Bambatha Rebellion

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The Bambatha Rebellion of 1906 began not with a battle cry but with a tax bill. In the British colony of Natal, the colonial administration introduced a poll tax of one pound per person, layered on top of a hut tax that already burdened Zulu households. For poorer families, this was not a hardship to be absorbed. It was a line drawn in the dirt. The uprising that followed would kill between 3,000 and 4,000 Zulu people, imprison more than 7,000 others, and cost the Natal colonial government £883,576 to suppress. It would also set in motion a chain of events that produced the Union of South Africa in 1910. Who was Bambatha, the chief whose name the rebellion carries? What drove young Zulu men into the forests to fight colonial troops with poorly-made weapons? And what does the presence of a young Indian lawyer named Mohandas Gandhi on the other side of that conflict tell us about the world these men inhabited?

• 2. A Tax and Its Purpose

  ›

  After the Second Boer War ended in 1902, European employers in Natal found themselves with a problem. Black farmers were not entering the labour market in the numbers industry needed, largely because competition from gold mines in the Witwatersrand was drawing workers elsewhere. The poll tax of one pound was not simply a revenue measure. It was designed to pressure Zulu men into wage labour by making subsistence farming economically unsustainable. The tax landed hardest on households already stretched thin. African tenants were being evicted by European landowners who wanted to work the land themselves, pushing the African majority onto increasingly small and overcrowded reserves. A cattle epidemic between 1896 and 1897 had already killed ninety percent of local herds, wiping out a foundational source of wealth for farming communities. The poll tax arrived into this already fragile economy with the force of a final push. Some chiefs and elders tried to hold back the coming storm, but many supported what they saw as an inevitable confrontation. Demonstrations broke out at poll tax collection stations, and on the 8th of February 1906, two police constables were killed. The Natal colonial authorities responded by declaring martial law.

• 3. Bambatha's Stand

  ›

  Bambatha was a Zulu chief from the Mpanza Valley, in what is now a district near Greytown, and he had a complicated history with the Natal colonial administration before the rebellion began. Authorities already suspected him of joining other chiefs in expressing discontent over the new poll tax. When he was summoned to Greytown, he did not go. Fearing arrest, he travelled instead to the palace of the exiled Zulu king Dinuzulu kaCetshwayo to seek counsel. Dinuzulu himself had returned from exile on the island of Saint Helena in 1897, and rumours had circulated since then that he was planning to restore African rule and expel white settlers. When Bambatha returned home to the Mpanza Valley, he found that the Natal government had removed him from his chieftaincy. With nothing left to lose through compliance, he gathered a force of supporters and on the 3rd of April began a guerrilla campaign against colonial forces, using the dense Nkandla forest as cover. The colonial response was swift and massive. Natal authorities called on soldiers and police from across the colony and requested help from the Transvaal and Cape colonies. The assembled force came to 4,316 men under Colonel Duncan McKenzie. On the 10th of June, McKenzie's troops surrounded Bambatha's fighters at Mome Gorge. Attacking at sunrise, they overwhelmed the poorly-armed rebels. The official report stated that Bambatha was killed in that engagement, but his supporters disputed it, believing he had escaped to Portuguese Mozambique. A DNA test of the body claimed to be his later failed to produce a definitive answer.

• 4. The Cost of Suppression

  ›

  After Mome Gorge, the rebellion was not finished. Chief Meseni kept it alive in the lower Thukela Valley from the 13th of June to the 11th of July before colonial forces suppressed that front as well. What followed through the rest of 1906 was what the historical record describes as the rebellion's bloodiest phase: indiscriminate counterinsurgency operations aimed at erasing any perceived resistance. Between 3,000 and 4,000 Zulus were killed. More than 7,000 were imprisoned. Four thousand were flogged. Thirty-six colonial soldiers died. The suppression cost the Natal government £883,576. The immediate military result was the destruction of organised Zulu armed resistance. The longer political consequence was subtler but more durable. The uprising intensified support among white colonists across Southern Africa for bringing the separate colonies together under a single government capable of defending white supremacy. Four years later, the Union of South Africa was formed. The poll tax collections tell their own quiet story: in 1906, the combined total collected from Natal and Zululand reached £76,490. By 1909, that figure had fallen to £45,018 as the communities that had been taxed were diminished, scattered, and pauperised.

• 5. Gandhi's Contested Role

  ›

  Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was working as a lawyer in South Africa in 1906, and his response to the rebellion placed him firmly on the side of the colonial authorities. Gandhi encouraged Indian South Africans to participate in suppressing the uprising. His argument was pragmatic and uncomfortable by later standards: Indians should demonstrate loyalty to the British war effort in order to strengthen their claim to full citizenship rights. Colonial officials would not allow Indians to serve as combatants, but they accepted Gandhi's offer to form a stretcher bearer corps. The corps numbered 21 men and Gandhi commanded it. Its assigned task was treating wounded white soldiers. In his columns in Indian Opinion, Gandhi urged the broader Indian population to support the suppression, writing that the colonial government was wasting a reserve force it could have trained for actual warfare. His position in 1906 was not the position he would hold two decades later. By 1927, Gandhi had written in The Story of My Experiments with Truth that the rebellion was not a war at all. He called it, in his own words, "No war but a man hunt." That reversal did not erase his participation, and the tension between his 1906 conduct and his later principles has followed his legacy ever since.

• 6. Memory and Meaning

  ›

  In 2006, the centenary of the rebellion brought an official ceremony that declared Chief Bambatha a national hero of post-Apartheid South Africa. His image was placed on a postage stamp and a street was renamed in his honour. At the ceremony, speakers repeated the belief that the body killed at Mome Gorge was not Bambatha's, and that the chief had escaped to Mozambique. That belief remains current and the inconclusive DNA test has not settled the question. The hip-hop musician Afrika Bambaataa, a figure of major significance in the development of hip-hop culture, takes his name directly from Chief Bambatha and the rebellion he led. That lineage carries the name of a man who launched a guerrilla campaign from the Nkandla forest into one of the defining artistic movements of the twentieth century.