John Bowker (theologian)

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  John Westerdale Bowker was born on the 30th of July 1935, and he spent decades asking a question that makes many people uncomfortable: what if science and religion are not enemies at all? At Cambridge, he did something no one had done before there. He introduced religious studies as a formal academic discipline to the university. That alone would mark a career. But Bowker kept going. He challenged one of the most famous scientists of his generation on the claim that belief in God was a kind of mental virus. He served as a consultant for UNESCO. He became an Honorary Canon of Canterbury Cathedral. And he broadcast regularly for the BBC. How does a man ordained as an Anglican priest end up at the intersection of neuroscience, biology, and the world's great faiths? That question runs through everything Bowker built across six decades of scholarship.

• 2. Early Formation

  ›

  St John's School in Leatherhead is where Bowker received his early education, before moving to Worcester College, Oxford and then Ripon Hall, Oxford. Between his studies and his academic career, he performed his national service with the Royal West African Frontier Force in northern Nigeria. That experience, far from the English university world, preceded a significant first posting. In 1961 he became the Henry Stevenson Fellow at the University of Sheffield. A year later he was at Cambridge, appointed Dean of Chapel at Corpus Christi College. His progression there was methodical: he moved from Assistant Lecturer in 1965 to full Lecturer by 1970. In 1974 the University of Lancaster appointed him Professor of Religious Studies, a chair that placed him at the heart of a field he was actively helping define.

• 3. A Cambridge Institution

  ›

  Trinity College, Cambridge became a central home for Bowker when he returned there in 1984, serving as Dean of Chapel until 1991 and as a Fellow until 1993. During that same period, in 1986, he was appointed adjunct professor at both the University of Pennsylvania and North Carolina State University, giving him a transatlantic reach unusual for a British theologian. From 1992 to 1997 he held the Gresham Professorship of Divinity at Gresham College in London, one of the oldest lectureships in England. Alongside those institutional posts, he delivered invited lectures across a wide range of universities: the Wilde lectures at Oxford, the Riddell at Newcastle, the Boutwood at Cambridge, the Scott Holland in London, and the Bicentenary lecture at Georgetown University. He also served on the Archbishops' Commission on Doctrine from 1977 to 1986, and was appointed vice-president of the Institute on Religion in an Age of Science in 1980.

• 4. Confronting the God-Meme

  ›

  Richard Dawkins put forward a striking proposition: that belief in God functioned like a mental virus, spreading through minds the way a pathogen spreads through bodies. Bowker took that claim seriously enough to spend his Gresham College lectures in 1992 and 1993 examining it in detail. His collaborator in the scientific portions was Quinton Deeley, a former student whose dissertation on biogenetic structuralism had led him to retrain as a doctor. Deeley later became a published psychiatrist. Bowker's critique was precise. He argued that Dawkins's account of religious motivation was, in his own words, "far removed from evidence and data." He pressed further: even if the so-called God-meme approach were granted, it "does not give rise to one set of consequences." He asked who decides which behaviours count as diseased, and on what grounds. His point was that the framework offered no objective measure. He observed that "there is nothing here as objective as the observation of chicken-pox" and that the observer "is highly relative." The 1987 book Licensed Insanities: religions and belief in God in the contemporary world had already staked out this territory, and the Gresham lectures deepened that argument with scientific collaboration.

• 5. Science, Faith, and the Brain

  ›

  The 2005 book The Sacred Neuron: The Extraordinary New Discoveries Linking Science and Religion pressed Bowker's argument into new ground. He took the position that viewing faith and reason as opposing functions is simply incorrect. His case rested on developments in neuroscience that were revealing, as his publishers described it, startling facts about how ideas are processed into beliefs. The neurophysiology of belief was, for Bowker, not a threat to religion but a window into it. He argued that faith and belief are not separate from reason but are actually rooted in it. His suggestion was that when rationality and faith are treated as complementary rather than competing, a new understanding of the human mind becomes possible. That understanding, he proposed, could serve as a basis for resolving conflicts between religions and cultures. An earlier edited volume, Violence and Aggression, published in 1983, had already shown his interest in the meeting point of biology, psychology, and religion, long before neuroscience made such arguments fashionable.