A. C. Bradley

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  A. C. Bradley was once so dominant in the study of Shakespeare that a satirical poem imagined the playwright himself failing a civil service examination because he had not read his own critic. Written by Guy Boas and published in 1926, the verse has Shakespeare answering questions on King Lear "very badly / Because he hadn't read his Bradley." That a scholar born in 1851 could achieve that kind of authority over a poet who died in 1616 raises a genuine question: how does a Victorian literary professor come to outrank the author in the minds of students? The answer runs through a career built entirely on lectures, a single book reprinted more than two dozen times, and a method that treated fictional characters as though they were living human beings. What that method achieved, and why it eventually attracted fierce resistance, is a story about how a generation defines literature for the next.

• 2. A Family of Scholars

  ›

  Andrew Cecil Bradley was born at Park Hill, Clapham, on the 26th of March 1851. Clapham was then still in Surrey; it is part of London today. He was the youngest of nine children born to his father's second wife, Emma Linton. His father, Charles Bradley, had been vicar of Glasbury and died in 1871. The family produced more than one distinguished mind. Francis Herbert Bradley, born in 1846, was the fifth child by the same father and became a philosopher of considerable reputation, living until 1924. A. C. Bradley studied at Balliol College, Oxford, and obtained a fellowship there in 1874. He lectured first in English and then in philosophy until 1881, when he moved to a permanent position at the University of Liverpool to lecture on literature. His academic path eventually carried him to Glasgow, where he took up the Regius Professorship in 1889, and then back to Oxford when he was elected to the professorship of poetry in 1901. He was offered the King Edward VII chair at Cambridge but declined it. Bradley never married; he spent his later years living in London with his sister, and he died on the 2nd of September 1935 at 6 Holland Park Road, Kensington.

• 3. Lectures Into Literature

  ›

  Every piece of work Bradley published began as a lecture. That fact matters because it shaped both the style and the scope of what he produced. His five years as Oxford's professor of poetry generated his two most significant books: Shakespearean Tragedy, published in 1904, and Oxford Lectures on Poetry, which appeared in 1909. His other published works include Poetry for Poetry's Sake from 1901, A Commentary on Tennyson's In Memoriam also from 1901, a contribution on "Aristotle's Conception of the State" to the volume Hellenica edited by Evelyn Abbott, and a collection called A Miscellany published in 1929. He also delivered the 1907-1908 Gifford Lecture at the University of Glasgow under the title "Ideals of Religion," the 1909 Adamson Lecture at the Victoria University of Manchester, and the 1912 Shakespeare Lecture of the British Academy. The lecture format gave his prose a directness that served him well in the classroom. His pedagogical manner and the confidence with which he guided students through the meaning of Shakespeare built a reputation that extended well beyond Oxford.

• 4. The Book That Shaped a Century

  ›

  Shakespearean Tragedy has been reprinted more than two dozen times since its publication in 1904, a figure that alone signals its reach. It became, as one assessment has it, probably the most influential single work of Shakespearean criticism ever published. The approach at its center treated Shakespeare's characters not as dramatic functions or poetic constructions but as full human beings with psychological depth and interior lives. For many students in the early twentieth century, this felt like a revelation. Bradley's self-confidence as a guide made the work feel authoritative rather than merely interpretive. The book's cultural weight grew large enough that it became the subject of its own scholarly study: Katherine Cooke's A. C. Bradley and His Influence in Twentieth-Century Shakespeare Criticism examined how thoroughly his methods had permeated the field. Harold Bloom, writing decades later in Shakespeare: the Invention of the Human, listed Bradley alongside Samuel Johnson and William Hazlitt as one of the Shakespeare critics he most admired.

• 5. Character and Its Critics

  ›

  By the mid-twentieth century, the approach that had made Bradley famous began drawing sustained criticism. Scholars argued that his method contained anachronistic errors, that it imposed late nineteenth century novelistic ideas about morality and psychology onto early seventeenth century dramatic texts. L. C. Knights mounted an early challenge with his 1933 essay "How Many Children Had Lady Macbeth?" The title was designed as a rebuke to Bradley-style speculation about characters' lives beyond what Shakespeare wrote. John Britton later pointed out that Bradley himself never actually posed that question; F. R. Leavis apparently invented it as a mockery of what he called "current irrelevancies in Shakespeare criticism." Kenneth Burke's 1951 article "Othello: An Essay to Illustrate a Method" offered a more formal counter to the Bradleyan way of reading character. After the 1970s, the rise of poststructuralist criticism pulled students further away from his work. More recently, however, scholars including Michael Bristol have returned to examining "character" as a legitimate historical category of evaluation, suggesting the debate Bradley's method ignited is not yet finished. His will, meanwhile, left behind something concrete: a research fellowship for young scholars of English Letters.