Land use statistics by country

• 1. Defining Cultivated Land Metrics

  ›

  The CIA World Factbook defines arable land as territory cultivated for crops like wheat, maize, and rice. These specific plants are replanted after each harvest cycle. Permanent cropland covers different ground entirely. It includes citrus groves, coffee plantations, and rubber trees that do not require replanting. This category also encompasses land under flowering shrubs, fruit trees, elm trees, and vines. The definition explicitly excludes land used for growing wood or timber. Other lands comprise any area that is neither arable nor permanent crop land. This broad group contains permanent meadows, pastures, forests, and built-on areas. Roads and barren land fall into this final classification. The total cultivated land area combines the sum of arable land and permanent crops.

• 2. Global Agricultural Distribution Patterns

  ›

  In 2011, the world held 17,235,800 square kilometers of cultivated land. This figure represented 11.6 percent of the global total area. Arable land made up 15,827,534 square kilometers or 10.7 percent globally. Permanent crops covered just 1,549,600 square kilometers at 1 percent. Some nations show extreme concentration in farming. One country ranked first with 1,765,260 square kilometers of cultivated land. That nation dedicated 53.7 percent of its territory to agriculture. Another state followed closely with 1,681,826 square kilometers available for farming. Its percentage stood at 17.1 percent. A third entity possessed 1,265,267 square kilometers of usable ground. Only 7.4 percent of that specific region was farmed. These top three countries dominated the global list by absolute size. Their percentages varied wildly from 53.7 down to 7.4. Many other states had much smaller totals. One entry showed only 1,684 square kilometers of cultivatable space. That tiny fraction represented 12.2 percent of its total area.

• 3. Per Capita Farming Capacity Analysis

  ›

  Population density drastically alters how much arable land exists per person. The world average sat at 1.92 hectares per capita in 2011. Several nations exceeded this global mean significantly. One country offered 4.86 hectares per resident. Another provided 8.55 hectares for every citizen. A third state gave 10.66 hectares to each inhabitant. Some regions struggled with severe scarcity. One nation managed only 0.48 hectares per person. Another recorded just 0.33 hectares available per individual. A third territory dropped to 0.26 hectares per head. These low figures indicate intense pressure on limited resources. High population numbers shrink the personal share of arable soil. The gap between the highest and lowest per capita values spans nearly twenty times. This disparity shapes food security strategies across different borders.

• 4. Data Sources And Methodology

  ›

  All percentage figures derive from the CIA World Factbook Land Use dataset. Total land area figures come directly from the CIA World Factbook Area report. The source defines total area as the sum of total land plus total water area. Every other figure including total cultivated land area relies on calculations based on these datasets. Researchers use these specific documents to generate comparative statistics. The data points span various years ranging from 2002 to 2023. Most entries utilize information collected in 2011. Some newer records reflect updates from 2016 or 2020. The West Bank entry specifically notes its status as a distinct region. The FAO Country Profiles serve as an external reference for further verification. These methodologies ensure consistency when comparing nations with vastly different sizes.

• 5. Regional Disparities In Land Use

  ›

  Specific regions display stark contrasts between cultivation rates and barren territories. One country dedicated 76.3 percent of its land to farming while leaving only 23.7 percent as other land. Another state allocated 59 percent to agriculture but kept 41 percent for other uses. A third nation showed 58.9 percent arable land against 41 percent remaining. Conversely, some areas possess almost no cultivatable ground. One territory recorded zero square kilometers of arable land. Its entire surface fell into the other land category at 100 percent. Another region listed 0.04 percent arable land against 99.96 percent non-farm area. Several small states reported zero cultivated land entirely. Their total area remained fixed at specific square kilometer counts like 14,000,000 or 2,166,086. These extremes highlight how geography dictates agricultural potential. Some places simply cannot support large scale crop production regardless of population needs.