Financial Conduct Authority

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The Financial Conduct Authority watches over around 58,000 businesses, employing 2.2 million people and generating roughly £65.6 billion in annual tax revenue for the United Kingdom. That is the scale of the industry the FCA is trusted to police. But who watches the watchmen? That tension between immense authority and persistent accountability failures sits at the heart of the FCA's story. How did this body come to exist? What powers does it actually hold? And why, after more than a decade of operation, has a parliamentary group described it as "incompetent at best, dishonest at worst"?

• 2. Born from Crisis

  ›

  The Financial Services Act 2012 came into force on the 1st of April 2013, and with it the FCA was born. The Act did not simply create a new regulator. It dismantled the old one entirely, abolishing the Financial Services Authority that had preceded it. The 2008 financial crisis had exposed how fragile the old framework was, and Parliament responded by splitting regulatory responsibility across three bodies. The Bank of England gained responsibility for financial stability. Its Financial Policy Committee and a new Prudential Regulation Authority would watch for systemic risk. The FCA would handle something distinct: how firms actually behave toward their customers.

  The FCA inherited its predecessor's legal structure, operating as a company limited by guarantee. It also inherited something else: a workforce and a culture shaped by the FSA years. Critics had already flagged Martin Wheatley, the FCA's first chief executive, for his record in Hong Kong in connection with a minibond episode there. The new regulator was carrying old baggage from its first day.

• 3. The Scope of Power

  ›

  Few UK regulators hold powers as broad as the FCA's. The authority can ban a financial product for up to a year while deciding whether to impose an indefinite ban. It can order firms to immediately retract promotions it judges misleading and publish those decisions publicly. It can freeze assets belonging to individuals or organisations under investigation, regardless of whether they have been found guilty of anything.

  Since the 1st of April 2014, the FCA has also regulated the consumer credit industry, taking that responsibility from the Office of Fair Trading. In July 2023, it turned that regulatory eye toward social media, announcing reforms aimed at limiting how "finfluencers" promote financial products to UK consumers. The trigger was stark: posts promoting financial products by finfluencers had risen 14 times compared to the previous year by 2022. The FCA's response included a ban on crypto incentives such as refer-a-friend bonuses and a mandatory 24-hour cooling-off period for first-time investors.

• 4. Building New Architecture

  ›

  In April 2015, the FCA spun up an entirely separate entity called the Payment Systems Regulator. The PSR was created under section 40 of the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013, with a mandate to promote competition and innovation in payment systems. From May 2019, the PSR's reach extended to victims of authorised push payment fraud, making some of them eligible for refunds under the Contingent Reimbursement Model Scheme, a voluntary arrangement covering customers of signatory firms.

  Another structure sits inside the FCA itself: the Office for Professional Body Anti-Money Laundering Supervision, known as OPBAS. Established in January 2018, OPBAS oversees 22 accountancy and legal professional bodies in their anti-money laundering duties, a responsibility shaped by the Money Laundering Act 2017. On the digital frontier, the FCA acts as the anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing supervisor for cryptoasset businesses, requiring any firm intending to operate in the UK to register before starting. Failure to do so can result in criminal as well as civil penalties.

  The FCA also rewrote the rulebook for UK stock market listings in 2024, publishing new Listing Rules effective from the 29th of July 2024. The changes created a single listing category and simplified eligibility criteria. The FCA described them as the most significant changes to the listings regime in over three decades.

• 5. Leadership and Friction

  ›

  Martin Wheatley held the top job from the FCA's launch on the 1st of April 2013 until July 2015, when Chancellor George Osborne's public criticism prompted his resignation. Tracey McDermott stepped in as acting chief executive in September 2015. Andrew Bailey was appointed on a permanent basis in January 2016, and after Bailey moved to become Governor of the Bank of England, Christopher Woolard served as interim chief executive before Nikhil Rathi took over permanently from the 1st of October 2020. In April 2025, Rathi was reappointed for a second five-year term running until 2030.

  The chair's seat saw its own turbulence. John Griffith-Jones, who became non-executive chair when the FSA was wound up in 2013, faced calls for his resignation because of his role as chairman of KPMG while it audited HBOS in the run-up to the 2008 financial crisis. Charles Randell succeeded him in April 2018, but resigned in October 2021 and left in Spring 2022. Richard Lloyd served as interim chair from June 2022, and Ashley Alder has held the post since 2023.

• 6. Scandals and Accountability

  ›

  In April 2023, the FCA moved against WealthTek Limited Liability Partnership, ordering the wealth management firm to cease operations and appointing Joint Special Administrators from BDO LLP. Investigators identified a potential shortfall of £81.4 million in client assets and money. The FCA obtained a worldwide freeze on assets belonging to John Dance, WealthTek's principal partner, up to £40 million. In December 2024, Dance was charged with multiple offences including fraud, money laundering, and making false representations about the firm's regulatory permissions. The charges allege he misappropriated approximately £64 million of client funds between January 2020 and April 2023.

  Earlier criticism came from the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards in June 2013. Their report "Changing Banking for Good" stated that the interest rate swap scandal had cost small businesses dearly and that the response by the FSA and FCA had been "inadequate." The report called on Government to ensure regulators had the powers needed to compel restitution for what it called "egregious mis-selling."

  A press briefing incident in March 2014 drew fresh scrutiny. A report by Simon Davis of Clifford Chance LLP, released on the 10th of December 2014, found significant failures in how the FCA controlled price-sensitive information. Treasury select committee chair Andrew Tyrie said it appeared the FCA had committed an "extraordinary blunder" that created a "disorderly market."

  The harshest verdict arrived in a 2024 report by the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Investment Fraud and Fairer Financial Services. Drawing on testimony from fraud victims, whistleblowers, and former FCA staff, the APPG called the regulator "incompetent at best, dishonest at worst." It described a "profoundly defective" culture in which challenges to the official line were met with bullying. Reforms proposed included a supervisory council, changes to funding, and removal of civil liability immunity. A follow-up report in 2025 accused the FCA of dismissing those criticisms as historic and making unsubstantiated claims about stakeholder satisfaction.