Science fantasy

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Science fantasy sits at a crossroads that most readers never think to name. It is the genre that refuses to choose between a universe governed by physics and one ruled by magic. The questions it raises are deceptively simple: can dragons be extraterrestrials? Can a spell have a chemical formula? Can a story feel mythic and scientific at the same time?

  The term itself was coined in 1935 by critic Forrest J. Ackerman, originally as nothing more than a synonym for science fiction. Yet within a few decades, writers, publishers, and readers had pulled it into its own territory. That territory proved slippery. The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction would later note that science fantasy has "never been clearly defined", and that the label was most commonly in use during the period between 1950 and 1966.

  What kept the genre alive despite fuzzy borders was a specific creative instinct: take the fantastical or supernatural, and give it a veneer of scientific logic. Not to explain the magic away, but to make it feel possible. That instinct would attract some of the most inventive pulp writers of the twentieth century, and its long shadow falls over franchises that billions of people recognise today.

• 2. Defining the Hybrid

  ›

  Rod Serling drew the clearest line between the parent genres. Science fiction, he argued, was "the improbable made possible"; fantasy was "the impossible made probable". Science fantasy, then, is the genre that starts with the impossible and works to make it feel plausible through scientific framing.

  A conventional science fiction story grounds its world in natural law. A conventional fantasy populates its world with supernatural elements that obey no scientific law. Science fantasy does something more unusual: it lays out a world that reads as scientifically logical, then supplies hard-science-like explanations for any supernatural elements that appear.

  Critic Judith Murry captured one version of this: she considered science fantasy to be fantasy in which magic carries a natural scientific basis. Science fiction critic John Clute preferred the narrower term "technological fantasy", carving it out from the broader umbrella of science fiction. The British journalist Walter Gillings, writing in the 1950s, placed science fantasy inside science fiction itself, treating it as the portion of the genre that lacked plausibility by the scientific standards of its day. His example was instructive: H. G. Wells' novel The World Set Free, which depicted nuclear weapons, was science fantasy when measured against Newtonian physics, and science fiction when measured against Einstein's theory. The genre's definition shifted depending on who held the ruler.

• 3. The Pulp Foundations

  ›

  Marion Zimmer, later known as Marion Zimmer Bradley, named the mixture directly in 1948, calling science fantasy a blend of science fiction and fantasy in the pages of Startling Stories magazine. But the practical foundations had been laid years earlier, in a magazine called Unknown.

  Unknown was edited by John W. Campbell Jr., whose Astounding Science Fiction had come to define the terse, scientifically grounded mainstream of the genre. Unknown was his laboratory for something different. The stories Campbell published there were, by design, a deliberate attempt to apply the techniques and attitudes of science fiction to traditional fantasy subjects. The results were relatively rationalistic, but the subject matter was drawn from folklore and mythology.

  Three works from that era stand out in the record. Robert A. Heinlein contributed Magic, Inc. L. Ron Hubbard contributed Slaves of Sleep. Fletcher Pratt and L. Sprague de Camp contributed the Harold Shea series. All three appeared in Unknown, and all three represent the genre's early shape: genre fiction's analytical rigor turned loose on material that had always belonged to the supernatural.

  During the same period, Henry Kuttner and C. L. Moore published novels in Startling Stories, alone and together, working in a far more romantic register. Their output overlapped with work they and others were producing for outlets such as Weird Tales, including Moore's Northwest Smith stories, which drew the genre toward a more atmospheric, mythic tone.

• 4. Golden Age Tensions

  ›

  During the Golden Age of Science Fiction, science fantasy occupied an uncomfortable position. Against the scientifically plausible material that dominated mainstream science fiction, typified by Astounding Science Fiction, science fantasy stories looked loose, romantic, even juvenile. They were often relegated to the status of children's entertainment.

  Ace Books pushed back against that relegation in practice, publishing a range of science fantasy titles through the 1950s and 1960s. But the critical establishment was slower to follow.

  The genre's freedom, which critics used against it, became its most durable asset. Writers in the 1960s associated with the New Wave movement grew frustrated with what they saw as the limitations of hard science fiction. The imaginative liberty and romance of science fantasy had been an early major influence on those writers, even when they could not point to it by name. The subgenre that reviewers had dismissed as children's fare had been quietly shaping the literary ambitions of the next generation.

• 5. Creatures, Myths, and Scale

  ›

  Science fantasy tends to describe worlds that look very much like fantasy worlds but are made believable through naturalist explanations drawn from science fiction. The clearest example involves creatures from folklore and mythology. In straight fantasy, a dragon or a sea monster exists because the world contains magic. In science fantasy, the same creature becomes a plausible organism because it is reimagined as an extraterrestrial life form, or the product of biological processes the story makes legible.

  Works operating this way have been described as "mythopoeic science fantasy", a term that catches the double ambition: myth-making and world-building at once. Subjects in the genre are often conceptualized on a planetary scale, giving science fantasy a scope that individual fantasy quests or science fiction missions do not always reach.

  Carl D. Malmgren, drawing on C. S. Lewis's own thinking, described what this creates emotionally. In the "counternatural worlds" of science fantasy, he wrote, the imaginary and the actual, the magical and the prosaic, the mythical and the scientific meet and interact. Lewis's own words, as Malmgren quoted them, described what readers find there: "such beauty, awe, or terror as the actual world does not supply", along with "the stuff of desires, dreams, and dread".

• 6. Franchises and Debates

  ›

  Star Trek, the franchise created by Gene Roddenberry, is sometimes cited as science fantasy. Writer James F. Broderick described Star Trek as science fantasy on the grounds that it blends semi-futuristic elements with supernatural or fantasy elements such as the entity known as The Q. The late science fiction author Arthur C. Clarke noted that many purists argue Star Trek belongs to science fantasy rather than science fiction because of its scientifically improbable elements, a position Clarke said he partially agreed with.

  The status of Star Wars has drawn a different kind of debate, in part because the franchise's creator weighed in directly. In 2015, George Lucas stated that "Star Wars isn't a science-fiction film, it's a fantasy film and a space opera". That statement moved the conversation from critics arguing over a label to the filmmaker himself declining the science fiction category.

  Both franchises illustrate why the genre boundary still resists resolution. When a story is large enough, popular enough, and internally consistent enough, genre taxonomy becomes less a description than a negotiation, and different participants in that negotiation bring different measuring sticks. The term Forrest J. Ackerman invented in 1935 as a casual synonym turns out to carry genuine analytical weight.