Amersfoort (2005), p. 359
  193. 199Amersfoort (2005), p. 360
  194. 200Amersfoort (2005), p. 361
  195. 201De Jong (1970), p. 302
  196. 202De Jong (1970), p. 303
  197. 203Amersfoort (2005), pp. 324–325
  198. 204Amersfoort (2005), p. 326
  199. 205Amersfoort (2005), p. 327
  200. 206Amersfoort (2005), p. 300
  201. 207Amersfoort (2005), p. 301
  202. 208Amersfoort (2005), p. 304
  203. 209Amersfoort (2005), p. 308
  204. 210Amersfoort (2005), p. 291
  205. 211Amersfoort (2005), p. 294
  206. 212Amersfoort (2005), p. 295
  207. 213Amersfoort (2005), p. 296
  208. 214De Jong (1970), p. 311
  209. 215Amersfoort (2005), p. 299
  210. 216Amersfoort (2005), p. 173
  211. 217De Jong (1970), p. 323
  212. 218Amersfoort (2005), p. 305
  213. 219Amersfoort (2005), p. 307
  214. 220Amersfoort (2005), p. 178
  215. 221Amersfoort (2005), p. 180
  216. 222Amersfoort (2005), p. 329
  217. 223De Jong (1970), p. 333
  218. 224Amersfoort (2005), p. 306
  219. 225De Jong (1970), p. 335
  220. 226Amersfoort (2005), pp. 367–368
  221. 227Amersfoort (2005), p. 368
  222. 228Amersfoort (2005), pp. 366–367
  223. 229Amersfoort (2005), p. 367
  224. 230De Jong (1970), p. 345
  225. 231Amersfoort (2005), p. 369
  226. 232De Jong (1970), p. 348
  227. 233De Jong (1970), p. 349
  228. 234De Jong (1970), p. 350
  229. 235De Jong (1970), p. 351
  230. 236Amersfoort (2005), p. 370
  231. 237De Jong (1970), p. 366
  232. 238De Jong (1970), p. 368
  233. 239De Jong (1970), p. 369
  234. 240De Jong (1970), p. 370
  235. 241De Jong (1969b), pp. 366–367
  236. 242Amersfoort (2005), p. 181
  237. 243Amersfoort (2005), p. 182
  238. 244Amersfoort (2005), p. 183
  239. 245De Jong (1970), p. 375
  240. 246Amersfoort (2005), p. 179
  241. 247De Jong (1970), pp. 385–386
  242. 248De Jong (1970), pp. 393–397
  243. 249De Jong (1970), p. 374
  244. 250De Jong (1970), pp. 376–377
  245. 251De Jong (1970), p. 384
  246. 252Amersfoort (2005), p. 184
  247. 253Amersfoort (2005), p. 244
  248. 254Amersfoort (2005), p. 239
  249. 255Amersfoort (2005), p. 241
  250. 256Amersfoort (2005), p. 255
  251. 257Amersfoort (2005), p. 245
  252. 258Amersfoort (2005), p. 246
  253. 259Amersfoort (2005), p. 247
  254. 260Amersfoort (2005), p. 248
  255. 261Amersfoort (2005), p. 249
  256. 262Hoebeke, pp. 112–114
  257. 263Amersfoort (2005), p. 250
  258. 264Amersfoort (2005), p. 251
  259. 265Amersfoort (2005), p. 252
  260. 266Amersfoort (2005), p. 253
  261. 267Shirer (1960), p. 723
  262. 269Mei 1940 – De Strijd op Nederlands grondgebiedSdu Uitgevers — 2005
  263. 270Nederlandse PantservoertuigenC.M. Schulten et al. — Unieboek BV — 1979
  264. 271Het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden in de Tweede Wereldoorlog, Deel 1: VoorpelLouis De Jong — Rijksinstituut voor Oorlogsdocumentatie — 1969
  265. 272Het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden in de Tweede Wereldoorlog, Deel 2: NeutraalLouis De Jong — Rijksinstituut voor Oorlogsdocumentatie — 1969
  266. 273Het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden in de Tweede Wereldoorlog, Deel 3: Mei '40Louis De Jong — Rijksinstituut voor Oorlogsdocumentatie — 1970
  267. 274Slagveld SloedamR.e. Hoebeke — Drukkerij Bareman — 2002
  268. 275Phoenix Triumphant: The Rise and Rise of the LuftwaffeE.R. Hooton — Brockhampton Press — 1994
  269. 276Luftwaffe at War, Volume 2; Blitzkrieg in the West 1939–1940E.R. Hooton — Chevron/Ian Allan — 2007
  270. 277Die deutsche Panzertruppe 1933–1942 – Band 1Thomas L. Jentz — Podzun-Pallas-Verlag — 1998
  271. 278Blitzkrieg-Legende – Der Westfeldzug 1940Karl-Heinz Frieser — R. Oldenbourg Verlag München — 2005
  272. 279The Rise and Fall of the Third ReichWilliam L. Shirer — Simon & Schuster — 1960
  273. 280Lightning War: Blitzkrieg in the West, 1940Ronald E. Powaski — John Wiley — 2003
  274. 281Lightning War: Blitzkrieg in the West, 1940Ronald E. Powaski — Book Sales Inc. — 2008
  275. 282Verliesregister 1939–1945. Alle militaire vliegtuigverliezen in Nederland tijdens de Tweede Wereldoorlog. Verliesregister 1940P. e.a. Grimm — Studiegroep Luchtoorlog 1939–1945, Nederlands Instituut voor Militaire Historie — 2008

Queue