Russian ballet
Russian ballet arrived in Paris not as a curiosity, but as what one observer called "a metaphor for invasion" - an eternal force that could, as they put it, "engulf and control, could penetrate the membrane of French society, culture and even art itself." That is the reputation that followed the Ballets Russes into French theaters in the early twentieth century. But to understand why a dance form earned such charged language, you have to go back much further - to the courts of Peter the Great, to the benches of a "paradise gallery" in an Imperial theater, and to a single dancing master appointed in the summer of 1734. This is the story of how Russian ballet became a global force by being, stubbornly and entirely, itself.
Classical ballet entered Russia not to entertain the masses, but to cultivate them. The aim, as scholars have described it, was to establish "a standard of physical comportment to be emulated and internalized - an idealized way of behaving." Peter the Great's ambitions shaped this purpose directly. He built St. Petersburg to compete with Moscow's isolationism and to rival the magnificent courts of the West. Ballet was part of that project: a physical embodiment of how a new Russian person should move, stand, and present themselves.
Empress Anna, who reigned from 1730 to 1740, translated this ambition into institutional reality. Devoted to ostentatious amusements - balls, fireworks, and elaborate tableaux - she ordered in the summer of 1734 the appointment of Jean-Baptiste Landé as dancing master at the military academy she had founded in 1731 for the sons of the nobility. By 1738, Landé had risen to become ballet master and head of a new ballet school, launching formal advanced study of ballet in Russia and attracting the patronage of elite families. That school, now known as the Vaganova Academy of Russian Ballet, was founded in that same year of 1738.
France supplied many of the early leaders who shaped the Imperial style. Charles Didelot worked in St. Petersburg from 1801 to 1831. Jules Perrot followed from 1848 to 1859, and Arthur Saint-Léon from 1859 to 1869. These were long tenures, suggesting deep institutional relationships rather than passing visits. The Imperial companies were unlike those anywhere else: their directors were personally appointed by the tsar, and the dancers themselves were, in a practical sense, Imperial servants. In the theater, male audience members stood until the tsar had taken his box, and no one sat again until after he had departed.
In the early nineteenth century, Russian ballet began a quiet but significant social shift. The imperial theaters, once the exclusive domain of nobility and court life, opened their doors to anyone who could afford a ticket. A seating section called a rayok - sometimes translated as "paradise gallery" - offered simple wooden benches at inexpensive prices. For the first time, Russians without wealth could sit in the same building as the ballet and watch the same performance.
The curtain call ritual inside those theaters illustrated the social hierarchy that still governed the art. Ballerinas bowed first to the tsar's box, then to the theater director's box, and only after those two acknowledgments did they turn to the general public. The order was deliberate and unremarkable to those who lived it. Yet the opening of the rayok introduced a new kind of audience member into that hierarchy - someone sitting on a wooden bench who had paid a small price to be present in a space that had previously excluded them.
The Moscow State Academy of Choreography, commonly known as the Bolshoi Ballet Academy, had been founded in 1773. The Mikhailovsky Theatre Ballet followed in the 1830s. By the time the rayok existed, Russian ballet already had decades of institutional infrastructure behind it, and that foundation made the expansion of its audience possible without destabilizing the art form itself.
In 1903, a Russian dancer and choreographer named Ivan Clustine - who had built his career at the Bolshoi Theatre - was appointed Maître de ballet at the Paris Opera. The appointment immediately triggered a "frenzy of questions" about his nationality and his intentions. Many in Paris read his hiring as the Opera's attempt to imitate the Russian company. Clustine himself seemed unsettled by the interpretation. He maintained, "not without despondency," that inspiration came too often from the north, and he quoted a sentiment he had heard: "A revolution! A method that people often apply in the country of the tsars."
CLUSTINE acknowledged his Russian identity with pride but denied any revolutionary intent. The irony is that observers documented what he denied. After 1909, the Opera's productions showed clear traces of Russian influence - in choreography, in institutional structure, in policy. Clustine's protestations did not change what audiences and critics could see.
The stigma attached to Russian ballet in Paris was not only aesthetic. The Ballets Russes were described as dangerous. French nationalism ran directly into Russian determination, and questions arose under the heading of "cultural politics" - debates about the delimitation of boundaries, the preservation of identity, and the nature of relational engagements between national traditions. A dance form had become a pressure point in a larger argument about who owned French cultural life.
Sergey Diaghilev, who lived from 1872 to 1929, founded the Ballets Russes in 1909 and headquartered it in Paris. He was not simply a director or a producer. He intervened in every layer of a production: direction, lighting, scenery, and performance itself. The company he built became distinct from any state theater - mobile, international, and entirely shaped by his singular involvement.
A protégé of Diaghilev, George Balanchine, went on to found the New York City Ballet in 1948. That lineage - from imperial St. Petersburg through Paris to New York - traces one arc of how Russian ballet's methods and priorities dispersed into the wider world.
The Vaganova method, named after the ballerina and teacher Agrippina Vaganova, became the most widely used pedagogical approach within Russian ballet. Its emphasis on technical precision and expressive movement reflected the values that had been embedded in the form since the Imperial era. The Perm Theatre Ballet, founded in 1896, and the Novosibirsk Theatre Ballet, founded in 1945, are among the companies that carried the tradition across Russian geography. The Saint Petersburg Eifman Ballet, founded in 1977, and the Russian State Ballet of Siberia, founded in 1978, extended it still further. The Kirov Ballet - now known as the Mariinsky Ballet - and the Bolshoi continue to tour internationally today.
The ballets produced within the Russian tradition span more than a century of premieres. The Pharaoh's Daughter debuted in 1862; The Nutcracker in 1892; Swan Lake in 1895. The Firebird arrived in 1910 - one year after Diaghilev founded the Ballets Russes in Paris. Romeo and Juliet premiered in 1940, and Cinderella in 1945, both works emerging during years of enormous difficulty in Russia.
The density of that list - from 1862 through 1945 - suggests that Russian ballet was not a single golden period followed by decline. It was a continuing practice, generating new works across different political eras and under radically different institutional conditions. Raymonda premiered in 1898; La Bayadere in 1877; Don Quixote in 1869. Each of these dates corresponds to a different phase of the Imperial theater system, a different set of French dance masters in residence, and a different tsar occupying the box that ballerinas were required to acknowledge before turning to their audience.
Common questions
When did Russian ballet first come to Paris and who led it there?
Russian ballet reached Paris in a significant way by the early 1900s. In 1903, Ivan Clustine, a Russian dancer and choreographer who had started his career at the Bolshoi Theatre, was appointed Maître de ballet at the Paris Opera. Sergey Diaghilev then founded the Ballets Russes in Paris in 1909.
Who founded the Ballets Russes and when?
Sergey Diaghilev, who lived from 1872 to 1929, founded the Ballets Russes in 1909 and headquartered the company in Paris. He was involved in every aspect of production, including direction, lighting, scenery, and performance.
What is the Vaganova method in Russian ballet?
The Vaganova method is the most widely used pedagogical approach in Russian ballet. It is named after the ballerina and teacher Agrippina Vaganova. The Vaganova Academy of Russian Ballet was originally founded in 1738 as the Imperial Ballet School.
What role did Peter the Great play in the history of Russian ballet?
Peter the Great opened Russian society to Western influence and built St. Petersburg to rival Western courts. Under his vision, classical ballet entered Russia not as entertainment but as a standard of physical comportment meant to cultivate a new kind of Russian person.
What was the rayok in Imperial Russian ballet theaters?
The rayok, sometimes called the "paradise gallery," was a seating section in Imperial Russian theaters that consisted of simple wooden benches at inexpensive prices. It allowed non-wealthy people to attend ballet performances for the first time in the early nineteenth century.
Who did George Balanchine study under and what did he go on to found?
George Balanchine was a protégé of Sergey Diaghilev. Balanchine went on to found the New York City Ballet in 1948, tracing a direct lineage from Imperial Russian ballet through the Ballets Russes to the United States.
All sources
8 references cited across the entry
- 5webNijinsky and his innovations in XX century balletrac_admin — 2020-05-11