Shadow (psychology)

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The shadow, Carl Jung once said, exposes something raw about human nature. He believed Freud's own method had produced, in his words, 'a minute elaboration of man's shadow side unexampled in any previous age.' In Jung's analytical psychology, the shadow is an unconscious aspect of personality. It does not match a person's ego ideal, the self a person believes they should be. Because the ego cannot bear to recognize this part of itself, it resists the shadow. Instead it projects the shadow outward, onto other people, and that projection creates conflict. The idea carries several other names as well: the ego-dystonic complex, the repressed id, the shadow aspect, the shadow archetype. Jung believed this hidden material does not stay formless. It can take on the shape of archetypes tied to what he called the collective unconscious, appearing in a figure such as the trickster. What is actually hiding in this unlit part of the mind? Why does the ego insist on pushing it onto others rather than facing it? And what happens to someone who refuses to look at all?

• 2. Facing The Unconscious

  ›

  Jung characterized the shadow as 'the blind spot of the psyche,' a part of the mind a person cannot see in themselves. Repressing the id, in Jung's account, is maladaptive, and it also blocks what he called shadow integration, the union of id and ego. Sigmund Freud and Jung disagreed about why civilization requires people to repress the id in the first place. Even so, the two thinkers converged on one point rooted in Plato's philosophy: the id rejects the nomos, the customary law that governs a community.

  Jung set the shadow directly against the persona, the mask a person shows to the world. He regarded the shadow as everything unconscious in a person, both the id and their own biography. That material sat held down beneath the superego's ego-ideal, the way the superego wants a person to be. The mask a person wears and the shadow behind it rarely match, and Jung believed the strain between them never fully disappears.

• 3. Not Only Darkness

  ›

  Some scholars describe the shadow as 'roughly equivalent to the whole of the Freudian unconscious,' though Jung's own definition ran wider than Freud's. Once pushed outward, the shadow shows up as cognitive distortions projected onto a person's social environment. Unlike a strictly Freudian picture, Jung's shadow can include anything sitting outside the light of consciousness, whether it is negative or positive.

  Even so, most accounts still treat the shadow as primarily a negative function within the self. That consensus holds even though repression never fully succeeds at keeping those qualities hidden. Positive traits can hide in the shadow too, particularly in people who carry low self-esteem, anxieties, or false beliefs about themselves. Analysis and therapy are the tools Jungians use to bring those hidden positive traits back into conscious awareness. The shadow may also be understood as a person's identification with the id, an identification usually superseded in early childhood. Still, its shape can keep being influenced anywhere from early to late childhood.

• 4. The Collective Shadow

  ›

  The collective unconscious, in Jung's framework, holds unconscious ideals that all of humanity shares. Out of it grows a projective identification bound up with uncertainty, helplessness, and other negative feelings. That projection frequently attaches itself to the figure of the Devil, added as a kind of fourth member to the Christian trinity described by Paul. In that role, the Devil functions as a grounding myth.

  The ancient Egyptian figure of Set, cast in that mythology as a devil, 'represents overwhelming affects' in much the same way. Other mythologies carry the same pattern. Unlike a personal shadow, the collective shadow is ancestral. It travels through the collective experience of the whole human race, showing up in the split between in-group and out-group. Dehumanization is one result of that split, and hate crime is a concrete example of where it leads.

• 5. Layers Of Appearance

  ›

  In dreams and visions, Jungians say the shadow tends to appear 'as a person of the same sex as that of the dreamer.' It can take many forms within that dreamscape. How the shadow looks and behaves depends heavily on a person's own lived experience. Much of it forms inside an individual's mind rather than arriving ready-made from the collective unconscious. That is what makes it so central to how Jungians interpret dreams. Some Jungian writers argue that the shadow 'contains, besides the personal shadow, the shadow of society... fed by the neglected and repressed collective values.'

  Jung also proposed that the shadow is built from several layers. Its top layers hold the meaningful flow of a person's direct personal experiences. Ordinary things push these experiences into unconsciousness: a shift of attention, plain forgetfulness, or active repression. Beneath those personal layers sit the archetypes, the psychic material common to all human experience. Jung described this deeper layer as 'a psychic activity which goes on independently of the conscious mind and is not dependent even on the upper layers of the unconscious , untouched, and perhaps untouchable , by personal experience.'

• 6. Encountering The Shadow

  ›

  Shadow work is the term Jungians use for a deliberate method of encountering this hidden material. Practitioners lean on active imagination, daydreaming, and meditation to bring it forward. The resulting experience gets worked through with narrative and art, in forms as varied as pottery, poetry, drawing, dancing, and singing. Analysts also perform dreamwork with their analysands, using a technique called amplification to lift unconscious material into conscious awareness. Jung had his own word for the deeper version of this descent: Nekyia, a term for the passage into darkness where the ego itself fades.

  Meeting the shadow eventually becomes a central event in the process Jung called individuation. He believed that 'the course of individuation... exhibits a certain formal regularity,' marked out by 'signposts and milestones' made of archetypal symbols. Of those stages, Jung held that 'the first stage leads to the experience of the shadow.'

  That first stage tends to open with the breakdown of the persona, called 'the typical Jungian moment both in therapy and in development.' It can begin quietly, with 'a deadly boredom that makes everything seem meaningless and empty.' It can feel as if a person's first brush with the Self already 'casts a dark shadow ahead of time.'

  Jung considered it a perennial danger of life that 'the more consciousness gains in clarity, the more monarchic becomes its content.' Eventually, he wrote, a kind of inner king needs 'the renewal that begins with a descent into his own darkness,' his own shadow. The dissolution of the persona is what sets that descent in motion.

  Jungian writers describe the shadow as everything 'the subject refuses to acknowledge about himself,' consciously or not. They call it 'a tight passage, a narrow door, whose painful constriction no one is spared who goes down to the deep well.' Anyone who manages to look directly at their own shadow tends to recognize certain traits. They often feel ashamed of qualities they deny in themselves but spot easily in others. Among the qualities named are egotism, mental laziness, and sloppiness. Others include unreal fantasies, schemes, and plots, along with carelessness, cowardice, and an inordinate love of money and possessions.

  Once the persona breaks down and individuation is fully underway, a real danger follows: 'falling victim to the shadow.' That shadow is described as the black one every person carries, the hidden, inferior side of their own personality. That danger, left unchecked, can end in an outright merger with the shadow.

• 7. Merging With The Shadow

  ›

  'A man who is possessed by his shadow,' Jung wrote, 'is always standing in his own light and falling into his own traps... living below his own level.' Jung viewed this kind of merging as a genuinely bad outcome, the point where a suppressed identity starts overwriting or controlling the ego. He noted that the shadow can overwhelm a person's actions outright, especially in moments when the conscious mind is shocked, confused, or frozen by indecision.

  Jung turned to Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde to explain what should happen instead. In terms of the story, he wrote, 'it must be Jekyll, the conscious personality, who integrates the shadow... and not vice versa.' Otherwise, he warned, 'the conscious becomes the slave of the autonomous shadow.'

  Individuation itself raises the risk of possession, since it pulls the ego further away from the collective unconscious. Jung described it: 'the libido leaves the bright upper world... sinks back into its own depths... below, in the shadows of the unconscious.' What had been 'hidden under the mask of conventional adaptation' rises to the surface: the shadow itself. The result, in Jung's words, is that 'ego and shadow are no longer divided but are brought together in an , admittedly precarious , unity.'

  Jung described the first effect of that confrontation as 'a dead balance, a standstill that hampers moral decisions and makes convictions ineffective.' He tied that state to old alchemical terms: nigredo, tenebrositas, chaos, melancholia. He wrote from personal experience that 'in this time of descent , one, three, seven years, more or less , genuine courage and strength are required.' There was no guarantee of ever coming back up.

  'No one should deny the danger of the descent,' Jung wrote, 'but every descent is followed by an ascent.' Out of that ascent comes a different outcome entirely: assimilation of the shadow, rather than possession by it.

• 8. Assimilating The Shadow

  ›

  Done well, this kind of work can produce what Jungians call a numinous experience. Acknowledging the shadow, and folding parts of it back into the ego, is what they call assimilation. Done carelessly, anchoring too heavily to that numinous effect without testing it against reality can tip over into ego inflation. Jungians also label that state archetypal possession.

  'Non-identification demands considerable moral effort,' one Jungian account holds. That effort describes the task facing the superego: staying aware of the shadow without becoming it or being ruled by it. The same account warns that 'the conscious mind is liable to be submerged at any moment in the unconscious.' Even so, 'understanding acts like a life-saver. It integrates the unconscious.'

  'Assimilation of the shadow gives a man body, so to speak,' one account puts it, describing reincorporation as a launchpad for further individuation. That leaves a person with a stronger, wider consciousness than before. Jungian theory treats this integration as the first stage of the analytic process, holding that 'without it a recognition of anima and animus is impossible.' The reverse also holds. The more a person recognizes and integrates the shadow, the more the question of the anima, or relationship, becomes central to individuation.

  Carolyn Kaufman framed the shadow's upside directly. 'In spite of its function as a reservoir for human darkness , or perhaps because of this , the shadow is the seat of creativity;' she wrote. Some go further still, describing a person's 'sinister shadow' as holding 'the true spirit of life' as against 'the arid scholar.'

  'Acknowledgement of the shadow must be a continuous process throughout one's life,' one account insists. That work continues even after a person's attention shifts toward the animus or anima. Those later stages of shadow integration keep going in private. One writer calls it 'the process of washing one's dirty linen in private,' continuing long after the first encounter with the shadow has passed.