Egyptians Act 1554

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The Egyptians Act 1554 was Parliament's second attempt to remove certain travelers from English soil. An earlier law had already failed to do the job. In 1504, Sir John Arundell of Lanhere noted in his gentry book paying 20d to 'the Egyptians when they danced afore me'. That small ledger entry hints at how ordinary their presence had become by the start of the Tudor era. Twenty-five years later, Thomas Moore's Dialogue Concerning Heresies described a fortune-teller lodging in Lambeth. The woman was known only as 'an Egyptian' and was never recorded by name. She used palmistry to tell fortunes. By 1554, these same travelers had become the subject of a law that threatened death as a penalty for their presence in England. What drove that resolve, who exactly was being targeted, and how did the legal language of 'Egyptians' shape an identity no one could precisely define?

  342

• 2. Wanderers Without a Parish

  ›

  David Cressy of Ohio State University has described the Egyptians in Tudor England as personifying the opposite of the status quo. They belonged to no recognized church, no parish, and claimed no legitimate occupation. In a society where those three anchors defined a person's place, their absence alone set them apart. The Romani People are an Indo-Aryan, nomadic group who traveled across continental Europe and the Ottoman Empire. They formed the core of those the law labeled as Egyptians. Beyond the Romani, the legal category also reached vagabonds, wanderers, and anyone else who lived a similar itinerant lifestyle within the realm. Those caught under the law were, in the view of scholars, marginalized through both legislation and the texture of everyday life. Their departure from the hierarchical norms of English society drew a disdain shared by leaders and common subjects alike. It is thought that the first arrivals came in the early 16th century, during the reign of Henry VII, the first Tudor.

  3427

• 3. A Borrowed Name

  ›

  'Counterfeit Egyptians' was the label Parliament attached to people it believed were pretending to be Gypsies. That category alone reveals how unstable the term had always been. The word 'Egyptian' had no fixed meaning tied to geography. Scholars describe the noun as neither a true endonym nor a true exonym. Those who used it for themselves were not of Egyptian origin, and the label was not simply imposed from outside either. It served instead as a term of self-presentation, describing a way of life rather than a place of birth. Those who called themselves Egyptians often framed their wandering as a penance for sins committed in their homeland of Egypt. The law, in absorbing this self-description, transformed it into a basis for legal action. By centering its definition on behavior and itinerant movement rather than ancestry, the state could draw the category's boundaries where it chose. Henry VIII's parliament had acknowledged this naming problem as early as 1531, when it described the group as 'outlandish people calling themselves Egyptians'.

  2346

• 4. What the Act Demanded

  ›

  'Naughty, idle and ungodly life and company' was the phrase Parliament placed at the heart of the 1554 Act. That language described what the law intended to eliminate. Mary I's government passed it because the Egyptians Act 1530 had left two specific gaps. The earlier legislation had not covered Gypsies who were born in England. Nor did it apply to those who had entered the country from Scotland. The 1554 Act closed both of those gaps. Gypsies caught within England under the new law faced deportation, and defiance of deportation could bring execution. English subjects found guilty of smuggling Gypsies into the realm were subject to fines. One exemption applied: those who had already settled in a fixed location and abandoned a nomadic life were not subject to the act's penalties. The goal was threefold. Gypsies could submit to a settled life, leave England voluntarily, or face the possibility of death at the will of the Crown. Two more statutes addressing the same underlying problem would follow in the decades ahead.

  6134

• 5. A Long Century of Laws

  ›

  Parliament's impulse to legislate against particular groups went back at least to the Ordinance of Labourers in 1349. Enacted by King Edward III in the immediate aftermath of the Black Plague, it aimed to regulate a labor shortage. The act filtered out those who did not meet its qualifications. The Egyptians Acts of the 16th century inherited that same logic. Between 1531 and 1598, four statutes directly addressed the question of people called Egyptians. The first two, in 1531 and 1554, carried the word 'Egyptians' explicitly in their titles. By 1562, under Elizabeth I, Parliament shifted its phrasing to 'vagabonds calling themselves Egyptians'. That change reflects how the legal category was slowly drifting away from the Egyptian label. The fourth statute, the Vagabonds Act 1597, dropped the word 'Egyptian' entirely. It grouped these travelers instead among 'rogues, vagabonds, and sturdy beggars'. Between the 1530 and 1554 acts, Parliament also enacted the Vagabonds Act 1547. Passed in King Edward VI's first year, it targeted those who refused to work. For Gypsies who refused to settle, the act imposed two years of slavery. It was repealed in 1550, just two years later, and its actual effect on the Egyptians remained largely unknown. The Egyptians Act 1554 itself endured far longer. It was finally repealed by the Repeal of Obsolete Statutes Act 1856. Section 1 of that act came into force on the 21st of July 1856. The question of who exactly counted as an Egyptian was one the law had never fully resolved.

  63415