Meaning (existential)

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Meaning (existential) begins with a question so personal it resists any single answer: what does your life actually mean to you? Not what philosophers say it should mean. Not what a tradition hands down. What does it mean to you, right now, in your own lived experience?

  The word "meaning" itself traces back to the root "mean", referring to the way something is conveyed, interpreted, or represented. But existentialist thinkers pressed further than etymology. They insisted that meaning is purely subjective, shaped by each individual's unique perspective. It is the personal significance of something physical or abstract, and it includes the assigning of values to that significance.

  Three figures stand at the center of this story: Soren Kierkegaard, who searched for meaning in the Word of God; Jean-Paul Sartre, who rejected God and placed the burden of meaning entirely on the individual; and Viktor Frankl, a psychiatrist and Holocaust survivor who built a whole therapy around the human drive to find meaning. Each one arrived at a different answer. Each one changed how we understand the question.

• 2. Kierkegaard's Living Quest

  ›

  Kierkegaard left behind one of the most candid statements about the search for meaning in all of philosophy. "What I really need is to get clear about what I must do, not what I must know," he wrote, "except insofar as knowledge must precede every act."

  For Kierkegaard, knowledge and meaning are not the same thing, though both matter. Meaning is a lived experience, not a set of conclusions. He described it as a quest to find one's values, beliefs, and purpose in a world that offers no built-in answers. The crucial thing, in his own words, was "to find a truth which is truth for me, to find the idea for which I am willing to live and die."

  Kierkegaard was a Christian, and his own search ended in the Word of God. But he did not insist others follow the same path. For those who were not Christian, he expressed a genuine wish that they would find their own answers. His framework does not prescribe a destination. It prescribes a seriousness of effort. Knowledge must "come alive" in the person, he wrote, before it can carry any weight.

• 3. Sartre and Self-Creation

  ›

  Sartre compressed his entire view into four words: "existence precedes essence." Humans exist first, before they have any meaning in life. Meaning is not given. It must be achieved.

  To illustrate the point, Sartre pointed to a knife. A knife has a maker who conceived its purpose before crafting it. The essence of the knife exists before the knife itself. Sartre, who was an atheist, argued that no such maker conceived our purpose before we were born. Without a God to have designed our nature in advance, humans come into existence first and then create their own essence through interaction with their surroundings and themselves.

  The implications are serious. Meaning carries no representation or bearing in anything or anyone outside the person. It is something truly unique to each individual, separate and independent. With that freedom comes full self-responsibility for who we are and what our lives mean. There is no external authority to appeal to and no inherited essence to fall back on.

• 4. Frankl and the Will to Meaning

  ›

  Viktor Frankl was a psychiatrist, and also a Holocaust survivor. The therapy he developed, called Logotherapy, grew from both of those facts.

  Logotherapy centers on what Frankl called a "will to meaning." He set it in deliberate contrast to two other frameworks: the Nietzschean and Adlerian doctrine of the "will to power," and Freud's "will to pleasure." For Frankl, the drive to find meaning is the primary human motivation for living. His three core tenets are direct: life has meaning under all circumstances, even the most miserable ones; our main motivation for living is our will to find meaning in life; and we have inalienable freedom to find meaning.

  Frankl also identified the barriers that stand in the way. He warned against affluence, hedonism, and materialism as obstacles in the search for meaning. And he mapped out three paths by which meaning can be found: by creating a work or doing a deed; by experiencing something or encountering someone; or by the attitude we take toward unavoidable suffering. That third path, the one grounded in suffering, is the one that carried the weight of his own biography.