Io9

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Io9 launched in 2008 as a standalone Gawker Media blog with a simple but ambitious premise: take science fiction seriously as a lens for understanding the real future. Its founding editor, Annalee Newitz, had just watched another project called Other magazine cease print publication when Gawker approached them about building something new. What Gawker asked for was a science and science-fiction blog. What Newitz built was something that blurred those two categories on purpose.

  The founding staff was an eclectic mix. Charlie Jane Anders joined from the start, as did Geoff Manaugh of BLDGBLOG, Graeme McMillan from Newsarama, Kevin Kelly from Joystiq and Cinematical, and Lynn Peril, a feminist retro-futuristic writer best known for the book Pink Think: Becoming a Woman in Many Uneasy Lessons. From that launch crew, io9 would grow into a site that could describe itself, in Newitz's own words, as being about looking into the future and science fiction.

  What lies ahead is a story of two editors who each left because managing got in the way of writing, a merger driven by a measured 12% content overlap, and a staff revolt in 2023 that put the site's identity at the center of a public fight.

• 2. Building the Ethos

  ›

  In February 2010, Michael Moran of The Times Eureka Zone blog placed io9 among the top 30 science blogs. His description captured something the site had been working toward: he called it ostensibly a blog for science fiction enthusiasts that also found space for pieces on cutting-edge technology, the wilder fringes of astronomy, and the more worrying implications of grey goo. The phrase "grey goo" was not accidental. Io9 treated speculative risk as worthy of coverage alongside conventional science reporting.

  Newitz had built the site around a future-facing ethos that refused to treat science fiction as escapism. The surrounding staff helped sustain that range. Lynn Peril's background as a feminist retro-futuristic writer gave the site a cultural dimension that most tech blogs lacked. Manaugh brought an architectural and environmental eye from BLDGBLOG. That mix of sensibilities meant the site could swing from hard science to cultural criticism without losing its center of gravity.

  By the time The Times Eureka Zone named io9 to its list, the site had been running for about two years and was already operating with enough breadth to stand alongside science journalism outlets that had been publishing far longer.

• 3. The Gizmodo Merger

  ›

  In January 2014, after seven years as io9's head editor, Newitz moved to Gizmodo to become its new editor. The transition was part of a deliberate plan by Gawker to bring the two sites closer together. Co-founder Anders stayed on as io9's editor, and io9's 11-member staff joined Gizmodo's 22-person staff under Newitz's overall supervision.

  Gawker had a concrete reason for the reorganization: the two publications shared roughly 12% of their content by overlap. A technology blog and a science and science fiction blog were covering the same ground often enough that coordination made editorial sense. The merger was meant to reduce that redundancy while letting each outlet keep its distinct identity.

  Newitz's tenure at both outlets ended on the 30th of November, 2015, just under eight years after io9 launched. They explained the departure by saying they had grown to disliking managing both sites at once and that the work had taken them away from their passion of writing articles. The next step was a position as tech culture editor at Ars Technica. Anders remained as io9's head editor after Newitz left, and several other longtime core staff members also departed during that same transitional window.

• 4. Editors Who Left to Write

  ›

  On the 26th of April, 2016, Charlie Jane Anders left io9 to focus on her then-untitled second novel. Rob Bricken stepped in as editor. On the 31st of July, 2018, Bricken himself stepped down, giving a reason that echoed Newitz's almost exactly: managing the site was consuming too much of his time and he would rather spend that time writing articles for it.

  The pattern of editors departing because the editorial chair pulled them away from writing was not coincidental. Io9 had always been built around writers with genuine enthusiasm for the subject matter, and the tension between managing a staff and producing work was a recurring structural problem at the site.

  Bricken's replacement was Jill Pantozzi, who had previously served as editor-in-chief of The Mary Sue. Pantozzi had originally joined io9 as a managing editor and moved to the deputy editor position before taking charge. She left the site entirely in December 2021. James Whitbrook, who had been a staff writer at io9 since 2014, was then made Deputy Editor in charge of the site.

• 5. The AI Backlash

  ›

  In 2023, G/O Media, the company that then owned io9, published AI-written articles across several of its sites. The decision drew significant backlash from readers and from within the company itself. James Whitbrook, by then the Deputy Editor of io9, published a public statement denouncing the decision to publish that material.

  Whitbrook's statement was notable precisely because he was not a departing editor writing from outside the organization. He was the site's current editorial lead, registering dissent against a policy set above him. The incident put io9, a site that had spent years covering speculative technology with genuine critical attention, at the center of a debate about how media companies were choosing to use that same technology.

  The backlash to G/O Media's AI publishing push joined a broader wave of criticism directed at outlets that introduced automated writing without staff consent. For a site whose founding ethos had been about looking into the future and science fiction, the gap between that promise and the AI rollout was not lost on readers or staff.