The American Historical Review

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The American Historical Review has been called the premier journal of American history in the world, yet its origins trace to a meeting in December 1894 when the American Historical Association gathered and decided the United States needed something better than what it had. Not a magazine. Not a digest. A rigorous scientific instrument for the discipline of history itself.

  At that founding moment, the motivating frustration was plain: existing historical magazines were not rigorous enough. American historians, many of them trained at German universities, had returned home having seen what a serious academic journal looked like. They wanted the same standard on their side of the Atlantic. What emerged from that ambition was a publication that would eventually claim the highest impact factor of any history journal in the world.

  How did a journal born out of two university history departments come to represent an entire profession? And what does it mean to hold that position for more than a century?

• 2. Two Universities, One Journal

  ›

  Cornell University and Harvard University jointly launched the journal in 1895, an unusual arrangement that signaled from the start that the AHR was meant to belong to no single institution. The model was explicitly borrowed from abroad: The English Historical Review and the French Revue historique served as templates for what American historical scholarship could aspire to.

  The phrase written into the journal's founding purpose captures the scope of the ambition: "for the promotion of historical studies, the collection and preservation of historical documents and artifacts, and the dissemination of historical research." That language is not incidental. It positioned the journal as something closer to infrastructure for a discipline than a venue for individual scholars.

  At a conference in April 1895, twenty-six historians drawn from a diverse group of North American universities met to set the main guidelines and structure of the publication. The breadth of that group mattered: this was not a regional project or a departmental one. It was a deliberate attempt to speak for historical scholarship across the continent.

• 3. A Discipline Finding Its Footing

  ›

  The late nineteenth century was a period when the number of American university historians had grown substantially. Many had done their graduate training in Germany, where they absorbed not just methods but expectations: that historical writing should meet the same standards of rigor applied in other scholarly fields.

  Europe offered specific models. Historische Zeitschrift and Revue Historique were the journals these scholars had read and cited. Returning home, they found no American equivalent. The founding of the AHR was in part a professional coming-of-age: the discipline asserting that it had enough serious practitioners to sustain a serious publication.

  The journal's founding in 1895 coincided with, and helped accelerate, the professionalization of academic history in the United States. It gave historians a shared venue, a shared standard, and a way to measure what counted as scholarship worthy of the field.

• 4. How the Journal Runs

  ›

  Four times a year, in March, June, September, and December, the AHR publishes a new issue containing research articles, reviews, and other items. The editorial offices sit at the American Historical Association headquarters in Washington D.C., where a small staff handles production under the oversight of a board of editors and a team of associate review editors.

  The editorial board is composed of scholars who represent all fields of historical study, a structure that reflects the journal's stated aim of covering all periods and facets of history rather than any single specialty. That breadth is part of what makes the acceptance rate so striking: submissions for research articles are accepted at a rate of only 8-10%.

  Around 650 reviews appear in the journal each year. That volume of critical assessment means the AHR functions not only as a venue for new research but as one of the discipline's main mechanisms for evaluating the books historians produce.

• 5. Publishers and Recognition

  ›

  From the October 2007 issue through 2011, the University of Chicago Press published the journal. As of 2023, Oxford University Press has taken over that role, publishing it on behalf of the American Historical Association.

  In the 2011 Journal Citation Reports, the AHR held the highest impact factor among all history journals. Impact factor measures how frequently articles in a journal are cited by other scholars; ranking first across an entire discipline is a concrete marker of how central the journal has become to the work of historians worldwide.

  The AHR targets readers interested in all periods and facets of history, a scope that is unusually wide for an academic journal. Most scholarly publications narrow their focus to a region, an era, or a methodology. The AHR's refusal to specialize in that way is itself a kind of editorial argument: that the discipline of history is unified enough to sustain one journal that speaks for all of it.