United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine arrived before the General Assembly on the 29th of November 1947 as Resolution 181, and by the time the votes were counted, 33 nations had said yes, 13 had said no, and the modern Middle East had been set on a course from which it has never fully recovered. The plan proposed dividing a single piece of land between two peoples who both believed it was theirs by right. One side celebrated with bonfires and free champagne in Tel Aviv. The other walked out of the chamber and announced they would not be bound by the decision. What the resolution could not resolve was how to actually make partition happen. Britain, which had governed the territory for decades, refused to enforce it. The violence that followed consumed tens of thousands of lives. And the legal and moral arguments that were argued in those committee rooms in 1947 are still being argued today. How did a four-part document attached to a UN resolution come to carry so much weight, and why did it fail so completely in the weeks after it passed?

• 2. The Land and Its Numbers

  ›

  At the end of 1946, Palestine held roughly 1,846,000 people: about 1,203,000 Arabs, 608,000 Jews, and 35,000 others. Those numbers were the arithmetic at the heart of every argument about the plan. Arabs formed a two-thirds majority of the population, yet the partition proposal allocated 56.47 percent of the Mandate's territory to the Jewish state and only 42.88 percent to the Arab state, with the remaining 0.65 percent set aside as an international zone covering Jerusalem, Bethlehem, and surrounding areas. The arable land figures made this asymmetry sharper. At the time the UN passed its decision, Arabs owned 93 percent of the arable land, and Jews owned 7 percent. Defenders of the allocation argued that the Jewish state included the Negev Desert, which was mostly unsuitable for agriculture and urban development at the time, and that the large desert territory was intended to make room for future Jewish immigration. The Jewish state, under the plan, would still contain roughly 407,000 Arabs alongside 498,000 Jews, a near-even split. Sub-Committee 2, drawing on a British report dated the 1st of November 1947, revised the Bedouin population upward significantly: a census in Beersheba had counted 3,389 Bedouin houses and 8,722 tents, yielding a total Bedouin population estimated at approximately 127,000. With that correction, the sub-committee calculated that the proposed Jewish State would contain about 509,780 Arabs and 499,020 Jews, making Arabs the majority at the outset. That finding went nowhere in the final vote, but it illustrated just how contested the numbers behind the map really were.

• 3. A History of Failed Partitions

  ›

  Partition was not a new idea when UNSCOP assembled in 1947. In 1937, following a six-month Arab General Strike and armed insurrection aimed at national independence, the British established the Peel Commission, which concluded the Mandate had become unworkable and recommended splitting the territory into an Arab state linked to Transjordan, a small Jewish state, and a British mandatory zone. That plan envisioned transferring roughly 225,000 Arabs out of the envisaged Jewish state and 1,250 Jews out of the Arab state, described as compulsory in the last resort. Palestinian Arab leadership rejected the Peel proposals entirely. David Ben-Gurion and Chaim Weizmann pushed the Zionist Congress to give provisional approval, and in a letter to his son in October 1937 Ben-Gurion wrote that partition would be a first step to possession of the land as a whole. The British then set up the Woodhead Commission to test whether partition was even practical. In 1938 the British government declared that the financial, administrative, and political difficulties made partition impracticable, and the idea was shelved. By May 1939, the MacDonald White Paper had reversed course entirely, declaring that Palestine should not become a Jewish state and placing strict limits on Jewish immigration. The League of Nations commission found the White Paper in conflict with the Mandate's own terms, but the outbreak of the Second World War shut down further debate. When Britain announced in February 1947 that it intended to hand the Palestine question to the United Nations, it was acknowledging that it had run out of options after a decade of failed plans.

• 4. The Vote and Its Pressure

  ›

  The two-thirds majority needed to pass the resolution looked uncertain right up to the final days. On the 25th of November 1947, the committee voted 25 to 13 with 17 abstentions, one short of the required threshold. What followed in the three-day delay before the final vote has been described by multiple sources as pressure unlike anything seen at the United Nations before. Zionists launched an intense lobby on the White House, and the Democratic Party, drawing heavily on Jewish contributions, warned President Truman that failure to support partition would endanger the party. Truman later stated that he had never faced as much pressure and propaganda aimed at the White House as he had in this instance; he described the persistence of some Zionist leaders as disturbing and annoying. A telegram signed by 26 US senators with influence over foreign aid bills was sent to wavering countries. Reports named specific nations: Liberia's ambassador complained that the US delegation threatened aid cuts, and Harvey S. Firestone Jr., president of Firestone Natural Rubber Company, also pressured the Liberian government. In the days before the vote, the Philippines representative General Carlos P. Romulo called the partition plan repugnant to the valid nationalist aspirations of the Palestinian people. After a phone call from Washington, Romulo was recalled and the Philippines' vote changed. Bernard Baruch visited France's UN delegate and implied that a vote against partition might block American reconstruction aid, at a time when French currency reserves were exhausted. France ultimately voted in favour. On the other side, India's Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru spoke with contempt for the way the vote had been lined up; his sister Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit, the Indian ambassador, had reportedly received daily warnings that her life was in danger unless she voted for partition. Cuba's delegation voted against the plan, stating publicly that it could not be party to coercing the majority in Palestine. On the 29th of November, the General Assembly voted 33 to 13, with 10 abstentions.

• 5. Acceptance, Rejection, and Strategy

  ›

  Ben-Gurion addressed the Central Committee of the Histadrut in the days after the vote and spoke with evident anxiety about the demographic numbers. The total population of the Jewish State at establishment, he noted, would be about one million, with almost 40 percent non-Jews. He said plainly that such a composition did not provide a stable basis for a Jewish State, and that there could not be absolute certainty that control would remain in the hands of the Jewish majority with only a 60 percent share. Revisionist Zionist leader Menachem Begin, heading the Irgun Tsvai Leumi, opposed the plan as a renunciation of what he regarded as legitimately Jewish territory. He predicted that the Arabs would attack the small state and that a war would follow. Some scholars, citing the work of Simha Flapan, have argued that the Jewish Agency's acceptance was a calculated tactical move designed to gain international recognition while leaving open the path to further territorial expansion. Baruch Kimmerling, writing later, put it directly: Zionists officially accepted the plan but invested their efforts toward improving its terms and expanding boundaries while reducing the Arab population within them. Arab leaders took no less unequivocal a position. The Arab Higher Committee rejected both the majority and minority UNSCOP recommendations, arguing that only an Arab state in the whole of Palestine would be consistent with the UN Charter. The joint Arab declaration issued the day after the vote called the result doubly invalid, obtained under great pressure and duress. Azzam Pasha, the General Secretary of the Arab League, had told an Egyptian newspaper in October 1947 that the Jews should not force the Arabs into a war, which he described as a potential war of elimination comparable to the Mongol massacre. Iraq's Foreign Minister Fadel Jamali warned from the General Assembly floor on the 28th of November 1947 that partition imposed against the majority's will would jeopardize peace across the Middle East and damage relations between Jews and non-Jews throughout the Arab world.

• 6. Aftermath and Long Shadow

  ›

  Britain had already decided, in a cabinet meeting on the 4th of December 1947, that the Mandate would end at midnight on the 14th of May 1948 and that it would not enforce the UN partition plan. In the months between the vote and the Mandate's end, Britain refused to share administration with the proposed UN transition regime, would not let the UN Palestine Commission establish a presence more than a fortnight before the Mandate expired, and declined to assist in handing territory or authority to any successor. The violence that the Arab leaders had forecast, and that Ben-Gurion had anticipated, arrived quickly. The 1947-48 civil war broke out between Palestinian Jews and Arabs. On the evening of the 14th of May 1948, the Jewish People's Council gathered at the Tel Aviv Museum, then declared the establishment of the State of Israel. The next morning, Arab states invaded. By the time the fighting subsided, 85 percent of the Palestinians living in the areas that became the State of Israel had been expelled or fled. The partition plan itself was never implemented as written. Jerusalem did not become an international zone. The proposed Arab state was not established. In 1988, the Palestine Liberation Organization cited Resolution 181 as the legal foundation for the Palestinian Declaration of Independence, arguing that the resolution continued to provide international legitimacy for Palestinian sovereignty. In 2011, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said publicly that the Arab rejection of the 1947 plan had been a mistake he hoped to rectify. On the 29th of November 2022, a monument designed by sculptor Sam Philipe was unveiled on a hilltop in Netanya to mark the plan's 75th anniversary; the date itself is the annual International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People.