Fraser's Magazine

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Fraser's Magazine for Town and Country ran for more than fifty years in London, from 1830 to 1882, and in that span it published some of the most recognisable names in Victorian letters. Thomas Carlyle wrote for it. William Makepeace Thackeray wrote for it. John Stuart Mill wrote for it. Yet the man who shaped the magazine's early character did so from behind a mask, writing under the invented name Oliver Yorke, and the portrait that supposedly captured the magazine's circle turned out to misrepresent who was actually in the room. Who really founded Fraser's Magazine, who ran it, and how did a journal with a sharp Tory edge become one of the longer-running literary titles of the nineteenth century? Those are the questions worth following.

• 2. A Tory Beginning

  ›

  Hugh Fraser and William Maginn founded the magazine in 1830, giving it a strong Tory line in politics from the outset. Maginn was the animating force in those early years. He directed the magazine loosely, not under his own name but under the pseudonym Oliver Yorke, a fiction that allowed editorial latitude and a certain detachment from any one contributor's reputation. Francis Mahony eventually stepped into a similar guiding role, also operating under the Oliver Yorke name, continuing that arrangement until around 1840. The publisher James Fraser, who shared a surname with co-founder Hugh but was no relation, played a practical hand in these early years as well. He solicited contributors and prepared each issue for the press, a role that placed him at the centre of the magazine's daily operations even as the editorial identity remained fictionalised.

• 3. The Portrait That Lied

  ›

  In 1835, the artist Maclise painted a group portrait of the Fraser's Magazine circle, and on the surface it looked like a document of who belonged to that world. Included in the image were David Brewster, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, John Gibson Lockhart, and Robert Southey. The problem is that none of those four were substantial contributors to the magazine. The portrait assembled a gathering that never quite existed on the page. The people who were actually active in the magazine during that period included Percival Banks, T. C. Croker, John Galt, John Abraham Heraud, E. V. Kenealy, David Macbeth Moir, Francis Mahony, Robert Willmott, and Thomas Wright. The gap between the painted circle and the working contributors is a reminder that a magazine's public image and its actual literary labour rarely tell the same story.

• 4. Ownership and Editors

  ›

  James Fraser died in 1841, and the magazine passed to George William Nickisson. By 1847 it had moved again, this time to John William Parker. Parker's entire business was then absorbed in 1863 by Thomas and William Longman, bringing the magazine into one of the established publishing houses of the era. The most notable editor across all of those ownership changes was James Anthony Froude, who held the position from 1860 to 1874. Among the contributors during the magazine's longer run were Frances Power Cobbe, Thomas Medwin, James Hogg, William Mudford, Janet Ross, and William Jardine Smith, names that round out a picture of a publication drawing on a wide range of writers across its decades.

• 5. The Final Chapter

  ›

  By 1882, the magazine had reached the end of its run under the Fraser's name. The Longmans did not simply close it. They renamed it Longman's Magazine and reduced the cover price to sixpence, a decision that positioned the title for a broader readership. That shift in price was also a shift in ambition, moving the publication toward what the notice describes as popularisation. The journey from a sharp Tory journal founded by Hugh Fraser and William Maginn to a sixpenny popular magazine owned by Longmans spans more than half a century of London publishing, and the renamed title carried forward whatever audience the original had built.