M1 Abrams

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The M1 Abrams earned the nickname "whispering death" at its worldwide debut during the 1982 Reforger exercise. Soldiers on the receiving end heard little more than a high-pitched whine before a 73-ton machine was upon them. That seeming contradiction between mass and stealth sits at the heart of what the Abrams is. It is a tank conceived at a moment when the United States Army had failed, more than once, to build its own replacement. How did a nation that struggled for nearly a decade to produce a viable main battle tank end up fielding what would become one of the most battle-proven armored vehicles of the modern era? The answers run through a canceled Franco-German collaboration, a last-minute political intervention by a defense secretary, British secret armor that required walls two feet thick, and a turbine engine that burns fuel so fast it can consume up to three gallons per mile. What follows is the story of how all of those things came together in a single machine.

• 2. A Decade of Failed Starts

  ›

  In 1963, the U.S. Army and West Germany's Bundeswehr set out to design one tank for both nations, aiming to improve NATO interoperability. The vehicle they produced, the MBT-70, known in Germany as the Kampfpanzer 70, was packed with unconventional ideas. It would swap a human loader for a mechanical autoloader, move the driver into the turret alongside the commander and gunner, and fire both conventional shells and Shillelagh missiles from a 152 mm gun-launcher. A hydropneumatic suspension could raise or lower the entire hull on command. The collaboration between the American team, led by General Motors, and a German consortium ran into cultural differences and design disagreements from the outset. By 1969, the unit cost was approaching $1 million per tank, many times the original estimate. The partnership dissolved in 1970. The Army then tried to salvage something from the wreckage, paring the design down into a vehicle called the XM803. Cost concerns persisted. Congress canceled the XM803 in December 1971, though it allowed the Army to redirect the remaining funds toward a clean-sheet design. The XM815 project began in January 1972, and with it the sequence of decisions that would eventually produce the Abrams.

• 3. Burlington Armor and the Weight Problem

  ›

  Major General William Desobry was placed in charge of the new tank effort, running the Main Battle Tank Task Force with technical support from the Tank-automotive and Armaments Command. In spring 1972, British officials briefed Desobry on a newly developed composite armor being tested at British Army laboratories, called Burlington. Against shaped-charge warheads, such as HEAT rounds, it performed exceptionally well. By September of that year, Desobry had persuaded the Army to incorporate it. The armor came with a catch. To use Burlington effectively, the new tank would need armor roughly two feet thick at its thickest point. For comparison, the armor on the M60 Patton was around four inches thick. That meant accepting a heavier vehicle. General Creighton Abrams, Army Chief of Staff, set the weight of the new design at 53 tons, abandoning an earlier goal of keeping it under 45 tons. The name Abrams, applied to the finished tank, honors him. With weight conceded, the Army turned its attention to cost. The procurement approach was also overhauled: rather than government engineers doing most of the design work, contractors would now compete by submitting their own complete designs. In January 1973, the Army issued the formal request for proposals, with a target cost cap of no more than $507,790 per unit.

• 4. The Turbine Decision

  ›

  Chrysler Defense and General Motors both submitted proposals in May 1973. Both firms armed their designs with the 105 mm M68 gun, and both delivered prototypes to Aberdeen Proving Ground in 1976. Testing showed that the GM design was generally superior, offering better armor protection, fire control, and turret stabilization. The Chrysler entry relied on a 1,500 horsepower Lycoming AGT1500 gas turbine, which consumed far more fuel than expected, burning 890 liters per 100 kilometers. GM's diesel design offered better fuel economy and had a slightly lower total program cost: $208 million versus $221 million for Chrysler. By spring 1976, Army evaluators had essentially settled on GM. What changed everything was Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. In July 1976, Rumsfeld announced a four-month delay and, over Army objections, made a turbine engine a requirement. Within days, GM was asked to redesign its entry around a turbine. According to Assistant Secretary for Research and Development Ed Miller, the decision to require a turbine effectively handed the contract to Chrysler, since they were the only firm that already had a gas turbine ready. On the 12th of November 1976, the Defense Department awarded Chrysler a $4.9 billion development contract. Chrysler had another advantage beyond its engine: the M60 had been lucrative business for the company, which derived around 5% of its income from military sales. GM, by contrast, earned only about 1% of its revenue from military contracts and submitted its bid only after a special plea from the Pentagon.

• 5. Testing and Early Troubles

  ›

  Eleven preproduction XM1 vehicles were manufactured between February and July 1978 at Detroit Arsenal Tank Plant. The first units arrived at Aberdeen Proving Ground in March 1978 and immediately revealed problems. Mud and debris accumulated under the hull, causing the tracks to throw. Chrysler installed a scraper, but that fix was incomplete. Months later, engineers determined that a gauge used to tension the tracks had been miscalibrated, causing them to be fitted too loosely. The engine air filters fitted poorly, allowing debris ingestion. Crews at Fort Bliss discovered they could throw the vehicle directly from forward acceleration into reverse, a maneuver they called the "bow tie" that offered a tactical advantage but damaged the transmission. Chrysler fixed that by installing a mechanical limiter. The 60 Minutes television program reported on the air filter induction problem in 1980, though the Army stated the issue had been resolved before the broadcast aired. Critics coalesced around a group called the Project on Military Procurement, later renamed the Project on Government Oversight. They raised concerns about the tank's vulnerability, high fuel consumption, and reliance on flammable hydraulics. Journalist Orr Kelly, writing in King of the Killing Zone in 1989, described those criticisms as close to the opposite of the truth. Military historian Steven Zaloga called the press criticism of the M1 during this period ill-founded, noting that the problems uncovered during trials were not particularly serious. Low-rate initial production was approved in May 1979. A total of 3,273 M1 Abrams tanks were produced during 1979-1985.

• 6. From 105 mm to 120 mm

  ›

  The original M1 carried the 105 mm M68A1 gun, a licensed version of the British Royal Ordnance L7. Choosing it over Germany's 120 mm Rheinmetall smoothbore had been a deliberate decision: the 105 mm was smaller, lighter, and cheaper, and it was already shared by the M60, the M48, and the tanks of virtually every other NATO ally. Standardizing the XM1's main gun with the rest of the alliance meant that any new ammunition developed for the Abrams would automatically upgrade the entire NATO arsenal. The tripartite British-American-German gun trials of 1975 had already produced agreement that a 120 mm weapon would eventually be needed, so both Chrysler and GM had designed their prototypes to accommodate a range of main guns. In January 1978, the Secretary of the Army formally announced that the Rheinmetall 120 mm gun would be mounted on future production versions. That decision created the XM1E1 program, keeping the original XM1 program unimpeded while the new gun variant was developed in parallel. About 5,000 M1A1 Abrams tanks were produced from 1986 to 1992, each fitted with the M256 120 mm smoothbore cannon. The M256 was manufactured under license in the United States at Watervliet Arsenal, New York. Production of M1 and M1A1 tanks combined totaled some 9,000 vehicles at a cost of approximately $4.3 million per unit. Among the munitions developed for the 120 mm gun, the depleted uranium M829A1, known as the Silver Bullet, would be the round that first proved the Abrams in combat.

• 7. Combat in the Gulf

  ›

  The Gulf War in 1991 marked the Abrams' first real test under fire. The first tanks to reach Saudi Arabia in August 1990, during the buildup to the campaign, were M1 and IPM1 models with 105 mm guns. All but two battalions of those older-armed vehicles were replaced by M1A1 tanks before the American invasion launched in January 1991. The U.S. Army ultimately deployed 1,956 M1A1s; the Marine Corps added 76 more, including some borrowed M1A1HA models from the Army. Iraq fielded T-54, T-55, T-62, and T-72 tanks, most of them lacking modern night-vision systems and rangefinders. Polish officials confirmed that no license-produced T-72 tanks, called the Lion of Babylon, had been completed before U.S. forces destroyed the Taji tank factory in 1991. The Abrams could engage targets at ranges beyond 2,500 meters, while Iraqi tanks were effective only within 2,000 meters. That gap allowed Abrams crews to destroy Iraqi armor before enemy gunners could even return fire. Of 23 M1A1s damaged or destroyed during the entire war, nine were total losses. Seven of those nine were destroyed by friendly fire; the other two were intentionally disabled by U.S. forces to prevent capture. Not a single M1 was lost to enemy tank fire. On the 27th of February, three Abrams were left behind enemy lines during a swift attack on Talil airfield, south of Nasiriyah. One had been hit by enemy fire; the other two had become mired in mud. All three were destroyed by U.S. forces rather than allow them to be claimed as trophies by the Iraqi Army.

• 8. Urban Warfare and Ukraine

  ›

  The Iraq War that began in 2003 exposed vulnerabilities that open desert had never revealed. In urban environments, attacks could come from every direction. Iraqi infantrymen used short-range rockets against tracks, rear panels, and the top armor. Some tanks were put out of action when externally stored fuel in turret racks was ignited by small-arms fire and the burning fuel ran into the engine compartment. By March 2005, approximately 80 Abrams had been forced out of action; 63 were shipped to the United States for repairs, while 17 were damaged beyond repair. By December 2006, more than 530 Abrams had been returned to the U.S. for repairs overall. The Army responded with the Tank Urban Survival Kit, or TUSK, which added reactive armor to the hull sides and slat armor at the rear to defend against rocket-propelled grenades. A transparent gun shield and thermal sight were added to the loader's machine gun. An exterior telephone was installed so that supporting infantry could communicate directly with the tank commander. In August 2006, General Dynamics Land Systems received a $45 million contract for 505 TUSK kits. The Russia-Ukraine War placed Abrams tanks in a very different challenge. In January 2023, President Joe Biden announced that the United States would send 31 M1 Abrams to Ukraine. The first deliveries, drawn from Marine Corps stocks and refurbished to M1A1SA standards, arrived in September 2023. By February 2024, one had already been destroyed by a FPV Piranha 10 quadcopter. The Russian use of hunter-killer drones made tank operation costly, and Ukraine eventually withdrew the Abrams from frontline service in April 2024. One captured example was put on display as a war trophy in Moscow in May 2024. Australia later announced in October 2024 that 49 of its recently retired M1A1 tanks would be transferred to Ukraine as its own forces transitioned to M1A2 models, with the final 12 delivered by the 19th of December 2025.