Amnesty International

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Amnesty International began with a single newspaper article and a feeling of impotent rage. On the 28th of May 1961, the British newspaper The Observer published a piece by lawyer Peter Benenson titled "The Forgotten Prisoners". In it, Benenson wrote about people being "imprisoned, tortured or executed because his opinions or religion are unacceptable to his government" and asked whether the world's collective disgust could be turned into action. That article sparked a movement. Within months, what started as a public appeal had become a permanent organization headquartered in London. Today, Amnesty International counts more than ten million members and supporters around the world.

  What drives an organization born from a single article to take on governments, dictators, and armed factions across every continent? How does it decide whose cause to champion and whose to leave aside? And what happens when the principles it was founded on come into conflict with the messy realities of politics, funding, and institutional life?

• 2. The Founding Moment

  ›

  Peter Benenson was travelling on the London Underground on the 19th of November 1960 when, by his own account, he read that two students from Coimbra had been sentenced to seven years in prison in Portugal for drinking a toast to liberty. Portugal at the time was governed by the Estado Novo regime of António de Oliveira Salazar, an authoritarian government that treated dissent as anti-Portuguese. Researchers have never been able to trace the original newspaper article Benenson described, but his reaction to reading it shaped everything that followed.

  Benenson was not working alone. His collaborator Eric Baker was a member of the Religious Society of Friends who had helped fund the British Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament. In his memoirs, Benenson called Baker "a partner in the launching of the project". Together with writers, academics, and lawyers including Alec Digges, they contacted David Astor, the editor of The Observer. The resulting article named its subjects "Prisoners of Conscience" and cited violations of articles 18 and 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The "Appeal for Amnesty" was reprinted by international newspapers and led directly to the publication of Persecution 1961, a book by Benenson and Baker that documented nine individual cases.

  By July 1961 the leadership had decided to make the appeal permanent. Benenson made sure that the Labour Party, the Conservative Party, and the Liberal Party were all represented at the founding meetings. On the 30th of September 1962, the organization was officially named Amnesty International.

• 3. Government Shadows

  ›

  From its earliest years, Amnesty International carried a tension between its stated independence and its quiet connections to the British government. Documents later surfaced showing that in 1963, the Foreign Office instructed its operatives abroad to provide "discreet support" for Amnesty's campaigns. That same year, Benenson wrote to Lord Lansdowne proposing to station a refugee counsellor on the border between the Bechuanaland Protectorate and apartheid South Africa. In his letter, Benenson explicitly stated that Amnesty wished to support British government policy in keeping communist influence out of that part of Africa.

  Things came to a head in 1966. Benenson suspected that British agents had suppressed a report by Hans Goran Franck, chairman of Amnesty's Swedish section, about torture at an interrogation centre in the British colony of Aden. A memo by Lord Chancellor Gerald Gardiner stated that Benenson had simply not wanted to harm a Labour government. Then came additional allegations: a US government report claimed that Seán MacBride, Ireland's former foreign minister and Amnesty's first chairman, had connections to a CIA funding operation. MacBride denied any knowledge of it.

  Benenson resigned as Amnesty's president, saying he could no longer live in a country where such activities were tolerated. The period became known as the Amnesty Crisis of 1966-67. After it ended, Amnesty vowed it "must not only be independent and impartial but must not be put into a position where anything else could even be alleged". The Foreign Office, for its part, adopted a posture of deliberate reserve toward the organization.

• 4. Growth and Nobel Recognition

  ›

  Amnesty International's membership grew from 15,000 in 1969 to 200,000 by 1979, driven partly by a deliberate widening of its original mandate. Under the leadership of Seán MacBride and Secretary General Martin Ennals, the remit expanded in the 1970s to include miscarriages of justice and torture alongside its original focus on prisoners of conscience. In 1977, the Nobel Committee awarded Amnesty the Nobel Peace Prize "for having contributed to securing the ground for freedom, for justice, and thereby also for peace in the world". The following year it received the United Nations Prize in the Field of Human Rights.

  Amid this institutional growth, Amnesty's British section found an unlikely fundraising vehicle. In 1976, it launched a series of comedy galas that eventually became known as the Secret Policeman's Balls. Created and developed by Monty Python alumnus John Cleese and entertainment executive Martin Lewis, working closely with Amnesty's Peter Luff and later Peter Walker, the first shows featured members of the Monty Python troupe. Later editions expanded to include leading rock musicians, and The Daily Telegraph credited the retitled series as having been "rather brilliantly re-christened".

  The 1980s brought larger stages. The 1986 Conspiracy of Hope tour played six concerts across the United States, including a daylong show at Giants Stadium featuring roughly thirty acts, on the occasion of Amnesty's 25th anniversary. The 1988 Human Rights Now! world tour stretched across five continents over six weeks, timed to mark the 40th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

• 5. Principles Under Pressure

  ›

  Amnesty's founding principle was a focus on prisoners of conscience, defined as persons imprisoned or prevented from expressing an opinion by means of violence. That principle carried a sharp edge: from the mid-1960s, the organization decided it could not extend the title of Prisoner of Conscience to someone convicted of activities involving violence, a ruling that excluded Nelson Mandela. Mandela had been a member of the South African Communist Party, and was convicted of violence by the South African government.

  The issue of violence has defined and divided Amnesty at multiple turns. The organization does not oppose the political use of violence in itself, noting that the Universal Declaration's preamble acknowledges situations in which people might resort to rebellion against tyranny as a last resort. But Amnesty condemns torture, the killing of captives, and arbitrary killings by opposition groups and governments alike. On capital punishment its position is absolute: Amnesty considers the death penalty the ultimate, irreversible denial of human rights and opposes it in all cases regardless of crime or method.

  In 1990 the organization became entangled in a different kind of failure. A Kuwaiti woman known publicly only as Nayirah testified before the US Congress that Iraqi soldiers had removed incubators from a Kuwaiti hospital and left infants to die. Amnesty International, which had investigators in Kuwait, confirmed the story and helped circulate it widely. The organization also reported a death toll higher than the number of incubators available in Kuwaiti city hospitals. After the Gulf War, the testimony was found to be entirely fabricated; Nayirah was in fact the daughter of a Kuwaiti diplomat with ties to a pro-war organization responsible for organizing the hearing. The episode remains one of the most-cited examples of human rights reporting being weaponized for political ends.

• 6. Internal Fractures

  ›

  By the time the 1990s drew to a close, Amnesty had grown to more than seven million members in over 150 countries. But size brought strains. The organization's financial and institutional life proved as fraught as any of the situations it investigated abroad.

  In 2019 the crisis became impossible to contain. An independent report found what it described as a "toxic culture" of bullying, harassment, sexism, and racism after investigators were asked to look into two deaths: that of 30-year Amnesty veteran Gaetan Mootoo, who died in Paris in May 2018 and left a note citing work pressures, and that of 28-year-old intern Rosalind McGregor, who died in Geneva in July 2018. Management offered to resign. By October 2019 five of the seven members of the senior leadership team at the international secretariat had left with what were described as "generous" redundancy packages. Secretary General Kumi Naidoo, who had acknowledged a budget gap of up to £17m in donor money, resigned on the 5th of December 2019, citing ill health.

  The following September, The Times reported that Amnesty had paid £800,000 in compensation to Gaetan Mootoo's family and required them to sign a non-disclosure agreement. The arrangement drew criticism from Shaista Aziz, co-founder of the advocacy group NGO Safe Space, who publicly questioned why the world's leading human rights organization would use such contracts. Amnesty stated that the payment would not come from donations or membership fees, but declined to identify its source. A 2022 independent investigation by the management consultancy Global HPO Ltd concluded that Amnesty's UK branch exhibited institutional and systemic racism and had "failed to embed principles of anti-racism into its own DNA".

• 7. A Global Campaign Machine

  ›

  Amnesty's structure is built around three interlocking bodies. The Global Assembly is the movement's highest decision-making authority, bringing together representatives from national sections each year to vote on strategy. It elects the International Board, a group of eight members who govern between Assembly meetings. The International Secretariat, led by a Secretary General appointed by the Board, manages daily operations, produces most of the research, and coordinates international campaigns.

  In 2019 there were 63 national sections. Amnesty funds itself primarily through membership fees and donations, and states that it does not accept money from governments. In practice, it has received grants from the UK Department for International Development, the European Commission, the United States State Department, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Ford Foundation, with conditions attached to some of those funds.

  Amnesty deliberately concentrates reporting on relatively more open countries rather than attempting a statistically representative survey of global abuse. A former Secretary General explained the logic: for many nations, the United States functions as a model, and large countries influence smaller ones. The organization also consciously shifted in 1993-94 toward producing more press releases and fewer background reports, increasing its focus on countries that were already attracting media attention. This strategy has placed Amnesty's country focus close to that of Human Rights Watch; between 1991 and 2000, the two organizations shared eight of their ten most-reported-on countries. The organization's logo, a candle wrapped in barbed wire, was designed by Diana Redhouse in 1963 as Amnesty's first Christmas card, drawing on the proverb: better to light a candle than curse the darkness.