Absolutism (European history)

• 1. Defining The Absolutist State

  ›

  The word absolutism emerged long after the kings who supposedly wielded it had died. Historians applied the term post-hoc to monarchs before the French Revolution, with the adjective absolute going back to the Middle Ages. Deriving from the Latin absolutus or absolved, it held a predominantly legal meaning describing power that took no heed of law's constraints. Wilhelm Roscher first attempted to periodize the absolutist age in the 19th century and assigned the enlightened epoch a separate historical position. He put forward a thesis of stages beginning with denominational absolutism, turning into courtly absolutism, and finally ending in enlightened absolutism. This typification began as a way to describe a form of monarchical power unrestrained by churches, legislatures, or social elites. The era spanned from the 16th century through the 19th century with several notable Medieval precursors.

• 2. Archetypes And Key Monarchs

  ›

  Louis XIV ruled France from 1643 until his death in 1715, earning the nickname the Sun King. His reign stands as the prime example of courtly absolutism within European history. Peter I, known as Peter the Great, governed the Tsardom of Russia from 1682 to 1725. Frederick II reigned over Prussia between 1740 and 1786, calling himself the Great. Catherine II led the Russian Empire from 1762 to 1796 under the title Catherine the Great. Joseph II held power in the Holy Roman Empire from 1765 to 1790. These rulers exemplified the system through their control over vast territories and populations. They spent considerable sums on extravagant houses for themselves and their nobles. In an absolutist state, monarchs often required nobles to live in the royal palace while state officials ruled the nobles' lands in their absence.

• 3. Institutional Consolidation Strategies

  ›

  The nationalization process manifested itself in the formation of standing armies across Europe. A bureaucratic apparatus dependent solely on the ruler emerged during this period. The integration of the church into the state became a standard feature of these regimes. A mercantilist economic system supported the growing power of the crown. Absolute monarchs typically were considered to have the divine right of kings as a cornerstone of philosophy justifying their power. This stood in contrast to previous orders where kings were vassals of the pope and emperor. Monarchs reduced effective noble power by causing them to become reliant upon largesse for livelihoods. State officials ruled the nobles' lands in their absence, stripping local authority from traditional aristocrats. Professional bureaucracies replaced feudal administrative structures that had previously governed daily life.

• 4. Philosophical Foundations Of Sovereignty

  ›

  Jean Bodin lived between 1530 and 1596 and formulated the thesis of sovereignty in his work Six Books of the Republic. He stated the sovereign's claim to omnipotence on which later absolutist systems of rule were built. Bodin first formulated the idea that the state represented an absolute, indivisible, and perpetual entity. The state directed common interests of several households in the right direction through its sovereign power. However, Bodin did not grant rulers a right to princely arbitrariness in his writings. He demanded respect for natural rights, divine commandments, and protection of family and property. Rulers claimed to receive power by the grace of God while Bodin provided theoretical foundations for this belief. His legal theories justified the existence of unrestrained monarchical power against other institutions like churches or legislatures.

• 5. Evolution Into Enlightened Despotism

  ›

  Enlightened absolutism refers to conduct and policies of European absolute monarchs during the 18th and early 19th centuries. These leaders were influenced by ideas of the Enlightenment espousing them to enhance their power. John Stuart Mill stated that despotism is a legitimate mode of government dealing with barbarians if improvement was the end goal. Enlightened rulers distinguished themselves from ordinary rulers by claiming to rule for subjects' well-being. Frederick II of Prussia described himself as the first servant of his state. The enlightened despotism of Emperor Joseph II summarized the approach as everything for the people but nothing by the people. Some historians note these rulers may have played a part in abolition of serfdom in Europe. General well-being became primary goal of otherwise absolute ruling monarchs during this transition period.

• 6. Historiographical Debates On Reality

  ›

  There is considerable variety of opinion by historians on extent of absolutism among European monarchs. Perry Anderson argued quite a few monarchs achieved levels of absolutist control over their states. Roger Mettam disputed the very concept of absolutism in his historical analysis. Historians who disagree argue most labeled monarchs exerted no greater power than other non-absolutist rulers. They emphasize differences between absolutist rhetoric and realities of effective use of power. William Bouwsma summed up contradiction stating governments were perennially in financial trouble unable to tap wealth. These governments likely stirred costly revolts whenever they attempted to develop adequate income. Nothing so clearly indicates limits of royal power as fact that governments struggled financially. Most monarchs labeled as absolutist faced constraints despite claims of unrestrained authority.