International Military Tribunal for the Far East

• 1. Tribunal Establishment And Charter

  ›

  On the 29th of April 1946, the International Military Tribunal for the Far East convened inside Ichigaya Court in Tokyo. This building had previously served as the Imperial Japanese Army H building before becoming the stage for a historic legal proceeding. General Douglas MacArthur issued a special proclamation on the 19th of January 1946 to establish this court and approved its charter on that same day. The tribunal drew judges from eleven nations including Australia, Canada, China, France, India, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the Philippines, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Joseph B. Keenan of the United States served as the chief prosecutor while over one hundred attorneys defended the accused defendants. The proceedings began with charges covering crimes against peace, conventional war crimes, and crimes against humanity committed between 1931 and 1945. The IMTFE exercised broader temporal jurisdiction than its Nuremberg counterpart by starting from the 1931 Japanese invasion of Manchuria rather than the 7th of December 1941.

• 2. Prosecution Strategy And Evidence

  ›

  The prosecution team opened their case on the 3rd of May 1946 and presented evidence across fifteen phases until the 24th of January 1947. They relied heavily on the doctrine of command responsibility which required proving three specific elements: systematic or widespread atrocities, knowledge of these acts by the accused, and authority to stop them. Article 13 of the Charter allowed admission of any evidence deemed to have probative value without technical rules. Prosecutors submitted 4,336 exhibits of evidence including depositions and affidavits from 779 other individuals. One piece of evidence used was the Tanaka Memorial, a document purportedly from 1927 that outlined plans for global conquest. This document later proved to be a hoax of Chinese origin yet remained unchallenged during the trial. Defense counsel argued that evidentiary standards were low while they themselves had to adhere to strict best evidence rules. The prosecution excluded all possible evidence implicating Emperor Hirohito and his family to protect American postwar objectives in Japan.

• 3. Defense Arguments And Dissents

  ›

  Defense attorneys opened their presentation on the 27th of January 1947 and concluded after 225 days on the 9th of September 1947. George Furness stated that regardless of individual integrity no tribunal could be impartial under these circumstances. Shigenori Tōgō maintained throughout the trial that Japan acted in self-defense against the Hull note. Five justices released separate opinions outside the court judgment which spanned 1,781 pages. Justice Radhabinod Pal dismissed the entire prosecution case as victor's justice and called for acquittal of all defendants. He argued that future generations would judge the atomic bomb decision more harshly than any Japanese action. Bert Röling of the Netherlands dissented calling for acquittal of several defendants including Kōki Hirota. Henri Bernard of France concluded that Japan's declaration of war had a principal author who escaped prosecution entirely. William Webb of Australia wrote that men advising crimes are in no worse position than those directing them.

• 4. Judgments And Sentencing Outcomes

  ›

  The reading of judgments occurred between November 4 and 12, 1948 with seven defendants sentenced to death by hanging. These included General Hideki Tojo, Prime Minister Kōki Hirota, General Seishirō Itagaki, General Heitarō Kimura, Lieutenant General Akira Mutō, General Kenji Doihara, and General Iwane Matsui. Executions took place at Sugamo Prison in Ikebukuro on the 23rd of December 1948 under MacArthur's order barring photography. Sixteen defendants received life imprisonment while three died in prison before release. The remaining thirteen were paroled between 1952 and 1958 following a campaign supported by ten million people. Foreign minister Shigenori Tōgō received twenty years but died in prison in 1950. Mamoru Shigemitsu served only seven years before parole and later became foreign minister again. Forty-two other suspects including Nobusuke Kishi remained imprisoned awaiting an unrealized second trial until their release in 1947 and 1948.

• 5. Imperial Family Immunity Controversy

  ›

  Emperor Hirohito and members of the Imperial House faced potential indictment yet were never prosecuted or called to testify. Herbert P. Bix documented how MacArthur confirmed to Admiral Mitsumasa Yonai on the 26th of November 1945 that abdication would not be necessary. Brigadier General Bonner Fellers worked immediately upon landing in Japan to protect Hirohito from war responsibility roles. Court officials coordinated testimony among major criminal suspects to ensure no one implicated the emperor directly. Shūichi Mizota recorded a meeting where Fellers told Yonai it would be convenient if Japanese could prove the emperor completely blameless. John W. Dower described this as a campaign knowing no bounds where prosecution effectively acted as defense for the emperor. Three justices wrote obiter dicta about Hirohito's criminal responsibility while maintaining he escaped all prosecution entirely.

• 6. Unit 731 Biological Warfare Deal

  ›

  Shirō Ishii received immunity for Unit 731 scientists in exchange for germ warfare data gathered through human experimentation. On the 6th of May 1947 MacArthur wrote to Washington stating information would be retained in intelligence channels rather than used as war crimes evidence. The deal concluded in 1948 despite Soviet trials finding some members guilty of bacteriological and chemical warfare crimes. Judge Röling later expressed bitterness that centrally ordered Japanese war criminality remained secret from the court by U.S. government action. John W. Powell published an article in 1981 detailing experiments conducted on live prisoners including open-air tests of germ warfare. These facts emerged decades after the trial when historians began examining previously classified documents about biological weapons programs.

• 7. Legacy And Diplomatic Repercussions

  ›

  In 1978 the kami of 1,068 convicted war criminals were secretly enshrined in Yasukuni Shrine creating ongoing diplomatic tensions with China and South Korea. A 2006 Asahi News survey found 70% of Japanese respondents unaware of trial details rising to 90% among those aged 20-29. Only 7% believed the war was strictly waged for self-defense while 76% acknowledged Japan perpetrated aggression during the conflict. Crown Prince Naruhito expressed concern in February 2015 about how history would be remembered by future generations without direct knowledge of the war. The San Francisco Peace Treaty signed the 8th of September 1951 accepted jurisdiction of the tribunal under Article 11. Public sympathy shifted toward Class B and C criminals in late 1940s and 1950s as domestic sentiment viewed Japanese people as victims rather than perpetrators.