Ledger (journal)

• 1. Founding Vision And Origins

  ›

  Peter R. Rizun and Christopher E. Wilmer met on the bitcoin forum bitcointalk.org in 2015 to discuss a new idea for academic publishing. Rizun is a physicist and entrepreneur living in Vancouver, Canada. Wilmer serves as an assistant professor in the Swanson School of Engineering's Chemical & Petroleum Engineering Department at the University of Pittsburgh. He once used his first Bitcoin purchase to buy honey caramels from a local beekeeper. The pair envisioned a journal specifically for people passionate about the technology who wanted to publish their research. Wilmer questioned the reliability of white papers that had become common during the cryptocurrency boom. He noted that submissions often lacked citations or contained poor quality work. Their goal was to establish a more traditional peer review system for the field.

• 2. Peer Review Methodology

  ›

  The journal receives two to four submissions every week according to Wilmer. Many of these initial drafts fail to meet basic academic standards. Occasional submissions arrive with no citations attached to their arguments. This volume of low-quality material prompted editors to implement strict traditional peer review processes. They rejected the informal nature of industry white papers in favor of rigorous scrutiny. The process ensures that only vetted research appears within the final publication. This approach distinguishes Ledger from other publications focused solely on market speculation. It prioritizes mathematical proofs and engineering details over hype cycles. The editors aim to build trust through transparency and verified data points.

• 3. Institutional Partnerships

  ›

  Coin Center provided funding as a nonprofit organization supporting the project. The University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh handles all publishing operations. The University of Pittsburgh Press cosponsors the initiative to ensure academic credibility. These partnerships allowed the team to operate an open access model without charging readers fees. The University of Pittsburgh itself appeared in the documentary film titled The Rise and Rise of Bitcoin. Such institutional backing helped legitimize cryptocurrency studies within established universities. Financial support from Coin Center enabled the hiring of necessary editorial staff. The collaboration bridged the gap between decentralized technology and formal academia.

• 4. Interdisciplinary Scope

  ›

  Topics covered include mathematics, computer science, engineering, law, economics, and philosophy. Wilmer describes the focus specifically as blockchain technology research rather than just currency trading. Articles often explore the underlying cryptographic algorithms used by systems like bitcoin. Legal scholars examine regulatory frameworks affecting digital assets across different jurisdictions. Economists analyze market behaviors and inflationary properties of new tokens. Philosophers debate ethical implications regarding privacy and decentralization. This breadth ensures that no single discipline dominates the conversation. The journal serves as a hub for diverse experts working on related problems.

• 5. Publication History And Timeline

  ›

  A call for papers was issued on the 15th of September 2015 with a deadline set to the 31st of December 2015. Formalizing the review process caused significant delays before any content could be released. The inaugural issue did not appear until December 2016 over a year after the initial announcement. Editors prioritized quality control over speed during this extended development period. The delay allowed them to refine submission guidelines and train reviewers effectively. Despite the wait, the first volume established a precedent for future issues. Subsequent editions continued to follow the same rigorous schedule. The timeline reflects the challenges of building a new academic infrastructure from scratch.