David (Michelangelo)
Michelangelo's David, a marble figure finished in 1504, began as a block of stone that sat neglected in a Florence cathedral yard for decades. A 1500 inventory of the cathedral workshops described it bluntly as "a certain figure of marble called David, badly blocked out and supine." Two respected sculptors had already tried and abandoned the block before Michelangelo, then 26, convinced the cathedral's overseers to hand him the job in 1501.
The finished statue stood 5.17 metres tall, the first colossal marble sculpture since antiquity and the first on such a scale in the High Renaissance. Rather than crowning the cathedral roofline as originally planned, it was unveiled in the Piazza della Signoria, Florence's civic square, on the 8th of September 1504. It remained there until 1873, when it moved indoors to the Galleria dell'Accademia, and a replica took its outdoor place in 1910.
The biblical hero David had long been a favourite subject in Florentine art. This particular statue came to represent the civil liberties promised by the city's 1494 constitution, guarding a republic threatened by rival states and Medici ambitions. What forces, then, shaped a statue that survived two failed sculptors, harsh open-air weathering, and more than one act of violence against its marble?
In 1410, Donatello completed the first of twelve planned prophet statues meant for the cathedral's roofline. It was a colossal terracotta figure of Joshua, gessoed and painted white to resemble marble from a distance. The Operai del Duomo, a twelve-member committee drawn mostly from the wool merchants' guild, ran the cathedral works and had ordered the whole series.
By 1463, according to scholar Charles Seymour Jr, Donatello's protégé Agostino di Duccio had been commissioned to carve a terracotta Hercules for the series, likely under Donatello's own supervision, though historian Paoletti suggests the word "hercules" may simply have meant a "giant" figure rather than one specific subject. A year later, the Operai contracted Agostino again, this time for a marble David, and in 1465 he brought back an enormous block of bianco ordinario stone from the Fantiscritti quarry near Carrara. He shaped the torso, legs, and feet, roughed out drapery, and possibly hollowed a gap between the legs. His work stopped in 1466, the year his master Donatello died.
Antonio Rossellino took over the commission in 1476, but his contract was cancelled soon after. The block then sat exposed to the weather in the cathedral yard for twenty-five years. By 1501, the Operai were determined to finally finish what they called il gigante, the giant. Leonardo da Vinci was consulted, and Andrea Sansovino also wanted the commission, but it was Michelangelo, then 26, who persuaded the Operai to choose him.
On the 16th of August 1501, Michelangelo signed a contract describing the block as nine braccia tall and badly blocked out by Agostino. It was still sitting in the cathedral workshops. The contract gave him a two-year deadline, a workspace behind the Duomo, and a salary of six florins a month. It named him precisely: Michelangelo, son of Lodovico Buonarrotti, citizen of Florence, now responsible for a giant that had already defeated two sculptors before him.
Nine days before he made his first real cut, on the 9th of September 1501, Michelangelo chiselled a knot of marble from the giant's chest. A note in the margin of his contract records the moment, describing it as removed with "one or two blows" of the chisel. Historian Irving Lavin suggests this knot may not have been leftover drapery, as many assumed, but a reference point Agostino di Duccio had left for measuring his own unfinished figure, possibly marking an error in his method.
Michelangelo believed a single block of marble already held every sculpture that could be carved from it, and that his task was simply freeing the ideal form trapped inside. In later years he described his early marble commissions the same way, saying he could already see the figures in his mind before he began. The idea reflected his Neo-Platonic belief that body and mind, though separate, must strive together toward union with each other and with the divine.
Giorgio Vasari described Michelangelo's method for carving the Prisoners: chiselling the parts in highest relief first, then slowly revealing what lay beneath. Scholar Franca Falletti argues this passage describes Michelangelo's general approach to marble, not just that one project. Before touching stone, he worked through sketches, drawings, and small models in terracotta or wax. He then carved directly into the block using Vasari's layered method, working the main face first before turning to the sides.
The block itself measured nine braccia in length and was cut from bianco ordinario, a lesser grade of stone than the prized statuario marble. It had travelled from the Fantiscritti quarry by oxen cart to the sea, then by barge up the river Arno to Florence. The Operai had already raised it upright before Michelangelo's first inspection, and workers built scaffolding so he could reach every side of it.
Michelangelo forged his own steel chisels and began with the subbia, a heavy, pointed iron tool for roughing out the statue's basic mass. He moved next to the calcagnuolo, a shorter, two-toothed blade. Then came the gradina, a three-toothed claw chisel whose marks show up throughout his unfinished works. For David's hair and the pupils of his eyes, Michelangelo used the trapano, a bow-driven drill, the same tool ancient sculptors had relied on.
During a 2003 restoration, researchers examined the statue's surface closely. They found marks from the subbia, the sharper subbia da taglio, and the flattened unghietto, or "fingernail" chisel. Marks from the gradina and a finer tool called the dente di cane, or dog's tooth, also appeared. They found no trace anywhere of a flat chisel, the standard tool most sculptors of his time relied on.
On the 25th of January 1504, with the sculpture nearing completion, Florentine officials faced an unavoidable problem. No one could hoist a statue weighing roughly 8.5 tons onto the cathedral roof. They convened a committee of 30 citizens, including Leonardo da Vinci and Sandro Botticelli, to weigh nine possible locations.
One faction, led by Giuliano da Sangallo and backed by Leonardo and Piero di Cosimo, wanted the statue placed under the roof of the Loggia dei Lanzi, worried that imperfections in the marble made outdoor exposure risky. A second faction favoured the entrance of the Palazzo della Signoria, the city's town hall, now called the Palazzo Vecchio. Botticelli and Cosimo Rosselli offered a third opinion, suggesting the statue stand in front of the cathedral instead.
In June 1504, David took its place beside the Palazzo della Signoria's entrance, replacing Donatello's bronze Judith and Holofernes, a work that had carried its own theme of heroic resistance. As diarists Luca Landucci and Pietro di Marco Parenti recorded, the four-day journey there required an armed guard. Rival artists, angered by Michelangelo's earlier bold appeal to the cathedral's wardens and to the city's governor, Piero Soderini, had turned hostile toward him. The precaution did not fully work: thrown stones struck the marble, leaving marks still visible on the statue's upper back. The Otto di Guardia, Florence's police magistracy, arrested four young men from prominent families. Three were imprisoned, though the attack may have been simple vandalism rather than a political act.
Once the statue stood in place, the Operai ordered architects Simone del Pollaiolo and Antonio da Sangallo the Elder, on the 11th of June 1504, to build a marble base around its feet. Because the David was already positioned, the pedestal was built as a sheath around a core rather than a single supporting block. Historian Kathleen Weil-Garris Brandt credits the architects on paper but argues the design was more likely Michelangelo's own idea, and calls it the earliest surviving Renaissance use of an antique architectural socle to support a sculptural giant. After the David, she notes, pedestals stopped being a decorative afterthought and became a permanent part of the sculpture itself.
Historian Alison Wright, drawing on the work of Richard Trexler, called the piazza's display of freestanding sculpture the greatest public forum of its kind in Renaissance Italy, a stage now framed for the first time by a base built specifically for the artwork it carried.
Donatello and Verrocchio had both cast bronze versions of David standing victorious over Goliath's severed head. Painter Andrea del Castagno showed him mid-swing, with the giant's head already resting between his legs. Michelangelo broke from all of them: no earlier Florentine artist had left Goliath out of the scene entirely. Scholars such as Howard Hibbard read this David as a figure caught before the fight, sizing up his opponent rather than celebrating a kill already made.
His brow is drawn, his neck tense, and the veins bulge along his lowered right hand. His left hand grips a sling that drapes over his shoulder and down to the right hand, which holds the sling's handle. The statue's weight rests almost entirely on its right foot, the left leg stepping forward in the twisting pose called contrapposto, which gives the torso a slight S-curve and a sense that the figure is about to move.
Renaissance sculptors treated contrapposto as a hallmark of antique art, a pose first fully realised in the Doryphoros of Polykleitos around 440 BC. In the David, the stance is sharpened further by the raised left arm, its hand near the shoulder, set against the lowered right hand resting near the thigh.
Giorgio Vasari called the statue's completion "certainly a miracle that Michelangelo was able to raise up one who had died." After listing the largest and most admired statues of the ancient world that he had personally seen, Vasari concluded that Michelangelo's work surpassed "all ancient and modern statues, whether Greek or Latin, that have ever existed."
The figure's head and right hand are noticeably larger than classical proportion would allow, a mismatch historians link to the statue's originally intended elevated vantage point. The genitals, by contrast, are small, matching both Renaissance convention and the proportions found throughout the rest of Michelangelo's work. The statue is also unusually slender from front to back for its height, likely a result of the shaping earlier sculptors had already carved into the block.
A convincingly naturalistic nude carries an inherent erotic charge, and Vasari acknowledged as much when he praised the figure's "very divine flanks." Modern scholar Antonio Forcellino called the statue's genitals "the most disquieting genitals of Renaissance sculpture," describing how a small, adolescent bulge frames a tuft of pubic hair that, in his words, "supports a penis full of energy and displays the testicles, also full of vigour."
Commentators have also pointed out that David is uncircumcised, despite the Jewish law the biblical figure would have followed. The choice matches Renaissance convention elsewhere, where even the Christ Child, clearly older than the eight days required by Jewish scripture, is typically shown the same way.
Donatello had already cast a bronze David around 1440 for Cosimo de' Medici. In 1494, when Florence expelled the Medici family, the Signoria seized that statue and placed it in the Palazzo della Signoria's courtyard as a symbol of republican rule. Historian Levine argues that placing Michelangelo's David in roughly the same location made it politically charged even before Michelangelo picked up a chisel, an artistic answer to Donatello's earlier work. The commission, staffed by the city's leading artists, weighed the statue's aria, moda, and qualità, its aura, style, and excellence, in choosing where it should stand.
In 1527, an anti-Medici riot broke the statue's left arm into three pieces. Giorgio Vasari later claimed that he and his friend Francesco Silviati, still just boys at the time, braved the violence to rescue the broken fragments, hiding them in Silviati's father's house.
Niccolò Machiavelli wrote of a long Florentine tradition that pictured David as defender of the patria, a theme worked out most fully across the sequence of statues running from Donatello's version to Michelangelo's. Having handed back the armour King Saul had lent him and choosing instead his own sling and knife, David stood for the citizen soldier, a Florentine able to defend his city with homegrown weapons rather than hired ones.
Rather than placing Goliath's severed head at David's feet, Michelangelo carved a tree stump against the back of the right leg, a support device ancient sculptors had used for the same practical reason. A contemporary document called this stump the broncone, the same word used for Lorenzo de' Medici's personal emblem, a dead laurel branch sprouting fresh green growth. Soon after installation, workers gilded the stump and the sling's strap, wound a vine of copper leaves around the groin to cover the genitals, and added a gilt bronze laurel wreath, ornaments that have all since vanished.
Machiavelli also penned a satirical text imagining a pleasure-obsessed society where rule-breakers faced punishments even more indulgent than their crimes. Women found guilty, in his telling, were sentenced to study the David closely "with eyeglasses," which the text calls "a notable product of the city."
In 1525, the marble block meant to become David's pendant slipped off a barge and sank into the Arno while being hauled toward Florence. Vasari claimed the stone had all but leapt into the river out of despair, on hearing that Baccio Bandinelli, not Michelangelo, would carve it into the planned Hercules and Cacus for the Palazzo della Signoria's entrance.
By the mid-1800s, officials noticed small cracks forming on the statue's left leg, likely caused by the ground beneath its weight settling unevenly. A cleaning had already taken place around 1746, and in 1813 sculptor Stefano Ricci coated the marble with a protective layer of beeswax-based encaustic, possibly mixed with linseed oil. In 1842, sculptor Lorenzo Bartolini urged a full conservation effort and recommended moving the statue to the Loggia della Signoria for its protection. The following year, sculptor Aristodemo Costoli instead scrubbed the surface with a 50 percent hydrochloric acid solution, stripping the old coating but leaving the marble pitted and porous, doing more damage than four centuries of open-air weathering ever had.
The actual crossing of the city took place inside a secured, wheeled wooden crate, over eleven days from the 30th of July to the 10th of August 1873. Its sixteenth-century base, already reported as decrepit, was lost when workers dismantled the crate afterward; a model of that crate now sits in the Museo di Casa Buonarroti, Michelangelo's former house museum on Florence's Via Ghibellina. The statue did not reach its permanent setting until 1882, when architect Emilio De Fabris designed a vaulted tribune for the Accademia, positioning it so daylight streamed onto the marble from windows in the dome above.
During the Second World War, workers packed David in sand and sealed it inside a brick enclosure, alongside Michelangelo's other Accademia sculptures, to protect it from bombing.
In 1991, an unemployed Italian man named Piero Cannata pulled a hammer from under his jacket and struck the statue's left foot, breaking the tip of its second toe. Police described Cannata as deranged; he later claimed a sixteenth-century Venetian painter's model had ordered him to do it. Museum patrons restrained him before police arrived, and guards caught three tourists trying to leave with broken fragments hidden in their pockets. Scientists later studied the recovered fragments using spectroscopic, isotopic, and petrographic analysis, confirming the marble came from the Fantiscritti quarries in Miseglia, one of Carrara's three small valleys, and that it consists entirely of the mineral calcite.
Because the marble's surface kept degrading, restorers gave David its first major cleaning since 1843 on the eve of the sculpture's five-hundredth anniversary in 2004. A scientific committee, drawn from the Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche and the government's Opificio delle Pietre Dure restoration institute, recommended cleaning the statue with poultices soaked in distilled water. Restorer Agnese Parronchi, chosen by museums superintendent Antonio Paolucci, examined hundreds of photographs and ran her own tests, then opposed that plan, fearing further damage, and insisted on a dry method using soft brushes and motorized erasers. When Paolucci demanded she use the wet poultice method instead, Parronchi refused and resigned. Restorer Cinzia Parnigoni then completed the job under the direction of Franca Falletti, the Accademia Gallery's director.
Researchers at the University of Siena separately examined the millimetre-sized cavities scattered across the statue's surface, which local quarrymen call tarme or, when smaller, taròli. Their study concluded the pits came from the mineral structure of Apuan Alps marble itself, not from decay, though many show milky white or grey halos left by centuries of exposure to the atmosphere and to past restoration treatments. As of 2024, crews still erect temporary scaffolding around the statue every two months, spending half a day clearing dust and spider webs with soft-bristled brushes and a bristle-tipped vacuum cleaner.
Since 2000, conservators have also tracked the statue using high-resolution 3D scanning, photogrammetry, finite element modelling, and fibre-optic sensors that watch for cracks in real time. These studies found that the statue's centre of gravity does not align with its base in its current upright position, though the modelling suggests it remains stable. A forward lean of one to three degrees has driven much of the cracking seen in its ankles. In 2006, researchers Borri and Grazini traced that lean to uneven subsidence and rotation of the statue's foundation, likely triggered by a flood that struck Florence in 1844.
Extra strain came in 1847, when sculptor Clemente Papi built a plaster mould from more than 1,500 separate segments, some weighing as much as 680 kilograms, adding considerable weight to the statue; the resulting lean was later corrected once the statue moved indoors. Ultrasonic tests carried out by Pascale and Lolli in 2014 identified the worst cracks in the broncone, the tree stump behind the right leg, and around the left ankle and heel. Roughly one and a half million tourists, about 4,000 a day, visit the Accademia each year to see the statue, raising concern that foot-traffic vibration could stress its weakened legs. In 2015, researcher Pieraccini and colleagues measured the statue's movement using interferometric radar on two consecutive days, a Monday when the gallery was closed and the following Tuesday, its statistically busiest day, and found no meaningful difference in vibration between the two.
In 2010, the municipality of Florence, citing a legal review of historical documents, claimed ownership of the David. The Italian Culture Ministry disputed that claim, and the disagreement has not been resolved.
On the 29th of August 1846, Leopold II, Grand Duke of Tuscany, commissioned Clemente Papi, a former student of Stefano Ricci, to cast a plaster mould of the David. Papi, an experienced bronze caster, began the work in the summer of 1847, likely using wax rather than oil or fat to release the mould, a gentler method than the encaustic Ricci had applied in 1813. Gypsum residue from that plaster mould still lingers in hard-to-reach spots on the statue, such as between the toes.
Papi produced two plaster replicas from his moulds. In 1857, Leopold II gave one of them to Queen Victoria as a diplomatic gesture, meant to smooth over his earlier refusal to lend a Domenico Ghirlandaio painting to London. Victoria, apparently caught off guard by the gift, passed it to the newly opened South Kensington Museum, now the Victoria and Albert Museum, where a detachable plaster fig leaf, made after her reported shock at the statue's nudity, still hangs nearby, ready to be hooked into place before royal visits.
A Tuscan government decree issued on the 2nd of October 1858 ordered a full bronze cast of the statue, which Papi completed in August 1866 and sent to the 1867 Paris Exposition the following year. That bronze cast was raised on the Piazzale Michelangelo in 1875 to mark the four-hundredth anniversary of Michelangelo's birth. Papi's other plaster copy went to the Accademia di Belle Arti's Gipsoteca in Florence, where it has served as the template for every cast made since.
On the 12th of November 2010, a fibreglass replica sat for a week atop a buttress on the cathedral's north tribune, finally letting photographers capture the view the Operai had originally intended for the statue. Later copies, made in plaster and simulated marble, have turned up in beach resorts, gambling casinos, and model railroads, chasing a borrowed air of culture in unlikely settings.
In 1966, a version called "Leather David" dressed the giant in leather and became a talking point in San Francisco, the furthest any reproduction had strayed from the marble original standing in the Accademia.
Up Next
Common questions
When did Michelangelo receive the official contract to create the David statue?
Michelangelo received the official contract on the 16th of August 1501. The agreement allowed him two years to complete the sculpture and provided a monthly salary of six fiorini.
Where is the original Michelangelo David statue located today?
The original marble statue has been displayed at Florence's Galleria dell'Accademia since 1873. A replica stands in the Piazza della Signoria where the original was installed in June 1504.
What specific tools did Michelangelo use to carve the David statue?
Michelangelo used the subbia, calcagnuolo, gradina, and trapano tools to shape the marble. He did not use flat chisels and relied on toothed chisels to bring the piece to its final state.
Why was the David statue moved from the Piazza della Signoria in 1873?
Officials moved the statue to the Accademia Gallery to protect it from weather damage and vandalism. The original location exposed the sculpture to stones thrown by protesters and riots.
How many years did the marble block sit neglected before Michelangelo worked on it?
The marble block known as il gigante sat neglected for twenty-five years before Michelangelo began carving. Agostino di Duccio started the work in 1464 but halted it after his master Donatello died in 1466.
What is the height and weight of the Michelangelo David statue?
The finished statue measures 5.17 metres in height and weighs approximately 8.5 tons. It stands nine braccia in length and was originally intended for the cathedral roofline.
All sources
97 references cited across the entry
- 1BookExploring David: Diagnostic Tests and State of ConservationAntonio Paolucci — Giunti Editore — 2004
- 2BookMichelangelo's DavidMichelangelo Buonarroti et al. — Harry N. Abrams — 2006
- 3BookThe Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican TraditionJohn Greville Agard Pocock — Princeton University Press — 2016
- 4BookMichelangelo's David: A Search for IdentityCharles Jr. Seymour — University of Pittsburgh Press — 1967
- 5BookPast-Present: Essays on Historicism in Art from Donatello to PicassoIrving Lavin — Berkeley : University of California Press — 1993
- 6JournalA study of Michelangelo's David from an accountability perspective: Antecedents of dialogic accounting in the early Florentine RenaissanceGiacomo Manetti et al. — February 2023
- 7BookThe Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological PerspectivesMihaly Csikszentmihalyi — Cambridge University Press — 1988
- 8BookThe Private Life of a MasterpieceMonica Bohm-Duchen — University of California Press — 2001
- 9BookFrom Marble to Flesh: The Biography of Michelangelo's DavidArnold Victor Coonin — B'Gruppo — 2014
- 10BookMichelangelo's David: Florentine History and Civic IdentityJohn T. Paoletti — Cambridge University Press — 2015
- 11BookMichelangelo, Selected Scholarship in English: Life and Early WorksCharles Jr. Seymour — Taylor & Francis — 1995
- 12BookMichelangelo's David: Florentine History and Civic IdentityJohn T. Paoletti — Cambridge University Press — 2015
- 13BookLa lettere di Michelangelo BuonarrotiMichelangelo Buonarroti et al. — Successori Le Monnier — 1875
- 14JournalCarrara marbleA.J. Barron — 2018
- 15BookCarteggio inedito d'artisti dei secoli 14., 15., 16. pubblicato ed illustrato con documenti pure inediti dal dott. Giovanni Gaye: 1500-1557. 2Giovanni Gaye — G. Molini — 1840
- 16JournalStudien zu Michelagniolo Buonarroti und zur Kunst seiner Zeit. IIIKarl Frey — 1909
- 17BookIl duomo di Firenze: documenti sulla decorazione della chiesa e del campanile tratti dall'archivio dell'operaGiovanni Poggi — B. Cassirer — 1909
- 18BookMichelangelo: SculptorRupert Hodson — Summerfield — 1999
- 19BookEncountering the Renaissance: Celebrating Gary M. Radke and 50 Years of the Syracuse University Graduate Program in Renaissance ArtArnold Victor Coonin — WAPACC Organization — 2016
- 20JournalThe David and Sculpture at the CathedralJohn T. Paoletti — Cambridge University Press — 2015
- 21BookThe World of Michelangelo: 1475–1564Robert Coughlan — Time-Life Books — 1966
- 22BookMichelangelo: A Life in Six MasterpiecesMiles J. Unger — Simon and Schuster — 2015
- 23BookMichelangelo: Divine Draftsman and DesignerCarmen C. Bambach et al. — Metropolitan Museum of Art — 2017
- 24BookMichelangelo's David: Florentine History and Civic IdentityJohn T. Paoletti — Cambridge University Press — 2015
- 25JournalMichelangelo in Florence: 'David' in 1503 and 'Hercules' in 1506Michael Hirst — 2000
- 26BookLives of the Artists: Volume 1Giorgio Vasari — Penguin Publishing Group — 1988
- 27BookMichelangelo's David: A Masterpiece RestoredFranca Falletti — Giunti Editore — 2004
- 28The Process of Artistic Creation in Terms of the Non-finitoJeremy Angier — 7 May 2001
- 29JournalThe Michelangelo phenomenonCaryl Rusbult et al. — 1 December 2009
- 30BookDavid's Sling: A History of Democracy in Ten Works of ArtVictoria C. Gardner Coates — Encounter Books — 2016
- 31BookMichelangelo's Mountain: The Quest For Perfection in the Marble Quarries of CarraraEric Scigliano — New York : Free Press — 2005
- 32BookMichelangelo's Mountain: The Quest For Perfection in the Marble Quarries of CarraraEric Scigliano — Simon and Schuster — 2007
- 33BookElementary Instructions for Students of SculptureFrancesco Carradori — Getty Publications — 2002
- 35BookIl Gigante: Michelangelo, Florence, and the David 1492–1504Anton Gill — Macmillan — 2013
- 36BookSculpture: Processes and PrinciplesRudolf Wittkower — Allen Lane — 1977
- 37JournalBozzetti and Modelli Notes on Sculptural Procedure from the Early Renaissance through BerniniIrving Lavin — Akten des 21. internationalen Kongresses für Kunstgeschichte in Bonn 1964 — 1967
- 38We finish scanning the DavidLevoy, Marc — March 28, 1999
- 39BookMaking and Moving Sculpture in Early Modern ItalyWilliam E. Wallace — Routledge — 2017
- 40JournalThe Location of Michelangelo's David: The Meeting of January 25, 1504Saul Levine — 1974
- 41BookMichelangelo and His World: Sculpture of the Italian RenaissanceJoachim Poeschke — Harry N. Abrams — 1996
- 42BookItalian High Renaissance and Baroque sculptureJohn Wyndham Pope-Hennessy — New York : Vintage Books — 1985
- 43JournalDonatello's Bronze David and Judith as Metaphors of Medici Rule in FlorenceSarah Blake McHam — 2001
- 44BookThe Expanding Discourse: Feminism And Art HistoryNorma Broude — Routledge — 2018
- 45BookArt in Renaissance ItalyJohn T. Paoletti et al. — Laurence King Publishing — 2005
- 46BookMichelangelo: A Reference Guide to His Life and WorksLilian H. Zirpolo — Rowman & Littlefield — 2020
- 47BookThe Cults of Raphael and Michelangelo: Artistic Sainthood and Memorials as a Second LifeTamara Smithers — Taylor & Francis — 2022
- 48JournalDiagnostic analysis of the lesions and stability of Michelangelo's DavidA. Borri — 2006
- 50BookThe Cults of Raphael and Michelangelo: Artistic Sainthood and Memorials as a Second LifeTamara Smithers — Taylor & Francis — 2022
- 51JournalGround Penetrating Radar Survey of the Floor of the Accademia Gallery (Florence, Italy)Lapo Miccinesi et al. — 26 March 2021
- 52JournalModelling the failure mechanisms of Michelangelo's David through small-scale centrifuge experimentsGiacomo Corti et al. — January 2015
- 53JournalRadar detection of pedestrian-induced vibrations on Michelangelo's DavidMassimiliano Pieraccini et al. — 10 April 2017
- 55NewsWho Owns Michelangelo's 'David'?Elisabetta Povoledo — 31 August 2010
- 56NewsFlorence vs Italy: Michelangelo's David at centre of ownership rowNick Pisa — The Daily Telegraph (London) — 16 August 2010
- 57BookMichelangelo, Selected Scholarship in English: Life and Early WorksCharles De Tolnay — Taylor & Francis — 1995
- 58JournalThe Sources of the Young David by Andrea del CastagnoDalia Haitovsky — 1985
- 59BookMichelangeloHoward Hibbard — Routledge — 2018
- 60BookArt of Renaissance Florence, 1400-1600Loren W. Partridge — Berkeley : University of California Press — 2009
- 61BookItaly Through the Stereoscope: Journeys in and about Italian CitiesDaniel James Ellison — Underwood & Underwood — 1908
- 62BookMichelangelo: The Artist, the Man and his TimesWilliam E. Wallace — Cambridge University Press — 2011
- 63JournalBellotto's Blunder and Michelangelo's DavidA. Victor Coonin — Spring 2016
- 64BookThe Beholder: The Experience of Art in Early Modern EuropeHubertus Günther — Routledge — 2017
- 65BookMichelangeloHoward Hibbard — Routledge — 2018
- 66BookMichelangelo's Nose: A Myth and Its MakerPaul Barolsky — John Wiley & Sons — 1997
- 67BookMichelangelo: A Tormented LifeAntonio Forcellino — John Wiley & Sons — 2023
- 68JournalMichelangelo and medicineR. M. Strauss et al. — 2002
- 69BookMichelangelo's Sculpture: Selected EssaysLeo Steinberg — University of Chicago Press — 2018
- 70JournalNew Evidence for the Iconography of David in Quattrocento FlorenceAndrew Butterfield — January 1995
- 71BookGiorgio Vasari: Art and HistoryPatricia Lee Rubin et al. — Yale University Press — 1995
- 72JournalMachiavelli, Michelangelo, and "David"Paul Barolsky — 2004
- 73BookL'art et les révolutions: Conférences plénières Tirage à part Strasbourg 1990 Congres International de histoire de l'artIrving Lavin — Société alsacienne pour le développement de l'histoire de l'art — 1990
- 74Journal'… con uno inbasamento et ornamento alto': The Rhetoric of the Pedestal c. 1430-1550Alison Wright — February 2011
- 75JournalOn Pedestals: Michelangelo's David, Bandinelli's Hercules and Cacus and the Sculpture of the Piazza della SignoriaKathleen Weil-Garris Brandt — 1983
- 76BookMichelangelo's David: Florentine History and Civic IdentityJohn T. Paoletti — Cambridge University Press — 2015
- 77BookMichelangelo's Mountain: The Quest For Perfection in the Marble Quarries of CarraraEric Scigliano — Simon and Schuster — 2007
- 78BookMichelangelo's David: From Symbol to MythAntonio Paolucci et al. — Harry N. Abrams — 2006
- 79BookMichelangelo's David: Florentine History and Civic IdentityJohn T. Paoletti — Cambridge University Press — 2015
- 80BookMichelangelo's David: A Masterpiece RestoredFranca Falletti — Giunti Editore — 2004
- 81JournalThe marble of the David of Michelangelo: A multi-method analysis of provenanceDonato Attanasio et al. — September 2005
- 82BookExploring David: Diagnostic Tests and State of ConservationDonato Attanasio et al. — Giunti Editore — 2004
- 83NewsMichelangelo's 'David' Gets Spruced Up for His 500th Birthday (Published 2004)Alan Riding — May 24, 2004
- 84BookContemporary Theory of ConservationSalvador Munoz-Vinas — Routledge — 2012
- 85MagazineInglorious Restorations Destroying old masterpieces in order to save themEric Scigliano — August 2005
- 86Michelangelo's 'David' Gets a BathFrances D'Emilio — 24 May 2004
- 87BookExploring David: Diagnostic Tests and State of ConservationMarco Giamello et al. — Giunti Editore — 2004
- 88'Dust is everywhere': rare glimpse of how Michelangelo's David is kept cleanAngela Giuffrida — 19 February 2024
- 89BookWestern European Museums and Visual Persuasion: Art, Edifice, and Social InfluenceJ. Donald Ragsdale — Cambridge Scholars Publishing — 2020
- 90BookMichelangelo: A Reference Guide to His Life and WorksLilian H. Zirpolo — Rowman & Littlefield — 2020
- 91BookMichelangelo's David: A Masterpiece RestoredFranca Falletti — Giunti Editore — 2004
- 93BookMichelangelo's David: Florentine History and Civic IdentityJohn T. Paoletti — Cambridge University Press — 2015
- 94BookMichelangelo and the Viewer in His TimeBernadine Barnes — Reaktion Books — 2017
- 95BookMichelangelo's David: Florentine History and Civic IdentityJohn T. Paoletti — Cambridge University Press — 2015
- 96JournalMedical kitschJ. Launer — 5 March 2008
- 97Thirty Years of Collecting Art that Tells Our StoriesElisabeth Cornu
- 98Finding Fe-Be's - Rediscovering the history of an iconic barMichael Flanagan — 2019-09-25