Short answers, pulled from the story.
The word brother originates from the Proto-Indo-European root b-h-r-t-r, evolving into the Latin frater and the modern English term used today. This linguistic lineage stretches back thousands of years, connecting modern speakers to ancient Indo-European tribes who first used the term to describe a male sibling sharing one or more parents.
The presence of an older brother in a girl's life has been shown to delay the onset of menarche by roughly one year, a biological effect that underscores the profound influence siblings have on each other's development. This delay in puberty suggests that the presence of a male sibling may trigger hormonal or psychological changes that alter the female body's timeline for sexual maturity.
Aristotle, writing in 350 B.C.E. in the Nicomachean Ethics, Book VIII, established the older brother as the primary ethical influence on the younger brother, arguing that it is the older brother's job to influence the ethics of the younger brother by being a person of good action. The philosopher believed that by imitating and reenacting the acts of good people, a child becomes habituated to good action, and this process is particularly potent when the model is a brother.
Research indicates that the likelihood of a man being gay increases with the number of older brothers he has, pointing to a complex interplay between genetics and family structure. These findings suggest that the number and order of siblings can have measurable effects on human biology and sexuality, challenging simple assumptions about how family dynamics shape individual outcomes.
Research into sibling dynamics has revealed a surprising correlation between brother pairs and risk-taking behavior that does not exist in other sibling combinations. In pairs of brothers, higher levels of sibling warmth are directly related to more risk-taking behavior, suggesting that the emotional closeness between male siblings may actually encourage dangerous or bold actions rather than preventing them.
A man's attractiveness to a heterosexual woman may increase with the degree to which he resembles her brother, while his unattractiveness may increase the more his likeness diverges from her brother. This phenomenon, known as sexual imprinting in human mate choice, suggests that the brother figure serves as a template for what a woman finds attractive in a potential partner.