Skip to content
— CH. 1 · THE MARCH 14TH BALLOT —

2004 Russian presidential election

~3 min read · Ch. 1 of 6
6 sections
  • Vladimir Putin stood at the center of a landslide victory on the 14th of March 2004. He secured 72% of the vote to win his second full four-year term as President of Russia. The election took place under a legal framework that required candidates to collect two million signatures for registration. This requirement created an unreasonable hurdle for many potential challengers. Local authorities launched massive campaigns to encourage voter participation across the country. They feared a turnout below 50% would trigger a new round of voting. In some regions, officials overused their power to force citizens into polling stations.

  • Sergey Glazyev ran as an independent candidate after losing a power struggle within the Rodina party. He campaigned as a critic of economic reforms and promised to improve social welfare. Oleg Malyshkin represented the Liberal Democratic Party following Vladimir Zhirinovsky's decision not to run again. Malyshkin had been Zhirinovsky's head of security since 1991. Sergey Mironov served as Chairman of the Federation Council while expressing support for Putin before launching his own campaign. Irina Khakamada emerged as Putin's most outspoken critic despite losing her State Duma seat in 2003. She told the daily newspaper Kommersant that she was not afraid of terrorists in power. Nikolay Kharitonov stood as the Communist Party candidate even though he was not a member of that party. Ivan Rybkin withdrew from the race on the 6th of March after appearing in Kyiv following a scandalous disappearance.

  • State-funded Channel One Russia dedicated more than four hours of news coverage to Putin in the month prior to the election. That coverage remained overwhelmingly positive throughout the broadcast period. In contrast, the second-most covered candidate received only 21 minutes of primetime news on the same channel. State-funded TV Russia gave Putin nearly two hours of primetime news with similarly positive tones. Glazeyev received just four minutes of coverage there, and the tone ranged from negative to neutral. TV Centre provided an hour and 25 minutes of coverage to Putin while giving Glazeyev merely seven minutes. Private broadcasters like REN TV offered 35 minutes of primetime news to Mr. Putin, but 35% of this coverage was negative. NTV did not air election debates due to Putin's refusal to participate in them.

  • Observers representing the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe cited abuses of government resources during the campaign. They pointed to bias in state media and instances of ballot stuffing on election day. The ad hoc Committee by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe stated that elections lacked elements of a genuine democratic contest. Localized instances of election-related abuse reflected a lack of democratic culture in areas distant from the capital. Conversely, observers representing the Commonwealth of Independent States recognized the election as free, democratic and fair. Yury Yarov assured that violations identified during his mission didn't affect the free expression of electors' will or the result of the election.

  • Mr. Putin received 98.2% of the vote in Ingushetia according to official results. He won 96.5% in Kabardino-Balkaria and 94.6% in Dagestan. Turnout reached 92.3% in Chechnya and 91.25% in North Ossetia. These figures stood in stark contrast to the general turnout of only 64.39% across Russia. Election officials in Grozny acknowledged filling in several thousand ballots for Putin. Moscow Times reported these admissions regarding the republic's capital. PACE noted unusually high turnout in five North Caucasus republics compared to national averages.

  • The election influenced Russia's future democratic trajectory significantly after 2004. Vladimir Putin secured another term that extended his tenure until 2012. The political landscape shifted toward centralized authority following this victory. Groups like the Yabloko party encouraged voters to boycott the election as a protest. Grigory Yavlinsky called it a slide of the country into authoritarianism. Human rights organizations joined the call for boycotts against what they viewed as undemocratic practices. The Central Election Commission ensured security and professional conduct despite irregularities. The outcome cemented a pattern of administrative resource use in subsequent elections.

Common questions

What percentage of the vote did Vladimir Putin receive in the 2004 Russian presidential election?

Vladimir Putin secured 72% of the vote to win his second full four-year term as President of Russia. The election took place on the 14th of March 2004 under a legal framework requiring candidates to collect two million signatures for registration.

Who were the main challengers to Vladimir Putin during the 2004 Russian presidential election?

Sergey Glazyev ran as an independent candidate after losing a power struggle within the Rodina party while Oleg Malyshkin represented the Liberal Democratic Party following Vladimir Zhirinovsky's decision not to run again. Irina Khakamada emerged as Putin's most outspoken critic despite losing her State Duma seat in 2003 and Nikolay Kharitonov stood as the Communist Party candidate even though he was not a member of that party.

How much state media coverage did Vladimir Putin receive compared to other candidates before the 2004 Russian presidential election?

State-funded Channel One Russia dedicated more than four hours of news coverage to Putin in the month prior to the election while the second-most covered candidate received only 21 minutes of primetime news on the same channel. State-funded TV Russia gave Putin nearly two hours of primetime news with similarly positive tones and Glazeyev received just four minutes of coverage there.

What did international observers report about the fairness of the 2004 Russian presidential election?

Observers representing the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe cited abuses of government resources during the campaign including bias in state media and instances of ballot stuffing on election day. The ad hoc Committee by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe stated that elections lacked elements of a genuine democratic contest while observers from the Commonwealth of Independent States recognized the election as free, democratic and fair.

Why were voter turnout figures unusually high in Chechnya and Dagestan during the 2004 Russian presidential election?

Turnout reached 92.3% in Chechnya and 91.25% in North Ossetia which stood in stark contrast to the general turnout of only 64.39% across Russia. Election officials in Grozny acknowledged filling in several thousand ballots for Putin and Moscow Times reported these admissions regarding the republic's capital.