King Lear

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  King Lear asks a question that has unsettled audiences for four centuries: what happens when a man with absolute power demands to be loved? William Shakespeare wrote The Tragedy of King Lear in late 1605 or early 1606, and its earliest known performance was on Saint Stephen's Day in 1606, before the court of King James I. The play is set in pre-Roman Britain, a world deliberately stripped of any fixed date. Its king divides his kingdom among his daughters according to how extravagantly they praise him, and what follows is a descent into storm, blindness, and madness that critics have called the most extreme tragic territory in all of literature. Percy Bysshe Shelley, writing in his 1821 Defence of Poetry, called it "the most perfect specimen of the dramatic art existing in the world". Yet for nearly two centuries, audiences never saw Shakespeare's version at all. They saw a tidied-up substitute with a happy ending, a love story bolted on, and the court jester cut entirely. The story of how King Lear came to be written, suppressed, recovered, and endlessly reimagined is almost as turbulent as the play itself.

• 2. Sources and Invention

  ›

  Raphael Holinshed's Chronicles of England, Scotlande, and Irelande, published in its second edition in 1587, is probably Shakespeare's most important source. Holinshed himself drew on the Historia Regum Britanniae by Geoffrey of Monmouth, written in the 12th century, which places the story at the time of Joash, King of Judah, around 800 BC. Shakespeare deliberately avoided that dating, setting the play only vaguely in the pre-Christian era while freely mixing in anachronisms: Anglo-Saxon names, titles like Duke and Earl, and oaths to Jupiter, Juno, and Apollo.

  The folk tale underlying the play belongs to a type catalogued as Aarne-Thompson 923, commonly known as "Love Like Salt", in which a father rejects his youngest daughter for a statement of affection that fails to please him. Edmund Spenser's Faerie Queene, published in 1590, already contained a character named Cordelia who also dies by hanging. An anonymous play called King Leir, published in 1605, was almost certainly read by Shakespeare in printed form and had a significant effect on his composition.

  The subplot involving Gloucester, Edgar, and Edmund came from a tale in Philip Sidney's Countess of Pembroke's Arcadia, written between 1580 and 1590, featuring a blind Paphlagonian king and his two sons, Leonatus and Plexitrus. Samuel Harsnett's 1603 pamphlet A Declaration of Egregious Popish Impostures supplied much of the language Edgar uses while feigning madness as Poor Tom.

  Shakespeare's most consequential departure from all these sources was his ending. In Geoffrey of Monmouth, Cordelia restores Lear to the throne and succeeds him as ruler. Shakespeare killed them both. That decision haunted audiences, critics, and adapters for generations to come.

• 3. The Text's Troubled History

  ›

  Two lunar and solar eclipses struck London two weeks apart in the autumn of 1605: a lunar eclipse on the 27th of September and a solar eclipse on the 12th of October. The passage in Act I about "these late eclipses in the sun and moon" appears to refer to those events, suggesting those lines were composed after both eclipses and after the published astrological commentary that followed. A Stationers' Register entry records a performance before James I on the 26th of December 1606.

  Modern editors work from three surviving versions: the 1608 quarto, known as Q1; a 1619 quarto, Q2, which is unofficial and based on Q1; and the First Folio of 1623, known as F1. Q1 has been described as containing "many errors and muddles". Q2 introduced both corrections and new errors. The differences between Q and F go well beyond minor variants: Q1 contains 285 lines not found in F1, while F1 contains around 100 lines absent from Q1. At least a thousand individual words differ between the two texts, punctuation styles diverge throughout, and about half the verse lines in F1 appear either as prose or differently divided in Q1.

  From Alexander Pope onward, editors conflated the two texts into a single version. The assumption was that Shakespeare wrote one original manuscript, now lost, and that both printings were imperfect copies of it. As early as 1931, Madeleine Doran argued that the two texts had independent histories and that their differences were critically interesting, but this view did not gain serious traction until the late 1970s when Michael Warren and Gary Taylor revived it. In 2021, Duncan Salkeld suggested Q1 was typeset from dictation, accounting for errors caused by mishearing. Harold Bloom and Anthony Nuttall have each endorsed the view that Shakespeare himself revised the tragedy at least once during his lifetime.

• 4. Tate's Reign and the Restored Text

  ›

  In 1681, the actor and playwright Nahum Tate looked at Shakespeare's play and saw what he described as "a heap of jewels, unstrung and unpolish't; yet so dazzling in their disorder, that I soon perceiv'd I had seiz'd a treasure." His revision omitted the Fool entirely, introduced a happy ending in which Lear and Cordelia survive, and built a love story between Cordelia and Edgar, two characters who never interact in Shakespeare's original. He also added a confidante for Cordelia named Arante and included titillating scenes, among them one in which Edgar rescues Cordelia from an attempted kidnapping and rape by Edmund. The play ends with a celebration of "the King's blest Restauration", a pointed reference to Charles II.

  Tate's version held the stage for close to 150 years. Joseph Addison, writing in The Spectator on the 16th of April 1711, complained that the original had "lost half its Beauty" through Tate's version, but on the professional stage, Tate prevailed. David Garrick cut back on Tate's lines and reduced the prominence of the Cordelia-Edgar love story without removing Tate's happy ending. One spectator, Arthur Murphy, called Garrick's rendering of Lear driven mad by his daughters "the finest tragic distress ever seen on any stage".

  Edmund Kean restored the tragic ending in 1823, but audiences rejected it and he reverted to Tate after only three performances. It took until 1838, when William Macready at Covent Garden performed Shakespeare's full version, for Tate's adaptation to be displaced. Macready restored the Fool, casting an actress, Priscilla Horton, described by one spectator as playing "a fragile, hectic, beautiful-faced, half-idiot-looking boy". John Forster, writing in the Examiner on the 14th of February 1838, expressed the hope that Macready's success had "banished that disgrace from the stage for ever." As Harold Bloom later summarised, Kean had initiated the restoration in 1823, but the stage held out until Macready completed it.

• 5. Shakespeare's Political Mirror

  ›

  James VI of Scotland inherited the English throne upon the death of Elizabeth I in 1603, uniting the kingdoms of Britain and making the idea of a unified British realm a live political question. James had given his sons Henry and Charles the titles of Duke of Cornwall and Duke of Albany, precisely the titles borne by the husbands of Regan and Goneril. The critic Andrew Hadfield argued that Lear's division of Britain was a deliberate inversion of James's unification project, intended as a warning to a king who preferred sycophantic courtiers over honest counsel.

  In 1604, a parliamentary election dispute became a flashpoint between James and the House of Commons. Sir John Fortescue, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, was defeated in Buckinghamshire by Sir Francis Goodwin. James declared the result invalid and installed Fortescue while the Commons insisted on swearing in Goodwin. The MP Thomas Wentworth, son of Peter Wentworth, who had been repeatedly imprisoned under Elizabeth for raising succession questions in the Commons, was most forceful in protesting James's attempt to override the election result.

  In the play, Kent's loyalty is explicitly institutional rather than personal: he serves the realm of which Lear is head, not the man himself. John F. Danby, in his 1949 study Shakespeare's Doctrine of Nature, identified the words "nature", "natural", and "unnatural" occurring over forty times in the play. Danby argued that the drama sets two opposing views of human nature against each other: the Lear party, aligned with the philosophy of Bacon and Hooker, and the Edmund party, whose bold rationalism anticipates Hobbes. Hadfield also argued that the court of Lear, with its riotous knights and culture of flattery, was a pointed portrait of James's own court, and that James's own 1598 book The Trew Law of Free Monarchies, which described the king as the "father of the nation", was directly echoed in Lear's demand that even his subjects address him in paternal terms.

• 6. Performance Across Centuries

  ›

  Shakespeare wrote the role of Lear for his company's chief tragedian, Richard Burbage, and had been writing incrementally older characters for Burbage as their careers advanced together. The Fool was possibly written for the company's clown Robert Armin, or possibly for a boy actor doubling as Cordelia. At the original Globe, there were no sets in the modern sense: Lear's costume itself tracked his decline, beginning in crown and regalia, moving to huntsman's dress, then bareheaded in the storm, and finally crowned with flowers in a parody of his opening state.

  All theatres in England were closed by the Puritan government on the 6th of September 1642. When the monarchy was restored in 1660, the theatrical repertoire was divided between two patent companies, the King's Company and the Duke's Company, and it was Tate's adaptation, not Shakespeare's, that entered their rotations. The 19th century saw a gradual push back toward Shakespeare, with John Philip Kemble introducing more of the original text while still keeping the happy ending, the love story, and the absent Fool.

  Donald Wolfit, considered the last of the great actor-managers, played Lear in 1944 on a Stonehenge-like set. James Agate praised his performance as "the greatest piece of Shakespearean acting since I have been privileged to write for the Sunday Times". At Stratford-upon-Avon in 1962, Peter Brook set the play on a huge, empty white stage against which Lear and Gloucester appeared, in the words of scholar Roger Warren, as "two tiny figures in rags in the midst of this emptiness", catching both the human pathos and the universal scale of the scene. Brook cast Paul Scofield as Lear, and later filmed the play with the same actor.

  From the 20th century onward, women began taking male roles in the play. Lear himself was played by Marianne Hoppe in 1990, Janet Wright in 1995, Kathryn Hunter in 1996-97, and Glenda Jackson in both 2016 and 2019. John Lennon, working at Abbey Road Studios on the song "I Am the Walrus", happened upon a BBC Third Programme broadcast of the play on the 29th of September 1967. He held a microphone to the radio and overdubbed fragments of Act IV, Scene 6, with the voices of Mark Dignam as Gloucester, Philip Guard as Edgar, and John Bryning as Oswald passing into the finished recording.

• 7. Film and Global Adaptations

  ›

  The first film version of King Lear was a five-minute German production made around 1905 that has not survived. Akira Kurosawa's 1985 film Ran remains among the most celebrated screen adaptations: at the time of its release it was the most expensive Japanese film ever made. Kurosawa moved the story to a fictional 16th-century Japanese warlord named Hidetora, who divides his domain among three sons rather than daughters, and gave his central character a violent backstory absent from Shakespeare. Emi Wada's colour-coded costumes for each family's soldiers won an Academy Award.

  Grigori Kozintsev's Soviet film Korol Lir, released in the early 1970s, drew praise from critic Alexander Anikst for its "serious, deeply thoughtful" even "philosophical approach". Boris Pasternak wrote the screenplay, and Dmitri Shostakovich composed the score, which included a trumpet fanfare for Lear that grew increasingly ironic as the film progressed, and a five-bar "Call to Death" marking each character's end. Jüri Järvet played Lear as "first among equals" in what Kozintsev described as an ensemble piece. Peter Brook's film of the same period, also starring Paul Scofield, divided critics sharply: Pauline Kael said she hated it, while Vincent Canby described it as "an exalting Lear, full of exquisite terror".

  In 1989, David McRuvie and Iyyamkode Sreedharan adapted and translated the play into Malayalam for performance in Kerala in the Kathakali tradition, a form that itself developed around 1600, roughly contemporary with Shakespeare's writing. The production later toured and in 2000 played at Shakespeare's Globe. In 1997, Ong Keng Sen staged an adaptation featuring six actors, each performing in a separate Asian acting tradition and in their own language. A pivotal moment came when the Jingju performer playing the elder daughter stabbed a Noh-performed Lear, whose straight face-forward fall to the stage astonished the audience.

  Jane Smiley's 1991 novel A Thousand Acres, set on an Iowa farm in 1979 and winner of the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction, retells the story from the perspective of the elder daughters, foregrounding a history of sexual abuse by their father. Jocelyn Moorhouse directed a film adaptation in 1997. Giuseppe Verdi commissioned a libretto for a proposed opera titled Re Lear, but never composed any music for it. German composer Aribert Reimann's opera Lear premiered on the 9th of July 1978, and Akira Kurosawa's own vision of the play's reach across cultures found its clearest expression in Ran's final image: Hidetora's blind son Tsurumaru, poised at the edge of a cliff at sunset, alone.