Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  On the 15th of February 1989, General Boris Gromov walked across the Bridge of Friendship connecting Afghanistan to Soviet territory. He crossed last, behind every soldier under his command. When Soviet television crews met him on the bridge and tried to get an interview, he swore at them. Years later, in a 2014 interview with a Russian newspaper, he explained what those words were really directed at: "the leadership of the country, at those who start wars while others have to clean up the mess."

  That crossing ended nearly a decade of Soviet military involvement in Afghanistan. It had begun with a Politburo decision in 1979, grown into a grinding counterinsurgency the 40th Army could never quite win, and concluded with a nine-month withdrawal governed by an international agreement that neither the United States nor Pakistan fully honored. The road from Gorbachev's first private acknowledgment that the war had to end, to the moment Gromov stepped off that bridge, runs through failed peace policies, fractured diplomacy, a rebel commander named Ahmad Shah Massoud, and a set of internal Soviet disagreements that nearly halted the departure entirely.

  What did it actually take to get Soviet forces out? And what did they leave behind?

• 2. Gorbachev's Three Conditions

  ›

  Mikhail Gorbachev became General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in March 1985, and by October of that year he had already decided to seek a withdrawal and won the Politburo's support for it. The speed of that internal consensus matters. It suggests how clearly the Soviet leadership recognized, even early in his tenure, that the war had become untenable.

  Gorbachev's private position, however, was constrained by powerful domestic forces. He had to satisfy what the source describes as a hawkish military-industrial complex, military leadership, and intelligence agencies. He later told UN Envoy Diego Cordovez that the influence of this "war lobby" should not be overestimated. Cordovez noted that Gorbachev's own advisors were not unanimous on that point, though they all agreed that disagreements with the United States, Pakistan, and realities in Kabul did more to delay withdrawal than any domestic pressure group.

  Abroad, Gorbachev needed to protect Soviet prestige with third-world allies. Like Soviet leaders before him, he considered only a dignified withdrawal acceptable. Three conditions had to be met before departure was permissible: internal stability within Afghanistan, limited foreign interference, and international recognition of the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan's communist government. None of these conditions would prove easy to engineer, and pursuing them would delay the actual withdrawal by years.

• 3. Najibullah and National Reconciliation

  ›

  Babrak Karmal, the Afghan leader installed under Soviet patronage, was judged by the Soviet leadership to be an obstacle to both military withdrawal and diplomacy. His replacement was Muhammed Najibullah Ahmadzai, appointed as General Secretary of the Afghan Communist Party with Soviet backing. The Soviets believed Najibullah capable of ruling without serious ongoing involvement from Moscow.

  The policy framework they built around him was called National Reconciliation. Its goal was to strip the Afghan government of its Marxist-revolutionary character and make space for rebel factions to align with it. Throughout 1987, the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan was renamed the Republic of Afghanistan, participation by all non-violent political parties was opened up, and Afghanistan's Islamic identity was formally reassumed. These were significant concessions on paper.

  On the ground, they satisfied almost no one. Cordovez and Harrison wrote that Najibullah's policy "went just far enough to antagonize hard-liners in the PDPA but not far enough to win over significant local tribal and ethnic leaders." Hard-liners within the ruling party feared losing control; opponents of the PDPA dismissed the reforms as propaganda. Mid-ranking Soviet military officers sometimes failed to grasp why their operations mattered politically. Afghan forces had to be persuaded to stop publicly calling the opposition "a band of killers" and "mercenaries of imperialism."

  The most telling assessment came from Vadim Kirpichenko, deputy chief of the KGB First Directorate. He later wrote that Najibullah's success in consolidating control within Kabul gave Soviet intelligence a false sense of a replicable model: "Faith in Najibullah and in the dependability of his security organs created illusions on the part of the KGB leadership.... These dangerous illusions, the unwillingness to look truth in the face, delayed the withdrawal of Soviet troops by several years."

• 4. Ahmad Shah Massoud

  ›

  Ahmad Shah Massoud, the rebel commander who would later be designated a National Hero of Afghanistan posthumously, represents one of the most instructive failures of the entire National Reconciliation effort. Soviet military leadership and diplomats had been in contact with Massoud since the early 1980s. Getting him to a formal ceasefire would have been a genuine strategic achievement.

  It never happened. Military operations continued against his troops even as high-level contacts were underway. The DRA insisted on his disarmament as a precondition. Information about his communications with the Soviets leaked, exposing him to the mujahideen community and undercutting the basis for any deal. Even Najibullah himself, whose survival the Soviets were trying to secure, complicated the relationship.

  By the time the withdrawal was actively underway, the Soviet military had managed to establish a de facto ceasefire with Massoud's forces for the specific purpose of moving troops through territories he controlled. That local, practical accommodation is what the years of formal negotiation had failed to produce. The KGB and Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze then argued to Gorbachev that Massoud needed to be attacked to guarantee Najibullah's longer-term survival. Gorbachev eventually sided with them. On the 23rd of January 1989, with the withdrawal nearly complete, Operation Typhoon was launched against Massoud's forces. His military commanders and on-the-ground advisors had argued against it.

• 5. The Geneva Accords and Their Limits

  ›

  On the 14th of April 1988, Pakistan and Afghanistan signed the Geneva Accords, with the Soviet Union and the United States acting as guarantors. The agreement set provisions for Soviet withdrawal and mutual non-interference between Pakistan and Afghanistan. It was, in Gorbachev's own framing, "however flawed" a preferable framework to withdrawing entirely outside any international agreement.

  What made them flawed was precisely the gap between their text and what any party was willing to enforce. Pakistan was obligated under the Accords to prevent cross-border weapons flows into Afghanistan, but it was not honoring that commitment. The United States was not bound by any obligation to stop arming the mujahideen. Arms continued to flow, and the mujahideen continued to attack withdrawing Soviet forces. The Soviet Union repeatedly reported these violations to United Nations monitoring bodies and even asked the United States to use its influence over the factions it was supplying. Neither appeal changed anything.

  The road to signing had been its own protracted problem. Secretary of State George Shultz had left Soviet negotiators with the impression that the United States would cease military shipments to the mujahideen immediately after Soviet withdrawal, provided the Soviets "front-loaded" the departure by withdrawing the majority of troops early. This impression turned out to be wrong. Reagan could not agree to an immediate arms halt. When the Americans clarified their position in late 1987, negotiations stalled. Vadim Zagladin recalled the broader context: "We weren't thinking only of Afghanistan. There were many processes taking place at that time. The INF agreement on missiles in Europe was particularly important, and all of these things were interconnected."

  Convincing Najibullah to accept the Accords required Soviet promises of dramatically expanded post-withdrawal aid.

• 6. The Withdrawal Itself

  ›

  The formal withdrawal began on the 15th of May 1988, with General of the Army Valentin Varennikov overseeing the operation and General Gromov commanding the 40th Army directly. As promised, it was front-loaded: half of the Soviet force had left by August.

  In the fall of 1988, with the security situation around Najibullah deteriorating, Gorbachev sided with the Shevardnadze-KGB line of policy. A halt to the withdrawal was ordered on the 5th of November 1988. In December, Gorbachev reversed course and decided to resume the departure, though he also approved Operation Typhoon against Massoud over the objections of commanders on the ground. Up until the very end, Shevardnadze and the KGB chief continued pushing Gorbachev to leave a contingent of Soviet military volunteers behind to defend land routes to Kabul. Gromov, Varennikov, and the chief Soviet military advisor in Afghanistan, General Sotskov, had all separately pleaded with top leadership to restrain Najibullah from trying to use Soviet troops for his own security operations.

  On the 15th of February 1989, the 40th Army completed its withdrawal. Gromov crossed the Bridge of Friendship last.

• 7. Aftermath

  ›

  Soviet support for Najibullah did not end with the military departure. Aid totalling several billion dollars continued to flow, including MiG-27 aircraft and Scud missiles. The CIA and State Department had predicted the government would fall quickly. It did not. The mujahideen made significant advances and even captured and held several cities, but Najibullah remained in power until the spring of 1992.

  The turning point was the coup of August 1991 in the Soviet Union itself. Following that event, the Soviet Union and later the Russian Federation under Boris Yeltsin cut off aid to their Afghan allies. The ruling party, by then renamed Hizb-i Watan from its former identity as the PDPA, was weakened severely. The army had already been damaged by fighting, internal struggles, and an abortive coup attempt in March 1990 that triggered a purge. Desertions had reached critical rates.

  Without the aid pipeline, Kabul fell. Najibullah was removed from power by members of his own party, and the mujahideen attempted to form a coalition government. That effort collapsed into infighting between factions led by figures including Massoud and Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. Their inability to govern together created the conditions under which the Pakistan-backed Taliban eventually came to power.