Tolkien and antiquarianism

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  J. R. R. Tolkien once used his pipe to burn the edges of handwritten pages. He pierced holes along one side to mimic the way parchment was stitched to a binding. Then he washed the pages with red paint to simulate bloodstains. This was the making of the Book of Mazarbul, a fictional relic embedded within The Lord of the Rings. Alongside the novel's narrative, Tolkien placed maps, genealogies, invented writing systems, poetry, proverbs, appendices, and entire constructed languages. Scholars have identified this body of material as placing Tolkien within the tradition of English antiquarianism. How deep that tradition ran, and where it came from, is the real story here. It explains why Middle-earth feels solid in a way that almost no other fantasy world does.

  24682633

• 2. The Antiquarian Tradition

  ›

  Thomas Percy published his Reliques of Ancient English Poetry in 1765. The collection surrounded its verse with prefaces, notes, appendices, and glossaries. William Stukeley had already extended that range, adding genealogies and maps to his antiquarian toolkit. Jonathan Swift populated Gulliver's Travels with false maps and pseudonymous authorship. William Blake filled his written works with illuminated pages of his own artwork. These writers, active between the early 18th and early 19th centuries, belonged to a tradition Nick Groom places Tolkien squarely within: English antiquarianism.

  Thomas Chatterton (1752-1770) pushed the tradition toward outright fabrication. He wrote in a constructed medieval style, inventing archaic language, calligraphy, heraldry, and manuscripts. These supported the illusion that his work was genuinely ancient. Jamie Williamson identifies antiquarianism as an ancestor of modern fantasy. He traces a line from figures like James Macpherson through William Morris to Tolkien himself. Each absorbed the devices of those before, using archaisms, elegy, and historical appendices to manufacture a feeling of realism.

  Christina Fawcett writes that Tolkien was following a tradition that interwove history with literature. He built not just a narrative but a full history behind that narrative. Carl Phelpstead argues that this achievement gave Middle-earth "an unprecedented (and unmatched) sense of reality." The key, he writes, was "the kind of inner consistency which commands Secondary Belief."

  Andrew Higgins captures something essential about how Tolkien and the antiquarians understood their own project. Unlike a novelist writing a self-consciously invented story, they "felt they were recording a past that was already there." Phelpstead notes that Tolkien argued against Samuel Taylor Coleridge's 1817 Biographia Literaria, which described fiction as prompting a "willing suspension of disbelief." Tolkien insisted the suspension was "involuntary" in successful fiction, and that achieving it required "much labor."

  2467534

• 3. The Found Manuscript

  ›

  Allan Turner writes that Tolkien presented The Lord of the Rings as a pseudotranslation. The device had a history. Miguel de Cervantes used it in his 1605 novel Don Quixote. The book was claimed to be a translation from an imagined Arabic author named El Cid Benegali. Walter Scott repeated the gambit in the introduction to his 1820 novel Ivanhoe. Tolkien applied the device to a fantasy world. He presented himself as the translator of a manuscript originally authored by the hobbits Bilbo and Frodo Baggins.

  In the frame story of The Lord of the Rings, those hobbit memoirs supposedly survived as the Red Book of Westmarch. Tolkien positioned himself not as the novel's author. Instead he became the last in a long line of philological editors who had transcribed and annotated a genuine ancient document. Janet Brennan Croft describes his paratexts as material that "resonates" or "collaborates" with the main text to amplify its believability. The maps, she notes, function as paratextual amplifiers alongside the prefaces, notes, and appendices.

  Christine Brooke-Rose dismissed the Appendices as "not in the least necessary to the narrative." She conceded only that "they have given much infantile happiness to the Tolkien clubs and societies." The scholar Tom Shippey directly refuted her. He argued that each added fact squares with the text and lends it depth. The mass of detail is what makes Middle-earth feel real and solid. Among all the layers of that machinery, Tolkien had placed its deepest root: the languages he had been building privately since his teens.

  401417388

• 4. Language as Foundation

  ›

  Tolkien described his compulsion to construct languages as "A Secret Vice," using the phrase as the title of an essay on the subject. He began building languages in his teens and continued throughout his life. He told his American publisher Houghton Mifflin that "the invention of languages is the foundation." The stories, he said, "were made rather to provide a world for the languages than the reverse." He put it most plainly of all: "To me a name comes first and the story follows."

  Quenya and Sindarin, the principal Elvish languages Tolkien built over decades, were the most developed of his glossopoeic projects. Tolkien made "daring" use of untranslated Elvish in the narrative. The poem A Elbereth Gilthoniel is performed in full at Rivendell without any English translation. The Tolkien scholar Tom Shippey argues that readers were not expected to understand the literal meaning. They were meant to sense that "there is more to Middle-earth than can immediately be communicated." The untranslated language itself performs that announcement.

  When Eomer cries "Westu Theoden hal!" he is using a dialectal form of an Old English phrase from Beowulf. The phrase means "Long Live King Theoden." It is delivered in the accent of ancient Mercia, the part of England where Tolkien himself grew up. This was, in Tolkien's own framing, a scholarly joke. It also illustrates his broader claim: "I am a philologist and all my work is philological."

  381025940

• 5. Scripts, Maps, and Heraldry

  ›

  When his publisher invited him to suggest dust-jacket ideas for the three volumes, Tolkien submitted a design using the Ring inscription in Tengwar. Tengwar was one of his three principal invented writing systems, alongside Cirth and Sarati. The publisher found the design too expensive to reproduce. A simplified version of the inscription was used for all three volumes. For the title page, Tolkien drew a top margin in Cirth that reads "THE LORD OF THE RINGS TRANSLATED FROM THE RED BOOK." A bottom margin in Tengwar continues the sentence through the full publication details.

  Nick Groom notes that Tolkien was not a "literary forger" in the way Thomas Chatterton was. His facsimile pages of the Book of Mazarbul nonetheless "enlisted the aesthetics of antiquarianism," Groom writes. Groom adds that Tolkien "adopts the techniques of literary forgery." Will Sherwood adds that these methods closely resembled Chatterton's own techniques for making documents look genuinely old.

  Tolkien began with maps when developing his fiction, then built his plots outward from them. He drew his maps of places like Gondor and Mordor to scale on graph paper. He plotted his characters' movements across them and annotated the tracks with dates. This ensured the chronology fitted exactly. Tom Shippey observes that Tolkien's maps contribute "an air of solidity and extent both in space and time." His successors in 20th century fantasy, Shippey notes, conspicuously lack this. Tolkien himself wanted his maps to be picturesque as well as functional.

  Tolkien described heraldic devices for many of the characters and nations of Middle-earth. He wrote these descriptions in plain English rather than formal heraldic blazon. Scholars note that his approach shifted over time. His early account of Elvish heraldry in The Book of Lost Tales broadly followed traditional heraldic conventions. By the time he wrote The Lord of the Rings, he was working more freely. In his complex use of symbols for Aragorn's sword and banner, he departed clearly from heraldic tradition to serve the demands of his story. Those emblems correspond in nature to their bearers, and their diversity contributes to the richly detailed realism of his writings.

  92483832

• 6. Verse and Proverb

  ›

  The Lord of the Rings contains over 60 pieces of verse. Tolkien stated that all of them were dramatic in function. They were not the poet's self-expression. They were devices for illuminating the characters who sang them, including Bilbo Baggins, Sam Gamgee, and Aragorn. This meant the verse had to serve the world rather than stand apart from it.

  The laments of the Riders of Rohan echo the oral tradition of Old English poetry. The light-hearted songs of Tom Bombadil occupy a very different register. The poetry of the Shire has been described as carrying a sense of "mythic timelessness." Commentators have noted that this verse was long overlooked by critics and almost never emulated by other fantasy writers. Since the 1990s, it has received sustained scholarly attention. Analysis has shown it to be technically varied and highly skilled, deploying different metres and rarely used poetic devices to achieve its effects.

  Barliman Butterbur, the publican of the Prancing Pony, is partly characterised through his use of proverbs. Tolkien scattered proverbs through The Lord of the Rings to give Middle-earth a texture of proverbial wisdom. This made its different cultures feel both familiar and solidly real. The Hobbits, Men, Elves, and Dwarves each carry different strands of this wisdom. At a subtler level, the proverbs carry Tolkien's sense of providence. He kept his Christianity hidden. Scholars have noted that what appears as luck to his protagonists reflects a higher purpose, woven throughout the narrative through these apparently casual sayings. Will Sherwood argues that Tolkien intentionally set about improving on antiquarian forgery. The result, he writes, was the creation of "the codes and conventions of modern fantasy literature."

  11158385