Round Table Conferences (India)

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The Round Table Conferences of 1930-1932 brought India and Britain to the same table in London for three rounds of negotiations over the future of one of the largest territories on earth. Seventy-four delegates from India attended the first session alone, representing princes, landlords, minority communities, women, labour unions, and political parties. Yet the most prominent political force in India, the Indian National Congress, was nowhere to be found. Its leaders, including Mahatma Gandhi, were sitting in jail for their role in the Civil Disobedience Movement. What follows is the story of why these conferences were called, who showed up, who refused, what was argued about inside those rooms, and what came out the other end.

• 2. Origins and Architects

  ›

  Muhammad Ali Jinnah's recommendation to Viceroy Lord Irwin and Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald planted the formal seed for the conferences. The Simon Commission, which submitted its report in May 1930, provided the official mandate. Demands for Swaraj, meaning self-rule, had been gathering force across India. By the early 1930s, enough British politicians accepted that India needed to move toward dominion status that a constitutional conversation could at least begin.

  Ramsay MacDonald, who chaired the opening conference, had written a book in 1909 titled The Awakening of India, advocating progress toward Indian self-government. One of the key advisers was Sir Malcolm Hailey, an Indian civil servant with thirty years of experience who also served as Governor of the United Provinces, the province where Gandhi lived. Sir Samuel Hoare wrote a cabinet memo recommending a federal formula designed, in his own words, to "make it possible to give a semblance of responsible government and yet retain the realities and verities of British control." That tension between the appearance of reform and its substance would run through all three conferences.

• 3. The First Conference and Its Boycott

  ›

  King George V officially inaugurated the first conference on the 12th of November 1930 at the Royal Gallery in the House of Lords. MacDonald chaired the proceedings while his son Malcolm MacDonald handled liaison work with Lord Sankey's constitutional committee. Sixteen British delegates from eight political parties took their seats. Fifty-eight representatives came from British India and sixteen from the princely states, bringing the Indian total to 74 delegates.

  The Indian National Congress and Indian business leaders stayed away entirely. Six plenary sessions opened the proceedings, followed by nine sub-committees covering federal structure, provincial constitutions, defense services, minorities, Sindh, the North West Frontier Province, Burma, franchise arrangements, and other matters. Tej Bahadur Sapru moved the idea of an All-India Federation to the centre of discussion. All attending groups, including the princely states and the Muslim League, expressed support for the federation, though the princes insisted their internal sovereignty be protected.

  MacDonald's diary entry from the 15th of December 1930 recorded that the conference had exposed "communalism and proportions of reserved seats" as the worst side of Indian politics. Lord Irwin's declaration that India should eventually receive dominion status drew sharp Conservative reaction. Winston Churchill, speaking at the Constitutional Club in March 1931, accused the Socialist Party of manipulating the entire conference "to achieve the result they had set before themselves from the beginning, namely the conferring of responsible government at the centre upon Indians." Despite the formal failure, agreement on the broad outline of a federation represented a small but real advance.

• 4. Gandhi at the Second Conference

  ›

  On the 26th of January 1931, Gandhi and other Congress leaders walked out of prison. The Gandhi-Irwin Pact followed, and Congress agreed to send a delegation to a second round. The second session opened on the 7th of September 1931. Gandhi arrived as the sole official Congress representative, accompanied by Sarojini Naidu, Madan Mohan Malaviya, Ghanshyam Das Birla, Muhammad Iqbal, Sir Mirza Ismail the Diwan of Mysore, S.K. Dutta, and Sir Syed Ali Imam.

  Gandhi staked out sweeping positions. He claimed Congress alone represented political India. He insisted Untouchables were Hindus and should not be counted as a separate minority. He opposed separate electorates or special safeguards for Muslims or any other community. Every one of these positions was rejected by other Indian participants. Two weeks before the session opened, the Labour government in London had fallen. MacDonald now headed a National Government dominated by Conservatives, with Samuel Hoare joining as Secretary of State for India. During the conference itself, Britain left the Gold Standard, pulling attention further away from India. MacDonald committed at the end to producing a Communal Award for minority representation, with a provision that any freely negotiated agreement between the parties could replace it.

• 5. The Ambedkar-Gandhi Collision

  ›

  B. R. Ambedkar attended as one of two Depressed Classes representatives, alongside Rettamalai Srinivasan. His demand was concrete: a separate electorate for Untouchables, giving them independent political representation rather than folding their votes into a broader Hindu electorate. Gandhi's objection was equally concrete. He held that Untouchables were Hindus and that any separate political status would permanently divide the community.

  Writing to the Times of India on the 12th of October 1931, Ambedkar accused Gandhi of demanding that other delegates oppose the claims of the Depressed Classes as a condition of his cooperation. The All-India Depressed Classes conference formally denounced Gandhi's claim to speak for them, a denunciation documented in Dhananjay Keer's biography of Ambedkar. Gandhi and Ambedkar eventually reached a settlement through the Poona Pact of 1932, but not before the extent of the disagreement had been placed on the public record.

• 6. The Third Session and the Act of 1935

  ›

  Only 46 delegates assembled when the third and final conference opened on the 17th of November 1932. Both the Labour Party and the Indian National Congress refused to come. Most of the principal Indian political figures were absent. The proceedings followed the same unproductive pattern as before and closed in December 1932.

  From September 1931 through March 1933, under Samuel Hoare's supervision as Secretary of State for India, the proposed reforms moved toward legislation. A Joint Committee translated the conference recommendations into a bill, and that bill was eventually enacted as the Government of India Act 1935. The Act restructured British India's constitutional arrangements and became the direct precursor to the independence negotiations of the following decade. Clement Attlee, who had served on the Simon Commission that originally prompted the conferences, wanted an early resolution; he was blocked by the Conservatives until 1945.