Corruption in Russia

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Corruption in Russia is not a hidden problem. It is, according to Transparency International, endemic. In 2024, Russia scored 22 out of 100 on the Corruption Perceptions Index and ranked 154th out of 180 countries. That score is Russia's worst since the current system of scoring began in 2012. To understand how a country reaches this point, you have to go back to the moment the Soviet Union collapsed, and follow the money that vanished in those chaotic early years. You have to watch the bribe totals climb. You have to meet the generals who were arrested mid-war. And you have to ask why, after decades of official anti-corruption campaigns, a third of Russian officials were still openly acknowledged as corrupt by the head of the National Anti-Corruption Committee himself.

• 2. The Soviet Inheritance

  ›

  Richard Palmer served as the CIA's station chief at the United States embassy in Moscow in the early 1990s. What he witnessed there shaped his understanding of how Russia's corruption epidemic took root. As the Soviet Union dissolved, elites from what Palmer described as "every corner" of the Soviet system moved quickly. They drew on knowledge of Western banking that the KGB had developed during the Cold War, and they used it to shift the equivalent of billions of dollars from the Soviet state treasury into private accounts spread across Europe and the United States. Palmer framed the scale of what happened by asking his American audience to imagine if the majority of Congress, the Departments of Justice and Treasury, the FBI, the CIA, the IRS, the Federal Reserve Bank, the Supreme Court, and local police were all simultaneously engaged in "massive corruption". That was, in his telling, the rough equivalent of what occurred in Russia. This wholesale looting during the transition period laid the groundwork for the crony capitalism that Transparency International and others have used to describe Russia's economic system ever since. The system that took shape was one where officials and business interests merged at the top, where relatives, friends, and acquaintances of those in power benefited from government expenditures and took over state property.

• 3. The Price of a Bribe

  ›

  The Russian Interior Ministry's Department for Combating Economic Crimes tracked bribe averages during the presidency of Dmitry Medvedev, and the numbers tell a striking story. In 2008, the average bribe amounted to 9,000 rubles. By 2009 it had risen to 23,000 rubles. In 2010 it climbed to 61,000 rubles. And in 2011, it reached 236,000 rubles. That means the average bribe in 2011 was 26 times greater than the average bribe in 2008, a rate of increase far outpacing inflation over the same period. Independent experts hold that corruption consumes as much as 25% of Russia's GDP, a figure dramatically higher than the official Rosstat estimate of 3.5 to 7% for 2011. Rosstat also counted the "shadow economy" at roughly 15% of GDP that year, which included unreported wages and tax evasion but did not fully capture the corruption picture. The mismatch between official and independent estimates is itself a measure of how deep the problem runs. Sergei Ivanov, the Kremlin's chief of staff, identified healthcare, education, housing, and communal services as the most corrupt sectors at the household level. Independent experts from RBC magazine placed law-enforcement agencies at the top of that list, followed by those same sectors. At the government level, the five leading corruption areas are government contracts and purchases; the issuance of permits and certificates; law-enforcement agencies; land distribution; and construction.

• 4. Corruption as a System

  ›

  In the 1990s, Russian businesses paid criminal groups for what was called a "krysha," literally a "roof," meaning protection. Since the 2010s, that protective function has shifted to officials. Experts who study Russia's corruption describe how it has transformed from a cost of doing business into a business in itself. Whereas officials once took bribes to overlook legal infractions, they now take them simply to perform the duties they are already paid to perform. The rapid increases in tariffs for housing, water, gas, and electricity, which some experts say significantly outpace the rate of inflation, are described by those same experts as a direct result of high volumes of corruption at the highest levels. Corporate raiding, property seizures, and land grabs have become commonplace. Some scholars frame all of this not as dysfunction but as architecture: an authoritarian regime and a hierarchical, state-corporatist economy in which the spread of corrupt practices is one of the mechanisms that keeps the entire system of power in place. At the beginning of Vladimir Putin's second presidential term, Russia's rank in the Corruption Perceptions Index fell 36 places in a single year, from 90th place in 2004 to 126th place in 2005. Starting from that same term, very few corruption cases have generated public outrage, and a broader normalization has taken hold.

• 5. Corruption in the Military

  ›

  In April 2024, Deputy Defense Minister Timur Ivanov was arrested by Russian federal authorities on charges of accepting bribes "on a particularly large scale." His arrest was followed closely by that of Lieutenant General Vadim Shamarin, Head of the Main Directorate of Communications of the Armed Forces and Deputy Chief of the General Staff, who was detained on the 22nd of May 2024 on bribery allegations. On the 30th of July 2024, the general director of a military-linked enterprise, Vladimir Pavlov, was detained; the following day he was charged with fraud on a particularly large scale. Two days later, on the 2nd of August 2024, Vyacheslav Akhmedov, director of the Patriot Park, was arrested alongside Major General Vladimir Shesterov, deputy of the Defense Ministry's innovations department. Both were accused of embezzling funds. Former Deputy Defense Minister Dmitry Bulgakov and the Head of the Department for Providing State Defense Orders, Vladimir Verteletsky, are also named among officials implicated in the military corruption sweep. The concentration of arrests within the defense establishment in the space of a few months in 2024 pointed to the reach of the problem into the institutions managing Russia's ongoing military operations.

• 6. Official Campaigns and Their Limits

  ›

  Anti-corruption efforts in Russia carry a long paper trail. On the 4th of April 1992, President Boris Yeltsin issued a decree called "The fight against corruption in the public service," which prohibited officials from engaging in business activities and required them to disclose income, property, bank deposits, and financial liabilities. Russia passed its first package of anti-corruption laws in 2008, after ratifying the United Nations Convention Against Corruption and the Council of Europe's Criminal Law Convention on Corruption. President Medvedev signed the decree "On Anti-Corruption Measures" in May of that year and at the first meeting of the Anti-Corruption Council on the 30th of September 2008 said: "Corruption in our country has become rampant. It has become commonplace and characterises the life of the Russian society." The National Anti-Corruption Plan followed in 2009, and the National Anti-Corruption Strategy in 2010. Putin approved a further plan for the period 2014 to 2015. By 2022, however, the direction shifted: Russia initiated its withdrawal from the Criminal Law Convention on Corruption, and civic participation in anti-corruption work was progressively closed off. In 2019, the Anti-Corruption Foundation led by Alexei Navalny was recognized by a Russian court as a foreign agent, and by 2021 a trial was underway to designate it an extremist organization and shut it down.

• 7. Navalny and the Foundation

  ›

  Alexei Navalny established the Anti-Corruption Foundation in Moscow in 2011 as a nonprofit dedicated to investigating and exposing high-ranking officials. The Foundation's investigations drew wide attention but, as the organization itself documented, the findings were consistently ignored by the criminal justice system and were used instead to discredit the Foundation. A 2017 documentary film produced by the Foundation, titled "He Is Not Dimon to You," examined alleged corruption by Dmitry Medvedev, who was Prime Minister of Russia at the time of release. The film estimated that 1.2 billion dollars had been embezzled by Medvedev. On its first day, the video reached roughly 1.5 million views. A week later, it had climbed to 7 million, surpassing the earlier Foundation film titled "Chaika." By May 2019, the total view count reached 30 million. The audience was large; the legal system's response was not. Citizens who engaged independently faced comparable consequences. In September 2023, a Russian YouTuber named Alexander Nozdrinov was sentenced to 8.5 years in prison for allegedly spreading "false information" about the Russian armed forces. He had been detained in March 2022 after investigators accused him of posting a photo of a bombed-out building in Kyiv. Nozdrinov had used his channel to address corruption by local authorities. His lawyer, Olesya Panyuzheva, said the case demonstrated that anyone who uncovers crimes and wrongdoings of corrupt officials "can be put behind bars."

• 8. Measuring What Persists

  ›

  Transparency International Russia's 2012 report described a campaign conducted across 20 cities in cooperation with the Youth Human Rights movement to check police officers' identification tags. The logic was direct: an identifiable officer is less likely to solicit a bribe. The same organization monitored income disclosures by public officials with student volunteers, and examined the use of 600 million rubles, equivalent to roughly 19 million US dollars, in public funds directed to socially oriented NGOs, finding multiple cases of conflict of interest. On the 9th of December 2014, the head of the National Anti-Corruption Committee, Kirill Kabanov, stated on air that a third of Russian officials were corrupt. A 2018 academic study of Russian state corruption during the period from the 1750s through the 1830s found something unexpected: routine extractions from the population were, by the measure of the historical records sampled, "surprisingly low." The researchers noted that small fees paid to clerks were so widely accepted that they appeared in official account books alongside ordinary operating expenses. Even those modest per-capita extractions, however, allowed district officials to more than triple their salaries. The Russian Prosecutor General Office reported that of all persons convicted for corruption in 2017, law enforcement functionaries and parliamentarians, together numbering nearly 2,200 persons, made up over 11% of the total. That detail, set beside a 2024 ranking of 154th out of 180 countries, traces a line from the ledgers of the eighteenth century to the arrests still appearing in news dispatches today.