Give My Regards to Broad Street (film)

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Give My Regards to Broad Street arrived in cinemas in 1984 with Paul McCartney's name above the title and a story he had written himself. The premise sounds almost charming in its modesty: a reformed criminal goes missing with a set of master tapes, and a rock star has until midnight to find them before losing his record company. Yet despite the star power of McCartney, Ringo Starr, and Linda McCartney all appearing as themselves, the film landed to some of the most withering reviews of McCartney's career. Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times awarded it one out of four stars and called it "about as close as you can get to a nonmovie." How did a project rooted in a lifelong ambition collapse so publicly? And why did audiences keep buying the record even as critics told them to skip the film entirely?

• 2. A Lifelong Ambition

  ›

  McCartney had been a film fan all his life, and his work with the Beatles on their celebrated films had only deepened the appetite. The urge to act again had waited years before it found a shape. Filming and recording for Broad Street began in November 1982, following the completion of his album Pipes of Peace. Work on both the film and the companion album continued until July the following year. In the interim, Pipes of Peace and its singles went out into the world, while the film was scheduled for an autumn 1984 release. McCartney himself, while promoting Broad Street, described it as his first film in 14 years. That claim quietly overlooked Rockshow, which had been released four years earlier.

• 3. The Plot McCartney Wrote

  ›

  McCartney structured the story around a single fictional day in his own life, playing a version of himself. It opens with him stuck in a traffic jam in a chauffeur-driven car, already late for an interview, when he learns that Harry, a reformed criminal, has gone missing along with master tapes he was meant to deliver the previous day. A creditor named Mr. Rath delivers an ultimatum: if the tapes are not found by midnight, he will take over the record company. The day that follows weaves together two music videos, a rehearsal in a loft, and a radio recording session, all while McCartney's character turns over the possibilities. Did Harry hand the tapes to bootleggers? Did he simply run off? Or was he murdered? The answer, when it arrives, is quietly absurd. Harry had accidentally trapped himself in a maintenance building near Broad Street station while looking for the toilet. The blue case containing the tapes was sitting on a platform bench the whole time.

• 4. A Title With a History

  ›

  The film's title is a deliberate play on "Give My Regards to Broadway," the song written by George M. Cohan. Where Cohan's lyric pointed to New York, McCartney's version pivots to London, specifically to Broad Street railway station, which gives the plot its resolution. The station is not merely a backdrop; it is the hinge the entire mystery turns on, the place Paul drives past late at night before suddenly remembering that Harry was headed there when he last saw him. The title also marks a notable milestone in McCartney's film career. Broad Street was his first appearance in a non-documentary feature film since Magical Mystery Tour in 1967. It remains, to date, his last starring role in a feature film.

• 5. What Played Before the Film

  ›

  Before audiences saw a frame of the main feature, a 13-minute animated film called Rupert and the Frog Song played in cinemas as a supporting short. It contained the song "We All Stand Together," performed by McCartney and what the credits called "the Frog Chorus." The short was timed deliberately around the film's premiere in November. Simultaneously with that premiere, "We All Stand Together" was released as a single and reached number 3 in the UK. Another song from the film travelled even further in terms of recognition. "No More Lonely Nights" received nominations for both a Golden Globe Award and a BAFTA Film Award for Best Original Song.

• 6. Critics, Audiences, and the Soundtrack

  ›

  Ebert's one-star verdict singled out the long dream sequences as irrelevant and faulted the photography. His advice was direct: buy the soundtrack album and skip the film. Rotten Tomatoes, measuring retrospective critical opinion, placed the film's positive score at 22 percent, drawn from reviews by 18 critics. Audiences who did see it were more forgiving. Those polled by CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of B-minus on an A-plus-to-F scale. The split between critical rejection and audience patience found its clearest expression in the soundtrack's performance. Despite the film failing both financially and critically, the album sold well. The music, in other words, did what the film could not: it found its audience.

• 7. The Video Game Continuation

  ›

  In 1985, the story of the missing tapes was extended into a video game released for the Commodore 64 and ZX Spectrum home computers. Argus Press Software developed it as part of a series called Mind Games, and the Commodore 64 version was published in the United States by Mastertronic under the catalog number ICD-0082. The game picks up where the film leaves off, revealing that one track from the album was not in the recovered tapes after all. That missing track was intended to be the lead single, placing the studio back in danger. Players took the role of McCartney and had to travel around London, tracking down band members and others who had attended the original studio session. The game package included a fold-out map of London and character profiles to help players predict where each person might be found.