Temple Works

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Temple Works stands in Holbeck, Leeds, a Victorian factory built in the image of ancient Egypt. When it opened in June 1840, it was said to be the biggest single room in the world. Sheep grazed on its grass-covered roof, not as a curiosity, but as part of a deliberate engineering system. The grass beneath them retained moisture in the mill, keeping the air inside damp enough for linen thread to hold. Three designers shaped the building: an engineer, a painter, and an architect. A flax merchant named John Marshall paid for it. Why did a Leeds industrialist build an Egyptian temple? And how did a grass-roofed factory in West Yorkshire become one of the most contested buildings in England?

• 2. The Egyptian Blueprint

  ›

  James Coombe, a former pupil of the engineer John Rennie, led the technical side of the design. Alongside him worked the painter David Roberts and the architect Joseph Bonomi the Younger. The office building facing Marshall Street took its proportions from two specific ancient structures. Its stone facade carried 18 full-height windows separated by 18 pillars, with an overhanging cornice. That cornice was modelled on the temple at Antaeopolis and the Temple of Horus at Edfu. The factory building behind it derived from the Typhonium at Dendera. Even the machinery inside received Egyptian treatment. Benjamin Hick supplied a 240 horsepower double-beam engine for the mill. His son, also named Benjamin, designed the engine's regulator in the form of a winged solar disk. A chimney originally rose in the shape of an obelisk. A crack forced its demolition in 1852, when a plain brick replacement took its place. The Marshalls' interest in Egyptology was the stated inspiration for the design. It shaped every visible element, from the stone facade to the iron machinery. But the decision to build at all grew from competitive pressures in the flax market that had nothing to do with aesthetics.

• 3. James Marshall's Wager

  ›

  By the early 1830s, the wet spinning process, introduced in 1829, had transformed the Marshall firm's fortunes. The transition took five years to complete. John Marshall's four sons all entered the business; increasingly, the father relied on James for the manufacturing side as he moved into semi-retirement. The firm at that time specialised in fine yarns, principally for the French market. That market was starting to shrink. James decided that diversification into thread and cloth manufacture was necessary. This decision required more floor space. He weighed two options. One was another six-storey mill on the site of the demolished Mill A on Water Lane. The other was a single-storey structure extending south from Mill C in Marshall Street to the junction with Sweet Street. He costed both carefully. The single-storey option came to £24,000, roughly 15% cheaper than the equivalent six-storey alternative. To test the concept, a model was built at one-third of the full size in the yard of Mill C. A Mr Smith had already built the first single-storey cotton mill in Deanston, near Stirling. The Marshalls planned something larger and more complete. James persuaded his father to approve the single-storey design. The factory was never extended to Sweet Street as James had planned. It was completed at roughly half the size he had forecast, with only half the spindles it could have housed. Before the machinery was even running, James had already written to his father describing the unusual arrangements for light and air inside the building.

• 4. Inside the Factory

  ›

  James Marshall wrote to his father John in May 1838 describing the skylights planned for the roof. About 60 conical glass skylights, each 14 feet in diameter, rose 10 feet above the roof surface. Light poured into the room at all hours of the day. Beneath the factory floor ran a maze of brick-vaulted cellars, housing passageways, tradesmen's shops, and private baths for workers. The cold baths were free; a hot bath cost one penny. A fan in one room pushed steam-heated air throughout the factory, maintaining a constant temperature and humidity. Sheep cannot use stairs, so a hydraulic lift was built to move them onto the roof. Benjamin Hick was a hydraulics engineer, but whether he was responsible for the lift's invention is not clear. The opening of the building in June 1840 was marked by a Temperance Tea for the firm's 2,600 workers. Six months after that celebration, the machinery was fully installed and production began. In 1847-50, a church dedicated to St John the Evangelist was constructed behind the mill, designed by George Gilbert Scott in the Gothic style. All the extra yarn produced at Temple Mill was turned into thread. No cloth was ever woven, as originally planned, because demand for finished products slumped during the 1840s. Free trade eroded the Leeds spinners' competitive edge; counterparts in Ireland, France, and Belgium proved impossible to undercut. Linen itself was being displaced by cotton. Day-to-day control of Temple Mill eventually passed to a manager named John Richardson, who had been with the firm since the 1820s.

• 5. Labor and Conflict

  ›

  In August 1842, barely two years after production began, the Plug Riots swept through Leeds. Outside the new mill in Marshall Street, as the Leeds Annals recorded, an excited mob armed with bludgeons and stones crammed the surrounding area. A Marshall family member and a number of workmen defended the yard door leading to the boilers; the crowd forced it open regardless. The rioters could not locate the boiler plug and withdrew without causing serious damage. They moved on to the mill of Messrs. Titley, Tatham and Walker in Water Lane. Prince George arrived there with Lancers at full speed. The Riot Act was read, and several ringleaders were taken prisoner.

  John Richardson installed several friends and relations in senior positions, paying each between £300 and £500 a year. On the 11th of August 1871, 600 operatives at the Water Lane mills staged a one-day strike demanding a 10% pay rise. Richardson first threatened the strikers, then closed all the mills the following day. Stephen Marshall, representing the third generation of the family, traced the unrest specifically to Temple Mill. He proposed the public dismissal of the Temple Mill foreman, designed to ruin the man. Other family members persuaded Stephen to reopen the mills and negotiate instead. Talks dragged on for days. The Leeds Mercury published an article contrasting the poverty of a worker's life with the spending and luxury of the Marshall family. After a family meeting, the 10% pay rise was conceded. The Marshalls resolved privately to address the troublemakers at Temple Mill in the long term. The firm outlasted most of its Leeds competitors but still closed in 1886, having made a loss in twenty-one of its last forty years.

• 6. After the Looms

  ›

  Temple Works was sold by auction in 1886, along with all the other assets of the Marshall firm. By the 1970s it had become the Kays Mail Order Warehouse, and workers ending night shifts were photographed outside by Peter Mitchell. A planning application submitted in July 2005 proposed partial demolition and refurbishment of the mill. The plans included a retail centre, offices, cafes, 75 flats, and parking. On the 8th of December 2008, a stone pillar in the mill's facade collapsed. A slab of millstone grit fell onto the pavement in Marshall Street, and the roof parapet above bowed outward. English Heritage advised on a repair strategy. Their spokesman described the building as probably the finest example of a carved stone elevation in the whole region.

  In November 2015, Burberry announced plans to use the site for manufacturing. Following the Brexit referendum, the company put those plans on hold and finally abandoned them in 2017. That year the building went to auction with a starting price of £1. The new buyer, CEG, estimated the restoration cost at £35 million in June 2019. The building formed part of plans to regenerate the South Bank of Leeds.

  In March 2020, the building came under consideration as a permanent northern branch of the British Library. The government's 2020 budget pledged £25 million toward the restoration. In February 2025, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government confirmed a further £10 million. The money went to Homes England with a view to bringing Temple Works into public ownership. The Culture Recovery Fund, working with Historic England, also made available over £1 million for repair work.

  John Betjeman filmed Temple Works for a BBC documentary about Leeds city architecture in 1968. In late 2009 the building opened briefly as an arts centre, with an initial exhibition during Leeds Light Night on the 9th of October. The poet Seni Seneviratne referenced it in the poem 'A Wider View'. The poem forms part of the Worlds and Lives AQA Anthology for the AQA GCSE English Literature specification. Temple Works also appeared in the second episode of the third series of the Leeds-based television series DCI Banks. The viability of a permanent British Library presence, the stated goal behind the February 2025 funding, remained to be established.