Bálint Bakfark

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Bálint Bakfark was so good at the lute that monarchs across Europe tried to poach him from one another, and he refused them all. Born around 1507 in Brassó, Transylvania, he rose from orphan status at a provincial court to become the most renowned lutenist of the Renaissance. His life took him from Hungary to Paris, from Poland to Vienna, and finally to Padua, where a plague claimed him in 1576. The music he spent decades composing was mostly destroyed in the same outbreak, burned alongside his other possessions as was required by public health law. What survives raises a haunting question: if the lost manuscripts were anything like the works that remain, what exactly did the world lose when Bakfark died?

• 2. An Orphan at Court

  ›

  Bakfark's early years were shaped by absence. His parents gone, he was raised by the Greff family, whose name he eventually carried as a formal alias. His education came at the court of John Zápolya in Buda, where he trained in a musical tradition that prized the lute above most other instruments. He stayed at that court until 1540, and there is a possibility he traveled to Italy at least once during those years, though the record is uncertain. The Transylvanian Saxon world he came from was a distinct community within the Kingdom of Hungary, and it gave him a surname spelled so many ways by contemporaries that his name appears as Bacfarc, Bakfarc, Bakfarkh, Bakffark, and Backuart across surviving documents. By the time he left Buda, he was ready to test his reputation outside Hungary entirely.

• 3. The Polish Years

  ›

  When Bakfark reached Paris sometime in the 1540s, the position he wanted was already taken. Rather than wait, he redirected toward Jagiellon Poland, and in 1549 he found the post he was looking for: court lutenist to Sigismund II Augustus. For the next roughly seventeen years he traveled widely across Europe, his fame growing with each stop, yet he kept returning to his employer's service. Other monarchs made serious efforts to recruit him away, and the riches Sigismund showered on him likely helped his loyalty hold. His attachment was specifically to the court held at the Palace of the Grand Dukes of Lithuania in Vilnius. Whatever his exact movements, the pattern was consistent: however far he traveled, Sigismund's court pulled him back. That loyalty ended abruptly in 1566, though precisely what Bakfark did to cause the rupture remains unknown.

• 4. Disgrace and Flight

  ›

  In 1566 something changed. Bakfark apparently gave the king reason for fury, and the consequences were swift. He barely had time to get out before Polish army troops entered his home and destroyed everything they found there. What triggered the episode the sources do not say. Afterward he moved to Vienna for a period, then came back to Transylvania, but he did not stay long in either place. By 1571 he had settled in Padua, in northern Italy, and there he lived out the remaining years of his life. His death came during the plague of 1576, on either the 15th or the 22nd of August. The outbreak that killed him also consumed most of what he had written.

• 5. Music Too Difficult to Print

  ›

  Very little of what Bakfark composed was ever published during his lifetime. One explanation repeated in the sources: the music was simply too hard for most other players to perform. The works that do survive point to why that reputation stuck. Ten fantasies, seven madrigals, eight chansons, and fourteen motets came down to later generations, all of them arranged for lute alone in what are described as remarkably faithful polyphonic settings. Polyphony normally involves multiple voices singing or playing simultaneously, and to render that texture convincingly on a solo lute requires both technical mastery and compositional ingenuity. Bakfark also transcribed works by major composers of his era for the instrument, including pieces by Josquin des Prez, Clemens non Papa, Nicolas Gombert, and Orlando di Lasso. The transcriptions are part of the surviving record; the vast manuscripts burned in Padua are not. What the plague erased was most likely the larger, more personal portion of his output.