Skip to content
— CH. 1 · DEFINING THE MOVEMENT —

Assisted migration

~5 min read · Ch. 1 of 6
6 sections
  • The phrase assisted migration describes the intentional establishment of populations or meta-populations beyond a species' historic range. This tactic moves plants or animals to geographic locations better suited for their present or future habitat needs. Species unable to migrate or disperse on their own receive this human intervention. Conservation biologists first used the term in publications during 2004. They intended it as a method to reduce biodiversity losses caused by climate change. By 2007, researchers offered synonyms like assisted colonization and managed relocation. A paper with 22 coauthors later popularized the latter term. Forestry science discusses the concept differently than conservation biology does. Paleoecologists had already noted significant lags in northward movement of dominant canopy trees since the final glacial retreat. Researchers began applying climate change projections to tree distribution modeling efforts in the 1990s. British Columbia became the first provincial government to update seed transfer guidelines with what they call climate-based seed transfer.

  • Debate concerning the ethics of assisted migration in forestry practice was both short-term and muted compared to that which prevails in conservation biology. Migration remained the standard term used in paleoecology for natural movements of tree species recorded in the geological record. Translocation terminology was not controversial among forestry researchers because of this historical context. The former field is necessarily guided by seed transfer guidelines whenever timber or pulp harvest follows reforestation plantings. A separate Wikipedia page titled Assisted migration of forests in North America launched in 2021. It serves as a teaching tool for climate adaptation education within the forestry profession. Conservation biologists focus on endangered species management where risks feel higher. They worry about invasive species potential when moving organisms into new ecosystems. Forestry scientists prioritize timber production and forest health over these specific ecological fears. This divergence created two distinct communities discussing similar actions under different ethical frameworks.

  • Scientists fear relocated species might spread diseases or become too successful in recipient ecosystems. The principal concern involves the potential for introduced species to drive out native flora and fauna. Most agree that assisted migration efforts should involve detailed planning and risk assessment unlike accidental introductions. Mueller and Hellman reviewed 468 documented species invasions and found only 14.7% occurred on the same continent where the species originated. The vast majority of those were fish and crustaceans. Terrestrial species that became invasive on the same continent often crossed large biogeographic barriers like mountain ranges. Expected uses of assisted migration generally involve helping species colonize habitats immediately adjacent to their current ranges. Those who wish to keep the practice on the table note very few invasions resulted from short-distance movement. Yet some argue any threat of introducing invasive species disqualifies assisted migration as a viable response. Uncertainty in predictive niche models limits confidence in decisions regarding future suitable habitat.

  • Stress conditioning consists of exposing organisms to sublethal stress to induce physiological changes increasing tolerance. A 1989 experiment used heat shock on rat kidneys to extend safe cold storage time to 48 hours. Researchers study this method as a solution for preserving coral reefs exposed to ocean warming. Assisted gene flow works to increase presence of desired naturally occurring genes in offspring without artificial code insertion. Different coral colonies of the Great Barrier Reef are interbred to test whether offspring display increased resistance to warmer living conditions. Hybridization refers to the process where an egg and sperm from two different species fertilize and produce young. Cupressus abramsiana serves as an example where hybridization could result in loss of biodiversity. The 2016 federal update warned of dangers of genetic introgression threatening the integrity of this cypress tree. Outbreeding depression reduces fitness when population growth rate falls below replacement rates wasting reproductive potential.

  • A review paper published in Science in 1989 compiled translocation use for rare species from 1973 to 1989 across multiple nations. Climate change was not mentioned as a cause for concern in that document. Three decades later, the International Union for Conservation of Nature reported climate change affects at least 10,967 species on their Red List. In another publication in 2021, climate change appeared 20 times but assisted colonization was mentioned just once. The United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity recognized climate change as the third most significant threat to global biodiversity in 2022. No mention was made of conservation tools like translocation within the agreement's goals. Although the Endangered Species Act of 1973 did not restrict assisted migration initially, regulatory changes in 1984 made prospective translocations more difficult. June 2022 saw the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service publish a proposed rule to revise section 10(j) regulations. The final decision scheduled for June 2023 aimed to delete reference to historical range parameters for experimental populations.

  • The Florida torreya is a critically endangered tree found at the state border region of northern Florida and southwestern Georgia. A self-organized group called the Torreya Guardians formed in 2004 to undertake its assisted migration. By 2018 citizens documented species thrival in dozen legacy horticultural plantings including seed production. Their own plantings in Cleveland Ohio began producing seeds that same year. The western swamp tortoise represents the first example of an endangered vertebrate experimentally translocated due to climate change. First trial began in 2016 with release of 24 captive-raised juveniles into distant locations. Lead scientist Nicola Mitchell spoke about ethical imperatives regarding human responsibility toward this reptile. Second trial started in 2022 within Scott National Park continuing into 2023. In Mexico City volcanic regions scientists reported positive results from combined projects involving Abies religiosa trees. Thirteen researchers coauthored a paper concluding establishment of these trees at 3,600 and 3,800 meters is feasible.

Continue Browsing

Common questions

What is assisted migration and when was the term first used?

Assisted migration describes the intentional establishment of populations or meta-populations beyond a species' historic range. Conservation biologists first used the term in publications during 2004 to reduce biodiversity losses caused by climate change.

How does forestry science differ from conservation biology regarding assisted migration ethics?

Forestry scientists prioritize timber production and forest health over ecological fears like invasive species potential. Debate concerning the ethics of assisted migration in forestry practice was both short-term and muted compared to that which prevails in conservation biology.

When did the Torreya Guardians begin their assisted migration project for the Florida torreya tree?

A self-organized group called the Torreya Guardians formed in 2004 to undertake its assisted migration. By 2018 citizens documented species thrival in dozen legacy horticultural plantings including seed production.

Which endangered vertebrate was the first example translocated due to climate change and when did trials start?

The western swamp tortoise represents the first example of an endangered vertebrate experimentally translocated due to climate change. First trial began in 2016 with release of 24 captive-raised juveniles into distant locations.

What specific risks do scientists fear regarding relocated species in recipient ecosystems?

Scientists fear relocated species might spread diseases or become too successful in recipient ecosystems. The principal concern involves the potential for introduced species to drive out native flora and fauna.

All sources

113 references cited across the entry

  1. 1bookA Dictionary of EcologyMichael Allaby — Oxford University Press — 2010
  2. 5journalMultidimensional evaluation of managed relocationDavid M Richardson — June 2009
  3. 6journalLags in vegetation response to greenhouse warmingMargaret B Davis — October 1989
  4. 9journalWidespread underfilling of the potential ranges of North American treesBenjamin J Seliger et al. — November 2020
  5. 10journalAdaptation, migration or extirpation: Climate change outcomes for tree populationsSally N Aitken et al. — 25 January 2008
  6. 11webTraveling trees: Assisted migration for climate resilienceSavannah Halleaux — 6 April 2023
  7. 12webClimate-based seed transferBritish Columbia government
  8. 13journalClimate change and forest seed zones: Past trends, future prospects and challenges to ponderDan McKenney et al. — March 2009
  9. 14journalPlacing Forestry in the Assisted Migration DebateJohn H Pedlar — September 2012
  10. 15journalPreparing for Climate Change: Forestry and Assisted MigrationMary I Williams et al. — 4 July 2013
  11. 17journalPolicy Forum: Global policy for assisted colonization of speciesJedediah F Brodie — 30 April 2021
  12. 18journalBiodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendationsN. E. Heller et al. — 2009
  13. 19journalExtinction risk from climate changeC. D. Thomas et al. — Jan 2004
  14. 20journalFailure to migrate: Lack of tree range expansion in response to climate changeK. Zhu et al. — 2012
  15. 21journalRange Shifts and Adaptive Responses to Quaternary Climate ChangeM. B. Davis et al. — 2001
  16. 23journalMolecular Indicators of Tree Migration Capacity Under Rapid Climate ChangeJ. S. McLachlan et al. — 2005
  17. 24journalSpecies richness changes lag behind climate changeR. Menendez et al. — 2006
  18. 25journalModern Global Climate ChangeT. R. Karl et al. — 2003
  19. 26journalA Framework for Debate of Assisted Migration in an Era of Climate ChangeJason S McLachlan et al. — 26 March 2007
  20. 28journalLast Resort: Moving Endangered Species in Order to Save ThemZach St George — 27 October 2022
  21. 29journalClimate Change and Moving Species: Furthering the Debate on Assisted ColonizationM. L. Hunter — 2007
  22. 30journalAn Assessment of Invasion Risk from Assisted MigrationJ. M. Mueller et al. — 2008
  23. 32newsBiologists Debate Relocating Imperiled SpeciesPhilip Bethge — 23 November 2007
  24. 35journalAssisted colonization is not a viable conservation strategyA. Ricciardi et al. — 2009
  25. 36journalManaged relocation: A nuanced evaluation is neededD. F. Sax et al. — 2009
  26. 37journalECOLOGY: Assisted Colonization and Rapid Climate ChangeO. Hoegh-Guldberg et al. — 2008
  27. 38journalBeyond Predictions: Biodiversity Conservation in a Changing ClimateT. P. Dawson et al. — 2011
  28. 39journalPredicting species distribution: Offering more than simple habitat modelsA. Guisan et al. — 2005
  29. 40journalCompetitive interactions between tree species in New Zealand's old-growth indigenous forestsJ.R. Leathwick et al. — 2001
  30. 41journalProjected distributions of novel and disappearing climates by 2100 ADJ. W. Williams et al. — 2007
  31. 42journalLocal and landscape management of an expanding range margin under climate changeC. R. Lawson et al. — 2012
  32. 43journalEcological Connectivity for a Changing ClimateM. Krosby et al. — 2010
  33. 44journalRegional climate change adaptation strategies for biodiversity conservation in a midcontinental region of North AmericaS. Galatowitsch et al. — 2009
  34. 45journalThe precautionary principle in managed relocation is misguided adviceM. W. Schwartz et al. — 2009
  35. 46journalAssisted colonization: Evaluating contrasting management actions (and values) in the face of uncertaintyM. A. Schlaepfer et al. — 2009
  36. 47journalAssisted migration to address climate change: Recommendations for aspen reforestation in western CanadaL. K. Gray et al. — 2011
  37. 49journalHuman Domination of Earth's EcosystemsP. M. Vitousek — 1997
  38. 51journalTranslocation of species, climate change, and the end of trying to recreate past ecological communitiesC. D. Thomas — 2011
  39. 52journalIntervention Ecology: Applying Ecological Science in the Twenty-first CenturyR. J. Hobbs et al. — 2011
  40. 53journalSeed supply for broadscale restoration: maximizing evolutionary potentialLinda Broadhurst — 4 September 2008
  41. 54journalAssessing the benefits and risks of translocations in changing environments: a genetic perspectiveAndrew Weeks et al. — 18 June 2011
  42. 55journalManaging microevolution: Restoration in the face of global changeKevin J. Rice et al. — 2003
  43. 56journalEvolutionary Responses to Climate ChangeD. K. Skelly et al. — 2007
  44. 58newsStress conditioning: a novel approach to organ preservationGeorge Perdrizet — 1989
  45. 59journalAssisted Gene Flow to Facilitate Local Adaptation to Climate ChangeSally N. Aitken et al. — 2013
  46. 61journalConsequences of Hybridization in Mammals: A Systematic ReviewRoya Adavoudi et al. — January 2022
  47. 62journalTranslocation as a species conservation tool: status and strategyB. Griffith et al. — 1989
  48. 64webGlobal conservation translocation perspectives (2021): Case studies from around the globeIUCN SSC Conservation Translocation Specialist Group (CTSG) — IUCN
  49. 65webConvention on Biological Diversity (2022)U.N. Environment Program
  50. 66journalAssisted migration—moving species by translocationPatrick D Shirey et al. — 22 December 2023
  51. 70journalAssisted colonization under the U.S. Endangered Species ActPatrick D Shirey et al. — 2010
  52. 71journalAssisted Migration Helps Animals Adapt to Climate ChangeJoanna Thompson — 12 October 2023
  53. 73journalREVIEW: Climate, Climate Change, and Range BoundariesChris D Thomas — 2010
  54. 74journalGarden plants get a head start on climate changeSebastiaan Van der Veken — 2008
  55. 75journalREVIEW: Climate Change, Managed Relocation, and the Risk of Intra-Continental Plant Invasions: A Theoretical and Empirical Exploration Relative to the Flora of New EnglandJesse Bellemare et al. — 2017
  56. 79reportTorreya taxifolia. In: Fire Effects Information SystemEsser, Lora L. — U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory — 1993
  57. 80newsDriving Mr. LynxChris Berdik — 12 October 2008
  58. 82webTorreya Guardians in the MediaTorreya Guardians
  59. 83journalReview of science-based assessments of species vulnerability: Contributions to decision-making for assisted migrationTannis Beardmore et al. — November 2011
  60. 84journalHome, Home Outside the Range?Richard Stone — 24 September 2010
  61. 92journalEndangered butterfly species defies climate changePatrick Barkham — 7 April 2014
  62. 96journalAlpine biodiversity and assisted migration: the case of the American pika (Ochotona princeps)Jennifer L Wilkening — December 2015
  63. 101journalSaving the hihi under climate change: a case for assisted colonizationAlienor L M Chauvenet — 5 September 2013
  64. 104journalEstablishing monarch butterfly overwintering sites for future climates: Abies religiosa upper altitudinal limit expansion by assisted migrationCuauhtémoc Sáenz-Romero — 18 September 2024
  65. 107journalGarden plants get a head start on climate changeSebastiaan Van der Veken — May 2008
  66. 109journalAs World Warms, How Do We Decide When a Plant is Native?Janet Marinelli — 19 April 2016