Skip to content
— CH. 1 · THE 1973 NORRMALMSTORG ROBBERY —

Stockholm syndrome

~4 min read · Ch. 1 of 6
6 sections
  • On the 23rd of August 1973, Jan-Erik Olsson entered Kreditbanken in Stockholm with a loaded gun. He held four employees hostage inside one of the bank's vaults for six days until the 28th of August. The group included three women and one man who remained trapped while police surrounded the building. Police negotiators attempted to resolve the standoff without using force. They made a critical error when they sent a 16-year-old boy into the bank thinking he was an associate of Olsson. The boy escaped unharmed but the incident agitated the robber significantly. Olsson fired rounds at the teenager before the situation escalated further. Hostage Kristin Enmark later described feeling more fear toward the police than toward her captors. She stated that the authorities' careless approach endangered their lives more than the robbers did. Enmark spent decades insisting she had no emotional bond with her captors. She claimed she only acted to survive the ordeal.

  • Swedish criminologist Nils Bejerot coined the term after the robbery ended on the 28th of August 1973. He never met or spoke to any of the hostages during or after the incident. Bejerot analyzed the victims from a distance while they were still in custody. He appeared on a news cast shortly after the captives were released to explain their behavior. He told the audience that the hostages had been brainwashed by their captors. He named the condition Norrmalmstorgssyndromet after the square where the robbery occurred. The phrase translates to The Norrmalm Square syndrome in English. It eventually became known internationally as Stockholm syndrome. Psychiatric experts later noted he conducted no formal clinical studies on the four people involved. His diagnosis relied entirely on media reports and police briefings rather than direct observation. This lack of personal contact remains a central point of criticism for his work today.

  • Patty Hearst was taken hostage by the Symbionese Liberation Army in 1974. She was the granddaughter of publisher William Randolph Hearst. Her captors gave her the name Tania and recorded her denouncing her family and the police. She later participated in bank robberies with the group using her new identity. After her arrest in 1975, her defense lawyer F. Lee Bailey attempted to use the concept of bonding as a legal strategy. The court rejected this argument because the term did not exist officially at the time. Hearst served seven years before President Bill Clinton commuted her sentence. Another major event involved the 1980 siege of the Iranian Embassy in London. Twenty-six hostages were held during that incident which ended with a special forces attack. Five of the six captors died while all but one hostage survived. These high-profile cases helped popularize the idea of emotional bonds between victims and kidnappers across global news cycles.

  • The Federal Bureau of Investigation released a bulletin in 1999 containing data from over 1,200 hostage incidents. Their analysis found that only 8% of kidnapping victims showed signs of Stockholm syndrome. When researchers excluded those who displayed negative feelings toward law enforcement the percentage dropped to 5%. A separate survey of 600 police agencies conducted in 1989 revealed zero cases where victim-kidnapper bonds interfered with rescue operations. This database suggests the phenomenon remains extremely rare despite its fame in fiction and media. Sensational stories cause the public to perceive it as common rather than exceptional. Crisis negotiators are advised to place the condition in proper perspective based on these statistics. The rarity of actual cases contradicts the widespread belief that it occurs frequently in real-world situations.

  • Stockholm syndrome has never been included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders since its inception. The American Psychiatric Association uses this manual as the authoritative guide for psychiatric diagnosis in the United States. Critics argue the lack of academic study prevents formal recognition of the condition. Many experts believe the symptoms fall under trauma bonding or post-traumatic stress disorder instead. Dr. Allan Wade presented findings at Dignity Conference 2015 after interviewing Kristin Enmark directly. He argued that concepts like Stockholm syndrome shift focus away from actual events to invented pathologies. Australian journalist Jess Hill described the syndrome as a dubious pathology founded on a lie in her 2019 treatise See What You Made Me Do. She noted that most diagnoses originate from media reports rather than professional psychologists or psychiatrists. The absence of clear diagnostic criteria continues to fuel skepticism among scholars and medical professionals worldwide.

  • Lima syndrome describes an inversion where abductors develop sympathy for their hostages. This concept emerged from the 1996 Japanese embassy hostage crisis in Lima Peru. Members of a militant movement took hundreds of people hostage during a party at the ambassador's residence. Most captives were released early which limited research into the dynamic between captor and captive. High-level diplomats involved possessed strong communication skills that may have strengthened bonds with their kidnappers. London syndrome represents another variation where hostages arouse antipathy by defying their captors. The name comes from the 1980 siege of the Iranian Embassy in London. During this event special forces killed five of six captors while rescuing all but one hostage. These alternative syndromes highlight how different dynamics can emerge depending on specific circumstances within each situation.

Common questions

When did the 1973 Stockholm bank robbery occur that led to the term Stockholm syndrome?

The robbery began on the 23rd of August 1973 and ended on the 28th of August 1973. Jan-Erik Olsson held four employees hostage inside Kreditbanken in Stockholm during this six-day standoff.

Who coined the term Stockholm syndrome after the 1973 bank robbery?

Swedish criminologist Nils Bejerot coined the term Norrmalmstorgssyndromet after the robbery concluded on the 28th of August 1973. He analyzed the victims from a distance without ever meeting or speaking to them directly.

What percentage of kidnapping victims showed signs of Stockholm syndrome according to FBI data released in 1999?

Federal Bureau of Investigation analysis found that only 8% of over 1,200 kidnapping victims displayed signs of Stockholm syndrome. When excluding those with negative feelings toward law enforcement the figure dropped to 5%.

Why is Stockholm syndrome not included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders?

Stockholm syndrome has never been included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders since its inception due to a lack of formal clinical studies. Critics argue that symptoms fall under trauma bonding or post-traumatic stress disorder instead of being a distinct condition.

How does Lima syndrome differ from Stockholm syndrome based on the 1996 Japanese embassy hostage crisis?

Lima syndrome describes an inversion where abductors develop sympathy for their hostages rather than the reverse dynamic. This concept emerged from the 1996 Japanese embassy hostage crisis in Lima Peru where most captives were released early.