American Civil War Centennial

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The American Civil War Centennial was not simply a series of ceremonies. It was a mirror held up to a divided nation at one of its most turbulent moments. Commemoration activities began in 1957, a full four years before the 100th anniversary of the war's first battle, and ran until 1965, closing with the anniversary of the surrender at Appomattox. In between, it revealed just how unresolved the questions of the Civil War still were. Who got to define the war's meaning? Whose sacrifice deserved celebration? And what happened when the government tried to build national unity from a conflict whose wounds had never fully closed?

• 2. Building the Commission

  ›

  Congress created the United States Civil War Centennial Commission in 1957, and from the very first, the federal government was reluctant to take charge of the message. Neither Congress nor President Dwight D. Eisenhower sought a unified theme for the commemorations. The law establishing the Commission explicitly pushed most of the implementation work down to the state level, and almost every state responded by setting up its own centennial commission.

  Within the national Commission, strong personalities pulled in different directions. Ulysses S. Grant III, the war's first chairman and grandson of the Union general, favored large public spectacles, events like sham battles and reenactments that would draw crowds. Emory University Professor Bell Wiley pushed instead for a serious preservation effort, urging that historic letters, newspapers, and public documents be documented before they were lost. Karl Betts, the Commission's first executive director and a businessman by background, saw the centennial as an engine for economic development.

  All three men found one point of agreement. Shaped by Cold War politics, they settled on a consensus that all Americans were ideologically united, which meant that the civil rights questions lurking inside the war's history would not be prominently addressed. That decision would haunt the commemoration throughout.

• 3. The Battle Flag's Return

  ›

  Before 1957, white Southerners who celebrated their heritage had drawn on a wide and scattered collection of signs and symbols. In the late 1950s, something shifted. Many coalesced around a modified version of the battle flag of the Army of Northern Virginia as the emblem of centennial commemoration. That flag was raised at event after event across the South.

  In April 1961, South Carolina's government raised the modified Confederate flag on the grounds of the State House as part of its official 100th-anniversary commemoration of the reduction of Fort Sumter. Eleven months later, state lawmakers passed a law making the flag's presence permanent, requiring it to fly over the capitol itself. The decision was bound up with white resistance to integration and the civil rights movement, and the flag remained in that position until 2015, when it was removed following the Charleston church shooting.

• 4. North, South, and Separate Truths

  ›

  The same geographical fault lines that had helped ignite the Civil War shaped how the state commissions interpreted it a century later. Northern and Southern commissions reached for different vocabularies, sponsored different memorials, and encouraged different kinds of public events.

  For the governments of the Southern states, the centennial offered a specific opportunity: to frame Jim Crow and segregation not as a political imposition but as the natural expression of a distinct Southern way of life. Many white Southerners responded with real enthusiasm, seeing the commemorations as an occasion to honor battlefield courage and continuity of culture. For the first time on a large scale, Americans, especially white Southerners, were recruited or volunteered into historical reenactment groups that performed pageants and re-created battles, field maneuvers, and encampments.

  Historian Robert J. Cook examined this dynamic in a 2007 study of the commemoration. Cook argued that efforts to use the centennial as a platform for serious adult education about the war's actual causes and issues were unsuccessful, and that the whole enterprise represented a missed opportunity.

• 5. Parks, Stamps, and Lasting Ground

  ›

  Not all of the Centennial's effects were symbolic. The National Park Service and other federal agencies that controlled key Civil War battlefields used the commemoration as leverage to lobby Congress successfully for increased funding. That money paid for re-landscaping and new interpretive work at battlefields across the country, and much of the interpretive infrastructure visitors encounter at major Civil War sites today traces back to planning decisions made in the early 1960s.

  At least two significant battlefields joined the National Park Service's roster during those years. Pea Ridge National Military Park in Arkansas and Wilson's Creek National Battlefield in Missouri were both added in this period. Civil War-related state parks, including Perryville Battlefield State Historic Site in Kentucky, also owe their origins to the Centennial years. The U.S. Post Office issued a series of commemorative stamps to mark the occasion as well.

  Alec Wilder composed Names from the War in 1961, a piece written specifically for the centennial and based on a long poem of the same name by Civil War historian Bruce Catton. It stands as one of the few cultural works directly commissioned for the commemoration that has a named author and a named source still on record.

• 6. The Reenactment Legacy

  ›

  One of the most durable things the Civil War Centennial created was not a monument or a park boundary. It was a community of people who dressed in period uniforms, camped in period conditions, and performed the movements of battles that ended a century before they were born. Before the Centennial, reenactment groups existed in scattered form. The Centennial years organized them, recruited them, and gave them a public stage.

  The infrastructure those years built, the networks, the costumes, the protocols, the expectation that communities would gather to watch such events, did not dissolve when 1965 arrived and the anniversary of Appomattox closed the official commemoration. It persisted and grew into a substantial American subculture. Whether those reenactors would carry the Cold War consensus about national unity, or eventually grapple more directly with what the war was fought over, remained an open question that the centennial's organizers had deliberately declined to answer.