Antisemitism in the United Kingdom

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Antisemitism in the United Kingdom has a recorded history stretching back to 1070, when the first Jewish settlement was established in England following the Norman Conquest. Nearly a thousand years later, in 2023, the Community Security Trust logged more than four thousand antisemitic incidents in a single year. That figure was the highest since systematic tracking began. What connects a medieval massacre in York to a synagogue attack in Manchester on Yom Kippur in October 2025? The answer runs through expulsions and readmissions, immigration panics and parliamentary inquiries, subtle literary rhetoric and open street violence. This documentary traces how prejudice against Jews has shifted in form across centuries without ever fully disappearing from British life.

• 2. Massacre and Expulsion

  ›

  The York Massacre of 1190 left an estimated 150 Jews dead, either killed by a mob or taking their own lives to avoid capture. It was one of a series of mass killings that swept across England in the same period, and it stands as one of the most documented acts of collective violence against any group in medieval English history.

  Before that violence, Jews living in England from around King Stephen's reign, which ran from 1135 to 1154, had already faced religious discrimination and tight controls on their financial activities. The blood libel, a fabricated accusation that Jews committed ritual murder, is thought to have originated in England in the 12th century. Among the named cases are Harold of Gloucester, Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln, Robert of Bury, and William of Norwich.

  Legal restrictions accumulated steadily. In 1181, the Assize of Arms barred Jews from owning a hauberk or chain mail. In 1253, Henry III's Statute of Jewry imposed segregation and required Jews to wear a yellow badge. In 1264-7, during the Second Barons' War, attackers targeted Jewish moneylenders with the explicit aim of destroying records of debts. Edward I's 1275 Statute of the Jewry outlawed usury, and his Edict of Expulsion in 1290 ended this first period of Jewish life in England entirely.

  The first dated portrait of an English Jew, a 1277 antisemitic caricature called Aaron, Son of the Devil, shows its subject wearing the English yellow badge, two tablets, on his upper garments. It survives as a reminder of how official hostility shaped even the way Jews were depicted visually. After the expulsion, converted Jews could remain in the Domus Conversorum, a house of the converted, with records surviving to at least 1551.

• 3. Readmission and Slow Reform

  ›

  Oliver Cromwell readmitted Jews to the United Kingdom in 1655, though historians believe that crypto-Jews had been living in England before that date. The community that rebuilt itself over the following centuries did so against a backdrop of laws not designed specifically for Jews but which caught them all the same.

  The Corporation Act of 1661 and associated Test Acts restricted public offices to members of the Church of England, which excluded Jews alongside Catholics and nonconformists. The Jewish Naturalisation Act, which would have allowed Jews to become naturalised through Parliament, received royal assent on the 7th of July 1753 but was repealed in 1754 following widespread opposition. When the Test Acts were repealed in 1828 for the purpose of Catholic emancipation, George IV replaced them with the Oath of Abjuration Act, which required all officers, lawyers, voters, and members of Parliament to swear an oath containing the words "upon the faith of a Christian."

  Historian William D. Rubinstein has argued that British antisemitism was lower than in several other European countries for reasons rooted in Protestant culture, the relatively small size of the Jewish population, and Britain's early adoption of constitutional government. But removal of legal barriers moved slowly. The Jews Relief Act 1858 finally removed the Christian oath requirement for Parliament, allowing Jews to sit as MPs. The Universities Tests Act of 1871 abolished the requirement for university staff and students to be members of the Church of England. Only in 1890, under the Religious Disabilities Removal Bill, were all restrictions across the British Empire lifted for every position except that of monarch and two specific offices.

  Those who opposed emancipation were sometimes prominent figures. Thomas Carlyle believed all Jews should be expelled to Palestine, objecting to what he saw as their materialism and archaic religion. His opposition sat alongside a broader cultural resistance that the formal removal of legal barriers did not fully dissolve.

• 4. Immigration and Economic Fear

  ›

  From 1882 to 1919, the Jewish population of Britain grew from 46,000 to 250,000, driven largely by the exodus from Russian pogroms and persecution. Many settled in the East End of London, and the growth triggered a popular and media backlash that mixed economic anxiety with open hostility.

  The British Brothers' League, formed with the support of prominent politicians, organised marches and petitions. At rallies its speakers argued that Britain should not become "the dumping ground for the scum of Europe". A 1905 editorial in the Manchester Evening Chronicle described the arriving foreigner in terms of disease and criminality. Antisemitic violence broke out in South Wales in 1902 and 1903, where Jews were physically attacked. The Aliens Act of 1905 was designed in significant part to restrict this immigration, and further tightened restrictions followed in 1914 and 1919.

  During the Second Boer War of 1899-1902, the accusation shifted to the financial sphere. Labour leader Keir Hardie claimed Jews were part of a secretive "imperialist" cabal promoting the war. John Burns told the House of Commons in 1900 that the British Army had become "a janissary of the Jews". The Independent Labour Party, the Trades Union Congress, and Robert Blatchford's newspaper The Clarion all blamed Jewish capitalists. Henry Hyndman and J. A. Hobson held similar views.

  In 1919, The Britons was founded, calling for British Jews to be deported en masse to Palestine. In 1920, the Morning Post published a translation of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion across seventeen or eighteen articles; the text later formed the basis of a book called The Cause of World Unrest, to which half the paper's staff contributed. A leader in The Times initially accepted the Protocols as genuine and blamed Jews for both World War I and the Bolshevik regime. The document was later exposed as a forgery.

• 5. Civil Antisemitism and Polite Hostility

  ›

  During the first decades of the twentieth century, scholars observe that British antisemitism developed a particular disguise. The mode they call "civil antisemitism" embedded prejudice within a discourse of politeness, where overt bigotry was treated as objectionable while the underlying attitudes remained.

  Parliamentary debates over the Aliens Acts of 1904 and 1905, for instance, framed hostility toward Jewish immigrants as concern about immigration in general. The figure of the "immigrant alien" became a rhetorical stand-in for "the Jew." The practice spread beyond politics. Scholars point to British modernist writers, including Virginia Woolf, as figures who used "the Jew" as a stylistic tool while operating within conventions that treated explicit hatred as vulgar.

  The result was a form of hate rhetoric that functioned precisely because it was submerged under the expectations of civilised discourse. Civil antisemitism appeared across parliamentary debates, fascist fiction and propaganda, modernist literature, and ethnographies. Concerns about Jewish immigration and assimilation were threaded through broader arguments about Britishness and civility, which made the prejudice harder to name and confront directly.

  This mode of expression would prove durable. Its logic, that hostility could be voiced indirectly through coded language that listeners understood, left a template for antisemitic discourse that persisted well beyond the period in which it first took shape.

• 6. The 1930s: Fascism and Refugee Exclusion

  ›

  The Battle of Cable Street in 1936 stopped a planned fascist march through the East End of London. Police attempting to clear the route for the march could not break through barricades defended by dock workers, socialists, anarchists, communists, Jews, and other anti-fascists. The march was abandoned.

  Behind this visible confrontation ran a quieter policy. Britain eventually accepted 70,000 Jewish refugees before the outbreak of World War II, along with the 10,000 children brought over by the Kindertransport. But British Jewish associations documented more than 500,000 case files of Jews who were not admitted. Louise London, author of Whitehall and the Jews, 1933-1948, stated that the immigration process "was designed to keep out large numbers of European Jews, perhaps 10 times as many as it let in."

  Those who did arrive found further restrictions. A law enacted in the 1930s capped Jewish children at no more than 5% of the student body in any school. Jewish physicians could not practise medicine, even while healthcare shortages existed. German Jewish refugees were discouraged from speaking German and pushed to assimilate, often at the cost of their personal history. The press generally opposed the refugee programme and incorrectly reported in the summer of 1938 that there were more Jews in Britain than there had been in Germany.

  The Evian Conference of 1938, attended by 32 countries, failed to reach agreement on accepting Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany. The Bermuda Conference held by the Allies in April 1943 also ended without practical steps, even though by that date it was known that the Nazi regime intended to exterminate Jews wherever it could. The overriding focus remained on winning the war.

• 7. Post-War Violence and Legal Protection

  ›

  In August 1947, after the Irgun hanged two abducted British sergeants in Palestine, anti-Jewish riots spread across the United Kingdom. The riots were the most visible sign of resentment that had built during the British Mandate as Zionist groups fought British forces.

  In the years that followed, fascist organisations including Jeffrey Hamm's British League of Ex-Servicemen and Oswald Mosley's Union Movement continued antisemitic activity, holding speeches in public places and, at the rank-and-file level, attacking Jews and Jewish property. In response, Jewish ex-servicemen formed the 43 Group, which operated from 1945 to 1950, breaking up far-right meetings, infiltrating fascist groups, and engaging in street fighting.

  Following lobbying by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, the Race Relations Act 1965 provided formal legal protection against discrimination on the grounds of colour, race, or ethnic or national origins in public places. But far-right groups continued. The National Front was founded in 1967 and a new British National Party in 1982. By 2016, a Select Committee report found that "Holocaust denial and Jewish conspiracy theories remain core elements of far-right ideology" within the BNP and successor groups.

  A 2016 survey by the World Jewish Congress found that 90% of antisemitic posts on social media in the UK were made by white males under the age of 40 with affiliations to extreme right-wing groups. A 2017 study by the Institute for Jewish Policy Research found that antisemitic attitudes were two to four times more prevalent among those who identified as very right-wing compared to the general population.

• 8. Contemporary Counts and Community Fear

  ›

  The Community Security Trust recorded 4,103 antisemitic incidents in 2023, a figure surpassed only by the 3,700 incidents recorded in 2025. Jews make up 0.5% of the British population but accounted for 17% of religious hate crimes in 2022. Between the outbreak of the 2023 Gaza War and March 2024, police in England and Wales recorded 3,282 antisemitic offences, more than double the figure from the previous year.

  The CST tallied 272 antisemitic incidents during the 2023-2024 school year, over five times the number from the year before. At the University of Leeds, the Jewish chaplain received threats to rape and kill his wife and murder his children. A 2018 survey by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights found that about a quarter of Jews in the UK had felt offended or threatened over the previous year, rising to one third over the previous five years.

  A poll conducted by the Campaign Against Antisemitism in December 2023 found that nearly half of British Jews had considered leaving the UK following the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel. A survey in June 2024 found that only a third of British Jews believed they had a long-term future in the country. By comparison, an Institute for Jewish Policy Research survey in 2012 had found that 18% had contemplated emigration at some point in the previous five years; by 2017 that figure had risen to 29%.

  On the 2nd of October 2025, Jihad al-Shamie, a 35-year-old Syrian-born British citizen, drove a car into pedestrians and stabbed worshippers outside the Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation in Manchester during Yom Kippur. Two people were killed and three were seriously injured. In March and April 2026, a series of attacks targeting Jewish schools, synagogues, and charities in London involved arson, explosive devices, and chemicals, with responsibility claimed by a group believed to be a front for Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. On the 23rd of March 2026, four Hatzola emergency vehicles were set on fire in Golders Green; Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis called it a "particularly sickening assault" on an organisation "whose sole mission is to protect life, Jewish and non-Jewish alike."