Classical Kuiper belt object
Classical Kuiper belt objects drifted undetected while two spacecraft silently flew through their domain. Both Voyager probes passed through the region before astronomers had confirmed the Kuiper belt's existence. These bodies, nicknamed cubewanos, orbit between 40 and 50 AU from the Sun. Unlike Pluto, none of their orbits crosses Neptune's path. About 870 are currently catalogued. What separates a true classical object from its resonant or scattered neighbors? Why do two populations of cubewanos show such different physical faces? And what does it mean that only one spacecraft has ever drawn close enough to study one of these ancient worlds in detail?
Cubewano traces back to 15760 Albion, the first trans-Neptunian object discovered after Pluto and Charon. Until January 2018, Albion circulated in scientific papers under only a provisional designation. Astronomers who needed a term for similar objects began calling them QB1-os, a name derived phonetically from that provisional label. That coinage became cubewanos. The scientific literature generally favors classical over the nickname. The objects classified as cubewanos include some of the largest bodies in the outer solar system. Makemake is recognized as a dwarf planet. Quaoar and 20000 Varuna each held, in turn, the distinction of being the largest known trans-Neptunian object at the moment of their discovery. Haumea spent time on the cubewano list as well. The Minor Planet Center catalogued it as a classical object in 2006. Subsequent study revealed a resonant orbit, and it was removed.
50000 Quaoar traces a nearly circular path close to the ecliptic, the embodiment of a cold cubewano orbit. The terminology borrows from kinetic theory. Molecules heat up by spreading out and moving faster; cold orbital populations have settled into low, flat, orderly paths. Cold cubewanos carry inclinations below 5 degrees and orbit between 42 and 47 AU. The hot population is different. It includes objects with inclinations extending beyond 30 degrees and more eccentric trajectories. The surface temperatures of both groups are equally frigid; the labels describe orbital behavior, not thermometers.
The Deep Ecliptic Survey captured this division in formal numbers. Its data identified two distributions: one centered at an inclination of 4.6 degrees, called Core, and a second extending past 30 degrees, called Halo. More than two-thirds of all known Kuiper belt objects have inclinations below 5 degrees and eccentricities below 0.1. Their semi-major axes show a preference for the middle of the main belt. What drove the hot population to its extreme inclinations remains, so far, unexplained.
In 2002, the difference in color between the two cubewano populations first became clear. The cold population, exemplified by 486958 Arrokoth, proved strikingly homogenous and red. The hot population showed far more variation in its hues. More recent studies, built on larger datasets, revised the inclination cut-off separating the two groups. The boundary now sits at 12 degrees, a higher threshold than the earlier 5 degree estimate. Researchers also refined their description of the hot population: it tends toward bluish tones, not merely varied ones.
Orbital inclination also predicts the likelihood of finding a binary companion. Binaries are quite common among cold, low-inclination cubewanos, and their two components typically match each other in brightness. Among hot, high-inclination objects, binaries appear less often, and when they do, the two components usually differ noticeably in brightness. This pattern of color and binaries supports the view that cold and hot cubewanos are at least two distinct overlapping populations, each with its own history. One group within the cold population, however, holds an entirely different surface chemistry: the Haumea family, whose members are neutral-colored rather than red.
Haumea sits at the center of the first known collisional family in the classical Kuiper belt. Such families form when bodies collide, leaving fragments on similar orbits that share their parent's physical properties. The Haumea family includes Haumea itself, its moons, and seven smaller bodies. Their surfaces carry large amounts of water ice and little or none of the dark organic compound called tholins. In the infrared spectrum, family members show deep absorption at 1.5 and 2.0 micrometers. Several other collisional families may yet be confirmed elsewhere in the classical belt.
Makemake, a recognized dwarf planet, sits in an ambiguous position in the catalogues of the outer solar system. The Minor Planet Center classifies it as a classical KBO. The Deep Ecliptic Survey flags it as ScatNear, suggesting possible scattering by Neptune. This disagreement reflects a broader problem: no official definition of cubewano or classical KBO exists. The boundary between the classical Kuiper belt and the scattered disk remains blurred.
J. L. Elliott and colleagues introduced the first formal definition in a 2005 Deep Ecliptic Survey report. Under their criteria, a classical KBO must be non-resonant and must show an average eccentricity below 0.2. Its Tisserand's parameter relative to Neptune must exceed 3. B. Gladman, B. Marsden, and C. van Laerhoven introduced a second scheme in 2007. It runs a 10-million-year orbit integration rather than using the Tisserand's parameter. Their approach subdivides the classical belt into an inner zone, a main belt, and an outer zone. The belt's physical edge adds a further complication. An apparent deficit of low-inclination objects beyond 47-49 AU was suspected as early as 1998 and confirmed by 2001.
New Horizons was the first spacecraft designed to visit a classical Kuiper belt object. After completing its examination of the Pluto system in 2015, the probe turned toward 486958 Arrokoth. On the 1st of January 2019, it came within 3,500 kilometers of the body. As of January 2019, Arrokoth is the only classical KBO any spacecraft has visited. Hundreds of catalogued bodies in the same belt have yet to receive a close-range visitor.
Up next
Updated
Common questions
What is a classical Kuiper belt object?
A classical Kuiper belt object is a low-eccentricity body orbiting the Sun beyond Neptune, with a semi-major axis between 40 and 50 AU, that is not controlled by an orbital resonance with Neptune. Unlike Pluto, classical KBOs do not cross Neptune's orbit. About 870 such objects are currently catalogued.
Why are classical Kuiper belt objects called cubewanos?
The nickname cubewano derives from 15760 Albion, the first trans-Neptunian object discovered after Pluto and Charon. Albion bore only a provisional designation until January 2018; astronomers informally called similar objects QB1-os, a term that eventually became cubewanos.
What is the difference between hot and cold classical Kuiper belt objects?
Cold classical KBOs follow low-inclination, near-circular orbits, typically below 5 degrees inclination and between 42 and 47 AU. Hot classical KBOs have highly inclined, more eccentric orbits, with inclinations extending beyond 30 degrees. The terms refer to orbital behavior, not temperature; both groups orbit in equally cold space.
What spacecraft has visited a classical Kuiper belt object?
New Horizons was the first spacecraft to visit a classical Kuiper belt object, flying within 3,500 kilometers of 486958 Arrokoth on the 1st of January 2019. The probe had previously explored the Pluto system in 2015.
What is the Haumea family and how does it relate to classical Kuiper belt objects?
The Haumea family is the first known collisional family in the classical Kuiper belt, consisting of Haumea, its moons, and seven smaller bodies believed to be remnants of a single parent body's breakup. Family members share similar orbits and carry large amounts of water ice with little or no tholins, giving them a neutral color distinct from the red-hued cold population around them.
How do scientists formally define classical Kuiper belt objects?
There is no single official definition. J. L. Elliott and colleagues, in a 2005 Deep Ecliptic Survey report, defined classical KBOs as non-resonant objects with a Tisserand's parameter above 3 relative to Neptune and average eccentricity below 0.2. An alternative scheme by B. Gladman, B. Marsden, and C. van Laerhoven, published in 2007, uses a 10-million-year orbit integration instead.
All sources
21 references cited across the entry
- 2Classical Kuiper Belt ObjectsDavid Jewitt — UCLA
- 3MPEC 2006-X45: Distant Minor PlanetsIAU Minor Planet Center & Tamkin Foundation Computer Network — 2006-12-12
- 4MPEC 2010-B62: Distant Minor Planets (2010 FEB. 13.0 TT)Brian G. Marsden — Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics — 2010-01-30
- 5BookSolar System Update : Topical and Timely Reviews in Solar System SciencesD. Jewitt et al. — Springer-Praxis — 2006
- 6JournalThe formation of the Kuiper belt by the outward transport of bodies during Neptune's migrationHarold F. Levison et al. — 2003
- 7JournalThe Deep Ecliptic Survey: A Search for Kuiper Belt Objects and Centaurs. II. Dynamical Classification, the Kuiper Belt Plane, and the Core PopulationJ. L. Elliot — 2006
- 8PlutinoD. Jewitt — 2004
- 9JournalThe Color Distribution in the Edgeworth-Kuiper BeltA. Doressoundiram et al. — October 2002
- 10JournalColor-inclination relation of the classical Kuiper belt objectsNuno Peixinho et al. — August 2008
- 11JournalEvidence for two populations of classical transneptunian objects: The strong inclination dependence of classical binariesK. Noll et al. — April 2008
- 12JournalThe Radial Distribution of the Kuiper BeltChadwick A. Trujillo et al. — 2001
- 13BookThe Solar System Beyond NeptuneB. J. Gladman et al. — University of Arizona Press — 2008
- 14JournalA collisional family of icy objects in the Kuiper beltMichael E. Brown et al. — 2007
- 15JournalThe surface of (136108) Haumea (), the largest carbon-depleted object in the trans-Neptunian beltN. Pinilla-Alonso et al. — 2009
- 16JournalThe water ice rich surface of (145453) 2005 RR43: a case for a carbon-depleted population of TNOs?N. Pinilla-Alonso et al. — 2007
- 17JournalA Collisional Family in the Classical Kuiper BeltE.-I. Chiang — July 2002
- 18JournalDynamically correlated minor bodies in the outer Solar systemCarlos de la Fuente Marcos et al. — 11 February 2018
- 19The PI's Perspective: Why Didn't Voyager Explore the Kuiper Belt?Alan Stern — 28 February 2018
- 20New Horizons prepares for encounter with 2014 MU69Emily Lakdawalla — Planetary Society — 24 January 2018
- 21andHarvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics