Economic history of the United Kingdom
The economic history of the United Kingdom begins not with a single invention or decree, but with a shift so profound it changed how the entire world works. By the 1720s, Britain was one of the most prosperous countries on earth. A few decades later, it would become the first industrialised nation in history. That sequence is worth sitting with: no country had ever done this before. And Britain did it by accident, by circumstance, and by design all at once.
Daniel Defoe captured the mood in the early 18th century when he boasted that Britain was the most diligent nation in the world, with vast trade, rich manufactures, and universal correspondence. He was writing about a nation still running on wool, canals, and handlooms. What came next would make his pride look modest.
From the absorption of Wales after 1535, through the Act of Union with Scotland in 1707, and the turbulent incorporation of Ireland between 1800 and 1922, this story spans centuries and continents. It passes through famines and railway bubbles, slave-trade profits and free-trade ideals, iron furnaces and financial houses. It asks: how does a small island become the workshop of the world? And what happens when the world learns the same tricks?
Woollen cloth was the chief export and the most important employer in England after agriculture, and the golden era of the Wiltshire woollen industry fell during the reign of Henry VIII. By that point England had built an industry around its eleven million sheep, with London and market towns buying raw wool from dealers and sending it out to rural households where family labour washed, carded, and spun it into thread before weaving it on a loom.
Henry VII had already set a diplomatic foundation for this trade by negotiating the favourable Intercursus Magnus treaty in 1496, opening European markets. Export merchants known as Merchant Adventurers carried woollens into the Netherlands and Germany. When Huguenot refugees arrived from France, they brought new textile skills that expanded the industry further.
Government interference proved costly. A new company in the early 17th century persuaded Parliament to transfer the Merchant Adventurers' long-held monopoly to themselves. Arguing that finished cloth was more profitable than unfinished, they pushed through a ban on exporting unfinished cloth. The result was catastrophic: large unsold quantities piled up, prices fell, unemployment rose, and the Dutch retaliated by refusing to import any finished cloth at all. Exports fell by a third. The ban was quickly lifted, but the trade losses proved permanent.
Money itself was scarce during this period. Few coins circulated because precious metals were rare, so most transactions ran on credit. Reciprocal debts were cancelled out at periodic reckonings, with only the net difference settled in cash. Coins formed less than ten per cent of all exchanges. It was the inflow of silver and gold from Spanish and Portuguese colonies in the New World that gradually changed this picture, expanding the money supply and, as Dr. Nuno Palma of the University of Manchester has argued, increasing market participation, reducing transaction costs, and opening new incentives for cash dealings.
Inflation accompanied the new specie, and it hit ordinary families hard. As the gap between rich and poor widened, rural landlords introduced enclosure measures, pushing the agricultural majority through one of the most disruptive transitions of the age.
By the 1720s Britain had organised its commercial ambitions into a system of royally chartered, privately financed trading companies, each holding a monopoly over a defined part of the globe. The Muscovy Company, set up in 1555, was the first. The East India Company and the Hudson's Bay Company in Canada followed. The Company of Royal Adventurers Trading to Africa, established in 1662 to deal in gold, ivory, and enslaved people, was rechartered in 1672 as the Royal African Company and focused on the Atlantic slave trade.
British involvement in each of the four major wars between 1740 and 1783 paid off in trade terms. Even the loss of the Thirteen Colonies in the American War of Independence was offset by a highly favourable trading relationship with the new United States. Exports soared from £6.5 million in 1700 to £14.7 million in 1760 and £43.2 million by 1800.
Not every venture flourished. The South Sea Company was privately conceived to renegotiate high-interest government loans amounting to £31 million through market manipulation. It issued stock four times in 1720, reaching about 8,000 investors. Share prices climbed from £130 to £1,000. When the bubble collapsed overnight, it ruined many speculators. Investigations revealed that bribes had reached into high places, even to the king himself. His chief minister Robert Walpole managed to wind down the crisis with minimal lasting damage, though some of those who lost fortunes fled into exile or took their own lives.
The Navigation Acts, dating from the late 17th century, underpinned the whole mercantilist system by requiring all trade to be carried in English ships manned by English crews. Colonists were required to send produce first to Britain, where the surplus was sold on to other markets. The goal was to run trade surpluses so that gold and silver poured into London, with the government collecting its share through duties while British merchants took the rest.
In the period loosely dated from the 1770s to the 1820s, Britain transformed a largely agrarian economy into the world's first industrial one. The textile industry was the catalyst. John Kay's flying shuttle enabled wider cloth to be woven faster, but it created a demand for yarn that existing spinning could not satisfy. James Hargreaves answered with the Spinning Jenny, a device that could do the work of multiple spinning wheels. Richard Arkwright's water frame went further, powering the process by a water wheel; Arkwright is credited with the widespread introduction of the factory system in Britain and is considered the first successful mill owner and industrialist in British history.
The water frame was eventually supplanted by Samuel Crompton's spinning mule, a hybrid of both earlier machines, later constructed in iron by Messrs. Horrocks of Stockport. Because these mills were water-powered, the first ones were built in rural locations beside streams, with workers' villages growing up around them, such as New Lanark Mills in Scotland.
Steam changed everything about location. Thomas Newcomen invented the first practicable steam engine, used initially for pumping water from mines. James Watt built a far more powerful reciprocating engine capable of driving machinery. The first steam-driven textile mills began appearing in the last quarter of the 18th century, turning the industrial revolution into an urban phenomenon and fuelling the rapid growth of industrial towns. Historian Emma Griffin has placed particular emphasis on the role of the steam engine in the making of Britain's Industrial Revolution.
Coal, iron, and transport formed a mutually reinforcing chain. Steam power drove demand for coal; the demand for machinery and rails drove the iron industry; and the need to move raw materials and finished goods drove the expansion of canals and, after 1830, the railway system. In 1709 Abraham Darby I had established a coke-fired blast furnace to produce cast iron, replacing charcoal. The cheap iron this eventually made possible was one of the factors that made the whole system viable.
Walt Rostow placed the 1790s as the industrial revolution's take-off decade, the point at which the process began feeding on itself and became irreversible. Max Weber traced the deeper cultural roots to the Puritan Ethic of the 17th century, which he believed produced personalities oriented toward innovation and a serious work ethic. Whether or not that particular explanation holds, the institutional conditions were real: property rights were secure, a middle class was prospering, and Parliament had cleared away medieval laws restricting business enterprise.
George Stephenson invented the modern steam locomotive in 1815 and made the decisive step in 1825 by opening the Stockton and Darlington line, integrating all the components of a railway system and demonstrating that a commercially useful network was possible. London poured money into railway building in what became a genuine bubble, though one with permanent productive value.
Thomas Brassey brought British railway engineering to the world. In the 1840s his construction crews employed 75,000 men across Europe. Isambard Kingdom Brunel, who lived from 1806 to 1859, designed the first major railway, the Great Western, built in the 1830s to cover the hundred miles from London to Bristol. Parliament authorised 8,000 miles of railways with a projected future cost of £200 million in the boom years of 1836 and 1845-47, a sum roughly equal to one year of Britain's entire GDP.
The most controversial figure was George Hudson, who became Britain's railway king by merging numerous short lines. With no government agency overseeing the railways, Hudson created the Railway Clearing House, a standardised system for transferring freight and passengers between companies and loaning out freight cars. By 1849 he controlled nearly thirty per cent of Britain's trackage. But he had concealed the true financial picture by paying large dividends out of capital rather than profits, and when his system collapsed the railway bubble of the late 1840s burst with it.
By 1850 Britain still had a well-integrated, fast, and inexpensive rail network reaching most cities and many rural districts. Freight rates for coal dropped to a penny a ton mile. By 1880 there were 13,500 locomotives, each carrying an average of 97,800 passengers a year or 31,500 tons of freight.
In the later decades of the 19th century, the industrialist began to yield ground to the financier. By the 1870s, financial houses in London had achieved an unprecedented level of control over industry. Electricity and chemical industries grew, though Britain lagged behind the United States and Germany in both. The severe Long Depression from 1873 to 1896 brought lengthy periods of falling profit rates and price deflation across practically every industry, and it pushed British capital increasingly toward financial services and overseas investment.
The repeal of the Corn Laws in 1846 was the pivot point of British economic policy in the 19th century. Those laws had imposed stiff tariffs on imported grain, keeping food artificially expensive. Sir Robert Peel, the Tory Prime Minister, defied his own party's landed interests to force the repeal through, partly because the potato blight devastating Ireland and parts of the Scottish Highlands made the case impossible to ignore. Relief funding for the Irish famine was dramatically cut in 1847 due to a financial crisis that year.
In Great Britain itself, agriculture initially weathered the change better than landowners had feared. But by the 1870s, global grain prices began to fall sharply as the Midwestern United States and the interior of Canada opened up to mechanised cultivation. Combined with lower global shipping costs, the average price of a quarter of grain dropped from 56 shillings in the years 1867-71 to 27 shillings and 3 pence per quarter in 1894-98.
Wheat-producing areas like East Anglia were especially hard hit. Wheat cultivation fell from 13 per cent of agricultural output in 1870 to just 4 per cent in 1900. Rents fell by around 26 per cent between the mid-1870s and mid-1890s, and the amount of land under cultivation shrank by about 19 per cent over the same period. Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli rebuffed calls to reintroduce the Corn Laws, arguing that protectionism would endanger British manufacturing.
The decline in agricultural profitability eroded the wealth base of the British aristocracy. Between 1809 and 1879-88 per cent of British millionaires were defined as landowners; by the years 1880-1914 that proportion had fallen to 33 per cent, as a new class of wealthy figures emerged from industry and finance. The male agricultural workforce shrank by 40 per cent between 1861 and 1901, while agriculture's share of national wealth fell from 20.3 per cent in 1851 to 6.4 per cent by 1901.
By 1913 about 50 per cent of capital investment throughout the world had been raised in London, making Britain the largest exporter of capital by a wide margin. Between 1900 and 1913 total British investment abroad doubled, rising from £2 billion to £4 billion. In 1911 alone, income from overseas investments amounted to £188 million, with income from services like insurance, shipping, and banking adding another £152 million.
British overseas investment was especially prominent in Latin America, where independent nations eagerly sought infrastructure. British contracting firms built railways and ports, and British merchants dominated international trade across the region. Not every investment paid off. Many British investors suffered substantial losses in bankrupt American railway companies, and some mining ventures in Sudan also proved unprofitable.
Foreign trade tripled in volume between 1870 and 1914, but Britain's share of that growing total was shrinking. In 1880-23 per cent of world trade was British-owned; by 1910 that figure was 17 per cent. By 1913 British and German exports each totalled $2.3 billion, while American exports exceeded $2.4 billion. In 1880 Britain had purchased roughly half the world's traded tea, coffee, and wheat, and just under half of global meat exports, while British shipyards were constructing about four-fifths of the world's new vessels in the 1890s.
In 1870 Britain's output per head was the second highest in the world, exceeded only by Australia. By 1914, British income per capita had slipped to third, behind New Zealand and Australia. By 1950 British output per head was still 30 per cent above the average of the six founder members of what would become the EEC, but within 20 years it had been overtaken by the majority of Western European economies. Britain entered the European Community in 1973, and the country's relative economic performance improved substantially in the decades that followed, to the point that, just before the Great Recession, British income per capita marginally exceeded that of both France and Germany.
Common questions
What caused the Industrial Revolution to begin in Britain rather than elsewhere?
Several conditions combined in Britain that existed nowhere else at the time. Secure property rights established after the revolutions of 1640 and 1688, a prosperous middle class, coal reserves, and a culture of private enterprise all contributed. Changes in marriage patterns meant people married later, allowing them to accumulate more education and skills. Religious nonconformity also increased literacy and spread a strong work ethic among skilled artisans.
When did Britain repeal the Corn Laws and why did it matter?
Parliament repealed the Corn Laws in 1846, with the abolition completed in phases through 1849. The laws had imposed stiff tariffs on imported grain, keeping food prices artificially high. Their removal opened the British market to foreign grain, lowering food costs for consumers, though it ultimately contributed to a long agricultural depression in Britain by the late 1870s as cheap grain flooded in from North America.
What was the South Sea Bubble and when did it collapse?
The South Sea Bubble was a financial scandal centred on the South Sea Company, which issued stock four times in 1720, attracting around 8,000 investors. Share prices rose from £130 to £1,000 before the bubble collapsed overnight, ruining many speculators. Investigations revealed bribery that reached to the highest levels of government, including the king's circle. Chief minister Robert Walpole managed to contain the political and economic fallout.
Who was George Hudson and what role did he play in British railways?
George Hudson became known as Britain's railway king by merging numerous short rail lines in the 19th century. By 1849 he controlled nearly 30 per cent of Britain's railway trackage. He created the Railway Clearing House, which standardised the transfer of freight and passengers between competing companies. His system eventually collapsed when it emerged he had been paying large dividends out of capital rather than profits, contributing to the railway bubble burst of the late 1840s.
How dominant was Britain as a financial centre in the early 20th century?
By 1913 approximately 50 per cent of capital investment throughout the world had been raised in London, making Britain the largest exporter of capital globally. Total British investment abroad doubled between 1900 and 1913, rising from £2 billion to £4 billion. In 1911 income from overseas investments alone reached £188 million, with financial services including insurance, shipping, and banking adding a further £152 million.
What happened to Britain's share of world trade between 1870 and 1914?
Although the total volume of British foreign trade tripled between 1870 and 1914, Britain's proportional share of global trade fell. In 1880-23 per cent of world trade was British-owned; by 1910 that share had dropped to 17 per cent. By 1913 British exports were roughly equal to Germany's at $2.3 billion each, with the United States edging ahead at $2.4 billion, though Britain remained the world's largest trading nation by total import and export combined.
All sources
182 references cited across the entry
- 3BookA History of the Global Economy. From 1500 to the Present.Baten, Jörg — Cambridge University Press — 2016
- 4A Brief History of How London Evolved into The World's Financial CapitalPat Harding — 10 November 2017
- 5BookBritain's Relative Economic Performance, 1870–1999Nicholas Crafts — Institute of Economic Affairs — 1966
- 9BookThe Economy of Obligation: The Culture of Credit and Social Relations in Early Modern EnglandCraig Muldrew — Palgrave Macmillan UK — January 1998
- 11Les Arméniens dans le commerce asiatique au début de l'ère moderneVahan Baibourtian — Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l'homme — 2018-11-08
- 14Poverty in Tudor TimesSpartacus-Educational.com
- 17BookSeeds of Liberty: The Genesis of the American MindMax Savelle — Kessinger — 1948
- 18BookThe American Revolution vol 1George Otto Trevelyan — 1899
- 20BookA Short History of the Industrial Revolution.Griffin, Emma — Macmillan Education — 2018
- 22JournalThe Importance of Slavery and the Slave Trade to Industrializing BritainDavid Eltis et al. — 2000
- 24JournalForging Ahead and Falling behind: The Rise and Relative Decline of the First Industrial NationNicholas Crafts — Spring 1998
- 26BookWorld Economic Outlook, May 1997: Globalization: Opportunities and ChallengesInternational Monetary Fund Research Dept. — International Monetary Fund — 1997
- 27Income tax abolished and reintroducedParliament of the United Kingdom
- 28BookThe Decline and Fall of the British EmpireLawrence James — 1994
- 30JournalBritish Policy, Trade, and Informal Empire in the Mid-19th CenturyMartin Lynn — 1999
- 31BookThe Great Depression of English Agriculture 1873–1896Fletcher, T.W. — British Agriculture 1875–1914 — 1973
- 32BookEngland: 1870–1914R.C.K. Ensor — Clarendon Press — 1936
- 33BookEngland: 1870–1914R.C.K. Ensor — Clarendon Press — 1936
- 34BookReshaping Rural England. A Social History 1850–1925Alun Howkins — Harper Collins Academic — 1991
- 35BookThe Decline and Fall of the British AristocracyDavid Cannadine — Yale University Press — 1990
- 36BookUrban workers in the early Industrial RevolutionRobert Glen — Croom Helm — 1984
- 37NewsSocial unrest in Britain 1815-1820A.D. Innes — britainexpress.com
- 38BookThe Pursuit of Power: Europe 1815–1914Richard J. Evans
- 40BookThe Peterloo MassacreJoyce Marlow — 1969
- 41BookThe Great Famine in Ireland and Britain's financial crisisCharles Read — The Boydell Press — 2022
- 42NewsThe British Economy Between the WarsBarry Eichengreen — eml.berkeley.edu — 2002
- 43BookUnfinished Empire: The Global Expansion of BritainJohn Darwin — Bloomsbury Books — 2012
- 44BookThe Age of Empire: 1875–1914Eric Hobsbawm — Vintage Books — 1989
- 45Shipbuilding in Britain in the 19th centuryportcities.org.uk
- 50BookUnfinished Empire: The Global Expansion of BritainJohn Darwin — 2012
- 51BookThe Oxford History of BritainKenneth O. Morgan — Oxford University Press — 2004
- 56JournalEmpire: How Colonial India Made Modern BritainAditya Mukherjee — 2010
- 57BookEssays in Indian HistoryIrfan Habib — Tulika Press — 1995
- 58BookThe Games Ethic and Imperialism: Aspects of the Diffusion of an IdealJ.A. Mangan — Routledge — 2013
- 60NewsFree Trade and Britain's Economic Decline: What Can America Learn?Spencer P. Morrison — nationaleconomicseditorial.com — 7 March 2017
- 61NewsThe Workshop of the WorldPat Hudson — BBC — 29 March 2011
- 62JournalThe Great Depression in Britain, 1873–1896: A ReappraisalA.E. Musson — June 1959
- 63NewsLessons from the 'Long Depression'Steve Davies — Institute of Economic Affairs — 3 January 2012
- 64Maddison Project Database 2018rug.nl — 10 November 2017
- 65BookThe Age of Empire (1875–1914)Eric Hobsbawm — Vintage Books — 1989
- 66BookThe Oxford Illustrated History of BritainKenneth O. Morgan — Oxford University Press — 2009
- 67The Liverpool General Transport Strike of 1911Ron Noon & Sam Davies — londonsocialisthistorians.blogspot.org — 9 October 2011
- 68BookA History of Britain: Liberal England World War and Slump 1901–1939Carter & Mears — 2011
- 69Trade Board Act 1909Schoolshistory.org.uk
- 70BookEconomic Development of the British Coal Industry, 1800–1914Brian R. Mitchell — CUP Archive — 1984
- 71NewsThe Tariff Reform Movement in Great Britain, 1895–1914Neil Alexander Swainson — University of British Columbia — 1952
- 72BookA History of Britain: Liberal England World War and Slump (1901–1939)Carter & Mears — 2011
- 73BookWar of Attrition: Fighting the First World WarWilliam Philpott — 2014
- 76BookThe Decline and Fall of the British AristocracyDavid Cannadine — Yale University Press — 1990
- 77Taxation during the First World WarParliament of the United Kingdom
- 78JournalSectional President's Address: INDIA IN THE WORLD ECONOMY 1900 TO 1935: THE INTER-WAR DEPRESSION AND BRITAin's DEMISE AS WORLD CAPITALIST LEADERUtsa Patnaik — 2013
- 79BookCapitalism in IndiaA I Levkovsky — PPH — 1966
- 80BookThe Last Great War: British Society and the First World WarAdrian Gregory — Cambridge U.P. — 2008
- 81BookBritain, America and the war debt controversy: the economic diplomacy of an unspecial relationship, 1917–1941Robert C. Self — Psychology Press — 2006
- 82BookA History of Britain: Liberal England, World War and SlumpCarter & Mears — 2011
- 84News1931:The spectre of mass unemployment haunts the UKResearch Department — 24 May 2011
- 85A History of Unemployment14 March 2021
- 87BookA History of Britain: Liberal England, World War and Slump 1901–1939Edward Henry Carter
- 88NewsWomen, Other Fresh Workers, and the New Manufacturing Workforce of Interwar BritainInternational Review of Social History — 2000
- 91BookThe economics of World War II: Six great powers in international comparisonStephen Broadberry et al. — Cambridge University Press — 1998
- 92BookThe Rise and Fall of the British EmpireLawrence James — 1994
- 93NewsWhat's a Little Debt Between Friends?Finlo Rohrer — BBC News Magazine — 10 May 2006
- 94BookPostwar: A History of Europe Since 1945Tony Judt — Penguin Press — 2005
- 95The Wasting of Britain's Marshall AidCorrelli Barnett — BBC History
- 96News1959: Macmillan wins Tory hat trickBBC News — 5 April 2005
- 100BookOxford Illustrated History of BritainKenneth O. Morgan — Oxford University Press — 2009
- 101NewsProgramming redevelopment after World War IIParliament of the United Kingdom
- 104Journal'The Age of Affluence': Council Estates and Consumer SocietyMatthew Hollow — 2011
- 106NewsWas Suez in 1956 the First Financial Crisis of the Twenty-First Century?James M. Boughton — Finance & Development — September 2001
- 108JournalDe-industrialization Not Decline: A New Meta-narrative for Post-war British HistoryJim Tomlinson — 12 October 2015
- 109BookWar in Human CivilizationAzar Gat — Oxford University Press — 2008
- 110BookModern Britain Since 1906: A ReaderKeith Laybourn — I.B.Tauris — 1999
- 112NewsBritish Aluminum Debut Faces World GlutJohn M. Lee — 29 May 1971
- 113JournalFrom coal to Ukip: the struggle over identity in post-industrial DoncasterCathrine Thorleifsson — Taylor & Francis — 2016
- 114JournalFrom coal to Ukip: the struggle over identity in post-industrial DoncasterTim Strangleman et al. — Cambridge Journals — Fall 2013
- 115JournalBrexit: understanding the socio-economic origins and consequences (discussion forum)Jacqueline O'Reilly — Oxford Journals — October 2016
- 118Journal'The wounds of class': a historiographical reflection on the study of deindustrialization, 1973–2013Steven High — November 2013
- 119JournalFrom coal to Ukip: the struggle over identity in post-industrial DoncasterCathrine Thorleifsson — 2016
- 122Heath on the failed negotiations1963-02-05
- 123NewsWhatever happened to full employment?BBC News — 13 October 2011
- 124News1982: UK unemployment tops three millionBBC News — 26 January 1982
- 126BookThe Age of ExtremesEric Hobsbawm — Abacus — 1994
- 127THE CAMPAIGN GUIDE1987
- 128BookUK Economic Decline: 'Myth' or Reality?David Kern
- 129Economics Essays: Unemployment in the UKTejvan Pettinger
- 130News1992: Tories win again against oddsBBC News — 5 April 2005
- 131News1993: Recession over – it's officialBBC News — 26 April 1993
- 132Economics Essays: Economic Record of Gordon Brown.Tejvan Pettinger
- 133NewsThe trade unions' long declineSteve Schifferes — BBC News — 8 March 2004
- 134United Kingdom: Industrial relations profile15 April 2013
- 136NewsUK in recession as economy slidesBBC News — 23 January 2009
- 139NewsBank to pump £75bn into economyBBC News — 5 March 2009
- 140NewsECB, Bank of England cut rates to record lowsCNN — 5 March 2009
- 141NewsQ & A: What is 'quantitative easing'?CNN — 5 March 2009
- 142NewsBank 'prints' £75bn and cuts interest rates in halfGary Duncan — 5 March 2009
- 143NewsEconomic growth revised upwardsBBC News — 30 March 2010
- 149NewsLabour market statistics, January 2010Office for National Statistics — 20 January 2010
- 152NewsUK economy comes to a standstillBBC News — 22 August 2008
- 153NewsUK is the only major economy to face recession this year, OECD warnsEdmund Conway — 2 September 2008
- 154NewsGordon Brown policies 'piling up budget deficit'Edmund Conway — 7 September 2008
- 160NewsMoody's hails UK austerity effortBBC News — 20 September 2010
- 161NewsUK economy in double-dip recessionBBC News — 25 April 2012
- 162NewsThe Productivity Problem13 August 2012
- 163NewsUK economy tracker: GDPBBC News — 29 April 2012
- 164NewsIMF raises UK economic growth forecastBBC News — 21 January 2014
- 165NewsUK inflation falls to 1.6% in MarchBBC News — 15 April 2014
- 166NewsU.K. Unemployment Lowest Since 2009 Amid Record Job CreationBloomberg News — 14 May 2014
- 167NewsUK employment hits all-time high17 October 2012
- 168NewsUK deficit falls to lowest level since start of financial crisis23 April 2014
- 170NewsONS: After six years, wage rises match inflationBBC News — 16 April 2014
- 171BookThe Conservative Party Manifesto 2015Conservative Party
- 172Cameron says no second EU referendum if result is close17 May 2016
- 173NewsHow will the Brexit transition period work?Asa Bennett — 27 January 2020
- 174NewsBrexit: What is the transition period?Tom Edgington — BBC News — 31 January 2020
- 175NewsQuestions and Answers on the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union on 31 January 2020European Commission — 24 January 2020
- 179Johnson's Brexit Deal Clears Parliament With Only Hours to SpareBloomberg News — 30 December 2020
- 180Brexit: What is in Boris Johnson's new deal with the EU?BBC News — 21 October 2019
- 181How Boris Johnson moved to break the Brexit deadlockGeorge Parker et al. — 11 October 2019
- 182Impact of Covid-19 and Brexit for the UK economy TUC18 December 2020
- 183NewsFTSE 100 Live: UK Stocks Rise Bucking European Tariff SelloffJuly 14, 2025
- 185BookThe Industrial Revolution a CompendiumP. L. Payne — Macmillan Education UK — 1988