The Plague (novel)

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The Plague, Albert Camus's 1947 novel set in the French Algerian city of Oran, begins with rats. Not one or two, but rats dying in the streets, in the hallways, on doorsteps, unnoticed at first by a population too busy with ordinary life to register what is accumulating beneath their feet. Then the deaths among people begin. Then the gates close. The novel draws on the cholera epidemic that killed a large proportion of Oran's population in 1849, yet Camus placed his story squarely in the 1940s, turning history into something that could speak directly to his own moment. What makes a city respond to catastrophe well, or badly? What does a person owe to strangers when survival itself is uncertain? And how does a writer, working in occupied France, tell a story about mass death without making it propaganda? Those are the questions the novel lives inside.

• 2. A City Under Quarantine

  ›

  Oran had known epidemic disease long before Camus wrote a word. According to an academic study, the bubonic plague struck the city in 1556 and again in 1678. Later outbreaks were smaller: 185 cases in 1921-76 in 1931, and 95 in 1944. None approached the catastrophic scale Camus imagined. That gap between historical record and fictional invention was deliberate. Camus needed a disaster large enough to expose how institutions behave, how individuals calculate loyalty, and how a whole society reorganizes itself around death. Authorities in the novel are slow to name what is happening. Official notices appear but are written to minimize alarm. A supply of anti-plague serum arrives, only to prove insufficient, and national emergency reserves are already depleted. By mid-August, armed sentries are shooting people who try to escape. Martial law and curfew follow. Funerals are stripped of ceremony, conducted with speed and with little concern for the bereaved. The quarantine becomes a world unto itself, with its own economy, its own moral pressures, and its own strange intimacies.

• 3. Characters Caught Inside

  ›

  Raymond Rambert is a visiting journalist when the gates close, separated from his girlfriend in Paris. His initial response is entirely practical: he courts criminals willing to smuggle him out. His arc turns when Tarrou tells him plainly that other people in the city also have loved ones outside it. Rambert stays. By late October, when an anti-plague serum is tried for the first time on the young son of the magistrate Othon, Rambert is there, watching alongside Paneloux and the doctor Rieux as the child suffers and dies. Jean Tarrou, a vacationer trapped by the quarantine, volunteers alongside Joseph Grand, a civil engineer, to assist Rieux in treating the sick. Tarrou eventually shares the story of his life with Rieux, including his deep opposition to capital punishment. The two men, to take their minds off the epidemic, go swimming in the sea together. Cottard occupies the other end of the moral spectrum: a remorseful criminal who attempted suicide before the plague began, he becomes wealthy through smuggling during the quarantine. When the epidemic ends and the gates open, he cannot bear the return of ordinary life. He shoots from his window, kills a dog, and is arrested. Grand, the civil engineer, catches the plague himself and asks Rieux to burn all his papers; unexpectedly, he recovers.

• 4. Faith and the Problem of Suffering

  ›

  Father Paneloux delivers two sermons over the course of the novel, and they do not say the same thing. The first argues that the plague is God's punishment for the city's sinfulness. That sermon drives many residents toward religion who would not otherwise have sought it. The second sermon comes after Paneloux has watched an innocent child die in agony. There, he addresses the problem directly: the suffering of someone who did nothing wrong requires a person either to deny everything or to believe everything. He urges his congregation to keep fighting. A few days after that second sermon, Paneloux becomes ill. His symptoms do not match the plague's typical presentation, but he dies nonetheless. Scholars including Thomas L. Hanna and John Loose have separately analyzed the novel's engagement with Christian themes, particularly as they play out through Paneloux and Rieux. Paneloux's trajectory has drawn considerable literary attention for the question it raises about faith under conditions of extreme and unjust suffering.

• 5. The Absurdist Framework

  ›

  Camus resisted the label that critics and scholars most often attached to his work. The Plague is widely considered an existentialist classic, but Camus objected to that characterization. The novel's philosophical weight comes from its insistence on the powerlessness of individual characters to control their own fates. Critic Germaine Brée described the characters' resistance to the plague as "undramatic and stubborn", contrasting it with the ideology of "glorification of power" she found in the novels of André Malraux; in Camus's telling, the characters "are obscurely engaged in saving, not destroying, and this in the name of no ideology". Marina Warner identified the novel's larger concerns as "engagement", "paltriness and generosity", "small heroism and large cowardice", and what she called "all kinds of profoundly humanist problems, such as love and goodness, happiness and mutual connection". The narrative tone has been compared to Kafka's, and specifically to The Trial, where individual sentences carry multiple possible meanings. At the novel's close, Rieux reveals himself as the narrator and states that he aimed for an objective record; he wrote the chronicle, he says, to show that even in crisis, people are more good than evil.

• 6. Allegory and Occupation

  ›

  As early as April 1941, Camus was working on the novel, recording early ideas about "the redeeming plague" in his diaries. On the 13th of March 1942, he wrote to André Malraux that he was working on "a novel on the plague", and acknowledged it might sound strange. France was then under Nazi occupation. The novel has been read widely as an allegorical treatment of that occupation and the French resistance. Camus's own medical history, including a bout with tuberculosis, has also been examined by Lulu Haroutunian as a shaping influence. Scholar Perri Klass has raised a different kind of historical critique: sulfa drugs were available at the time the novel is set, and their absence from the treatment of patients is an omission Klass considers worth noting. Journalist Carlos Maza conducted a critical analysis of the novel in light of contemporary politics, drawing parallels to Trumpism and the COVID-19 pandemic.

• 7. Revival During COVID-19

  ›

  Sales in Italy tripled during that country's nationwide lockdown in 2020. Penguin Classics reported struggling to keep up with demand as the novel became a top-ten bestseller there. The publisher's editorial director said "it couldn't be more relevant to the current moment". Camus's daughter Catherine offered a pointed gloss: "we are not responsible for coronavirus but we can be responsible in the way we respond to it". The fictional cordon sanitaire around Oran had acquired a new audience. Adaptations multiplied around the same period. Neil Bartlett's 2017 stage version, in which a black woman replaces the male doctor Rieux and a black man replaces Tarrou, was adapted for radio and premiered on the 26th of July on BBC Radio 4 during the pandemic. Actors recorded the play at home during quarantine, with Sara Powell as Doctor Rieux, Billy Postlethwaite as Rambert, Joe Alessi as Cottard, Jude Aduwudike as Tarrou, and Colin Hurley as Grand. Among the earlier adaptations, Roberto Gerhard composed a cantata titled La Peste in 1965, and Luis Puenzo directed a film version in 1992.