Zero-emissions vehicle

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Zero-emission vehicles are defined, at their most exacting, by what happens when a cold engine first turns over. Internal combustion engines produce their maximum burst of pollutants precisely at that moment, during what regulators call cold-start conditions. The California Air Resources Board coined the phrase "zero-emission vehicle" and built that scenario into the standard. A qualifying vehicle must produce no exhaust or other pollutants under any and all possible operational modes and conditions. Transport is cited as the primary source of greenhouse gases in a number of countries and states, making this standard politically charged. The questions ahead concern what precisely qualifies and where pollution actually goes when a tailpipe falls silent. Regulators and cities have fought over these answers for decades. A vehicle with no exhaust from its engine may still carry a hidden environmental cost.

  123

• 2. What Counts as Zero

  ›

  CARB and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency originally identified six categories of harmful pollutants: particulates, hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, ozone, lead, and various oxides of nitrogen. More recent applications of the term expanded that list. Volatile organic compounds now fall within the common definition, as do several toxic airborne compounds. Among those specifically cited is 1,3-Butadiene. Carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are also included in many current uses of the term.

  Battery electric vehicles qualify under the standard, as do fuel cell vehicles powered by hydrogen and muscle-powered vehicles like bicycles and gravity racers. Each produces no pollutants from its onboard power source during operation.

  Hydrogen internal combustion engine vehicles are excluded from the ZEV category because they do generate some emissions, even if small. Vehicles running on 100% biofuel face the same exclusion: they emit exhaust gases, even if they are considered carbon neutral overall.

  Emissions from the manufacturing process fall entirely outside the definition. One argument holds that the emissions produced during vehicle manufacture are currently comparable in magnitude to those generated over a vehicle's entire operating lifetime. Advocates of zero-emission vehicles argue that manufacturing emissions will shrink as production scales up, technology advances, and renewable energy spreads further through supply chains.

  146712

• 3. The Shifting Burden

  ›

  CARB's original definition accounts only for pollutants emitted at the point of vehicle operation. That restriction means a battery electric vehicle may simply relocate its emissions to wherever the electricity charging it is generated. If that electricity comes from coal or natural gas plants rather than from hydroelectric, wind, solar, or nuclear sources, the pollution does not vanish. It moves.

  With the 2018 U.S. energy mix, a zero-emission vehicle would produce an average 58% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions per mile driven. In the United Kingdom, that predicted reduction was 40%. In China, it was 19%.

  Fuel cell vehicles powered by hydrogen face a parallel version of the problem. Hydrogen can be produced via electrolysis, but that process requires electricity. Only if that electricity comes from clean sources can the vehicle be considered genuinely zero-emission from well to wheel. Compressed hydrogen can also function as a form of energy storage. Electricity generated by wind turbines when demand is low can drive electrolysis, producing hydrogen for later use. Electricity demand is lowest at night. That surplus capacity creates a practical window for charging EV batteries or producing hydrogen without drawing on dedicated generation.

  1314175

• 4. The Regulatory Battle

  ›

  CARB's authority over greenhouse gas emissions began in 2004, grounded in California's Pavley Act of 2002, also known as AB 1493. Opposition came quickly. The U.S. EPA rejected the waiver California needed to enforce its own greenhouse gas rules, doing so in 2007. California's Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, designated AB 32, then granted CARB broader authority. That mandate included the power to set low-carbon fuel standards.

  In the United Kingdom, the definition came under legal scrutiny in a different arena. The Advertising Standards Authority investigated Renault UK over advertising claims about its "zero-emission vehicles." The ASA's ruling arrived in March 2010: the advertisement was banned. It had breached the CAP Broadcast TV Code, with violations found under four specific rules addressing misleading advertising and environmental claims. Those four rules were 5.1.1, 5.1.2, 5.2.1, and 5.2.6.

  11

• 5. Pedals, Panels, Prototypes

  ›

  Bicycle ownership became common in the mid-19th century, during what was then called the bike boom, well before mass car ownership. In the 1960s, the Flying Pigeon became the single most popular mechanized vehicle on the planet. China today has some 210 million electric bikes on its roads.

  Solar Impulse 2 completed a circumnavigation of the Earth in 2015-2016, powered entirely by solar energy. Electric aircraft can draw power from multiple sources: batteries, ground cables, solar cells, ultracapacitors, fuel cells, and power beaming.

  Rotorsails, wing sails, turbo sails, and skysails can propel boats and other watercraft without any onboard engine. On land, the Segway Personal Transporter operates on two lithium-ion batteries and produces zero emissions during use. It is eleven times more energy-efficient than the average American car.

  The South African Department of Science & Technology, working alongside private investors, made US$5 million available through the Innovation Fund. The goal was to develop a five-seater car called the Joule, planned for release in 2014. The company behind the Joule ceased trading in 2012, before the vehicle reached production.

  As individual projects rose and fell, cities had begun drawing their own geographic boundaries around the concept.

  181916

• 6. Cities and Zones

  ›

  Oxford, in February 2022, became the first city in Britain to introduce a zero emission zone. Electric vehicles enter the zone free of charge. Other vehicles driving within it between 07:00 and 19:00 may pay up to £10.

  London's Ultra Low Emission Zone, known as ULEZ, launched in 2019 and was set to expand in 2023. Daily charge rates apply to vehicles that do not meet the zone's emission standards, creating a financial incentive to shift to cleaner options.

  Japanese public transport has moved toward zero emissions in response to growing environmental concern. Honda launched a conceptual bus featuring exercise machines at the rear, designed to generate kinetic energy for propulsion. The stop-and-start nature of urban transit routes also makes regenerative braking a viable energy recovery strategy for future public transport systems.

  Governments have also moved beyond incentives. Measures to phase out fossil fuel vehicles directly have appeared in several countries. That approach would leave zero-emission vehicles not as one option among many but as the only vehicles permitted on the road.

  2221