Gaze

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The gaze, known in French as le regard, is something far more loaded than a simple act of looking. It is the awareness one person has of another, the recognition that being seen can fundamentally change who you feel you are. Jean-Paul Sartre put the concept into philosophical focus in Being and Nothingness in 1943, and since then scholars across phenomenology, existentialism, and post-structuralist thought have turned it into one of the central ideas of social theory. What does it mean to be watched? Who holds power when eyes meet? And what happens to the person being seen? Those are the questions this documentary will follow, from Sartre's first formulations to the colonial encounter, from the cinema screen to the mirror a child stands before for the very first time.

• 2. The Mirror and the Look

  ›

  Jacques Lacan's engagement with the gaze began at a specific developmental moment: the mirror stage. A child, encountering a mirror, discovers for the first time that they have an external appearance visible to others. That moment of recognition is not simply self-knowledge; it is the entry point into language and culture. The child constructs what Lacan called an ideal image of themselves, a self to aspire toward, and that ideal can also be embodied by the parents, siblings, and teachers who surround them.

  Later in Lacan's career, his account of the gaze shifted considerably. Rather than the mirror's clarifying reflection, the gaze became associated with anxiety. It is the unsettling sensation that the object you are looking at is somehow looking back at you on its own terms. That reversal carries real psychological weight. A person who becomes aware of being seen loses a degree of autonomy; they become a visible object in the world rather than simply a subject moving through it. Lacan extended this further: even an inanimate object, simply by being perceived, can trigger the awareness that one is also an object in a shared material reality. For Lacan, the philosophic core of the gaze lies in the meeting of face and gaze, because only there, he argued, do people truly exist for one another.

• 3. Surveillance and Power

  ›

  Michel Foucault first brought the gaze into explicit contact with institutional power in The Birth of the Clinic in 1963. There he applied what he called the medical gaze to the act of diagnosis: the doctor looks, and that look is never neutral. It carries with it the unequal power dynamic between physician and patient, and the cultural authority a society grants to medical knowledge. Marita Sturken and Lisa Cartwright, writing in Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture in 2009, put it plainly: "the gaze is integral to systems of power, and to ideas about knowledge."

  Foucault returned to these ideas in Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison in 1975, where the gaze became an apparatus of power built from surveillance and self-regulation. His concept of panopticism described how people modify their own behaviour when they believe they might be watched by an institution. Nick Crossley, writing in 1993 in a piece titled 'The politics of the gaze: Between Foucault and Merleau-Ponty', argued that Foucault's account of panoptic power contains deficiencies, and that the philosophy of Merleau-Ponty offers the resources to address them. One way to summarize what all these thinkers share: "to gaze implies more than to look at - it signifies a psychological relationship of power, in which the gazer is superior to the object of the gaze."

• 4. The Male Gaze

  ›

  John Berger, the English art critic, introduced the phrase "male gaze" in Ways of Seeing, a BBC film series that aired in January 1972, later published as a book. Berger used it to analyze the treatment of the nude in European painting, describing the asymmetry between who watches and who is watched in both art and in society: men are placed into the role of the watcher, and women are placed into the role of being looked at.

  Laura Mulvey, a British film critic and feminist, pushed the argument further into cinema in her 1975 essay Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. Mulvey linked activity to masculinity and passivity to femininity, and argued that Hollywood films positioned the viewer in the role of the active masculine subject, directing desire toward the passive feminine figure on screen. Voyeurism and scopophilia, she argued, were the operative pleasures those films cultivated. Her essay became foundational in feminist film theory and media studies. Berger, Mulvey, and Foucault each, from their different vantage points, connected the act of gazing inextricably to the exercise of power.

• 5. Female and Oppositional Gazes

  ›

  The term "female gaze" emerged as a direct response to Mulvey's formulation of the male gaze. At its core, the female gaze resists the assumption that all cinematic desire must flow through a masculine lens. In Gender Trouble, published in 1990, Judith Butler proposed the female gaze as a framework through which men perform their masculinity, using women as the ones who compel men into self-regulation. Film director Deborah Kampmeier rejected the term "female gaze" altogether in favour of something more embodied: "For me personally, it's not about a female gaze. It's the female experience. I don't gaze, I actually move through the world, feeling the world emotionally and sensorily and in my body."

  Bell hooks developed a related but distinct intervention in her 1992 essay "The Oppositional Gaze: Black Female Spectatorship." Where Mulvey had centered the objectification of white women, hooks opened a different critical space: the gaze of Black women looking back. The oppositional gaze functions as the reciprocal of the normative white spectator gaze. It is a critique born from sustained and deliberate misrepresentation, specifically the reduction of Black women in cinema to stock characters - the Mammy, the Jezebel, the Sapphire. Hooks described oppositionality as a key paradigm in feminist analysis of scopophilic regimes in Western culture.

• 6. Objectification and Self-Surveillance

  ›

  Barbara Fredrickson and Tomi-Ann Roberts introduced objectification theory in 1997, building a framework to account for what it feels like to live under constant sexual scrutiny. Their definition is precise: sexual objectification is the experience of being treated as "a body, or collection of body parts, valued predominantly for its use to, or consumption by, others." That stripping away of bodily agency applies across three arenas: interpersonal encounters in daily life, visual media that depicts social situations such as advertising, and visual media that puts bodies and body parts on display, such as social media platforms.

  The theory's reach extends inward as well. When the objectifying gaze is constant and normalized, individuals begin to see themselves from the outside, through the eyes of the objectifier. Fredrickson and Roberts called this self-objectification. It is not vanity; it is a coping strategy. A person under the objectifying gaze may restrict their own social movement or adjust their presentation as a way to reclaim some measure of control in a situation where control has already been taken from them. Although objectification theory originally centred women's experiences, Fredrickson and Roberts noted that mass media was extending the objectifying gaze to men as well.

• 7. Colonial and Imperial Gazes

  ›

  Edward Said was the first to describe what would become known as the postcolonial gaze, using the term "orientalism" to name the way colonial powers framed and defined the people of colonized countries. Positioning the colonized as the "other" helped establish the colonizer's own identity as conqueror and maintained a constant reminder of that hierarchy. The postcolonial gaze, as theorists after Said have articulated it, "has the function of establishing the subject/object relationship": at one end it locates the subject, the one who looks; at the other, the object, the one who is seen. The colonizer-colonized relationship, on this reading, was the very ground on which colonizers built their self-understanding.

  E. Ann Kaplan extended this analysis with the concept of the imperial gaze, in which what is observed gets defined entirely in terms of the observer's own values. From the perspective of the colonized, Kaplan argues, the imperial gaze infantilizes and trivializes. She drew an explicit parallel: "The imperial gaze reflects the assumption that the white western subject is central, much as the male gaze assumes the centrality of the male subject." Postcolonial gaze theory, as scholars use it today, offers formerly colonized societies a way to identify and work through the socially constructed barriers that limit their cultural, social, economic, and political expression. The male tourist gaze carries this dynamic into the present: the tourism image is shaped by advertising agencies that have been male dominated, constructing a vision of the world tailored to a presumed white, Western, heterosexual traveler, and projecting that vision back onto the places and people being visited.