Turco-Mongol tradition

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The Turco-Mongol tradition was born from one of history's most sweeping collisions of peoples, languages, and faiths. When the armies of Genghis Khan swept across Eurasia in the 13th century, they did not simply conquer territories. They set in motion a slow, centuries-long transformation in which the conquerors gradually became something new. By the time the dust settled, the Mongol ruling elites of the Golden Horde and the Chagatai Khanate had adopted Turkic languages and Islam, yet kept the political and legal frameworks their ancestors had built on the steppe.

  What emerged from that fusion was a distinct ethnocultural identity: the Turco-Mongols. They would go on to found empires stretching from Crimea in the west to the Tian Shan mountains in the east, and from Southern Siberia down to the Indian subcontinent. One of their number, Babur, born in 1483 and a descendant of Timur, would establish the Mughal Empire. How did a ruling class absorb the culture of the people it defeated, while still claiming the prestige of Genghis Khan? And how did that synthesis spread, eventually shaping the courts of South Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East for centuries to come?

• 2. The Steppe Fusion

  ›

  At the kurultai of 1206, Genghis Khan was declared ruler of a unified steppe confederation, and the formal Mongol ulus came into being. That union was never purely Mongolic. Tribes related to Genghis Khan, such as the Barlas, Qongirat, Manghud, Dughlat, and Ushin, stood alongside Mongolic-speaking peoples including the Kereits, Jalairs, Oirats, and Tatars. Turkic-speaking groups, among them the Naimans, Onguts, and Uyghurs, were also part of the confederation from the outset.

  The 13th-century chronicle known as The Secret History of the Mongols described this new people simply as "the people of the felt tents." The work Jami' al-tawarikh, a universal history compiled under the Ilkhanids of Iran by the scholar Rashid al-Din, went further, classifying the population as consisting of two new and one original Mongol component. As the ulus expanded into the Kipchak steppe, it absorbed further groups: the Kangly and Kipchaks among the Turkic peoples, and the Kara-Khitai among the Mongolic ones.

  By the mid-13th century the empire had split into four major Chinggisid states: the Yuan dynasty, the Ilkhanate, the Ulus of Jochi known as the Golden Horde, and the Ulus of Chagatai. The two eastern polities, the Yuan and Ilkhanate, did not survive the century's end intact. The Mongols of China returned to the Mongolian steppes in 1368 after the Ming Empire overthrew the Yuan. The Ilkhanid Mongols were absorbed into the Turkmen tribes of Iran and Anatolia. The Golden Horde and the Chagatai Khanate, however, endured, preserving a Mongol identity for roughly four more centuries until Russian conquest.

• 3. Language and Identity

  ›

  Long before Genghis Khan, Turkic and Mongolic peoples had been trading words across the steppe for millennia. Extensive lexical borrowings from Proto-Turkic into Proto-Mongolic occurred from at least the first millennium BCE. The two language families share borrowed similarities in their personal pronouns, and scholars date some of these to before the breakup of the Turkic peoples around 500 BCE. Deeper structural parallels, including synchronic vowel harmony, the absence of grammatical gender, extensive agglutination, and closely matched phonotactic rules, point to an even more ancient period of contact.

  These resemblances once led scholars to posit an Altaic language family linking Turkic, Mongolic, Tungusic, Koreanic, and Japonic languages. More recently, the evidence has shifted toward describing a Northeast Asian sprachbund, a zone of prolonged contact and borrowing rather than a shared ancestor. Within that zone, Turkic and Mongolic display the most extensive similarities of all. Turkic loanwords are, in fact, the most common foreign words found in the Mongolian vocabulary.

  After the Mongol conquests, linguistic assimilation followed the contours of each khanate. In the Golden Horde, most of the population, both sedentary and nomadic, adopted the Kypchak language, which then developed into the regional languages of the Kypchak groups once the Horde disintegrated. In the Chagatai Khanate, the Mongol elites adopted a form of Karluk Turkic that became known as the Chagatai language. This was the native tongue of the Timurid dynasty. It is also the direct ancestor of modern Uzbek and Uyghur.

• 4. Islam and the New Order

  ›

  The early Mongol conquerors largely followed Tengrism, yet they ruled over enormous Muslim populations in Iran and Central Asia. The shift came from within the ruling class itself. In the Golden Horde, the pivotal moment arrived when Uzbeg Khan assumed the throne in 1313 and declared Islam the state religion. He proscribed Buddhism and Shamanism among the Mongols in Russia, actively reversing the spread of Yuan culture. By 1315 he had succeeded in Islamicizing the Horde, a process he enforced by executing Jochid princes and Buddhist lamas who opposed him.

  Uzbeg Khan also renewed and extended the Golden Horde's alliance with the Mamluk Sultanate of Egypt, a relationship that had begun under an earlier ruler named Berke. He maintained a friendly bond with the Mamluk sultan and eventually arranged a marriage between a princess of his family and Al-Nasir Muhammad, Sultan of Egypt. His capital Sarai attracted merchants from other countries, and the slave trade flourished through the Mamluk connection. Under Uzbeg and his successor Jani Beg, who ruled from 1342 to 1357, Islam gained general acceptance across the Horde, though adherents remained tolerant of other beliefs.

  In the Chagatai Khanate, the transition began when Mubarak Shah converted to Islam, and the elite followed over time. The Timurid ruler Timur, who succeeded the Chagatai khans in Central Asia, took a distinctly ideological approach. According to the historian John Joseph Saunders, Timur was "the product of an Islamized and Iranized society" and not a steppe nomad in the traditional sense. He called himself the "Sword of Islam," patronized educational and religious institutions, and converted nearly all the Borjigin leaders during his lifetime. His decisive victory over the Christian Knights Hospitaller at the Siege of Smyrna reinforced his identity as a ghazi, a fighter on behalf of the faith.

• 5. Becoming Kipchak and Karluk

  ›

  Ibn Fadlallah al-Umari, secretary to the Egyptian sultan, recorded one of the most striking observations about the Turkification of the Golden Horde: "In ancient times, this state was the land of the Kipchaks, but when it was conquered by the Tatars, the Kipchaks became their subjects. Later, as the Tatars intermingled and intermarried with them, the land itself overcame the original qualities and racial characteristics of the Tatars." He concluded that long habitation in a land alters human nature according to the nature of the country itself.

  The 18th-century scholar Johann Eberhard Fischer offered a different explanation for why Turkic speech prevailed over Mongolian. He argued that Tatars served in Genghis Khan's armies in far greater numbers than the Mongols themselves, so wherever conquering forces settled, it was the Tatar language that took root while Mongolian disappeared. The Soviet Mongolist Boris Vladimirtsov noted, however, that the process was not uniform. In northern Central Asia, the adoption of Muslim culture by the Mongols proceeded more slowly than in Persia and the Central Asian heartland of Transoxiana, Khorasan, Khwarazm, and the Tarim Basin. Proximity to other ethnically related Turkic nomads was the key variable.

  The Kipchaks became, in Vladimirtsov's framing, the most Turco-Mongolised people and the strongest embodiment of Turco-Mongol legacies within the Turkic world. Their later dispersal meant that Islamic practice adapted to local environments, incorporating Roman Catholicism, Eastern Orthodox Christianity, Confucianism, and Tibetan Buddhism alongside the dominant Hanafi school of Islam. That flexibility also meant the Turco-Persian court tradition never took as deep an institutional hold among the Kipchak groups as it did among the Oghuz and Karluk peoples.

• 6. The Turco-Persian Legacy

  ›

  Among the successors of the Chagatai Khanate, the Turco-Mongol elites of Karluk ethnicity became the most enthusiastic patrons of the Turco-Persian tradition, the dominant culture among the Muslims of the Central Asian heartland. They carried it outward with them as they conquered new territories. It became the predominant culture of the ruling and elite classes across North India, Central Asia, the Tarim Basin in northwest China, and large parts of the Middle East.

  This was most visible in the states they built: the Timurid Empire, the Mughal Empire, and the succession of polities in the region known as Altishahr, including the Turpan Khanate and Yarkent Khanate. Even the Kipchak-origin Shaybanids and Janids, who expelled the Timurids in 1507 to take control of the Central Asian heartland as the Khanate of Bukhara, underwent a kind of reversed Karlukification. They came to see themselves as heirs and developers of Timurid civilisation and reconciled with the Mughals in India.

  From that long process of assimilation, reconquest, and cultural transmission emerged the modern identities of the Uzbek and Uyghur peoples, along with numerous Central and South Asian Muslim groups. All carry partial Mongol links. Yet the Turco-Persian inheritance is the more deeply embedded strand, a testament to the absorptive power of the urban, literate, and Islamic cultures that the original Mongol conquerors had swept over but ultimately could not resist.