Stephen Holmes (political scientist)

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Stephen Holmes, born on the 21st of February 1948, has spent decades examining why liberal democracy is harder to build than it looks, and why its enemies are often more coherent than its defenders. He asked those questions from some of the most demanding institutions in American law and political thought: the University of Chicago, Princeton, and New York University, where he now holds the Walter E. Meyer Professorship of Law. What draws a legal scholar to write about the biblical Book of Samuel one decade and America's response to terror the next? And what connects a study of the 19th-century French liberal Benjamin Constant to a reckoning with the collapse of post-Cold War liberal optimism? Those threads run through a career that began with a prize-winning doctorate at Yale and kept returning, in book after book, to a single uncomfortable question: what does liberty actually cost?

• 2. Education and Early Career

  ›

  Holmes earned his B.A. from Denison University in 1969, then went on to Yale, where he completed a Ph.D. in 1976. His doctoral work stood out enough to win the John Addison Porter Prize for that year, one of Yale's most distinguished graduate awards. His first faculty appointment came at the University of Chicago, where he joined as an Associate Professor of Political Science in 1985. By 1989 he had earned tenure, holding a joint position as Professor of Political Science and Law at Chicago's law school. That dual anchoring in political theory and law would shape every book that followed. In 1997 he moved to Princeton as a Professor of Politics, a post he held until 2000 before taking his current chair at New York University.

• 3. The Liberalism Project

  ›

  Holmes's 1984 book on Benjamin Constant, published by Yale University Press, set the terms for much of his subsequent work. Constant was a Swiss-French thinker who navigated the turbulence of post-Revolutionary France, and Holmes used him to trace the intellectual origins of modern liberalism. The book found readers beyond English-speaking academia and was translated into French. Nine years later, in 1993, Harvard University Press published The Anatomy of Antiliberalism, a systematic examination of liberalism's critics, which reached German, Italian, and Chinese audiences in translation. Passions and Constraint, his 1995 study of liberal democratic theory, appeared from the University of Chicago Press and was translated into Italian. Taken together, these three books form a sustained argument about what liberal politics requires and what its opponents consistently misunderstand.

• 4. Rights, Taxes, and Collaboration

  ›

  The Cost of Rights, published in 1999 by Norton, marked a shift in method: Holmes wrote it with the legal scholar Cass R. Sunstein. Their argument, that liberty depends on taxes because rights require government enforcement to mean anything, proved durable enough to reach Italian, Polish, and Chinese readers. The collaboration with Sunstein brought Holmes's ideas into conversation with legal theory in a way his earlier solo work had not, and the book became one of the more cited texts in debates about the relationship between freedom and the state. It also positioned Holmes as a thinker willing to make economically grounded arguments inside a field more comfortable with philosophical abstraction.

• 5. Terror, Power, and Media

  ›

  In 2004, Holmes appeared in the BBC documentary The Power of Nightmares: The Rise of the Politics of Fear, a film that examined how political leaders use fear of external enemies to consolidate authority. His presence in that production reflected a growing public dimension to his scholarly work. Three years later, Cambridge University Press published The Matador's Cape: America's Reckless Response to Terror, his direct engagement with the consequences of the September 11 attacks and the policy choices that followed. The title image of a matador's cape suggested something deliberately provocative: a lure, not a target, drawing aggression toward something that isn't really there. That framing placed Holmes among scholars arguing that the war on terror was strategically incoherent as well as legally damaging.

• 6. Biblical Power and Liberal Failure

  ›

  Princeton University Press published The Beginning of Politics: Power in the Biblical Book of Samuel in 2017, a work that looked to ancient text for lessons about the nature of political power itself. The move from contemporary American policy to the Hebrew Bible reflected Holmes's range as a theorist and his willingness to find political argument in unexpected places. His most recent major work arrived in 2019: The Light that Failed, co-written with the Bulgarian political scientist Ivan Krastev and published by Allen Lane and Penguin under the subtitle A Reckoning. The book examined what went wrong with the liberal optimism that followed the end of the Cold War, arguing that expectations of a smooth global spread of liberal democracy had always been illusory. It was translated into German, and its diagnosis of liberalism's post-1989 troubles gave it an audience well beyond academic political science.