Eugène Ionesco

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Eugène Ionesco sat down at age 40 to learn English from a textbook, and what came out of that exercise was not a language skill but a theatrical revolution. The Assimil method asked him to copy whole sentences and memorize them. When he read them back, something strange happened. He found himself not learning English so much as stumbling upon stupefying truths: that there are seven days in a week, that the ceiling is up and the floor is down. Facts he already knew. Facts that suddenly seemed to vibrate with absurdity.

  From that bewilderment came The Bald Soprano, a play he called an "anti-play," and from that anti-play came an entirely new branch of theatre that critics would eventually call the Theatre of the Absurd. Ionesco was born in Slatina, Romania, on the 26th of November 1909, and died in Paris on the 28th of March 1994. Between those two dates, he wrote dozens of plays, a novel, theoretical essays, and one opera libretto, all while insisting he belonged to no movement and followed no school.

  What drove him? A vision of light in a French village that never left him. A lifelong obsession with death. A fury at the way language masks rather than reveals. And a stubbornness about being misunderstood that turned his critical writing into its own combative art form. The questions that follow are ones he spent a lifetime trying, and mostly refusing, to answer.

• 2. The Light in the Village

  ›

  Deborah B. Gaensbauer, in her book Eugène Ionesco Revisited, describes the central experience of Ionesco's childhood in precise terms. Walking in summer sunshine in a whitewashed provincial village under an intense blue sky, the young Ionesco was profoundly altered by the light. A sudden feeling of intense luminosity overtook him, along with the sensation of floating off the ground and an overwhelming feeling of well-being.

  When the feeling passed, the return was brutal. The real world, seen fresh, appeared to be full of decay, corruption, and meaningless repetitive action. Death, he understood then, takes everyone in the end. He was still a child when this happened, spending most of his early years in France after his parents relocated there.

  The experience lodged itself so deeply in his imagination that it surfaces, again and again, across his most important works. Characters in The Killer and The Chairs pine for an unattainable city of lights. In A Stroll in the Air and Amédée, characters are granted the ability to fly. Exit the King confronts the inevitability of death directly. The semi-autobiographical figure of Bérenger, who recurs across several plays, carries both the ecstatic revelation and the depression the real world inspires. That single childhood afternoon in France gave Ionesco's entire career its emotional architecture.

  He returned to Romania with his parents in 1925, after their divorce, and enrolled at Saint Sava National College before studying French Literature at the University of Bucharest from 1928 to 1933.

• 3. Before the Stage

  ›

  Emil Cioran and Mircea Eliade were both students at the University of Bucharest in the early 1930s, and Ionesco met them there. The three became lifelong friends, a formative circle of Romanian intellectuals each of whom would eventually make his name in Paris.

  Ionesco qualified as a teacher of French, but his first instinct was not for the stage. He began writing poetry and criticism, publishing in several Romanian journals. Two early texts stand out. Nu was a book criticizing other writers, including prominent Romanian poets, and it did not soften its blows. The Hugoliade took aim at Victor Hugo himself, presenting a satirical biography that retold the most scandalous episodes of Hugo's life in exaggerated form. Its subtitle, "The Grotesque and Tragic Life of Victor Hugo," announced its tone plainly.

  The Hugoliade mocked Victor Hugo's status as a great figure in French literature, but it was not purely destructive. Inside it were prototypes for themes that would define Ionesco's later work: the ridiculous authoritarian figure, the false worship of language. The playful rage that would power The Bald Soprano was already present in Romanian, aimed at a different target.

  In 1936 Ionesco married Rodica Burileanu. They had one daughter, Marie-France Ionesco, for whom he would later write a number of unconventional children's stories. The family returned to France in 1938 for his doctoral thesis, were caught by the outbreak of World War II in 1939, returned briefly to Romania, and then, with the help of friends who arranged travel documents, made it back to France in 1942. Ionesco spent the remainder of the war in Marseille, then moved to Paris after the city's liberation.

• 4. The Anti-Play

  ›

  The Assimil textbook introduced, in its later lessons, a couple named Mr. and Mrs. Smith. Mrs. Smith informed her husband, to his astonishment, that they had several children, that they lived near London, that their name was Smith, that Mr. Smith was a clerk, and that they had a servant named Mary, who was English like themselves. Ionesco found her eminently methodical procedure in her quest for truth to be remarkable. And then, re-reading, he found the clichés and truisms of the conversation primer disintegrating into wild caricature.

  He set about translating this experience directly into a play, La Cantatrice Chauve. Nicolas Bataille directed the first performance in 1950, and by most measures the premiere was a failure. The play went unnoticed until two established figures, the playwright Jean Anouilh and the writer Raymond Queneau, championed it publicly.

  The play's origins mattered to Ionesco as a point of principle. He was not interested in realistic representation of human psychology. He was interested in language itself as an unreliable, potentially menacing material. In his earliest one-act plays, written from 1948 to 1953, dramatic structure came not from plot or character development but from accelerating rhythms and cyclical repetition. Words and material objects gained a life of their own, increasingly overwhelming the characters.

  La Cantatrice chauve eventually moved to the Théâtre de la Huchette in 1952, where it has been playing ever since, holding the world record for the play staged continuously in the same theatre for the longest time.

• 5. Bérenger and the Full-Length Plays

  ›

  Amédée, ou Comment s'en débarrasser, written in 1954, was Ionesco's first full-length play. It introduced a different kind of theatrical problem: how to sustain the pressure of absurdism across an extended dramatic situation while keeping a character human enough to engage the audience's sympathy.

  The answer Ionesco found was Bérenger. This semi-autobiographical figure, comically naive, carrying Ionesco's own sense of wonderment and anguish at the strangeness of reality, became the protagonist of several major works. In The Killer, Bérenger encounters death in the form of a serial killer. In Rhinocéros, written in 1959, he watches his friends transform into rhinoceroses one by one until he alone remains unchanged. The image was direct. Ionesco drew it from his horror at the rise of the fascist Iron Guard in Romania during the 1930s, and from his recognition that entire societies can capitulate to ideological conformism while individuals stand by watching.

  Exit the King, from 1962, places Bérenger on a throne. As King Bérenger I, he is an everyman figure who must come to terms with his own impending death. The play strips the subject of consolation and forces the confrontation Ionesco had been circling since his childhood revelation in that French village.

  By 1981, Ionesco had stopped writing for the stage. His final theatrical work was Voyage chez les morts. After that he wrote only the libretto for the opera Maximilien Kolbe, with music by Dominique Probst, which was performed in five countries, produced for television, and recorded for CD release.

• 6. Theoretical Battles

  ›

  Notes and Counter Notes collects Ionesco's essays and direct responses to critics, and it opens with a confession that surprises many readers. In the section titled "Experience of the Theatre," Ionesco wrote that he had hated going to the theatre as a child because it gave him no pleasure or feeling of participation.

  This was not nostalgia. He was trying to explain why realistic theatre struck him as a narrowing rather than an expansion of truth. He believed that theatre relying on what he called an "imaginative truth" was more interesting and more freeing than the narrow truth presented by strict realism. He also argued, directly, that "drama that relies on simple effects is not necessarily drama simplified."

  The book also contains a heated exchange with the British critic Kenneth Tynan, rooted in Ionesco's intense hostility to Brecht and Brechtian theatre. This was not a polite disagreement. Ionesco wrote his critical pieces, as one of his sources notes, primarily to correct critics he felt were misunderstanding his work and thereby misshaping how audiences received it.

  Martin Esslin, in his book The Theatre of the Absurd, grouped Ionesco with Samuel Beckett, Jean Genet, and Arthur Adamov. Ionesco himself pushed back on the grouping. He stated plainly in Notes and Counter Notes that he was not an existentialist, and he criticized Jean-Paul Sartre specifically. Although Ionesco knew Beckett and respected his work, he insisted that the so-called absurdist playwrights were never an organized movement.

• 7. Influences and Allegiances

  ›

  Alfred Jarry, the creator of 'Pataphysics, was one of the writers Ionesco claimed as an actual influence rather than a label applied from outside. He admired the Dadaists and Surrealists, and in particular his fellow Romanian Tristan Tzara. He became friends with André Breton, whom he revered.

  In his memoir Present Past, Past Present, Ionesco quoted Breton directly: "Breton taught us to destroy the walls of the real that separate us from reality, to participate in being so as to live as if it were the first day of creation, a day that would every day be the first day of new creations." The phrasing carries the quality Ionesco sought in theatre: not realistic depiction but the dissolution of the barrier between the world as it appears and what might lie beyond it.

  Raymond Queneau, who had championed The Bald Soprano in its early days, was himself a former associate of Breton. Queneau was a member of the Collège de 'Pataphysique and a founder of Oulipo, two groups with which Ionesco was associated. The network of literary experimentalists around Ionesco was tightly interwoven, even as he insisted on his independence from any doctrine.

  In an interview collected in Through Parisian Eyes: Reflections on Contemporary French Arts and Culture by Melinda Camber Porter, Ionesco addressed death with the directness that defined his late work: "Death is our main problem and all others are less important. It is the wall and the limit. It is the only inescapable alienation; it gives us a sense of our limits. But the ignorance of ourselves and of others to which we are condemned is just as worrying. In the final analysis, we don't know what we're doing. Nevertheless, in all my work there is an element of hope and an appeal to others."

  He was nominated for the Nobel Prize in Literature eight times. He was buried in the Cimetière du Montparnasse in Paris, and in 2009, fifteen years after his death, the Romanian Academy granted him posthumous membership.