Augustus of Prima Porta

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The statue known today as the Augustus of Prima Porta emerged from the ground on the 20th of April 1863. Excavations led by Giuseppe Gagliardi had broken into the buried complex of the Villa of Livia near Rome. The marble figure weighed 1000 kilograms and stood 2.08 meters tall. It is a full-length portrait of Augustus, first emperor of Rome, dressed for command and frozen mid-gesture. The villa had been the retreat of Livia Drusilla, Augustus's third and final wife, after his death in AD 14. Wilhelm Henzen, a German archaeologist, announced the find the same year in the Bulletino dell'Instituto di Corrispondenza Archaeologica. The statue has since become the best known of Augustus's portraits. It ranks among the most celebrated sculptures to survive from the ancient world. But behind that cool marble surface lies a web of deliberate calculation. Why is the emperor shown without shoes? Who commissioned this figure, and when? What is the breastplate built to argue? And does the stark white marble we see today look anything like the sculpture Livia once owned?

• 2. The Greek Blueprint

  ›

  Polykleitos carved the Doryphoros, or Spear Bearer, in the 5th century BC. The Prima Porta sculptor adapted its famous contrapposto stance for the Augustus statue centuries later. In that pose, one leg bears the body's weight while the other relaxes, creating diagonal tension across the figure. The Prima Porta Augustus stands exactly this way: the right leg is taut and the left eases forward as if in mid-step.

  Following each Roman conquest, waves of Greek artworks arrived in the capital. Over generations, this influx reshaped elite taste. Greek artifacts became signals of wealth and refinement among the upper class. Under the Republic, aged and weathered features had marked a portrait as trustworthy and serious. The Prima Porta tilts away from that tradition, presenting Augustus as youthful, strong, and physically ideal. This reversal looked toward the Greek classical and Hellenistic periods, where youth and strength were signs of leadership. The chain of emulation reached all the way to Alexander the Great himself.

  Parian marble forms the head and neck, which were carved separately and fitted to the torso. The face is idealized but not blank: Augustus's individual features remain, including his somber expression and the characteristic fringe of hair across his forehead. His right hand is raised in the adlocutio gesture, the formal pose of a commander addressing troops. His left may have held a spear or a consular baton, though no weapon survives. On the breastplate, a complex ring of deities and personified peoples tells a very different kind of story.

• 3. What the Cuirass Claims

  ›

  In 53 BC, Parthia defeated the Roman general Crassus and seized the legionary eagles, the sacred standards of the army. Mark Antony suffered further losses of eagles in the 40s BC. In 20 BC, Augustus recovered the standards through diplomacy, one of the most significant achievements of his reign.

  Parthia's military strength had deterred Augustus from the war his people expected. He chose negotiation instead. Recovering the standards without battle was a real triumph, but it required a persuasive frame. The lorica musculata cuirass on the Prima Porta statue provides that frame in carved stone.

  The Parthian king Phraates IV occupies the breastplate's center. According to the most common reading, he is handing Crassus's captured standard to an armored Roman. That Roman figure may represent Tiberius, who brokered the recovery as Augustus's intermediary, or may stand for Mars Ultor, or for the ideal Roman legionary. Below the exchange, a canine crouches; archaeologist Ascanio Modena Altieri has identified it as the she-wolf who nursed Romulus and Remus. To each side stand female figures in mourning. One carries a sheathed sword, personifying peoples from the east forced to pay tribute to Rome. The other holds an unsheathed blade, representing subjected peoples such as the Celts. Caelus spreads the sky at the top. Below stand Aurora and Luna, then Sol, Diana, Apollo, and the earth goddess Ceres, also called Tellus. On each shoulder of the cuirass, a Sphinx recalls Augustus's defeat of Cleopatra.

  The imagery has been compared to the carmen saeculare, the hymn Horace composed to celebrate the Pax Romana. Scholars note that among all the figures carved here, only the Parthian king is actively doing something. Every other character is posed, divine, or personified. Roman success is staged as a fact of the cosmos, divinely sanctioned and inevitable.

  The cuirass iconography places the bronze original after 20 BC. The marble copy falls somewhere between that date and Livia's death in AD 29. Tiberius appears on the breastplate in the most flattering possible role; the statue may have been his commission. Such a commission would link him visually to the deified Augustus and suggest continuity between the two reigns. At the statue's feet, below all this political theater, a small naked child riding a dolphin makes a claim of an entirely different order.

• 4. Divinity in the Details

  ›

  Augustus stands barefoot. In classical iconography, bare feet marked gods and heroes, not military commanders. Depicting Augustus without sandals lifts the figure into divine or heroic territory while stopping short of stating it outright.

  The barefootedness may indicate the statue is a posthumous copy of an earlier portrait from Rome in which Augustus wore sandals. Livia may have set this version up after his death. During his lifetime, Augustus resisted open claims to divine status, unlike the emperors who came after him. The barefoot stance is one of several signals of divine nature that accumulate across the figure without ever quite declaring it plainly.

  At his feet crouches a small Cupid riding a dolphin. Cupid is the son of Venus; the dolphin is Venus's patron animal. Together they reference the Julian family's claim of descent from the goddess Venus. Both Augustus and his great-uncle Julius Caesar had pressed this claim of divine lineage. The dolphin carries a second argument: it evokes the battle of Actium, where Augustus defeated one of his chief rivals, Mark Antony. The Cupid figure also serves as structural support for the marble statue, but the choice of Cupid was not incidental.

  The paludamentum, the draped cloak of the Roman commander, falls across the body in deep folds. Earlier portraits had shown Augustus in a more monarchical style. The Prima Porta type amended this, representing him instead as primus inter pares, a first among equals, while still projecting authority. Within a generation, this same face would appear across every corner of the empire.

• 5. One Face, Many Copies

  ›

  Around 27 BC, the Prima Porta portrait type was formally introduced to carry the visual meaning of the title Augustus. Full-length statues and busts in this style spread throughout the empire.

  A strand of hair falls directly over the center of Augustus's forehead, the key marker identifying this as the Prima Porta type. Two strands stray from the left side of the brow; three come from the right. This specific hairstyle appeared first on this statue. Comparison with the portrait on Augustus's coinage confirms which type is which and helps date the Prima Porta piece.

  The Prima Porta type is the second and most popular of Augustus's three official portrait types. The other types can be traced in works such as the Ara Pacis. A full-size statue called the Augustus of Via Labicana shares the Prima Porta hairstyle. It shows Augustus in his role as Pontifex Maximus, or chief priest, and is now held in the Museo Nazionale Romano.

  From its introduction around 27 BC, every official copy presented Augustus as forever young. No version aged him. Roland R. R. Smith described the cumulative effect as a visual paradox, what he called "mature, ageless, and authoritative youthfulness." The stark white marble of every surviving copy is almost certainly a distortion of what these statues originally looked like.

• 6. Color Lost

  ›

  Vincenz Brinkmann of Munich spent the 1980s examining ancient sculptures under ultraviolet light, searching for traces of surviving pigment. His work confirmed that the Prima Porta Augustus had almost certainly been painted. So few traces survived that historians had to rely on old watercolors and scientific analysis for evidence. The paint had been lost in the soil, and what little remained had faded further since the statue's recovery.

  The Vatican Museums produced a painted copy, working from colors confirmed when the original was cleaned in 1999. Fabio Barry, an art historian at the University of St Andrews in Scotland, criticized this reconstitution as unsubtle and exaggerated. Other critics have pointed to substantial differences between the original Prima Porta and the painted version. A separate painted copy, using a different color scheme, was produced for the Tarraco Viva 2014 Festival.

  The second-century polymath Lucian left a vivid account of how ancient viewers understood painted sculpture. Lucian wrote: "I Fear I stand in the way of her most important feature!..." The passage continues: "the rest of the body let Apelles represent... not too white but diffused with blood." Lucian also used the term chora, meaning the skin or finishing layer, for the coating that completed a statue. Without its chora, he implied, a sculpture was simply unfinished.

  Since at least the 18th century, the familiar sight of unpainted Roman marble has encouraged the assumption that classical sculpture was always white. Surface treatment is now recognized as integral to the intended effect of any ancient sculpture. What colors were chosen for the Prima Porta remain unknown. Red is considered plausible given its associations with military command and royalty, but no confirmed evidence survives. The dispute over the statue's pigmentation is matched by an equally open question about where, precisely, inside the villa the figure originally stood.

• 7. Where It Stood

  ›

  The archaeological journals from the excavation are incomplete. Ambiguous evidence has left historians uncertain about where inside the villa the Prima Porta Augustus originally stood. Four proposed locations exist: an underground complex, a staircase area, the atrium, and a laurel grove on the southeast corner of the Prima Porta hill.

  Jane Clark Reeder has argued for the underground complex. Ceramic pot fragments found at the edge of the Prima Porta hill suggest to her the former presence of laurel trees. They were discovered directly in front of the underground complex. She also draws on the historian Suetonius, who recorded that Augustus feared lightning and frequently sheltered in underground rooms. In antiquity, laurel was thought to offer protection against lightning, which would give the underground space a personal resonance beyond the merely decorative.

  The gallina alba, Latin for white hen, provides the context for the laurel. When Livia married Octavian, an eagle dropped a hen onto her lap while carrying laurel seeds in its beak. The religious authorities of Rome read this as a sign of divine favor. The laurel was cultivated with great care at the villa and grew into a grove. When Julio-Claudian generals returned from military campaigns, Reeder records, they would take a laurel branch from that grove as a mark of triumph.

  Reeder's theory has been challenged on two grounds. Critics note that the ceramic pots she cites could equally have held lemons or other plants. A drawing made in 1891, roughly 25 years after the original excavation, places the statue at the foot of the staircase. It was not found inside the underground complex itself.

  Alan Klynne and Peter Liljenstolpe have proposed the atrium as an alternative. In their reconstruction, the statue stood on a rectangular structure against the south wall. Visitors entering through the fauces at the northeastern corner would have seen it first, from the left. Kähler had argued the statue was designed to be viewed from this angle. Walking across the atrium, a visitor's sight line would gradually come to meet the emperor's gesture of address. Suetonius alone preserved the most personal piece of evidence in this debate. He recorded Augustus's terror of lightning and his habit of retreating underground whenever storms approached.