Intact forest landscape

• 1. Defining The Intact Forest Landscape

  ›

  An area must span at least 500 square kilometers to qualify as an intact forest landscape. This minimum size requirement ensures the ecosystem can support viable populations of diverse species. A circle with a diameter of 10 kilometers must fit entirely within the territory boundaries. Human economic activity cannot significantly influence these zones. Settlements create a one-kilometer buffer zone that disqualifies nearby land from inclusion. Transportation infrastructure like roads and railways also generate exclusion buffers on either side. Industrial activities such as logging or mining during the last 30 to 70 years render areas ineligible. Some low-intensity disturbances like shifting cultivation remain eligible for classification. These technical criteria distinguish IFLs from other forest types globally.

• 2. Global Distribution And Extent

  ›

  Intact forest landscapes cover approximately 23 percent of all global forest ecosystems. This total area spans roughly 13.1 million square kilometers across the planet. Two biomes hold almost all remaining IFLs: dense tropical forests account for 45 percent while boreal forests make up 44 percent. Temperate broadleaf and mixed forests contain very small proportions of these intact areas. Sixty-six countries out of 149 potential candidates still possess some form of IFL. Canada, Russia, and Brazil together hold 64 percent of the world's total IFL area. Nineteen percent of this global area falls under some form of protection status. Only 10 percent belongs to strict IUCN protected categories numbered one through three. The planet has lost seven percent of its intact forest landscapes since the year 2000.

• 3. Origins Of The Concept

  ›

  Environmental non-governmental organizations developed the term intact forest landscape in the early 1990s. Groups including Greenpeace and the World Resources Institute created the initial definition. Biodiversity Conservation Center and International Socio-Ecological Union joined the effort. Transparent World also contributed to establishing the concept. Regional monitoring projects began using the term shortly after its creation. Global Forest Watch became a framework for presenting regional maps between 2002 and 2006. Greenpeace Russia presented the first regional map covering northern European Russia in 2001. A complete description of the mapping algorithm accompanied that report. Scientists and environmental groups collaborated under the Global Forest Watch initiative to produce subsequent regional maps. These efforts built upon earlier frontier forest concepts used by the World Resources Institute.

• 4. Mapping Methodologies And Technology

  ›

  Satellite imagery provides the primary data source for identifying intact forest landscapes globally. High spatial resolution images from the Global Land Cover Facility enable detailed analysis. USGS satellite data supplements these observations with additional coverage. Algorithms process information at approximately one millionth scale resolution. This fine scale allows detection of small disturbances invisible to coarser maps. Previous attempts like wilderness area maps operated at scales no finer than 1:16 million. The IFL method produces results roughly sixteen times more precise than those older initiatives. Publicly available high-resolution imagery forms the backbone of the global mapping project. Consistent criteria apply uniformly across all regions during the assessment process. The resulting maps serve as geographically explicit baselines for ecological integrity assessments.

• 5. Conservation Value And Biodiversity

  ›

  Large roaming animals require intact forest landscapes to maintain viable populations. Species such as forest elephants, great apes, bears, wolves, tigers, jaguars, eagles, and deer depend on unfragmented habitats. Fragmentation and habitat loss threaten plant and animal species with extinction. Forest biodiversity largely depends on maintaining large natural areas free from human disturbance. Ecosystems absorb and recover from disturbances better when exposure to humans remains low. Varied tree ages and sizes support optimal sub-canopy flight for species like wild turkeys. Managed forests with even-aged compositions fail to achieve abundance values for many organisms. Large natural forest areas supply essential ecosystem services including water purification and carbon sequestration. Remoteness and low economic value often reduce the cost of protecting these vast areas.

• 6. Policy Implementation And Monitoring

  ›

  Governments utilize IFL maps to propose new national parks in Russia. Kutsa and Hibiny parks emerged in the Murmansk Region based on mapping data. Kalevalsky National Park formed in the Karelia Republic using similar methodology. Onezhskoye Pomorye became a protected area in the Arkhangelsk Region following analysis. The Forest Stewardship Council incorporates IFL concepts into High Conservation Value Forest standards. Canadian and Russian national FSC standards require intactness values be preserved. Retailers including IKEA Trading und Design AG and Lowe's commit not to use wood from IFLs unless conditions remain intact. Bank of America invests only in companies that maintain such ecological values. These corporate policies rely directly on regional IFL maps for implementation. International initiatives like REDD and CBD require preservation of large natural forest areas globally.