Cornish engine

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The Cornish engine was built for one relentless task: keeping a mine from flooding. Cornwall was rich in tin, copper, and other metal ores, and its mines had always fought the water that collected as shafts went deeper. Lifting it out required enormous, sustained power. Horses had limited output, and waterwheels depended on a nearby stream. Coal-fired steam was more versatile, but Cornwall had no coalfields. Every bushel burned to run a pump had to be imported from Wales. That cost made fuel efficiency not just an engineering preference but a financial pressure the entire mining industry felt. Engineers measured engine performance against a standard called duty: the work, in foot-pounds, produced by a single bushel of coal, a bushel weighing 94 pounds. The Watt engines already running in Cornwall reached a duty of 20 million; later Watt designs pushed past 30 million. Those numbers would be exceeded, decade by decade, by machines refined precisely because the cost of falling short was too high to accept.

  3651

• 2. The Expansive Cycle

  ›

  In his 1782 patent, James Watt had described letting steam expand inside a cylinder after the inlet was closed. The idea was to extract more energy from each charge of steam rather than wasting it. At the low pressures his engines used, though, the gain was too small to justify the change. Steam entered the top of a Cornish engine's cylinder at up to 50 psi, pressing the piston down. Midway through the stroke, the inlet valve was shut. The trapped steam then expanded through the remaining half of the stroke, dropping in pressure but still pushing the piston. On the other side of the piston, steam from the previous stroke was being drawn into a condenser, keeping a partial vacuum there throughout. Less energy was thrown away into the condenser than in a Watt engine, which admitted steam for the full length of the power stroke. Insulating the pipes and cylinder, along with steam jacketing, reduced heat loss further.

  Pump rods and equipment hanging deep in the mine shaft pulled the piston back up during the return stroke. Steam was transferred through an equilibrium pipe to balance pressure on both sides as the piston rose. The engine paused completely at one point in each cycle and moved rapidly on the downstroke. That irregular rhythm made it unsuitable for rotary motion and most industrial uses beyond pumping. A timing device called a cataract could slow the cycle when full-speed operation was unnecessary. The framework that made all of this pressure possible had been laid by Richard Trevithick earlier in the century.

  2413

• 3. Trevithick and the Rivals

  ›

  Richard Trevithick's early steam engines, known as puffer engines, vented their spent steam straight into the air. Watt's engines had worked differently, moving steam from the cylinder into a separate condenser where it cooled and created a vacuum that pulled the piston. In the 1810s, Trevithick developed machines that combined both methods: high-pressure steam drove the piston in one direction, then passed to the other side and condensed, adding a vacuum effect for good measure. Arthur Woolf developed a parallel approach at the same time: a compound steam engine in which steam expanded through two cylinders in succession, both above atmospheric pressure. In 1816, Trevithick sailed for South America and transferred his patent rights to the engineer William Sims. Sims built or adapted several engines. One at Wheal Chance ran at 40 psi above atmospheric pressure and achieved a duty of nearly 50 million, though its performance later fell back. In 1825, at Wheal Alfred, engineers staged a direct comparison between a Trevithick-type single-cylinder engine and a Woolf compound engine. Both achieved a duty of slightly more than 40 million.

  Samuel Grose brought the next significant step in the late 1820s. Grose wrapped the pipes, cylinders, and boilers in insulation, sharply cutting heat losses. At Wheal Hope the duty climbed above 60 million. At Wheal Towan it reached almost 80 million. Those peaks were hard to hold. Boiler leaks, general machinery wear, and the deterioration of boiler plates all eroded performance over time. Damaged plates forced pressure reductions, and the duty fell with them. By the mid-1840s, engineers recognized that the design had reached its practical limits. Forces at operating pressure were already causing machinery breakages. Stamps and whim engines shared in these improvements, but their best duty figures were lower than those of pumping engines. Whim engines fared worst, because their work was discontinuous. Capital and maintenance costs had long kept Cornish engines out of reach for operators beyond Cornwall. A change in the economics of urban waterworks was beginning to shift that.

  15674

• 4. A Wider Market

  ›

  Thomas Wicksteed installed a secondhand Cornish engine at the Old Ford waterworks of the East London Waterworks company in 1838. A comparison with a Watt engine showed results in the Cornish engine's favour. Coal in London was even more expensive than in Cornwall, making the efficiency advantage worth the higher initial outlay. That arithmetic did not hold across the whole country. Manchester and Leeds ran their textile mills on cheaper coal, and replacing existing engines made no economic sense there. Only in the late 1830s did textile manufacturers begin shifting toward high-pressure working. When they did, the usual method was adding a high-pressure cylinder to an existing machine, creating a compound engine without abandoning the original infrastructure. Several Cornish engines are still standing today, some maintained in working order despite being more than a century old.

  5736

• 5. What Remains

  ›

  The London Museum of Water and Steam holds the largest collection of Cornish engines in the world. At Crofton Pumping Station in Wiltshire, two are preserved. One of them is a Boulton and Watt built in 1812. It is described as the oldest working beam engine in the world still in its original engine house. Its task, when it runs, is unchanged from the day it was installed: pumping water to the summit pound of the Kennet and Avon Canal.

  Two engines survive at the Cornish Mines and Engines museum on the site of East Pool mine, near the town of Pool in Cornwall. At Poldark Mine in Trenear, Cornwall, a Harvey of Hayle Cornish Beam Engine from around 1840-1850 holds a particular distinction. Originally used at Bunny Tin Mine, it later moved to Greensplat China Clay Pit near St Austell. It remained in commercial use at Greensplat until 1959, making it the last Cornish engine to work commercially in the county. The engine was relocated to Poldark Mine in 1972 and is now driven by a hydraulic mechanism rather than steam.

  At the Cruquius pumping station in the Netherlands stands a Cornish engine built by Harvey and Co in Hayle, Cornwall. Its cylinder has the largest diameter ever constructed for a Cornish engine: 3.5 metres. Eight separate beams connect to that single cylinder, each one driving its own pump. Work carried out between 1985 and 2000 restored the engine to operational condition, though it now runs on an oil-filled hydraulic system.

  The 1879 engines at Dalton Pumping Station in County Durham were the only Cornish engines ever designed to run on superheated steam. One of the last Cornish engines to be built was installed at the Dorothea Slate Quarry in 1904. It remains within its engine house. The Cornish Engines Preservation Committee was formed in 1935 to save the Levant winding engine. Renamed in honour of Richard Trevithick, the organisation publishes a newsletter, a journal, and books on Cornish engines, mining history, and industrial archaeology.

  89101112