Skip to content

Charles Villiers Stanford

Ch. 1 of 8
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Contents

Charles Villiers Stanford

8 sections
  • Charles Villiers Stanford was born in Dublin on the 30th of September 1852, into a family where music was not a hobby but a way of life. His father, John James Stanford, was a prominent Dublin lawyer who also happened to be a cellist and a noted bass singer. John Stanford had been chosen to perform the title role in Mendelssohn's Elijah at the Irish premiere in 1847. His mother, Mary, was an amateur pianist capable of performing solo concerto parts at Dublin concerts. From his earliest years, the boy was surrounded by exceptional musicianship and high ambition.

    The result was a prodigy. By the time he was eight, Stanford had written a march in D major that was performed at the Theatre Royal, Dublin. At seven, he gave a piano recital playing works by Beethoven, Handel, Mendelssohn, Moscheles, Mozart and Bach. By the time he left for Cambridge in 1870, he had already composed orchestral works, sacred music, and secular vocal pieces.

    Yet for all his early brilliance, Stanford spent much of his career in the shadow of others: first competing for primacy with Sullivan, Parry and Mackenzie, then watching a younger generation of composers surpass him, composers he had trained himself. How did a man of such talent come to be remembered more for his pupils than for his music? And what does the arc of his career reveal about the fate of ambition in music?

  • Elizabeth Meeke, Stanford's godmother and one of his earliest teachers, set a demanding standard before he turned twelve. She had studied with Ignaz Moscheles, one of the most celebrated pianists of the early nineteenth century, and she drilled the young Stanford without mercy. Stanford recalled her method: she made him play every day at the end of his lesson a Mazurka of Chopin, never letting him stop for a mistake. By the time he had worked through all fifty-two Mazurkas, he could read most music his fingers could handle with comparative ease.

    Meeke was one of three of Stanford's teachers who were former pupils of Moscheles. The others included Henrietta Flynn, whom he turned to after Meeke left Ireland, and Michael Quarry, who followed Flynn. His parents also arranged violin, piano, organ and composition lessons with a succession of teachers, treating his musical education as seriously as any academic subject.

    The cultural life of Dublin in the 1860s fed Stanford's wider musical imagination. The city received occasional visits from international stars, and the young Stanford heard performers of the calibre of Joseph Joachim and Adelina Patti. The annual visit of the Italian Opera Company from London, led by Giulia Grisi and Giovanni Matteo Mario and later Thérèse Tietjens, gave him a taste for opera that never left him. During a summer stay in London when he was ten, he met the composer Arthur Sullivan and the writer and musical administrator George Grove, both of whom would later play important parts in his career.

  • Stanford went up to Cambridge in 1870 on an organ scholarship at Queens' College, having narrowly missed a classics scholarship at Trinity Hall. He had already tried for a different path; his father had hoped he would enter the law. The two men reached a compromise: a conventional university education first, then music studies abroad.

    At Cambridge, Stanford immediately immersed himself in the musical life of the university, often to the detriment of his Latin and Greek. He joined the Cambridge University Musical Society and became its assistant conductor. The society, founded in 1843, had declined in quality and was restricted to male singers, which limited its repertoire severely. Stanford could not persuade the members to admit women, so in February 1872 he co-founded a rival ensemble, the Amateur Vocal Guild, which performed as a mixed choir. The Musical Times called the result "a bloodless revolution." The quality gap between the two groups was plain enough that the CUMS membership voted to merge, with women admitted as associate members.

    In the summer of 1873 Stanford made his first trip to continental Europe, travelling to Bonn for the Schumann Festival. There he met Joachim again, and also met Brahms. The encounter deepened a commitment that would define his aesthetic for the rest of his life. At a moment when many music-lovers were choosing sides between classicists and the modernist camp of Liszt and Wagner, Stanford aligned himself with Schumann and Brahms. He could still admire Die Meistersinger while remaining cool toward much of Wagner's other output. This was not a fashionable position, and he knew it.

    His academic record was less distinguished. Two days after being formally appointed organist of Trinity College at a salary of £100 a year, Stanford sat his finals for his classics degree. He ranked 65th out of 66 candidates and received a third-class degree.

  • On the recommendation of Sir William Sterndale Bennett, now director of the Royal Academy of Music, Stanford travelled to Leipzig in the summer of 1874 for lessons with Carl Reinecke, professor of composition and piano at the Leipzig Conservatory. The composer Thomas Dunhill later noted that 1874 represented "the tail-end of the Leipzig ascendancy, when the great traditions of Mendelssohn had already begun to fade." Stanford arrived hoping to encounter something better than he could find at home. What he found was worse.

    Reinecke, Stanford said, was "the most desiccated" of all the dry musicians he had ever known. He had no good word for any contemporary composer. He loathed Wagner, sneered at Brahms, and had no enthusiasm of any sort. Stanford's biographer Paul Rodmell offers an unexpected defence of this experience: Reinecke's ultra-conservatism may have been unexpectedly valuable, as it may have encouraged Stanford to kick against the traces. A more inspiring teacher might have produced a more docile student.

    Relief came when Joachim recommended Stanford study in Berlin with Friedrich Kiel. The contrast was immediate. Stanford said he learned more from Kiel in three months than from all the others in three years. Piano lessons in Leipzig with Robert Papperitz, organist of the Nikolaikirche, also provided a more helpful counterpoint to Reinecke's sterile instruction.

    While in Leipzig, Stanford attempted a setting of part one of Longfellow's poem The Golden Legend. He intended to set the entire poem but abandoned the project, defeated by Longfellow's "numerous but unconnected characters." He later excluded this work, along with most of his compositions from these years, when assigning opus numbers. The earliest pieces in his official catalogue date from 1875.

  • Stanford returned to Cambridge in the intervals of his German study and found the musical society in good shape under his deputy, Eaton Faning. In 1876 the society gave one of the first performances in Britain of the Brahms Requiem. The following year CUMS presented the first British performance of Brahms's First Symphony. Both were deliberate acts of advocacy for the music Stanford believed in.

    At the same time he was drawing major figures to Cambridge: Joachim, Hans Richter, Alfredo Piatti and Edward Dannreuther all appeared with the society. Stanford commissioned incidental music from Hubert Parry and helped Parry gain wider recognition at a time when the two men were still on easy terms. He also composed church music that his biographer Jeremy Dibble calls "highly distinctive," including a Service in B in 1879, the anthem "The Lord is my shepherd" in 1886, and three Latin motets including Beati quorum via in 1888.

    In 1882, aged twenty-nine, Stanford was one of the founding professors of the Royal College of Music, appointed professor of composition and conductor of the college orchestra alongside the violinist Henry Holmes. He had accepted the post partly out of concern for the state of British orchestral training, which he had measured directly against the German standards he admired. George Grove, the founding director of the college, shared this diagnosis, and Stanford was one of his two principal allies in building the institution.

    Five years later, in 1887, Stanford was appointed professor of music at Cambridge, succeeding Sir George Macfarren, who died in October of that year. He held both professorships simultaneously, and after six years of effort he persuaded Cambridge to require three years of study at the university before a candidate could sit the bachelor of music examinations, ending the earlier practice of awarding degrees to candidates who had never been undergraduates there.

  • Stanford completed nine operas across his career, none of which entered the standard repertory. The fact that he kept trying, decade after decade, after reviews ranging from mixed to savage, is one of the more revealing things about him.

    His first opera, The Veiled Prophet, completed around 1880, was based on a poem by Thomas Moore. Stanford offered it to the impresario Carl Rosa, who declined and suggested he try Germany first, noting that success abroad would give the work better prospects at home. Rosa also pointed, bluntly, to the enormous popularity of Gilbert and Sullivan: "If the work was of the Pinafore style it would be quite another matter." Stanford's friend the conductor Ernst Frank got the opera staged at the Königliches Schauspiel in Hanover in 1881. The premiere attracted mixed reviews and the English premiere had to wait until 1893.

    The opera Savonarola, written with the author Gilbert à Beckett, had its premiere in Hamburg in April 1884 to a reasonable reception. At Covent Garden three months later it was received with ferocity. A reviewer in The Theatre wrote that the libretto was dull, stilted and dramatically weak, then added that even so the music was worse: Savonarola had convinced him that opera was "quite out of Stanford's line and that the sooner he abandons the stage for the cathedral, the better for his musical reputation." Parry privately agreed the work was badly constructed.

    A comic opera, Shamus O'Brien, premiered in 1896 with the young Henry Wood conducting. It ran for eighty-two consecutive performances. Thomas Beecham thought it "a colourful, racy work" and revived it in 1910. Yet it eventually came to seem old-fashioned. His last opera, The Travelling Companion, composed during the First World War, was premiered by amateur performers at the David Lewis Theatre, Liverpool, in 1925, a year after Stanford's death. Critics who have revisited it more recently, including Christopher Webber, argue that it has "timeless qualities" that could yet restore his reputation as an opera composer. A new production of The Critic, staged at the Wexford Opera Festival in 2024 to mark the centenary of his death, received critical acclaim.

  • Herbert Howells, one of Stanford's pupils at the Royal College of Music, described what it was like to be found out in a fault: Stanford's great hatreds were slovenliness and vulgarity, and when those qualities walked into the teacher's room, they came out badly damaged. Another pupil, Edgar Bainton, remembered a teaching method that seemed to have no method at all. Stanford's criticism consisted mostly of "I like it, my boy" or "It's damned ugly, my boy," with the latter the more frequent verdict. Bainton concluded that in this apparent chaos lay the value of the experience: Stanford's comprehensive knowledge of musical literature from all nations and ages gave even his most irritating opinions a weight that could not be dismissed.

    Stanford's most celebrated pupils included Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, Gustav Holst, Ralph Vaughan Williams, John Ireland, Rebecca Clarke, Frank Bridge and Arthur Bliss. He rated the English pianist and composer William Hurlstone as his most talented student. What most of these figures shared was a trajectory away from the Brahmsian principles Stanford had instilled in them, toward idioms that Stanford himself viewed with suspicion or open hostility.

    The composer George Dyson reflected on this paradox: the very rebellion Stanford fought against was the most obvious fruit of his methods. Driving students toward various forms of revolution may, Dyson speculated, be one of the best things a teacher can do. The works of Holst and Vaughan Williams entered the general repertory in Britain and beyond in a way that Stanford's never did. On the day Stanford died, Holst said to Howells, "The one man who could get any one of us out of a technical mess is now gone from us."

  • Edward Elgar was, in the 1890s, a composer struggling for recognition. Stanford supported him during those years: conducting his music, proposing him for a Cambridge doctorate, putting him forward for membership of the Athenaeum. The music scholar Robert Anderson later characterised the reversal that followed in terms of cricket: Stanford "had his innings with continental reputation in the latter decades of the nineteenth century, but then Elgar bowled him out."

    Stanford did not accept this quietly. When Richard Strauss praised Elgar as the first progressive English composer, Stanford, who detested Strauss, found the judgment particularly galling. When Elgar was appointed professor of music at Birmingham University in 1904, Stanford wrote him a letter Elgar found "odious." Elgar's inaugural lecture contained remarks about composers of rhapsodies that were widely read as a counter-attack on Stanford. Stanford returned fire in his book A History of Music, writing that Elgar, "cut off from his contemporaries by his religion and his want of regular academic training, was lucky enough to enter the field and find the preliminary ploughing done."

    The criticism most consistently levelled at Stanford by his contemporaries and later writers was that his music lacked passion. Bernard Shaw, writing as a music critic, praised what he called "Stanford the Celt" and attacked "Stanford the Professor," who reined in the Celt's emotions. George Grove, one of Stanford's earliest supporters, wrote to Parry that Stanford's music contained "everything but sentiment. Love not at all."

    After Stanford died on the 29th of March 1924, his ashes were buried in Westminster Abbey on the 3rd of April, near the graves of Henry Purcell, John Blow and William Sterndale Bennett. The Royal College of Music orchestra, conducted by Adrian Boult, ended the service with a funeral march Stanford had written for Tennyson's Becket in 1893. The Times observed that the conjunction of his music with that of those great predecessors showed how thoroughly, as a composer, he belonged to their line. His church music has proved his most durable legacy; Vaughan Williams ranked the Stabat Mater among Stanford's works of "imperishable beauty," and the Services in A, F and C remain in the cathedral repertory today.

Updated

Common questions

Who was Charles Villiers Stanford?

Charles Villiers Stanford was an Anglo-Irish composer, conductor and teacher born in Dublin on the 30th of September 1852 and died on the 29th of March 1924. He was a founding professor of the Royal College of Music in 1882 and Professor of Music at Cambridge from 1887. Among his most celebrated pupils were Gustav Holst and Ralph Vaughan Williams.

What did Charles Villiers Stanford compose?

Stanford composed approximately 200 works, including seven symphonies, nine operas, eleven concertos, about forty choral works, twenty-eight chamber works, around sixty partsongs, roughly 200 art songs and around 300 folksongs arranged for the concert hall. His church music, including the Services in A, F and C and the Stabat Mater, has proved the most enduring part of his output.

Who were Charles Villiers Stanford's most famous pupils?

Stanford's pupils at the Royal College of Music included Gustav Holst, Ralph Vaughan Williams, Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, John Ireland, Rebecca Clarke, Frank Bridge and Arthur Bliss. Stanford himself rated the pianist and composer William Hurlstone as his most talented student.

Where is Charles Villiers Stanford buried?

Stanford's ashes are buried in the north choir aisle of Westminster Abbey, near the graves of Henry Purcell, John Blow and William Sterndale Bennett. He was cremated at Golders Green Crematorium on the 2nd of April 1924 and interred in the Abbey the following day.

Why is Charles Villiers Stanford's music not performed more often?

Critics from Bernard Shaw onward argued that Stanford's music lacks passion, with Shaw distinguishing between the spirited "Stanford the Celt" and the emotionally restrained "Stanford the Professor." His reputation was further eclipsed in the early twentieth century by Edward Elgar, and by the renown of his own pupils Holst and Vaughan Williams, whose works entered the standard repertory while Stanford's did not.

When was the Charles Villiers Stanford Society founded and what does it do?

The Charles Villiers Stanford Society was founded in 2007 by a group of music enthusiasts and academics including Stanford biographer Jeremy Dibble. It was formed to promote research into Stanford's works and life and to support performances and recordings of lesser-known compositions, including a world premiere recording of his last opera, The Travelling Companion.

All sources

198 references cited across the entry

  1. 3Rodmell, p. 9
  2. 4"Charles Villiers Stanford", The Musical Times and Singing Class Circular, vol. 39, no. 670 (December 1898), pp. 785–793
  3. 5Stanford (1914), pp. 27–28
  4. 6Willeby, p. 264
  5. 7Stanford (1914), p. 58
  6. 8Rodmell, p. 28
  7. 9"University of Dublin Choral Society", Freeman's Journal and Daily Commercial Advertiser, 16 February 1867, p. 3
  8. 10Stanford (1914), pp. 61–62
  9. 11Stanford (1914), p. 91
  10. 12Stanford (1914), p. 70
  11. 14Dibble, p. 25
  12. 15Stanford (1914), p. 75
  13. 17BookCharles Villiers Stanford: Man and MusicianJeremy Dibble — Oxford University Press — 2002
  14. 18Stanford (1914), p. 103
  15. 19Stanford (1914), p. 105
  16. 20Porte, p. 9
  17. 21Dibble, p. 48
  18. 22Dibble, pp. 48–49
  19. 23Stanford (1914), p. 115
  20. 24Rodmell, p. 37
  21. 25Rodmell, p. 38
  22. 26Dibble, p. 51
  23. 27Rodmell, p. 49
  24. 28Dibble, p. 56
  25. 29Rodmell, p. 39
  26. 30Dibble, p. 38
  27. 31Dunhill, Thomas. "Charles Villiers Stanford – Some Aspects of His Work and Influence", Proceedings of the Musical Association, 53rd session. (1926–1927), pp. 41–65
  28. 32Rodmell, p. 44
  29. 33Stanford (1914), p. 157
  30. 34Rodmell, p. 45
  31. 35Dibble, p. 66
  32. 36Stanford (1908), p. 158
  33. 37Porte, pp. 15–16
  34. 38Stanford (1914), pp. 164 and 172
  35. 39Dibble, p. 68.
  36. 40Stanford (1914), p. 166.
  37. 41Rodmell, p. 51
  38. 42Dibble, p. 78
  39. 43"Variorum Notes", The Examiner, 22 April 1876, p. 468.
  40. 44Rodmell, p. 63
  41. 45Dibble, pp. 84–86.
  42. 46Rodmell, pp. 90, 114.
  43. 47Rodmell, p. 67.
  44. 48Stanford (1914), p. 108.
  45. 49Porte, p. 138; and Rodmell, p. 79.
  46. 50Dibble, p. 111.
  47. 51Fuller Maitland, J. A. "Mr. Stanford's Opera, The Veiled Prophet of Khorassan", The Musical Times and Singing Class Circular, vol. 22, no. 457 (March 1881), pp. 113–116
  48. 52Dibble, p. 112.
  49. 53Rodmell, Paul. "A Tale of Two Operas: Stanford's Savonarola and The Canterbury Pilgrims from Gestation to Production", Music & Letters, vol. 78, no. 1 (February 1997), pp. 77–91
  50. 55"Savonarola", The Theatre, 1 August 1884, p. 79.
  51. 56The Era, 3 May 1884, p. 10; and The Morning Post, 1 May 1884, p. 3.
  52. 57Willeby, pp. 293–294.
  53. 58Wright, David. "The South Kensington Music Schools and the Development of the British Conservatoire in the Late Nineteenth Century", Journal of the Royal Musical Association, vol. 130, no. 2 (2005), p
  54. 70O'Connell, Kevin. "Stanford and the Gods of Modern Music", The Musical Times, vol. 146, no. 1890 (Spring 2005), pp. 33–44
  55. 71Rodmell, p. 306
  56. 72Rodmell, p. 134
  57. 73Rodmell, p. 173
  58. 74Reid, pp. 59–60 and 86
  59. 75Rodmell, p. 114
  60. 76Walker, p. 386
  61. 78Rodmell, p. 346
  62. 79"Aeschylus at Cambridge", The Times, 2 December 1885, p. 6
  63. 80"Oedipus at Cambridge", The Times, 23 November 1887, p. 6
  64. 81Shaw, p. 389
  65. 82Shaw, pp. 389–390
  66. 83Eatock, p. 90
  67. 84Shaw, p. 429
  68. 85Schaarwächter, p. 53
  69. 86"Music", The Observer, 30 July 1893, p. 6
  70. 87"The Opera", The Times, 27 July 1893, p. 11
  71. 88Wood, p. 86
  72. 89Jacobs (1994), p. 47
  73. 90"Classified Advertising", The Times, 3 March 1896, p. 8 and 12 May 1896, p. 10
  74. 91"Shamus O'Brien in Germany", The Times, 16 April 1907, p. 8
  75. 92Beecham, p. 95
  76. 93Rodmell, p. 181
  77. 94Rodmell, p. 169
  78. 95Anderson, Robert. "Surveying Stanford"], The Musical Times, vol. 144, no. 1882 (Spring 2003), pp. 48–50
  79. 96Young, p. 217
  80. 97Ainger, p. 372
  81. 98Stanford, C. V. "The Leeds Festival Conductorship", Letters to the Editor, The Times, 26 September 1904, p. 6
  82. 99Jacobs (1986), p. 406
  83. 100Shaw, pp. 373 and 513; and Rodmell, p. 266
  84. 101Jacobs (1986), pp. 381 and 385
  85. 102"The Leeds Musical Festival", The Musical Times and Singing Class Circular, vol. 39, no. 669 (November 1898), pp. 730–732
  86. 103Young, p. 216
  87. 104"The Leeds Musical Festival", The Musical Times and Singing Class Circular, vol. 42, no. 705 (November 1901), pp. 731–734
  88. 105"Leeds Musical Festival", The Musical Times, vol. 45, no. 741 (November 1904), pp. 730–732
  89. 106"Leeds Musical Festival", The Musical Times, vol. 48, no. 777 (November 1907), pp. 737–738
  90. 107"The Leeds Festival", The Musical Times, vol. 51, no. 813 (November 1910), pp. 719–720, 729
  91. 108Rodmell, pp. 265–266
  92. 109"Royal Opera", The Times, 31 May 1901, p. 4
  93. 110"Much Ado About Nothing", The Manchester Guardian, 31 May 1901, p. 5
  94. 111Gillespie, Elgy. "Charles Villiers Stanford (1852–1924): Brilliant Dublin Boyhood, Cantankerous London Old Age", History Ireland, vol. 12, no. 3 (Autumn 2004), pp. 24–27
  95. 112Reed, p. 61
  96. 113Moore, pp. 449 and 459
  97. 114Quoted in Moore, p. 700
  98. 115"Sir C. Stanford's New Opera", The Times, 8 January 1916, p. 9; and Rodmell, p. 292
  99. 116"Opera in Manchester – Sir Thomas Beecham's Enterprise", The Times, 3 June 1916, p. 11; and "Comedy and Criticism",The Times, 23 June 1916, p. 11
  100. 117Rodmell, p. 298
  101. 118Rodmell, p. 297
  102. 119Kennedy, p. 68
  103. 120Stanford, Charles Villiers. "On Some Recent Tendencies in Composition", Proceedings of the Musical Association, 47th session (1920–1921), pp. 39–53
  104. 121"At the Abbey Gate", The Times, 7 March 1921, p. 8
  105. 122Anderson, W. R. "Yesterday's Music", The Observer, 6 March 1921, p. 15
  106. 123Rodmell, p. 328
  107. 124Rodmell, p. 333
  108. 125"The Late Sir Charles Stanford", The Times, 3 April 1924, p. 17
  109. 127"Sir Charles Stanford", The Times, 4 April 1924, p. 15
  110. 128Bonavia, F. "Stanford's Last Opera: The Travelling Companion", The Musical Times, vol. 66, no. 988 (June 1925), pp. 523–524
  111. 129McN, W. "The Travelling Companion", The Musical Times, vol. 76, no. 1107 (May 1935), pp. 456–457
  112. 130The Coronation Honours26 June 1902
  113. 131Davies, Walford et al. "Charles Villiers Stanford, by some of his pupils", Music & Letters, vol. 5, no. 3 (July 1924), pp. 193–207
  114. 132Porte, p. 13
  115. 133Porte, pp. 14–15
  116. 134Howells, Herbert. "Charles Villiers Stanford (1852–1924). An Address at His Centenary", Proceedings of the Royal Musical Association, 79th session (1952–1953), pp. 19–31
  117. 135Dibble, p. 461
  118. 136Dibble, p. 464
  119. 137Rodmell, Appendix Two, unnumbered pages
  120. 138Rodmell, p. 415
  121. 139Rodmell, p. 416
  122. 140Rodmell, p. 413
  123. 141Rodmell, p. 417
  124. 142Whitehouse, Richard (2008). Notes to Naxos CD 8.570355, OCLC 227035121
  125. 144Porte, p. 32
  126. 145Porte, pp. 32–33
  127. 146Stradling and Hughes, p. 140
  128. 147"List of Members", Journal of the Folk-Song Society, vol. 1, no. 2 (1900), pp. i–vi
  129. 149"Concerts", The Times, 19 January 1906, p. 8
  130. 150Foreman, Lewis (1987). Notes to Chandos CD CHAN 8545, OCLC 19774048
  131. 152Porte, p. 69
  132. 153Rodmell, p. 414
  133. 154Temperley, p. 204
  134. 155Temperley, p. 205
  135. 156Rodmell, p. 374
  136. 157Burton, p. 349
  137. 158Porte, p. 107
  138. 159Porte, p. 111
  139. 160Christopher Webber, 'Charles Villiers Stanford – An Operatic Chameleon', Opera, November 2018, pp.1352–1356
  140. 164Stanford, Magnificat in GChoir of St George's Chapel, Windsor — Columbia Records — 1926
  141. 176Discography2015-04-16
  142. 177BookGilbert and Sullivan – A Dual BiographyMichael Ainger — Oxford University Press — 2002
  143. 178BookA Mingled ChimeThomas Beecham — Hutchinson — 1959
  144. 179BookMusic in Britain – The Romantic Age 1800–1914Burton, Nigel — Athlone Press — 1981
  145. 180JournalThe Crystal Palace Concerts: Canon Formation and the English Musical RenaissanceColin Eatock — 2010
  146. 181BookArthur Sullivan – A Victorian MusicianArthur Jacobs — Oxford University Press — 1986
  147. 182BookHenry J. Wood – Maker of the PromsArthur Jacobs — Methuen — 1994
  148. 183BookAdrian BoultMichael Kennedy — Hamish Hamilton — 1987
  149. 184BookEdward Elgar: A Creative LifeJerrold N Moore — Oxford University Press — 1984
  150. 185BookSir Charles V. StanfordJohn F Porte — Kegan Paul — 1921
  151. 186BookElgarW H Reed — Dent — 1946
  152. 187BookMalcolm Sargent: A BiographyCharles Reid — Hamish Hamilton — 1968
  153. 188BookCharles Villiers StanfordPaul Rodmell — Scolar Press — 2002
  154. 189JournalChasing a Myth and a Legend: 'The British Musical Renaissance' in a 'Land Without Music'Jürgen Schaarwächter — 2008
  155. 190BookShaw's Music – The Complete Music Criticism of Bernard Shaw, Volume 2Bernard Shaw — The Bodley Head — 1989
  156. 191BookStudies and MemoriesCharles Villiers Stanford — Archibald Constable and Co — 1908
  157. 192BookPages from an Unwritten DiaryCharles Villiers Stanford — Edward Arnold — 1914
  158. 193BookThe English Musical Renaissance, 1840–1940: Constructing a National MusicRobert Stradling — Manchester University Press — 2001
  159. 194BookMusic in Britain – The Romantic Age 1800–1914Temperley, Nicholas — Athlone Press — 1981
  160. 195BookHans von Bülow – A Life and TimesAlan Walker — Oxford University Press — 2010
  161. 196BookMasters of English MusicCharles Willeby — James R Osgood, McIlvaine & Co — 1896
  162. 197BookMy Life of MusicHenry J Wood — Victor Gollancz — 1938
  163. 198BookSir Arthur SullivanPercy M Young — J M Dent & Sons — 1971

Queue