Skip to content

German colonial empire

Ch. 1 of 8
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Contents

German colonial empire

8 sections
  • The German colonial empire entered history not with a plan, but with a reversal. Otto von Bismarck, the man who built unified Germany, spent decades telling anyone who would listen that he wanted nothing to do with overseas colonies. "I am no man for colonies," he said repeatedly. Then, in 1884, he changed course entirely. Within a single year, Germany assembled the third-largest colonial empire on earth, trailing only Britain and France. It stretched from the coast of West Africa to the islands of Micronesia, encompassing tens of millions of people across dozens of distinct societies. How did a statesman who called colonies a burden and an expense end up building an empire? Why did that empire, after barely three decades, vanish so completely that talk of its revival was banned as irrelevant to wartime? And what did it leave behind, in the lands it occupied and in Germany itself?

  • German-speaking merchants had been trading across the globe long before Germany existed as a unified state. The Hanseatic republics of Hamburg and Bremen sent traders to every continent, and their private trading houses concluded treaties and land purchases with chiefs in Africa and the Pacific. These early commercial agreements would later serve as the legal foundation for annexation. The obstacle was not ambition but structure. Before unification in 1871, the German states held separate political goals and lacked a unified navy. Without a fleet capable of operating in distant waters, no would-be colonial power could defend or supply overseas territories. German foreign policy under Bismarck focused entirely on the European "German question" and the balance of power on the continent. Colonial aspirations did exist in private and commercial circles, particularly in the 1840s. In 1839, a private group tried to purchase the Chatham Islands east of New Zealand for German settlement, only to find Britain had a prior claim. The Society for the Protection of German Immigrants to Texas, founded in Mainz in 1842, aimed to build a colony of "New Germany" with roughly 7,400 settlers, but about half died from disease and shortages, and the venture collapsed with Texas's annexation by the United States in 1845. Prussia did attempt to claim Formosa, modern Taiwan, in 1859, sending a naval expedition to conclude trade treaties and potentially occupy the island. The mission was abandoned due to the limited strength of the expedition and the desire not to jeopardize a trade deal with Qing China. In a cabinet order of the 6th of January 1862, the expedition's ambassador Friedrich Albrecht zu Eulenburg was released from any obligation to find overseas settlement sites.

  • Bismarck made his opposition to colonies explicit in writing. In a letter to the Prussian Minister of War Albrecht von Roon in 1868, he laid out his thinking in careful detail: the trade benefits were mostly illusory, the costs of establishing and maintaining colonies typically exceeded whatever the homeland gained, and the German navy was not strong enough to protect distant territories. His skepticism was not rooted in moral or humanitarian objections. It came from a hardheaded calculation about profitability, feasibility, and the risks that colonial adventures posed to his carefully managed European balance of power. Multiple offers to acquire territory came to him and were refused. In 1866 and again in 1876, the Sultan of the Sulu Islands, located between Borneo and the Philippines, offered to place his islands under Prussian and then Imperial German control; both times he was rebuffed. Without Bismarck's knowledge, a German naval commander negotiated with the President of Costa Rica in 1867 to establish a base at Puerto Limón. Bismarck rejected the acquisition, citing the American Monroe Doctrine. He also turned down a Dutch offer of a naval base on the island of Curaçao for the same reason. When journalist Eugen Wolf pressed him in 1888 to grab more African territory before rival powers did, Bismarck replied with a remark that has defined how historians remember him: "Your map of Africa is very pretty, but my map of Africa lies in Europe. Here is Russia, here is France, and we are in the middle. That is my map of Africa." By 1889, witnesses reported he was prepared to abandon the colonies entirely, wishing to end Germany's activities in East Africa and Samoa, and at one point he offered to sell Germany's African possessions to Italian Prime Minister Francesco Crispi.

  • In April 1884, the trading post of Adolf Lüderitz at the Bay of Angara Pequena in southwest Africa was placed under the protection of the German Empire. The shift had been building for years. In November 1882, the Bremen-based tobacco merchant Lüderitz had contacted the Foreign Office requesting protection for his trade station south of Walvis Bay. The British government twice refused to extend protection when he asked. Hamburg merchants, fearing British and French tariff dominance over West Africa, pressed Bismarck through the Hamburg Chamber of Commerce. A secret request submitted on the 6th of July 1883 told him plainly that German trade in Atlantic territories needed political backing to survive. By March 1884, Bismarck had named Gustav Nachtigal as Imperial Commissioner for the West African Coast. Within months, Togoland and Adolph Woermann's holdings in Cameroon followed Lüderitz Bay under the German flag. Then the northeastern section of New Guinea, called Kaiser-Wilhelmsland, and the neighboring Bismarck Archipelago. In February 1885, Carl Peters returned from East Africa with documents bearing the marks of tribal chiefs, claiming some 60,000 square miles of territory for his Society for German Colonization. This became German East Africa. Historians still debate why Bismarck reversed course so sharply. Domestic explanations point to the approaching 1884 federal election and Bismarck's desire to bind the pro-colonial National Liberal Party to his government. Hans-Ulrich Wehler argued that colonial expansion served to redirect social tensions created by the economic crisis following the Panic of 1873. A foreign-policy reading sees it as an extension of European balance-of-power logic to a global stage, with a colonial partnership with France potentially diverting French resentment over Alsace-Lorraine. One reading in particular, the so-called "Crown-prince thesis," holds that Bismarck deliberately strained German relations with Britain to prevent the expected succession of the anglophile Frederick III from turning Germany toward liberal English-style governance.

  • The treaties that secured German colonial territory were instruments of dispossession. Indigenous rulers signed away vast areas they often had no exclusive claim to, in exchange for vague promises of protection and payments that contemporaries described as laughably small. The language barrier meant the terms frequently remained unclear to the signatories. Carl Peters accumulated his territories through documents marked with X-marks by illiterate chiefs; brutality, hanging, and flogging prevailed during these land-grab expeditions. After an outbreak of cattle disease in South West Africa in 1897, the Herero spread their surviving herds onto new pastures that settlers claimed as their own. The crisis escalated in 1904 into a full revolt. The understaffed Imperial Schutztruppe could not contain it, and Berlin dispatched a naval expeditionary force and reinforcements totaling around 15,000 men under Lieutenant-General Lothar von Trotha. German forces defeated the Herero at the Battle of Waterberg in August 1904. Von Trotha then issued what became known as the Vernichtungsbefehl, the extermination order, driving surviving Herero into the wilderness. By the end of November 1904, some 1,800 survivors had reached British Bechuanaland. At the time, the Herero population was estimated at 50,000; by 1908, roughly half had died. The Nama, who had initially fought on the German side, suffered around 10,000 deaths, also close to half their population. This was the first genocide of the 20th century. The Maji Maji rebellion in German East Africa in 1905-1906 brought an estimated 100,000 additional deaths, many caused by famine from German scorched earth tactics. Reports of these atrocities circulated in the German press. The rejection of a supplementary budget to fund further colonial conflicts at the end of 1906 forced the dissolution of the Reichstag. The subsequent "Hottentot election" of January 1907 saw large voter turnouts shaped by anti-colonial sentiment, and the newly elected Reichstag imposed a complete overhaul of the colonial service.

  • Bernhard Dernburg arrived at the Colonial Department in September 1906 as a banker and private-sector restructurer from Darmstadt. By May 1907, that department had been separated from the Foreign Office entirely and elevated into the Imperial Colonial Office, with Dernburg as Secretary of State. He toured the colonies personally to diagnose problems firsthand. Incompetent officials were removed from office; some faced trial. Corporal punishment was abolished. Every colony in Africa and the Pacific established the beginnings of a public school system, and every colony built and staffed hospitals. Dernburg declared that the indigenous population was "the most important factor in our colonies." Capital investment was secured with public funds to reduce private risk. Rail lines were extended into the interior of every African protectorate. Dar es Salaam evolved, as one observer wrote, into the showcase city of all tropical Africa; Lomé grew into the prettiest city in western Africa; and Qingdao in China was described, in miniature, as German a city as Hamburg or Bremen. The results in trade were measurable. Between 1906 and 1914, palm oil and cocoa production in the colonies doubled; rubber output from the African colonies quadrupled; cotton exports from German East Africa increased tenfold. Total trade between Germany and its colonies climbed from 72 million marks in 1906 to 264 million marks in 1913. Colonial tax income increased sixfold over the same period. By 1914, only German New Guinea, Kiautschou, and the African Schutztruppen still required direct subsidies from Berlin. Wilhelm Solf, who became Colonial Secretary in 1911, continued Dernburg's approach, touring Africa in 1912 and 1913 and advocating a ban on forced labor. He secured support for this direction from every party in the Reichstag except the right. There were no further major revolts after 1905.

  • When war was declared in late July 1914, Britain and its allies moved against the German colonies immediately. The public was told that every German colony possessed a powerful wireless station and that German ships would use them as cover to raid Allied commerce. Togoland was the first to fall, surrendering on the 26th of August 1914. The German possessions in the Pacific were largely undefended. Troops from New Zealand invaded German Samoa in August 1914; Australian troops occupied German New Guinea the following month; Japanese forces seized the German holdings in Micronesia in October 1914, including the Mariana, Caroline, and Marshall Islands. One German force held out longer than all the rest. General Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck and his troops in German East Africa fought the Allies until the armistice that ended the war in Europe. The Treaty of Versailles, through Article 119 and Article 22, transformed the former German colonies into League of Nations mandates distributed among Belgium, Britain and its Dominions, France, and Japan. Britain and France divided German Kamerun and Togoland. Belgium gained Ruanda-Urundi. Portugal received the Kionga Triangle. South Africa administered the former German South West Africa. Of the 12.5 million people living in the colonies in 1914-42 percent passed to British and Dominion mandates, 33 percent to France, and 25 percent to Belgium. The mandate system was a diplomatic construction. The principle of self-determination written into the League of Nations covenant was, in the words of participants at the Paris Conference, regarded as meaningless when applied to these territories. President Woodrow Wilson described the League as the "residuary trustee" for captured German colonies; British deliberations acknowledged the need to avoid looking like what America saw as a land-devouring empire, even as the colonies were retained. South African Prime Minister Louis Botha later stated publicly that all wartime allegations about German colonial brutality had been, without exception, baseless fabrications.

  • Nearly all parties elected to the Weimar National Assembly on the 19th of January 1919 voted in favor of a resolution demanding the return of the colonies on the 1st of March 1919, while the Paris Peace Conference was still meeting. Only seven delegates from the USPD voted against it. The charge that Germany had failed to civilize the peoples under its control struck most Germans as especially outrageous, given that this had been a central justification for the colonial enterprise itself. Konrad Adenauer, then mayor of Cologne, was among those who called for restitution; he later served as Deputy President of the German Colonial Society from 1931 to 1933. A Colonial Office within the Foreign Ministry operated from 1924, directed by Edmund Brückner, who had been the former Governor of Togo. Colonial revisionist organizations multiplied through the Weimar years: the Korag umbrella group was established in 1925, from which the Reichskolonialbund emerged in 1933. When Adolf Hitler came to power, he occasionally mentioned the lost colonies as a bargaining point in speeches, but his real ambitions lay in Eastern Europe. Rudolf Hess, Martin Bormann, and Joachim von Ribbentrop actively blocked colonialists' publicity efforts, regarding their cause as a discarded past irrelevant to the pursuit of Eastern European Lebensraum. The Reichskolonialbund was disbanded by decree in 1943 for activity irrelevant to the war. A small but tangible remnant persisted: some Germans had returned to their plantations in Cameroon as early as 1925, purchasing land with Foreign Office support. By 1934, roughly 16,774 Germans still lived in the former colonies, with around 12,000 in former Southwest Africa. Their descendants, known as German Namibians, are the one community for whom the colonial era left a continuous living presence.

Updated

Common questions

When did the German colonial empire begin and end?

The German colonial empire began in 1884, when Germany claimed its first territories in Africa and the Pacific, and formally ended after World War I through the Treaty of Versailles, which transferred all German colonies to League of Nations mandates in 1919-1920.

Why did Bismarck initially oppose building a German colonial empire?

Bismarck believed colonial benefits were mostly illusory, that the costs of establishing and maintaining colonies typically exceeded what the homeland gained, and that the German navy was too weak to defend distant territories. He also feared colonies would complicate his European balance-of-power strategy.

What was the Herero and Nama genocide in German colonial history?

The Herero and Nama genocide was carried out in German South West Africa between 1904 and 1908. Lieutenant-General Lothar von Trotha issued the Vernichtungsbefehl (extermination order) after defeating the Herero at the Battle of Waterberg in August 1904. Of an estimated 50,000 Herero, roughly half died; the Nama suffered around 10,000 deaths, also close to half their population. It is recognized as the first genocide of the 20th century.

How large was the German colonial empire compared to other European powers?

Within a single year after 1884, Germany assembled the third-largest colonial empire in the world, surpassed only by Britain and France. Its territories stretched across parts of Africa and Oceania.

What economic reforms did Bernhard Dernburg make to the German colonies?

Bernhard Dernburg, who became head of the Colonial Department in September 1906, abolished corporal punishment, established public schools and hospitals in every colony, extended rail lines into the African interior, and secured capital investment with public funds. Between 1906 and 1914, total trade between Germany and its colonies rose from 72 million marks to 264 million marks, and colonial tax income increased sixfold.

What happened to German colonies after World War I?

Under the Treaty of Versailles, German colonies were transformed into League of Nations mandates divided among Belgium, Britain and its Dominions, France, and Japan. Of the roughly 12.5 million people in the colonies in 1914-42 percent passed to British and Dominion mandates, 33 percent to France, and 25 percent to Belgium. Germany was stripped of all colonial possessions permanently.

All sources

211 references cited across the entry

  1. 2Germany 2: Colonial EmpireThomas Biskup et al. — Wiley — 2016
  2. 3See North German Missionary Society.
  3. 4Washusen, p. 61.
  4. 5Biskup, Thomas; Kohlrausch, Martin. "Germany 2: Colonial Empire". Credo Online. Credo Reference.
  5. 6Michael Fröhlich: Imperialismus. Deutsche Kolonial- und Weltpolitik 1880–1914. dtv, München 1994, , pp. 18 & 22.
  6. 7Walter Nuhn: Kolonialpolitik und Marine. Die Rolle der Kaiserlichen Marine bei der Gründung und Sicherung des deutschen Kolonialreiches 1884–1914. Bernard & Graefe, Bonn 2002, p. 27.
  7. 8Washausen, p. 67-114; the West and East Africa firms
  8. 9Lawrence Sondhaus: Preparing for Weltpolitik. German Sea Power Before the Tirpitz Era. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis 1997, p. 68.
  9. 10BookBismarck: The Man and the StatesmanAlan John Percivale Taylor — Hamish Hamilton — 1955
  10. 11Bismarck und der Kolonialismus BismarckJürgen Zimmerer — 2015-03-20
  11. 12Percy Ernst Schramm: Deutschland und Übersee. Der deutsche Handel mit den anderen Kontinenten, insbesondere Afrika, von Karl V. bis zu Bismarck. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Rivalität im Wirtschafts
  12. 14Hans-Ulrich Wehler: Bismarck und der Imperialismus. fourth edition, dtv, München 1976, , pp. 367 f.
  13. 15Lawrence Sondhaus: Preparing for Weltpolitik. German Sea Power Before the Tirpitz Era. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis 1997, p. 98.
  14. 16Michael Fröhlich: Imperialismus. Deutsche Kolonial- und Weltpolitik 1880–1914. dtv, München 1994, S. 32.
  15. 17Cord Eberspächer: Die deutsche Yangtse-Patrouille. Deutsche Kanonenbootpolitik in China im Zeitalter des Imperialismus 1900–1914, Verlag Dr. Dieter Winkler, Bochum 2004, p. 24.
  16. 18Martha Mamozai: Herrenmenschen – Frauen im deutschen Kolonialismus, Rowohlt, Hamburg 1990, p. 82.
  17. 19: Deutsche Kolonialgeschichte. Reclam, Stuttgart 2005, pp. 18 f.
  18. 21Hans-Ulrich Wehler: Deutsche Gesellschaftsgeschichte, Vol. 3: Von der „Deutschen Doppelrevolution" bis zum Beginn des Ersten Weltkrieges 1845/49–1914. C. H. Beck, München 1995, pp. 980 f.
  19. 22Reichstag deputy Friedrich Kapp stated in debate in 1878 that whenever there is talk of "colonization" he would recommend to keep pocketbooks out of sight, "even if the proposal is for the acquisition
  20. 24Hermann Joseph Hiery Die deutsche Südsee 1884–1914. Ferdinand Schöningh, Paderborn 2001, p. 2.
  21. 25Norbert Berthold Wagner: Die deutschen Schutzgebiete. Erwerb, Organisation und Verlust aus juristischer Sicht. Nomos, Baden-Baden 2002, pp. 94–96.
  22. 27Hermann Joseph Hiery: Die deutsche Südsee 1884–1914. Ferdinand Schöningh, Paderborn 2001, pp. 3 and 6.
  23. 28Crankshaw, Bismarck, p. 395
  24. 29Washausen, p. 115
  25. 30Crankshaw, p. 397.
  26. 31Taylor, p. 221.
  27. 32Helmut Böhme: Probleme der Reichsgründungszeit 1848–1879, Kiepenheuer & Witsch, Köln/Berlin 1968, p. 346.
  28. 33Klaus J. Bade: Friedrich Fabri und der Imperialismus in der Bismarckzeit, Atlantis Verlag, Freiburg 1975, p. 198.
  29. 34Hermann Joseph Hiery: Die deutsche Südsee 1884–1914. Ferdinand Schöningh, Paderborn 2001, pp. 649 and 694.
  30. 35Hermann Joseph Hiery: Die deutsche Südsee 1884–1914. Ferdinand Schöningh, Paderborn 2001, p. 695.
  31. 36Hermann Joseph Hiery: Die deutsche Südsee 1884–1914. Ferdinand Schöningh, Paderborn 2001, pp. 2 f.
  32. 37Michael Fröhlich: Imperialismus. Deutsche Kolonial- und Weltpolitik 1880 bis 1914. dtv, München 1994, p. 37.
  33. 38Klaus Jürgen Bade: Friedrich Fabri und der Imperialismus in der Bismarckzeit, Atlantis Verlag, Freiburg 1975, pp. 316–318.
  34. 39Harry R. Rudin: Germans in the Cameroons 1884–1914. A Case Study in Modern Imperialism. Yale University Press, New Haven 1938, S. 34–39.
  35. 40Kurt Grobecker: 325 Jahre Handelskammer Hamburg 1665–1990. Handelskammer Hamburg, Hamburg 1990, S. 79–81.
  36. 41Miller, p. 7
  37. 42Miller, Battle for the Bundu, p. 6
  38. 43Miller, p. 10
  39. 44German Colonialism: A Short History, Sebastian Conrad, p. 146, Cambridge University Press, 2012.
  40. 45Horst Gründer: Geschichte der deutschen Kolonien. 5. Auflage, Ferdinand Schöningh, Paderborn 2004, p. 52.
  41. 46Horst Gründer: "... da und dort ein junges Deutschland gründen". Rassismus, Kolonien und kolonialer Gedanke vom 16. bis zum 20. Jahrhundert. dtv, München 1999, S. 68 u. ö.; Karsten Linne: Deutschland
  42. 47Beate Althammer: Das Bismarckreich 1871–1890. Schöningh, Paderborn 2009, pp. 228 f.
  43. 48Hans-Ulrich Wehler: Bismarck und der Imperialismus. Kiepenheuer und Witsch, Köln 1969; Deutsche Gesellschaftsgeschichte, Vol. 3: Von der "Deutschen Doppelrevolution" bis zum Beginn des Ersten Weltkrie
  44. 49Beate Althammer: Das Bismarckreich 1871–1890. Schöningh, Paderborn 2009, pp. 229& f.
  45. 50Beate Althammer: Das Bismarckreich 1871–1890. Schöningh, Paderborn 2009, p. 231.
  46. 51Horst Gründer: Geschichte der deutschen Kolonien, fifth edition, Ferdinand Schöningh, Paderborn 2004, p. 55.
  47. 52Hans-Ulrich Wehler: Deutsche Gesellschaftsgeschichte, Vol. 3: Von der „Deutschen Doppelrevolution" bis zum Beginn des Ersten Weltkrieges 1845/49–1914. C. H. Beck, München 1995, p. 985; Gründer 2004, p
  48. 53Washausen, p. 116
  49. 54Wolfgang J. Mommsen: Das Ringen um den nationalen Staat. Die Gründung und der innere Ausbau des Deutschen Reiches unter Otto von Bismarck 1850 bis 1890. Vol. 7, Part 1, Propyläen, Berlin 1993, , p. 52
  50. 55Winfried Speitkamp: Deutsche Kolonialgeschichte. Reclam, Stuttgart 2005, p. 26–30.
  51. 56Winfried Speitkamp: Deutsche Kolonialgeschichte. Reclam, Stuttgart 2005, pp. 30–35.
  52. 57Miller, p. 9
  53. 58once the military command was able to harness this aggressiveness through training, the German Askari forces of the Schutztruppe demonstrated that fierce spirit in their élan and war time performance
  54. 59Hans-Ulrich Wehler: Bismarck und der Imperialismus, fourth ed, München 1976, p. 423 f.
  55. 60Hans-Ulrich Wehler: Bismarck und der Imperialismus, fourth ed., München 1976, pp. 408, n. 2.
  56. 62Horst Gründer: Geschichte der deutschen Kolonien. 5. Auflage, Ferdinand Schöningh, Paderborn 2004, , pp. 80 f.
  57. 64Washausen, p. 162
  58. 65Horst Gründer: "'Gott will es'. Eine Kreuzzugsbewegung am Ende des 19. Jahrhunderts," Geschichte in Wissenschaft und Unterricht 28 (1977), pp. 210–224.
  59. 66Winfried Speitkamp: Deutsche Kolonialgeschichte. Reclam, Stuttgart 2005, S. 35 f.
  60. 67Louis (1963), Ruanda-Urundi, p. 163
  61. 68Michael Fröhlich: Imperialismus. Deutsche Kolonial- und Weltpolitik 1880–1914, dtv, München 1994, S. 73–88.
  62. 69Helmut Strizek: Geschenkte Kolonien. Ruanda und Burundi unter deutscher Herrschaft. Ch. Links, Berlin 2006, .
  63. 70BookSvalbards historieArlov, Thor B. — Tapir Akademisk Forlag — 2003
  64. 71Roy M. MacLeod, Milton James Lewis: Disease, medicine, and empire: Perspectives on western medicine and the experience of the European expansion, 1988,
  65. 72Khoo Salma Nasution: More than Merchants: A History of the German-speaking Community in Penang, 1800s–1940s. Areca Books, Penang 2006, pp. 70–71.
  66. 73Tom Marks: The British Acquisition of Siamese Malaya (1896–1909). White Lotus, Huay Yai 1997, pp. 25, 26, 33.
  67. 74Barbara W. Tuchman: The Zimmermann Telegramm. Ballantine Books, New York 1985, , pp. 27 f.
  68. 75Klaus Hildebrand: Deutsche Außenpolitik 1871–1918 (= Enzyklopädie deutscher Geschichte, Vol. 2). Oldenbourg, München 1989, pp. 35–38.
  69. 76Haupt, Deutschlands Schutzgebiete, p. 85
  70. 79Hull, Isabel V., Absolute destruction: military culture and the practices of war in Imperial Germany, pp 3ff.
  71. 80A. Dirk Moses, Empire, Colony, Genocide: Conquest, Occupation and Subaltern Resistance in World History, p. 301
  72. 81Susanne Kuß, "Kolonialkriege und Raum." Militärgeschichtliche Zeitschrift 73, Heft 2 (2015), S. 333–348, hier S. 338–341 (via De Gruyter Online).
  73. 82Cohen, Paul A. History in Three Keys: The Boxers As Event, Experience, and Myth, Columbia University Press, (1997), pp. 185–185
  74. 84Sebastian Conrad: Deutsche Kolonialgeschichte. second edition, Beck, München 2012, p. 53.
  75. 85Jürgen Zimmerer, Joachim Zeller (ed.): Völkermord in Deutsch-Südwestafrika. Der Kolonialkrieg (1904–1908) in Namibia und seine Folgen. Links, Berlin 2003, .
  76. 86Tilman Dedering: "The German-Herero War of 1904: Revisionism of Genocide or Imaginary Historiography?" Journal of Southern African Studies, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1993, p. 80.
  77. 87Dominik J. Schaller: "'Ich glaube, dass die Nation als solche vernichtet werden muss': Kolonialkrieg und Völkermord in 'Deutsch-Südwestafrika' 1904–1907", Journal of genocide research, Vol. 6, 2004 ,
  78. 88Reinhart Kößler, Henning Melber: "Völkermord und Gedenken. Der Genozid an den Herero und Nama in Deutsch-Südwestafrika 1904–1908". In Irmtrud Wojak, Susanne Meinl (edd.): Völkermord. Genozid und Krieg
  79. 89Lauman, Dennis (2003). "A Historiography of German Togoland, or the Rise and Fall of a "Model Colony". History in Africa. 30: 195–211.
  80. 90Jeremy Sarkin, and Carly Fowler, "Reparations for Historical Human Rights Violations: The International and Historical Dimensions of the Alien Torts Claims Act Genocide Case of the Herero of Namibia."
  81. 91Sarkin, Jeremy, and Carly Fowler. "Reparations for Historical Human Rights Violations: The International and Historical Dimensions of the Alien Torts Claims Act Genocide Case of the Herero of Namibia.
  82. 92Gründer 2004, S. 241.
  83. 93Miller, p. 19.
  84. 94Miller, p. 20
  85. 95Garfield, The Meinertzhagen Mystery, p. 83
  86. 96Miller, p. 23, German East Africa Usambara Railway and Central Railway; Haupt, p. 82, Togoland coast line and Hinterlandbahn; Haupt, p. 66, Kamerun northern and main line; Haupt, p. 56, map of rail li
  87. 97Haupt, p. 74
  88. 98Haupt, p. 129
  89. 99Miller, p. 22
  90. 100Miller, p. 21, school system in German East Africa; Garfield, p. 83, "hundreds of thousands of African children were in school"; Schultz-Naumann, p. 181, school system and Chinese student enrollment i
  91. 101Miller, p. 68, German East Africa, Tanga, shelling of hospital by HMS Fox; Haupt, p. 30, photograph of Dar es Salaam hospital; Schultz-Naumann, p. 183, Qingdao European and Chinese hospital; Schultz-N
  92. 102Lewthwaite, pp. 149–151, in Samoa "German authorities implemented policies to draw locals into the stream of economic life", the colonial government enforced that native cultivable land could not be s
  93. 103Churchill, Llewella P. Samoa 'uma. New York: F&S Publishing Co., 1932, p. 231
  94. 104Miller, p. 21
  95. 105Hans Georg Steltzer: Die Deutschen und ihr Kolonialreich. Societäts-Verlag, Frankfurt am Main 1984, S. 281 f.; Wilfried Westphal: Geschichte der deutschen Kolonien. C. Bertelsmann, München 1984, S. 26
  96. 106Detzner, Hermann, (Oberleut.) "Kamerun Boundary: Die nigerische Grenze von Kamerun zwischen Yola und dem Cross-fluss." M. Teuts. Schutzgeb. 26 (13): 317–338.
  97. 107Louis (1963), p. 178
  98. 108Gann, L. H. & Duignan, Peter. The Rulers of German East Africa, 1884–1914. Palo Alto, California: Stanford University Press. 1977, p. 271
  99. 110Louis (1967), pp. 17, 35.
  100. 111Louis (1967), p. 30.
  101. 112Louis (1967), p. 31.
  102. 113Louis (1967), p. 37.
  103. 114Louis (1967), pp. 16, 36
  104. 115Louis (1967), pp. 102–116
  105. 116Louis (1967), p. 9
  106. 117German South West Africa was the only African colony designated as a Class C mandate, meaning that the indigenous population was judged incapable of even limited self-government and the colony to be a
  107. 118J. A. R. Marriott, Modern England: 1885–1945 (4th ed. 1948) p. 413
  108. 119Australia in effective control, formally together with United Kingdom and New Zealand
  109. 120Louis (1967), pp. 117–130
  110. 122Louis (1967), p. 132
  111. 123Louis (1967), p. 7
  112. 124General J. C. Smuts is often identified as the inventor of the idea of "mandates" Louis (1967), p. 7
  113. 125Louis (1967), p. 6
  114. 126Louis (1967), p. 157
  115. 127Louis (1963), p. 233
  116. 128Louis (1967), p. 159
  117. 129Louis (1967), p. 160
  118. 130Winfried Speitkamp. Deutsche Kolonialgeschichte. Reclam, Stuttgart 2005, p. 156.
  119. 132Joachim Nöhre. Das Selbstverständnis der Weimarer Kolonialbewegung im Spiegel ihrer Zeitschriftenliteratur. LIT, Münster 1998, , p. 12, pp. 51 f.
  120. 133Karsten Linne. Deutschland jenseits des Äquators? Die NS-Kolonialplanungen für Afrika. Ch. Links, Berlin 2008, pp. 23 f.
  121. 134Karsten Linne: Deutschland jenseits des Äquators? – Die NS-Kolonialplanungen für Afrika Ch. Links, Berlin 2008, p. 38.
  122. 135The standard work on this 'Colonial Guilt Myth' was Heinrich Albert Schnee: Die koloniale Schuldlüge. Sachers und Kuschel, Berlin 1924.
  123. 137Norman Rich, Hitler's war aims: The establishment of the new order (WW Norton, 1974) pp 404–405.
  124. 138Gerhard L. Weinberg, The Foreign Policy of Hitler's Germany: Diplomatic Revolution in Europe, 1933–1936 (1970) pp 276–281.
  125. 139Willeke Sandler, Empire in the Heimat: Colonialism and Public Culture in the Third Reich (Oxford UP, 2018) p. 10.
  126. 141Dominik Nagl: Grenzfälle. Staatsangehörigkeit, Rassismus und nationale Identität unter deutscher Kolonialherrschaft, 1884–1914. Frankfurt/Main 2007, pp. 41–46.
  127. 142Ulrike Schaper: Koloniale Verhandlungen. Gerichtsbarkeit, Verwaltung und Herrschaft in Kamerun 1884–1916. Campus, Frankfurt am Main/New York 2012, pp. 44 f.
  128. 143Ulrike Schaper: Koloniale Verhandlungen. Gerichtsbarkeit, Verwaltung und Herrschaft in Kamerun 1884–1916. Campus, Frankfurt am Main/New York 2012, 49 f.
  129. 145BookStrafrecht und Strafrechtspflege in den deutschen Kolonien von 1884 bis 1914 Ein Rechtsvergleich innerhalb der Besitzungen des Kaiserreichs in ÜberseeJulian Steinkröger — Verlag Dr. Kovač — 2019
  130. 146BookStudies in German colonial historyWilliam Otto Henderson — Routledge — 1962
  131. 147Conrad, Sebastian (2012) German Colonialism: A Short History. Cambridge University Press, p. 158
  132. 149Winfried Speitkamp: Deutsche Kolonialgeschichte. Reclam, Stuttgart 2005, S. 44 und 61.
  133. 150Winfried Speitkamp: Deutsche Kolonialgeschichte. Reclam, Stuttgart 2005, S. 44 f. und 61.
  134. 151Dieter Gosewinkel: Einbürgern und ausschließen. Die Nationalisierung der Staatsangehörigkeit vom Deutschen Bund bis zur Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 2003, p. 303.
  135. 152Birthe Kundrus: Moderne Imperialisten. Das Kaiserreich im Spiegel seiner Kolonien. Böhlau, Köln 2003, , pp. 219 ff.
  136. 153Frank Oliver Sobich: „Schwarze Bestien, rote Gefahr". Rassismus und Antisozialismus im deutschen Kaiserreich. Campus, Frankfurt am Main 2006, p. 125 f.
  137. 154Winfried Speitkamp: Deutsche Kolonialgeschichte. Reclam, Stuttgart 2005, pp. 91 f.
  138. 155Horst Gründer: "'Gott will es'. Eine Kreuzzugsbewegung am Ende des 19. Jahrhunderts." Geschichte in Wissenschaft und Unterricht 28 (1977), pp. 218 f.
  139. 156Winfried Speitkamp: Deutsche Kolonialgeschichte. Reclam, Stuttgart 2005, S. 91–97.
  140. 157Spoehr, Florence. (1963) White Falcon. The House of Godeffroy and its Commercial and Scientific Role in the Pacific. Palo Alto, California: Pacific Books, p. 51-101
  141. 158Daniel J. Walther, "Sex, Public Health and Colonial Control: The Campaign Against Venereal Diseases in Germany's Overseas Possessions, 1884–1914." Social history of medicine 26.2 (2013): 182–203.
  142. 159Mamdani, Mahmood. (2001) When Victims Become Killers: Colonialism, Nativism, and the Genocide in Rwanda, Princeton: Princeton University Press, p. 12
  143. 160Cooper, Allan D. (2008) The Geography of Genocide. University Press of America, p. 153
  144. 161Hitler's Black Victims: The Historical Experiences of European Blacks, Africans and African Americans During the Nazi Era (Crosscurrents in African American History) by Clarence Lusane, page 50-51 Rou
  145. 163Erichsen, Casper and David Olusoga (2010) The Kaiser's Holocaust: Germany's Forgotten Genocide and the Colonial Roots of Nazism. Faber and Faber, p. 225
  146. 164Social DarwinismEncyclopædia Britannica
  147. 167Michael Schubert, "The 'German nation' and the 'black Other': social Darwinism and the cultural mission in German colonial discourse," Patterns of Prejudice (2011) 45#5 pp 399–416.
  148. 168Felicity Rash, The Discourse Strategies of Imperialist Writing: The German Colonial Idea and Africa, 1848–1945 (Routledge, 2016).
  149. 169JournalProgress through Racial Extermination: Social Darwinism, Eugenics, and Pacifism in Germany, 1860–1918Richard Weikart — 7 May 2003
  150. 171Germany subsequently tried to turn Europe into its colonial possession by practicing a migrations form of colonialism that was reworked into the ideology of Lebensraum(...) Aime Cesaire pointed out th
  151. 172Helmut Bley, Continuities and German Colonialism: Colonial Experience and Metropolitan Developments Historisches Seminar, Universität Hannover 2004.
  152. 173Volker Langbehn and Mohammad SalamaRace, eds. the Holocaust, and Postwar Germany (Columbia U.P., 2011)
  153. 175Winfried Speitkamp, Deutsche Kolonialgeschichte. Reclam, Stuttgart 2005, p. 173.
  154. 178BookEine Kopfjagt. Deutsche in Ostafrika: Spuren kolonialer HerrschaftMartin Baer et al. — Christoph Links Verlag — 2001
  155. 184Koloniale VerbindungenMartin Doll (Curator) — 2017
  156. 185Koloniale Verbindungen (Ausstellung)Heinrich-Heine-Universität — 2017
  157. 186BookKoloniale Verbindungen. Das Rheinland in Deutschland und das Grasland KamerunsTranscript-Verlag — 2019
  158. 188Robert Gaudi (2017), African Kaiser: General Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck and the Great War in Africa, 1914–1918, Caliber. Pages 416–417.
  159. 189Heinz Höhne & Hermann Zolling (1972), The General was a Spy: The Truth about General Gehlen, 20th-century Superspy who served Hitler, the CIA, and West Germany, Coward, McCann & Geoghegan, New York. P
  160. 192Statistische Angaben zu den deutschen KolonienDeutsches Historisches Museum
  161. 193Michael Pesek: Das Ende eines Kolonialreiches. Campus, Frankfurt a. M./New York 2010, , pp. 86–90.
  162. 195BookThe Origins of the Boxer UprisingJoseph W. Esherick — University of California Press — 18 August 1988
  163. 196BookMiddlemen of the Cameroons Rivers: The Duala and their Hinterland, c. 1600–c.1960Ralph A. Austen et al. — Cambridge University Press — 1999
  164. 197BookAfrica Under Colonial Domination, 1880–1935U of California Press — 1985
  165. 198BookBismarckEdward Crankshaw — The Viking Press — 1981
  166. 199BookSamoa mo Samoa, the Emergence of the Independent State of Western SamoaJ. W. Davidson — Oxford University Press — 1967
  167. 200BookThe Meinertzhagen MysteryBrian Garfield — Potomac Books — 2007
  168. 201BookThe German colonial empire, its beginning and endingPaolo Giordani — G. Bell — 1916
  169. 202BookLife, Land and Agriculture to Mid-Century in Western SamoaGordon R. Lewthwaite — Whitcomb & Tombs Ltd — 1962
  170. 203BookGreat Britain and Germany's Lost Colonies 1914–1919Wm. Roger Louis — Clarendon Press — 1967
  171. 204BookRuanda-Urundi 1884–1919Wm. Roger Louis — Clarendon Press — 1963
  172. 205BookBattle for the Bundu. The First World War in East AfricaCharles Miller — Macmillan — 1974
  173. 206BookHistory of the Flag of the United States of America: With a Chronicle of the Symbols, Standards, Banners, and Flags of Ancient and Modern NationsGeorge Henry Preble — Houghton, Mifflin and Co — 1894
  174. 207JournalThe Ideology of German Colonialism, 1840–1906W. D. Smith — 1974
  175. 208BookThe Devil's Handwriting: Precoloniality and the German Colonial State in Qingdao, Samoa, and Southwest AfricaGeorge Steinmetz — University of Chicago Press — 2007
  176. 209BookGerman Imperialism in Africa: From the Beginnings Until the Second World WarHumanities Press International — 1987
  177. 210BookBismarck, The Man and the StatesmanA.J.P. Taylor — Random House, Inc. — 1967
  178. 211BookDivide and Rule: The Partition of Africa, 1880-1914H.L. Wesseling — Preager — 1996
  179. 212BookDeutschlands Schutzgebiete in Übersee 1884–1918Werner Haupt — Podzun-Pallas Verlag — 1984
  180. 213BookUnter Kaisers Flagge, Deutschlands Schutzgebiete im Pazifik und in China einst und heuteJoachim Schultz-Naumann — Universitas Verlag — 1985
  181. 214BookKoloniale Verhandlungen. Gerichtsbarkeit, Verwaltung und Herrschaft in Kamerun 1884–1916Ulrike Schaper — Campus Verlag — 2012

Queue