Richard Thaler

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Richard H. Thaler walked onto the set of a Hollywood film in 2015 and, alongside pop star Selena Gomez, explained to moviegoers why people make terrible financial decisions. The film was The Big Short, a dramatization of the credit and real estate collapse that triggered the 2008 financial crisis. Thaler played himself. It was a fitting cameo for a man who had spent decades arguing that real human beings, not the flawless rational agents of standard economics textbooks, are who actually drive markets.

  Thaler is the Charles R. Walgreen Distinguished Service Professor of Behavioral Science and Economics at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. In 2017, he received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences described his work as building a bridge between economic and psychological analyses of individual decision-making.

  Why do people value things more simply because they own them? Why does a tax refund feel like found money even when it comes from the same wallet as a paycheck? And why, when a company enrolls its workers in a retirement plan by default, do roughly 90 percent of eligible employees stay enrolled? These are the questions Thaler spent his career turning into rigorous science. The answers would change not only how economists think about markets, but how governments around the world design policy.

• 2. A Father's Wine Collection

  ›

  Thaler earned his Ph.D. from the University of Rochester in 1974, writing his dissertation on the value of saving a human life under the supervision of economist Sherwin Rosen. He also studied under the departmental chair Richard Rosett, a neoclassicist whose wine-buying habits became an early exhibit in Thaler's growing catalogue of economic anomalies.

  Rosett's behavior was the kind of thing a traditional economist could not explain. He refused to sell bottles from his cellar at prices he would never pay to buy them, treating owned wine as categorically different from unowned wine of identical quality. Standard theory said the market value of an object should be the same whether you hold it or seek to acquire it. Rosett's cellar told a different story.

  From 1977 to 1978, Thaler spent a year at Stanford University working alongside Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, whose psychological research gave him the formal vocabulary he had been searching for. The anomalies he had collected, including the wine example, now had a theoretical home in what Kahneman and Tversky called prospect theory. That year in California became the intellectual foundation for Thaler's life's work.

• 3. The Endowment Effect

  ›

  Kahneman, Knetsch, and Thaler published experimental tests of what Thaler called the endowment effect, showing that people consistently demand more money to give up an object they own than they would pay to acquire the identical object they do not own. The gap cannot be explained by preference differences or transaction costs. It traces to a fundamental asymmetry in how people experience gains and losses.

  Traditional economic theory held that human decisions depend entirely on market value. A coffee mug is worth whatever someone will pay for it, regardless of whose hands it currently sits in. The endowment effect experiments showed that ownership changes the subjective value of an object in a way the classical model had no room for.

  Thaler's 1980 paper, "Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice," published in the Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, was an early formal attempt to build a model that accommodated this kind of behavior. It appeared when behavioral economics barely existed as a named field, and it seeded a generation of research into how people actually weigh what they have against what they might gain.

• 4. Mental Accounts and Sunk Costs

  ›

  Thaler introduced the concept of mental accounting to describe a behavior that traditional finance dismissed as irrational: people treat money differently depending on where it comes from. A tax refund, a bonus, and a regular paycheck may all contain the same dollars, yet people tend to spend them as if the dollars carry different moral weights.

  His 1985 paper, "Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice," published in Marketing Science, laid out how these internal bookkeeping practices shape budgeting, saving, and spending. Someone might decline to spend a large sum from their regular paycheck but spend the same sum freely from an unexpected windfall, even though their total wealth is identical in both cases.

  The practical implications reach into retirement savings, health care, and consumer credit. Thaler showed that even minor changes in how money is labeled or presented can redirect behavior in predictable ways. His work with Shlomo Benartzi, published in 1995 in the Quarterly Journal of Economics, extended the analysis to investing, demonstrating that myopic loss aversion, where investors weigh short-term losses more heavily than long-term gains, helps explain why equity markets return more than bond markets even over long periods.

• 5. Nudge and Choice Architecture

  ›

  In 2008, Thaler and Cass Sunstein published Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness through Yale University Press, and with it coined the term "choice architecture." The book argued that the way options are arranged and presented is never neutral. Every design embeds a default, and defaults shape outcomes at scale.

  The retirement savings plan is the book's sharpest example. When enrollment is the default setting, roughly 90 percent of eligible workers participate. When workers must actively sign up, participation falls sharply. The financial outcome for the workers is better under the default-on arrangement, yet no one is forced to join. Thaler and Sunstein called this approach libertarian paternalism: structures that steer people toward better outcomes while leaving them entirely free to choose otherwise.

  The 2021 final edition of Nudge added a chapter on what the authors call "sludge." Where nudges reduce friction to help people reach good decisions, sludge adds friction to obstruct them. Difficult subscription cancellations, mail-in rebate forms, and opaque pricing are all examples of sludge at work. These practices, Thaler and Sunstein noted, overlap with what designers call dark patterns.

  On organ donation, the book takes a counterintuitive position. Simply setting donation as the default opt-out, they argue, is not an effective policy, because family members are still consulted before organs are removed, and the absence of an explicit opt-out is not a reliable signal of the deceased's true wishes. Instead, Thaler and Sunstein advocate for prompted choice, asking individuals directly for their decision, combined with a first-person consent rule that gives active donors' documented wishes priority.

• 6. Building the Field

  ›

  From 1987 to 1990, Thaler ran a column called Anomalies in the Journal of Economic Perspectives, documenting case after case of behavior that standard microeconomic theory could not account for. Princeton University Press collected those columns into a book in 1992. The column gave behavioral economics a regular platform inside a mainstream economics journal at a time when the field was still fighting for legitimacy.

  At Cornell University, where he taught from 1978 to 1995, Thaler helped found the Center for Behavioral Economics and Decision Research in 1989, serving as its first director. When the University of Chicago's Booth School of Business hired him in 1995, he brought the field into one of the most influential economics departments in the world, the same institution whose classical tradition he was, in the words of his 2015 memoir Misbehaving, partly attacking.

  Thaler co-founded and co-directed the National Bureau of Economic Research Behavioral Economics Project alongside Robert Shiller from 1991 to 2015. He also co-founded Fuller and Thaler Asset Management in 1993 with Russell Fuller, an investment firm built on the premise that cognitive biases like the endowment effect and status quo bias create exploitable patterns in financial markets. Thaler has served as its principal since 1999.

• 7. The Nobel and Its Discontents

  ›

  When the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences announced Thaler's Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 2017, Professor Peter Gardenfors of the prize committee said in an interview that Thaler had "made economics more human." Committee chair Per Stromberg, in presenting the prize, stated that Thaler's work on self-control had "finally liberated Adam Smith."

  That work, done jointly with economist Hersh Shefrin, proposed a two-system planner-doer model of the mind. Stromberg argued it reconciled a tension running through Smith's own writing: the Theory of Moral Sentiments of 1759, which dealt with imperfect rationality and moral sentiments, and the Wealth of Nations of 1776, which centered on rational self-interest. The planner-doer framework also provided the theoretical foundation for the nudge approach that Thaler would later develop into policy.

  Thaler himself noted that much of the prize-winning work traced to his Cornell years, given the typical lag between research and Nobel recognition. Not everyone was celebratory. Robert Shiller, a 2013 laureate and fellow behavioral economist, pointed out that some economists still regard Thaler's incorporation of psychology into economics as a dubious move. An article in The Economist praised Thaler while noting that behavioral economics had pushed the discipline away from broad theoretical models and toward narrower empirical and policy questions. Paul Krugman, the 2008 laureate, offered a different view, calling behavioral economics the best development in the field in generations.